A Liberal Democrat councillor in Harrogate says he will not be voting in favour of the controversial Station Gateway proposal next month.
Michael Schofield, who represents Harlow & St Georges, is the first local councillor and first Liberal Democrat to confirm which way he will vote when the decision is made by the Harrogate and Knaresborough Area Constituency Committee in May.
The controversial £11.2 million project has been in development for three years after funding was won from the government’s Transforming Cities Fund to make the town centre more accessible to cyclists and pedestrians.
North Yorkshire Council’s Conservative executive member for highways Keane Duncan has said the council will follow whatever decision Harrogate and Knaresborough councillors take at a meeting on May 5 regarding the scheme.
But Cllr Schofield, whose division includes the troubled Otley Road cycle path, says he will not be voting for the gateway to go ahead “in its current guise”.
He cited concerns over its design, cost, and impact on businesses.
The councillor is also the landlord of the Shepherd’s Dog pub on Harlow Hill and said the disruption during construction could lead to financial hardship for town centre shops, bars and restaurants. He said:
“Our independents were once thriving; they have have had to deal with covid and the cost of living crisis. I therefore cannot vote for something that may potentially deal them yet another blow.”
Since the scheme was announced, the cost of building materials has rocketed and inflation has topped 10%.
Cllr Duncan has said the scheme’s build quality will not be compromised but Cllr Schofield said this could result in higher costs for taxpayers. He said:
“Unless corners are cut, who will pay? It is unfair to ask other towns within North Yorkshire to foot the bill at the expense of their residents as it is also unfair to expect the good people of Harrogate to foot the bill.”
Read more:
- D-Day looms for £11.2m Harrogate Station Gateway
- £3m from parking fines won’t be spent on Harrogate Station Gateway if costs rise
The gateway scheme would see Station Parade reduced to one lane which has been unpopular with some residents and businesses as has the proposed part-pedestrianisation of James Street. Cllr Schofield said other designs should have been considered. He added:
“It is my belief that there are other plans out there created by retired professionals in the field of urban design that have not been considered and are more sympathetic to not only the public realm but also the businesses in the town centre.
“We have been told it is the plan on the table or nothing which is very undemocratic when other plans are available that should be considered.”
A third round of public consultation about the scheme was published in January and showed 46% of views were negative and 45% were positive.
Cllr Duncan said previously:
Almost 500 appointments cancelled at Harrogate hospital due to junior doctors’ strike“While overall opinion of the scheme is split almost 50:50, key elements of the scheme received positive support from the public who took part.
“They told us they believe the scheme will be positive for business, make getting around the town centre safer and encourage more people to walk and cycle.”
Last week’s junior doctors’ strike led to 470 appointments and 21 operations being cancelled and rescheduled at Harrogate District Hospital.
It was the second round of industrial action undertaken by members of the British Medical Association union this year and saw junior doctors strike over pay for an unprecedented four days.
Nationally, it’s estimated more than 190,000 appointments had to be cancelled last week.
Junior doctors are qualified doctors in clinical training and they make up nearly half of the medical workforce in England.
A Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust spokesperson described what impact the strikes had at the Lancaster Park Road hospital.
They said:
“During the recent junior doctors’ industrial action, our focus was to maintain safe patient care and ensure emergency services would continue to operate.
“A number of clinical colleagues were freed up from activities, such as outpatient clinics and theatre sessions, to support emergency cover of our wards and departments which were impacted by the strike.
“Some planned, non-urgent treatment, including 470 outpatient appointments and 21 elective operations, needed to be rescheduled. The postponed appointments and treatments are being rescheduled as a priority so that that our patients can be seen as soon as possible.
“We appreciate this situation is frustrating for those affected and we apologise for any inconvenience caused.”
The British Medical Association says while workload and waiting lists are at record highs, junior doctors’ pay has effectively been cut by more than a quarter since 2008.
Read more:
- Harrogate hospital advertises for new chief executive
- Harrogate hospital to remove parking barriers to ease traffic queues
- Bank holiday nurses’ strike to impact intensive care and cancer wards in Harrogate
It is asking for a pay-rise of 35%, which it says will reverse 15 years of real-term cuts.
A BMA spokesperson said:
“If junior doctors are forced out of the NHS because of poor pay and conditions, the services we all rely on to look after our loved ones will suffer.”
Health secretary Steve Barclay said the number of cancelled appointments and operations last week was “deeply disappointing”.
He said:
“We remain ready to start formal talks with the BMA as soon as the union pauses its strikes and moves significantly from its unrealistic position of demanding a 35% pay increase – which would result in some junior doctors receiving a pay rise of £20,000.”
