A pilot scheme designed to provide public transport in rural areas with little or no services looks set to be extended for a year amid concerns restrictions deterring key potential customers will make it unsustainable.
Leading North Yorkshire County Council members will be asked to approve spending nearly £230,000 of taxpayers’ money on trialling its Yorbus demand-responsive bus service for a further year at a meeting on Friday, despite officers behind the initiative estimating it only stands to generate £12,833 in fares.
The authority has repeatedly stated its ambition to roll out its flagship rural transport scheme across the county if the pilot in the Masham, Ripon and Bedale area is a success.
‘Stronger than forecast’
An officers’ report to Friday’s meeting has underlined the pilot was being viewed as successful, partly because “patronage of the YorBus service has been stronger than forecast”.
However, following Freedom of Information Act requests to the council from the Transport Action Network and residents, it has been claimed the council deliberately set extremely low passenger targets to ensure Yorbus would be regarded as a success.
They say target passenger journeys were set at a total of 758 for the trial’s first three months and at 885 for the first six months, equating to just 0.9 and 0.5 passenger journeys per operating hour, assuming just one of the service’s two minibuses was operating for 11 hours a day.
On the same assumption, it transpired passenger journeys per operating hour were 2.9 trips per bus hour in the first three months and 3.4 per hour in the 14-seater vehicles over the first six months.
Padam, technology firm Siemens’ demand responsive transport software arm, estimates that to be fully commercial such services need an average of seven to eight people per vehicle throughout the day.
The Yorbus service covers Ripon, Masham and Bedale
Campaigners say the low patronage was likely to have been artificially increased by Yorbus having a flat fare of £1.20, which would inevitably have to rise if rolled out across the county.
They added features of Yorbus, including the inability to book any trip the day before, will make it very difficult to attract sufficient passengers or be cost-effective, and that in the long-run it will be dropped.
Read more:
- No replacement buses for Harrogate district commuters during strike
- ‘Tough cookie’ Masham councillor becomes final chair of county council
The officers’ report states preventing customers from booking rides in advance offers the service maximum flexibility and also maximises the ability to meet passenger demand.
However, Padam states “encouraging advance booking really helps with both increasing passenger numbers and operational planning” as people can plan their days in advance and depend on the service.
Padam states:
“We see around 75% of passengers booking in advance, which validates our expectation that people use this as reliable public transport rather than a taxi equivalent.”
Mark Parry, chair of Action for Yorkshire Transport, said his group questioned whether the service was value for money. He added:
“Given the nature of the service, I just wonder what North Yorkshire is trying to do by not having advance booking. If you are going to have demand-responsive transport I would certainly say you need some scope with advance bookings.”
Campaigners say while Yorbus’s low patronage figures could be considerably boosted by allowing advance bookings, particularly for people wanting to travel to work, passenger numbers could be significantly increased by offering a door-to-door service for elderly and disabled customers.
‘Virtual bus stops’
After initially only picking up passengers at recognised bus stops, some potential passengers complained that their village had no bus stop, so the council introduced “virtual bus stops”, which campaigners say have not been advertised and are few and far between.
Nevertheless, the council has revealed no intention to offer limited mobility passengers a door-to-door service as part of the pilot extension, but said it would consider introducing limited pre-booking, extending operating hours, and seeking funding to offer Yorbus in other parts of the county.
It added it would also look at developing its telephone contact option for customers, consider how to roll out return booking, and undertake a fares review, including incentivising such options as group bookings.
A council spokesman said the pilot would “enable options for a wider roll-out to be explored in more detail”.
North Yorkshire County Council has agreed to take part in a pilot for a government system to fund adult social care.
A meeting of the county council’s executive heard becoming one of the country’s first five local authorities to take up the government’s charging reforms programme would create a series of uncertainties for the council in an area which already accounted for almost half of its budget.
Nevertheless, officers underlined that if the new system was not working for the authority there would be opportunities to pull out of the pilot.
Although it will be up to the incoming North Yorkshire Council to make a final decision over joining the Trailblazer pilot, after receiving the unanimous support of the outgoing executive the scheme is likely to see numerous measures brought in.
Everybody who is receipt of care will have the right to have an account where the total cost of care over their lifetime is capped.
An £86,000 cap on the amount residents will need to spend on their personal care is set to be introduced in North Yorkshire from January next year, nine months ahead of elsewhere.
Read more:
Also, the point at which people become eligible to receive some financial support from their local authority, will rise to £100,000 from the current £23,250.
