An apartment block that will replace the now-demolished Dunlopillo offices in Pannal is beginning to take shape.
Plans submitted by Echo Green Developments to build 38 flats on the site at Station Road were approved by Harrogate Borough Council in February 2022.
However, it will be two-storeys taller than the previous structure which led to ill feeling in the village. Pannal historian Anne Smith said residents would be lumbered with a “skyscraper-type building”.
The decision to approve the scheme was made at officer level and without a vote from councillors.

The frame of the new building.
This provoked Conservative MP for Harrogate and Knaresborough Andrew Jones to say the now-abolished council made a mistake with the process by not putting the application before the planning committee.
But the plans weren’t considered by councillors because the application was made under permitted development rights, which were brought in under the Conservative government and can be used by developers to fast track the redevelopment of disused offices.
Cllr Howard West, chairman of Pannal and Burn Bridge Parish Council, said at the time that planning officers “made errors” and that the parish council had written to the government about it.
Read more:
- Plans approved for 38 flats at ‘Pannal skyscraper’
- Harrogate council should have acted quicker on Dunlopillo housing plans, review finds

How the building will eventually look.
It ultimately led Harrogate Borough Council to launch an internal review into how it handled the application.
The review found it should have acted quicker and a “longer period of time than ideal” was spent on parts of the process.
It also said residents should have been consulted sooner and this could have allowed time for a vote from councillors. Despite this, the council concluded the plans were still “appropriately considered”.

The former Dunlopillo building
Dunlopillo – which makes pillows and bedding – moved out of the site in 2008 when the company went into administration and its former office building fell into disrepair, with residents describing it as a “monstrosity”.
Other parts of the vast site have or currently are being redeveloped, including the construction of the Vida Hall Care Home which opened in 2013 and a residential development by Bellway Homes.
Parish council slams ‘fast track’ planning rules after latest Dunlopillo proposals passedFast track rules which speed up the planning system have been slammed by a parish council after latest housing plans for a derelict office block near Harrogate were approved without a vote from councillors.
The proposals for 38 flats at the former Dunlopillo building in Pannal were passed by Harrogate Borough Council last week.
This came after the developers Echo Green previously won permission for 48 flats at the Station Road site before submitting a second application also under permitted development rights.
These rules were first introduced to ease the path of conservatories, small extensions and other uncontroversial works.
But in recent years they have been used by the government to drive up housing numbers through offices being converted into or replaced by entirely new buildings without usual planning permission.
Councillor Howard West, chairman of Pannal and Burn Bridge Parish Council, had raised several objections over the Dunlopillo plans and has now launched fresh criticism at the planning rules which he argues fails to take into account rural areas.
He said:
“We’re disappointed that the construction of an even bigger building than the one that was universally hated has been allowed.
“However, once Harrogate Borough Council officers made their original decision on the first prior notice of permitted development, there really was no way to stop construction.
“The principle of prior notice of permitted development was essentially to protect the high street from having empty commercial units when they could be converted to accommodation.
“However, to allow loopholes where rural villages could be overshadowed by bigger monstrosities than those originally built was patently an oversight by the civil servants who drafted the legislation and by those who voted it into planning law.”
The rules allow for developers to apply to councils to simply seek confirmation that a development is acceptable before commencing work.
This was the case for both applications for the Dunlopillo site and is different from usual planning permission which requires an outline and reserved matters application, and sometimes a vote from councillors.
But Harrogate Borough Council has admitted it could have allowed for a vote from councillors if it had acted quicker on the first application.
Read more:
- Plans approved for 38 flats at ‘Pannal skyscraper’
- Scrapping Pannal cycle lane ‘ludicrous’, says cycling group
It made this admission in a lessons learned review, which concluded that while the plans were “appropriately considered”, “a longer period of time than ideal” was spent on parts of the process.
‘Ghastly design’
Councillor West said he believes the plans could have been refused if presented to councillors as he also described the council-run review as “akin to marking one’s own homework”.
He said:
“Had council officers involved the planning committee for the first prior notice of permitted development then there might have been a chance in getting it stopped because of the ghastly design – although some of the past committee decisions defy logic.
“The second proposal is a country mile better than the first, albeit much too high and overbearing and not at all in keeping with a village environment.”
The latest plans for the Station Road site include demolishing the existing building to make way for an apartments block two-storeys higher.
This is something that has been a key concern for residents who are fearful the development will have a major visual impact on the area surrounding the site which pillows and bedding manufacturer Dunlopillo moved out of in 2008.
Since then, the building has fallen into a state of disrepair with residents describing it as an “eyesore” and “monstrosity”.
Its current state is far from how many employees will remember the building in the 1970s and 1980s when an estimated 440 people worked there.