More NHS strikes
Nurses at Harrogate District Hospital are set to take part in two days of industrial action over the upcoming May bank holiday.
The strike will take place from 8pm on Sunday, April 30, to 8pm on Tuesday, May 2.
Unlike the two previous Royal College of Nursing (RCN) strikes at the hospital on Lancaster Park Road this year, it will involve nurses working in emergency departments, intensive care, cancer and other wards.
Concern Harrogate charities will lose out with new ‘mayor-lite’ positionThe final mayor of the Harrogate borough Victoria Oldham says the new charter mayor position will see charities lose out on profile-boosting visits.
Cllr Michael Harrison was appointed on Monday (April 17) as the charter mayor of Harrogate for the next 12 months.
But his role will be much-reduced from the former Harrogate Borough Council mayor who attended hundreds of events and functions across the district every year.
By contrast, the charter mayor is only expected to attend around a dozen events over the next year. Cllr Harrison described the role as ‘mayor-lite’.
Former councillor and mayor Victoria Oldham attended the meeting at the Civic Centre where she congratulated Cllr Harrison and wished him well.
But after the meeting she told the Local Democracy Reporting Service that organisations in Harrogate will suffer due to the charter mayor’s leaner schedule.
Ms Oldham said:
“I do have my concerns that a lot of organisations in the Harrogate area will miss out on mayoral visits.
“Most mayors have done hundreds of visits and engagements, the charities, the churches and the elderly care homes will obviously not have those visits. They are a stimulus and they do help, let’s just hope it’s only for 12 months.”
Read more:
- Councillor Michael Harrison appointed first charter mayor of Harrogate
- Mayor of Ripon nominated to serve a third term in office
North Yorkshire Council has allocated an annual budget of £12,100 for Harrogate charter trustee business.
However, if a Harrogate Town Council is created, it will assume responsibility for the mayoral position from North Yorkshire Council should it want it.
It could then decide to allocated more money to a mayoral position that would see its role expanded, which Ms Oldham said she would be in favour of.
She added:
“Going forward the citizens of Harrogate will need mayoral representation and I will be fully supportive of a town council being set up.”
Ms Oldham, who was the Conservative councillor for the Washburn ward on Harrogate Borough Council until it was abolished on March 31, also said some people don’t always appreciate the volume of work that went into the mayoral position.
She said:
Bank holiday nurses’ strike to impact intensive care and cancer wards in Harrogate“It’s not just smiling for the photographs and shaking hands. It’s the time, commitment, the caring and being prepared to drop everything and make it work.
“It’s not just about you as mayor, it’s about the citizens, Harrogate, our vibrant festival and hospitality industries, sports and more.”
Nurses at Harrogate District Hospital are set to take part in two days of industrial action over the upcoming May bank holiday.
The strike will take place from 8pm on Sunday, April 30, to 8pm on Tuesday, May 2.
Unlike the two previous Royal College of Nursing (RCN) strikes at the hospital on Lancaster Park Road this year, it will involve nurses working in emergency departments, intensive care, cancer and other wards.
It is taking place because members of the union rejected the government’s latest pay offer of a 5% rise plus a lump sum of at least £1,655.
Nurses on picket lines have said low pay is forcing nurses to leave the profession which is risking patient safety.
Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust has been impacted by a series of national strikes over the last few months.
Last week, junior doctors took part in an unprecedented four days of industrial action over pay and there have been previous strikes by nurses and ambulance workers.
RCN general secretary Pat Cullen wrote to health secretary Steve Barclay on Friday calling on him to make an improved offer to nurses “as soon as possible” in order to avert the strike.
Ms Cullen wrote:
“What has been offered to date is simply not enough. The government needs to increase what has already been offered and we will be highly critical of any move to reduce it.
“Since our talks in February, we have seen the pressures on the NHS continue to increase. The crisis in our health and care services cannot be addressed without significant action that addresses urgent recruitment and retention issues and nursing pay to bring this dispute to a close urgently.”
Read more:
- Harrogate hospital advertises for new chief executive
- Harrogate hospital to remove parking barriers to ease traffic queues
A Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust spokesperson said the trust is developing “comprehensive plans” to “keep disruption to a minimum” at Harrogate hospital. They said emergency services will continue to operate as normal.
The spokesperson said:
Councillor Michael Harrison appointed first charter mayor of Harrogate“During strike action, urgent and emergency treatment will be our priority. We will be working with our nursing staff to deliver safe services, while facilitating and respecting the right of those staff who wish to take legal industrial action.