The council’s social care executive member Councillor Michael Harrison said it was important North Yorkshire helped shape national policy as it had a disperate care market, with 235 care homes spread across England’s largest county.
However, he said the authority did not know if the changes would entail a huge bill for the council as it remained unaware of how many people currently receiving care in the county funded it themselves.
Alongside uncertainties surrounding the information technology needed, the council remains unclear about the impact on the care market there is a risk to the council in that it could cost more than has been budgeted for.
However, Cllr Harrison said it was clear the new system was weighted more heavily in favour of residents, and particularly those with an average amount of savings, than the government.
He added:
Harrogate bus plans in tatters after government rejects £116m funding bid“It would be a bigger leap in the dark if we weren’t involved in the pilot. There is undoubtedly going to be some unknown consequences and hopefully they will be flushed out during the pilot.
“It also means we are shaping national policy. This is really important that councils with rural areas rather than urban ones with a straightforward care market where the council is the biggest client help shape the system.
“In North Yorkshire we have a huge say in the market, but there’s so many self-funders, the market will take its own course. If it works the benefits are brought to North Yorkshire residents earlier than the rest of the country.
“This is definitely a step forward but there is still a lot of stress in the care sector. We still think more needs to be done to raise the profile and the conditions of those working in the sector to make it more attractive to people.”
Ambitious plans to transform buses in North Yorkshire were dealt a stunning blow today when the county was completely overlooked for funding.
North Yorkshire County Council applied for £116million from a UK government scheme to improve buses outside London.
The county council warned last month it was unlikely to receive the full £116million after government funding for the Bus Back Better initiative was slashed from £3billion to £1.4billion.
But officials were left shocked today when North Yorkshire didn’t receive a penny, with the government suggesting their plans lacked ambition.
It means plans to create better and more affordable buses in the county will have to be reconsidered.
Harrogate a priority area
Congested Harrogate had been earmarked as a priority area in North Yorkshire to benefit from funding. New bus lanes and a park and ride were among the upgrades planned.
Michael Leah, assistant director of travel, environmental and countryside services at the council, said:
“We are extremely disappointed not to have received an allocation from this round of government funding.
“We believe we had a strong and ambitious bid in our Bus Service Improvement Plan, but we understood that the government’s fund was greatly over-subscribed and that there was no guarantee of funding.
“We are keen to speak to the Department for Transport to understand its decision and to discuss the possibility of any future opportunities to bid for funding.”
Read more:
- £7.8 million awarded to help make Harrogate Bus Company’s fleet all-electric
- Bus strategy ‘hollow’ without more money, says Harrogate Bus Company boss
‘No funding for areas lacking ambition’
The government awarded funding today to 31 councils, city regions and unitary authorities — and some will implement fare cuts of up to 45% from next week.
A Department for Transport statement said:
“The successful areas have been chosen because of their ambition to repeat the success achieved in London — which drove up bus usage and made the bus a natural choice for everyone, not just those without cars.”
“As the government stated in last year’s national bus strategy, Bus Back Better, areas not showing sufficient ambition, including for improvements to bus priority, would not be funded.”
The funding means passes for unlimited bus travel across Cornwall — one of the successful bidding areas — will be reduced from £9 a day to £5.
Despite today’s setback, Mr Leah said:
“We remain committed to enhancing North Yorkshire’s public transport and continuing to work with bus operators to improve services across the county.
“Our recently agreed enhanced partnership with operators is not entirely reliant on this funding, so we will be able to progress elements of that partnership.”
Welcome to Yorkshire asks for 45% more funding from councils
Councils are to consider whether to help keep Welcome to Yorkshire afloat after the troubled tourism body upped its subscription fee for local authorities by some 45 per cent.
Harrogate Borough Council and North Yorkshire County Council are among the councils paying annual subscription fees to WtY. Harrogate Borough Council paid £12,100 in July last year.
Leading councillors have responded to the increase by calling for the stream of public money that has been handed to WtY to be permanently plugged or for a decision to be postponed until options for the future direction of tourism marketing in the region are presented to the Yorkshire Leaders Board next month.

Welcome to Yorkshire at the 2021 Great Yorkshire Show.
The tourism body has admitted making “big mistakes” in the way it spent taxpayers’ money, including spending more than £430,000 removing and investigating its former chief executive, Sir Gary Verity, following concerns over his expenses claims.