“Patients should continue to attend appointments as planned unless contacted to reschedule. We will be re-arranging any postponed appointments as a priority. We appreciate this situation is frustrating for patients affected and apologise for any inconvenience caused.
“Nobody should put off seeking urgent or emergency care during the strikes, and key services will continue to operate.
“For people who require medical assistance and are considering visiting our Emergency Department, unless it’s a life-threatening or a severe illness or injury, we would ask that they contact NHS 111 first either by calling or going online https://111.nhs.uk/. The NHS will help them right away and if they need urgent care, the NHS can book them in to be seen quickly and safely.
“People with life-threatening or severe illnesses or injuries should continue to dial 999 and anyone who arrives at A&E without calling NHS 111 will still receive medical care, with those needing emergency treatment prioritised.
“While pay is a matter for government and the trade unions, we greatly value our staff and want to see a resolution as soon as possible to ensure we can continue to focus on delivering high quality patient care to all those who need it.”
Councillor Michael Harrison was appointed the first charter mayor of Harrogate at the Civic Centre this morning.
Cllr Harrison is a Conservative who represents Killinghall, Hampsthwaite and Saltergate on North Yorkshire Council.
The non-political role will involve promoting the historic and ceremonial traditions of the Harrogate area during events and occasions such as Remembrance Sunday.
It will differ from the former Harrogate Borough Council mayoral role, which covered the whole of the former borough and undertook a wider range of engagements.
Cllr Harrison described the position as “mayor-lite“. He said:
“We’re doing that deliberately but there needs to be the element of civic duty that will continue. I can assure you I will be doing that.”
The mayor was elected by the Harrogate charter trustees, which are 10 councillors who represent divisions covering the unparished parts of Harrogate town.
It was a more low-key occasion than previous Harrogate Borough Council mayor-making ceremonies, which were traditionally held each year at Harrogate’s Royal Hall.
Cllr Harrison was nominated for the role by Liberal Democrat councillor for High Harrogate and Kingsley, Chris Aldred, who was also appointed charter deputy mayor during the meeting.
Cllr Aldred said:
“Some observers may expect us to nominate one of our own but it’s also equally important to prove that charter trustees are actually non-political in order to continue the civic traditions and heritage of Harrogate. I’m sure Michael will do that and be a great ambassador for the town.”
Cllr Harrison’s first engagement as charter mayor will be at the unveiling of new sculptures at the New Zealand garden in Valley Gardens this month.
He will also attend ANZAC memorial day at Stonefall Cemetery.
Read more:
- Councillors to elect ceremonial mayor for Harrogate this month
- Mayor of Ripon nominated to serve a third term in office
Ceremonial robes and chains most recently used by the last Harrogate borough mayor, Victoria Oldham, will be used by the charter mayor.
But he won’t be entitled to perks enjoyed by previous council mayors such as having a chauffeur-driven car to get to events.
The new council has allocated an annual budget of £12,100 for Harrogate charter trustee business.
However if a Harrogate Town Council is created, it will assume responsibility for the mayoral position from North Yorkshire Council should it want it.
The charter trustees will meet again in October. Cllr Harrison said at the next meeting the charter trustees will make a suggestion to North Yorkshire Council on what the council tax precept for the town council might be.
Consultation documents for the town council state Harrogate households would be asked to pay between £40 and £60 on top of their council tax each year if a Harrogate Town Council were created.
The budget would be spent on accommodation, employment costs, office and IT equipment, insurance, professional fees, the mayor and delivering services.
What those services might be are still to be decided but it would likely involve taking control of assets once held by the abolished Harrogate Borough Council.
Dispute continues over contamination at proposed Bilton housing siteA developer has reaffirmed that a site mooted for 53 homes in Harrogate has been thoroughly tested for ground contamination — but this has been disputed by a local toxicology expert.
North-east developer Jomast‘s plans to build at Knox Lane in Bilton have been met with opposition from local residents who have raised concerns about the proposals with contamination proving to be particularly contentious.
The application has been before Harrogate Borough Council’s planning committee twice in the last six months.
It was deferred on both occasions as councillors were not not satisfied the land had been thoroughly investigated for toxic materials.
This is because some of the site was previously part of a railway that pulled hoppers and tankers for the gas works in Bilton.
Asbestos was used for installation on steam trains and there are also concerns that tar from coal could still be toxic, posing a threat to future residents.
However, the developer’s agent, Stephen Courcier, told councillors at a meeting in February that testing for contamination took place across the whole site, including the proximity of the former railway tracks, and showed no “significant levels” of contamination.