In recent years numerous local authorities have threatened to withhold funding from WtY, at a time that its finances have been hit hard by the pandemic.
Self-funded model
Lord Scriven, the former leader of Sheffield City Council, has said WtY needs to adopt a self-funded model.
Nevertheless, in October, WtY said it had sufficient funds to operate until March 31, assuming all committed subscriptions for 2021/22 are paid.
An officers’ report to a meeting of Richmondshire District Council’s corporate board on Tuesday next week states the subscription fee for local authorities was initially “modest” at £1,300 a year until 2012, when the rate was raised to £10,000.
Read more:
- Severe cold weather warning begins tonight in Harrogate district
- Harrogate district covid rate sets new high as Omicron cases surge
The cost of the subscription for next year has risen to £14,515, which WtY has justified on the basis that there had been no increase in the six previous years.
‘Nothing but scandal’
Stuart Parsons, leader of the Independents group on North Yorkshire County Council, said WtY’s page views for Richmondshire were far inferior to the privately-run Richmond Online tourism website, which was receiving one million hits a month.
He said:
“What have we been getting out of Welcome to Yorkshire? Nothing but scandal. Originally it was supposed to be immediately self-funding, but it has always relied on massive public contributions.
“Councils should not be giving any more money to an organisation that has not demonstrated it is making an effective difference to our lives and our economy.”
The county council’s finance boss, Councillor Gareth Dadd, said the authority would examine any request for funding from WtY “in the light of its performance and our ability to pay”.
He added:
‘Bleak’ future for North Yorkshire fire service due to underfunding“There is most definitely an advantage of having a tourism marketing body.”
North Yorkshire’s fire and rescue service faces a bleak outlook due to chronic underfunding, systemic on-call staffing shortages, crumbling buildings and out of date vehicles, a meeting has heard,
North Yorkshire’s police, fire and crime panel was told the Office of the North Yorkshire Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner and the fire service, which serves about 824,000 people across the county, was working “exceptionally hard” to break even this year.
Chief financial officer Michael Porter told the meeting the service would be drawing on £638,000 of reserves to balance the books until April, but “next year is looking like it is going to be really challenging”.
Mr Porter said a £390,000 deficit had initially been forecast for 2022/23 from reserves to balance the 2022/23 budget, but that was likely to deepen significantly due to pay awards, soaring utility bills and increases in national insurance contributions.
The meeting heard unless restrictions on fire services increasing their council tax demands were eased by the government, the service would need to make more savings. Mr Porter said:
“There’s an awful lot of additional pressures that are lining up for the fire service for next year. Initial views on the settlement for next year are that it is probably not as generous as it has been for the police and the police have more scope to increase precept.”
The meeting heard members question why some £365,000 had been spent on “minor works” to fire service buildings, before hearing they were built as medium-term premises up to 70 years ago and constructed with interiors designed for a different time, when there were few female firefighters.
Read more:
- Residents submit complaint over South Stainley solar farm decision
- Ripon Cathedral hosts concert to raise money for mental health
Mr Porter said the service’s 30 buildings across the county and its fleet of vehicles had been significantly under-invested in for some time.
“There are a significant number of properties within the estate that are in dire need of replacement, as opposed to maintenance. The longer that we leave it or are unable to replace the buildings, the more we will have to spend patching them up.
“We have got an aged estate that doesn’t meet modern requirements and standards it is an inhibitor of what the organisation wants to do as it moves forward. We almost have to borrow every single penny we have to invest in the capital programme as it is. It is not a rosy picture.”
Sharing buildings
The meeting was told the fire service was considering sharing more buildings with other emergency services to cut costs, but the fire service needed to have bases spread across the county to reach emergencies in good time.
City of York Council leader Councillor Keith Aspden told the meeting recruitment issues over on-call firefighters had persisted for a long time, but overall funding was the key issue.
“Every time I see the fire minister I ask about capital grants for fire services and precept flexibility. Unless something happens nationally things are going to get very difficult, particularly for services like this with relatively small budgets and rural areas.”
Interim Chief Fire Officer Jon Foster told members on-call recruitment remained a challenge due to changes in people’s lifestyles and covid had further impacted on it.
He said the service was examining changing terms and conditions and flexibility of being an on-call firefighter as the system was very outdated, paying a small amount for being available and a larger amount to attend calls.
After the meeting, the panel’s chair, Councillor Carl Les said:
North Yorkshire highways boss ‘confident’ in bid for £1.5m active travel projects“I think the situation is bleak. The fundamental problem is the overall funding for the fire and rescue service.
“Arguments will be made that the government grant could and should be increased, but also the fact that the precept regime with the fire and rescue service is very limited.
“I think we need to lobby the government that for small rural forces like North Yorkshire it would be useful if there was flexibility to go above the two per cent increase cap and levy an extra £5 or £10.
“We know that delivering services in rural areas is more expensive than delivering services in cities.
“For a number of years resources have been difficult to find to allocate for things like buildings and machinery that are getting older.”
The highways boss of North Yorkshire County Council has expressed confidence that the authority will win most of the £1.5m it is bidding for under the latest round of active travel projects.
Councillor Don Mackenzie, executive member for access, approved the bid to the government’s active travel fund at a meeting on Friday.
The application includes funding for four projects, two of which are in the Harrogate district. They include traffic calming measures in Ripon and a feasibility study into the creation of a 7km cycleway and footpath between Knaresborough and Flaxby Green Park.
The bid is being made to the third round of the active travel fund. The council only secured half of the £266,000 allocated to it by the Department for Transport in the first round but won almost all of the £1m it bid for in the second round.
Cllr Mackenzie said:
“We have been told to expect roughly around the same amount we received in tranche two and as soon as we know what this value is our bid will be submitted with the government.
“Clearly there are various sources of money for these kinds of projects in the future. The government has set aside £2bn as part of its active travel fund and I believe it has only allocated around a quarter of this so there will be plenty more to come.”
Under the latest plans, around £550,000 would be spent on the development of “sustainable travel corridors” in the west of Ripon. These could include footway widening, better crossing facilities and traffic calming measures.
The council also said feasibility work for the proposed 7km cyclepath between Knaresborough and Flaxby Green Park would cost £50,000 and that it would link with wider plans to improve connections to York.
There are also plans for schemes in Craven and Ryedale.
Read more:
- Work on £10.9m Harrogate Station Gateway could start in February
- Harrogate Festivals chief angry after county council removes promotional banners
Under earlier rounds of the fund, cash has been earmarked for cycle lanes and junction upgrades on the A59 between Harrogate and Knaresborough, as well as similar improvements in the Victoria Avenue area of Harrogate town centre.
There were also plans for a one-way traffic system and junction filters on Oatlands Drive but these were scrapped after a fierce backlash from residents.
Instead, the council is carrying out a feasibility study this summer to look into what other improvements could be made not just on Oatlands Drive but also the surrounding area.
The aim for the A59 and Victoria Avenue schemes is for construction to start in November with completion in March 2022.
A government decision on the third round bid is expected in autumn and, if successful, the funds must be spent before March 2023.
Harrogate Toy Library receives funding for more baby classesHarrogate and Knaresborough Toy Library says classes for new parents has become more important following lockdown and with new funding it can offer more.
The charity received £1,307 from The National Lottery Community Fund and has had their venue hire prices covered by Chain Lane Community Hub until December.
The funding has helped the charity hold a second new parent class.
Play session worker, Rachael Bolton, says lockdown has isolated some new parents leaving them with out the usual opportunities to socialise and demand for spaces has increased. The library’s capacity is currently limited due to restrictions.
Play session worker, Rachael Bolton said:
“New parents can often feel alone at the beginning because it is all new and meeting new parents normalises it all because you have common experiences. But many have missed out on this over lockdown.
“This can be extremely isolating and we are really happy to be able to give this opportunity to the local community.”
Read more:
The baby and new parent classes on a Monday and Wednesday are held at Chain Lane Community Hub in Knaresborough.
An outdoor play session is also held for toddlers and older children at Knaresborough House on Tuesdays.
The charity also offers a toy library where parents can pick toys via the online library to take home for two weeks before returning them.
The shelves are stacked high with doll houses, dinosaurs and board games
County council funding for vulnerable extended until MarchNorth Yorkshire County Council has extended its support to local groups after recognising the ongoing need of those struggling.
A total of 23 organisations in the county have received an additional £453,000 in funding from the county council to continue supporting vulnerable people in their communities until March 2021.
Six of these are in the Harrogate district:
- Harrogate and District Community Action
- Knaresborough Connectors
- Ripon Community House
- Boroughbridge Community Care
- Nidderdale Plus
- Masham Community Office
This initiative was set up in April to support those self-isolating and ensure volunteers were in place within communities to offer deliveries of food and essential items.