But councillors weren’t convinced and ordered the developer to undergo more testing before a decision was made.
After the meeting, Mr Courcier sent an email to the council that has been published on the local authority’s planning portal. It says there would be “no benefit” to further sampling.
He wrote:
“The railway line and its immediate locality were subject to seven exploratory excavations. Therefore, the consultants have advised that the former railway line has been comprehensively assessed.
“Nevertheless, the consultants have produced the attached note that clearly highlights the extent of the testing carried out in proximity to the former railway line and their findings.”
Mr Courcier confirmed to the Local Democracy Reporting Service on Friday the developer’s position on the contamination report had not changed since the email was sent on March 31.
Railway lines
However, a local toxicology expert who lives in the area said he was not satisfied with where the samples were taken from on the former tracks.
Dr Damian Bowen said:
“The land contamination report advises that the proposed development site, including the former railway has been comprehensively tested. Samples taken for contamination analysis however do not target the area of the former railway lines.
“Instead, testing was conducted either side of the embankment, across the open field. Furthermore, analysis was not conducted for all samples taken. The developer has provided no justification as to the inadequacies of the testing strategy. You certainly can’t find anything if you’re looking in the wrong places.“
The email from Mr Courcier to the council also asked if a quick decision could be made on the plans.
He suggested North Yorkshire Council’s first Harrogate and Knaresborough planning committee this month was a potential option.
However, this request was made too late in the day to be considered for the meeting on April 25, according to the council.
North Yorkshire Council’s assistant director of planning, Trevor Watson, said:
“We can confirm that a submission was made on behalf of the applicant on March 31.
“This was received too late to be considered at April’s Harrogate and Knaresborough planning committee meeting.
“Once the submission has been assessed by officers, a report will be prepared and presented to the planning committee at a later date.“
Ripon council could take control of city’s key assets in 12 months’ time
There are hopes Ripon City Council could be running Ripon’s town hall and market place by April next year, according to the council leader.
The council submitted an expression of interest at the end of last month to North Yorkshire Council to be part of a “double devolution” pilot scheme that would see it take control of some of the city’s key assets.
These were previously owned by the abolished Harrogate Borough Council before being handed to the new unitary council on April 1.
If successful, council leader Andrew Williams, who also sits on the North Yorkshire Council as an independent, says the pilot scheme in Ripon could be up and running in time for the next financial year in April 2024.
North Yorkshire Council will choose six pilot schemes from across the county after considering each expression of interest.
Cllr Williams told the Local Democracy Reporting Service that he believes Ripon’s bid is one of the most ambitious submitted to the council and they have a “proven track record” of delivering services after previously taking over the lease of Hugh Ripley Hall from HBC.
He said the city council would commit to refurbishing and repurposing the town hall, which he said had been neglected by the old Harrogate-based authority.
“Quite clearly there’s been no investment in the building for years. It hasn’t been painted in 20 years and vast areas are laying idle so there may be a mix of things could be done.
“It’s a blank canvas but we think it could be used to generate economic activity in Ripon. It could be used as a museum to display Ripon’s historical artificats and I’d like to see North Yorkshire Council use it as a customer service point for residents.
“Part of the building could also be converted into rentable office space. Something needs to be done but we know there’s plenty of potential.”
Cllr Williams also said the city council would look to tidy up the market place and could use surplus revenue from car parking charges towards the refurbishment of the town hall.
Improvements to city centre public toiliets, which also formed part of the council’s expression of interest, would also make the city more appealing to tourists and businesses, he added.
“There’s grass growing out of the market square, such as been the poor maintenance of it.
“We believe collectively as a city council that we can draw more visitors to Ripon and bring businesses to the city centre. If the city looks smart and going places people are more likely to spend money here.”
Read more:
- UK’s largest-ever health research programme comes to Ripon
- New city-wide Ripon bus service to start on Monday
Plans for 9 more warehouses at business park near A1(M)
Plans have been submitted for a further expansion of the Harrogate 47 business park next to the A1 (M) near Knaresborough.
Described as a “sustainable employment development,” the site is off junction 47 of the motorway and once completed will include employment space for office, hi-tech and logistics businesses.
It’s one of the key employment sites in the former Harrogate Borough Council Local Plan with the potential to bring 2,000 jobs to the district.
The development is being brought forward by Flaxby Investment LLP, which is a joint venture between Opus North and Bridges Fund Management.
The developer won planning permission from Harrogate Borough Council to develop part of the site last year.
It is bringing the development forward in stages and is now seeking permission to build nine further warehouses with a total size of 129,953 sq ft.