The county council has chosen to extend this throughout the winter as tougher restrictions come into place.
Helen Flynn, executive director of Nidderdale Plus, said:
“We are an organisation reliant on volunteers but currently we are unable to get many of them together. With this funding we have been able to increase the hours of a member of staff to cover this.
“We are also expanding our current services and starting up new projects to better help the community. The funding also allows us to continue working with our 13 community groups across Nidderdale and Washburn to distribute information to those rural communities.”
A total of £930,000 will have been invested across the county by March 2021. The money has been made available through its North Yorkshire Local Assistance Fund.
The government contributed £150,000 to the fund.
Read more:
- County Council health boss said the county is “hanging on by a thread” as a move to tier two looks more likely.
- An announcement about care home visiting in North Yorkshire is expected this week.
County Council Leader Cllr Carl Les said:
“This Local Assistance Fund makes use of County Council resources and we also welcome Government money sent to us since the pandemic began.
“We have used the funds to support food banks, our local Community Support Organisations and the Citizens Advice network across the county as these are where residents go for advice and help.”
The county council has said it is constantly reviewing the need of its communities and will continue to adjust its interventions if necessary.
Harewood House awarded funding boostHarewood House Trust has been awarded £695,556 by the Cultural Recovery Fund.
It is the latest grant in the fight to support the stately home through the coronavirus pandemic.
Last week, Harewood was given £296,128 by Historic England and DCMS to fund the restoration of its Terrace balustrade. It was also awarded an emergency National Heritage Lottery Fund grant to support re-opening earlier in the year.
The charity has now received more than £1 million to help survive and recover from its coronavirus-enforced closure.
Lockdown forced Harewood to close its doors for 14 weeks this year – more than a third of its open season. This resulted in losses of £1.2 million, as an estimated 80,000 people were unable to visit.
Trust director Jane Marriott said:
“Like many of our colleagues, Harewood’s total closure earlier in the year placed us in such a difficult financial situation, facing over £1 million in losses. However, the combination of our visitors’ support and a significant grant from the Culture Recovery Fund has secured Harewood’s future recovery, so that we can continue to do ambitious programming, and to make certain that this wonderful place can continue to be enjoyed by as many as possible.
“The national funding bodies’ confidence in Harewood’s work is very much needed and appreciated. We are now in a position to improve the site, develop our learning programme, continue to work with artists and maintain our ambitious visitor experience, looking once again to our future.”
Read more:
- Ripon cultural organisations receive £170,000 lifeline
- Harrogate embraces coffee shop working culture
The grant from the Cultural Recovery Fund will support a series of family friendly activities, invest in Harewood’s technology infrastructure, and provide canopies for outdoor spaces. This will provide cover for weddings and private hire events, in turn generating vital income for the charity.
Ripon organisations can apply for £1,000 council grantsRipon City Council has more than £17,000 ready to award to charities, not-for-profit and community organisations.
Town clerk Paula Benson, told the Stray Ferret:
“The council has a fund of £20,000 available in its small grants scheme
“However, just three organisations have made applications so far for awards totalling £2,567.”
This year the activities of many groups and organisations in Ripon have been either disrupted or put on hold because of the coronavirus crisis.

Organisations applying for grants need to be based in Ripon
With this in mind, the council has decided to keep the fund open beyond the original closing date and invite more applications for grants of up to £1,000.
Read more:
- Ripon student’s prize-winning poem
- Vandalism closes Ripon playground
- Curtain falls on Ripon’s racing season
Unlike in previous years, there will be no closing date and applications will be received by RCC at each meeting of the council for review and a decision.
The fund will remain open for applications until all of the £20,000 has been awarded.
Applications will be accepted from registered charities, not-for-profit and community organisations based in the city.
Organisations wishing to apply must have membership that is open, with no discrimination on the grounds of gender, race, religion or sexuality.
Funding applications must clearly be of benefit to the people of Ripon as the council’s small grants scheme has been funded by an increase in the precept – money collected through the council tax levied on Ripon residents.
The council will not consider applications from commercial organisations, individuals, political groups or for projects of a directly political nature.
If the applicant is not a wholly Ripon-based organisation it may be necessary to ringfence any grant from the council towards a Ripon-based event, project or activity.
All valid applications will be considered by full council and applicants will be contacted after their application has been reviewed at a meeting of council.
Further details area available on: http://riponcity.gov.uk/small-grants-scheme/index.html