Read More:
- Flaxby Park withdraws appeal over 350 eco lodges refusal
- Business park near Flaxby that could support 2,000 jobs approved
The first four warehouses would be located close to the Flaxby roundabout that was completed in 2014. These will be smaller starter units for business with a size of under 5,000 sq. ft each. The remaining larger units would be situated close to the Ilke Homes factory which produces modular homes. The plans include 72 car parking spaces that would also be added to the site.
Speaking previously about the scheme, Ryan Unsworth, development director at Opus North said:
“This development is key for the Harrogate and wider North Yorkshire economy due to its capacity to transform vacant land into office and industrial space for local, regional and national occupiers, and the vast job-creating potential it has.
“The delivery of Harrogate 47 will allow local companies to expand and grow within the region in addition to attracting inward investment into the district.”
The application will be decided by North Yorkshire Council at a later date.
North Yorkshire Council bans TikTok from staff phonesNorth Yorkshire Council has banned the Chinese-owned social media app TikTok from staff devices over security fears.
The move means people working for the new council are not be allowed to use the app on any work devices.
Staff have also been “strongly discouraged” from using the app on personal devices that are also used for work purposes.
It follows the lead of parliament, which banned the app last month.
A council spokesperson said the ban came into effect from April 1, which was the council’s first day of existence.
TikTok has over 1.5 billion users around the world and allows people to create and share short-form videos.
However, there have been growing fears over what the company does with the personal data it collects from users.
TikTok, which is owned by Chinese company ByteDance, has strongly denied allegations that it shares data with the Chinese government.
Assistant director of technology for North Yorkshire Council, Madeline Hoskin, said:
“North Yorkshire Council does not allow the media sharing app TikTok on any of its corporate devices and it is not approved to be used for any work purpose.
“In addition to this, we would strongly discourage any use of the app or website on personal devices that are also being used for work purposes.
“We have made this decision because both the TikTok app and the website collect a lot of personal and very detailed information that is stored outside of the UK, and though currently this data is predominantly used for targeted advertising, the volume and depth of the data being captured and stored poses a potential risk we do not believe is acceptable.”
‘Fundamental misconceptions’
A TikTok spokesperson said:
“We believe recent bans are based on fundamental misconceptions and driven by wider geopolitics, in which TikTok and our community around the world play no part.
“We remain committed to working with governments and partners to address any security concerns, but ask to be judged on facts, not fears, and treated equally to our competitors.
“We have already begun implementing a comprehensive plan to further protect our US and European user data, building on the principles of local data storage and introducing third-party independent oversight of our approach.”
Read more:
£3m from parking fines won’t be spent on Harrogate Station Gateway if costs rise
Up to £3m collected from parking fines will not be spent on the Harrogate Station Gateway should costs rise — despite calls from the outgoing Harrogate Borough Council.
The £11.2 million project has been in development for three years after funding was won from the government’s Transforming Cities Fund to make the town centre more accessible to cyclists and pedestrians.
However, the rising cost of building materials and high inflation has led to concerns that the project, if approved, could go over-budget.
When the gateway scheme was first announced it had an anticipated cost of £7.9m.
North Yorkshire County Council had responsibility for on-street parking in the Harrogate district until April 1.
According to a report that went before councillors on the new North Yorkshire Council today, it has a parking enforcement surplus for the new financial year of £3m, which includes £2m collected in the Harrogate district.
As part of local government reorganisation, the outgoing borough councils, including Harrogate, were invited to suggest what it should be spent on.
The report includes a letter sent by Trevor Watson, Harrogate Borough Council’s director of economy, environment and housing to Barrie Mason, assistant director of highways at North Yorkshire County Council.
Dated April 2022, the letter says some of the surplus should be put aside for contingency if Station Gateway costs rise.
Mr Watson said:
“With inflation rising it would be prudent to budget for additional match funding from civil parking enforcement surplus expenditure.”
However, the report pours cold water on this request and says match funding through the surplus “would not be possible.”
Instead, it lists projects such as the Whitby and Scarborough park-and-ride schemes, the A1 (M) junction 47 changes and other highways improvements as beneficiaries.
A spokesperson for North Yorkshire Council said “it’s too early to speculate about final costs” of the Station Gateway.
Next steps
A final decision on the scheme will be made in the summer before a full business case is submitted to the West Yorkshire Combined Authority, which made the original bid for government funding.
The council hopes work, if approved, could begin by the end of this year.
Conservative councillor Keane Duncan, who has responsibility for highways on the council’s decision-making executive, has in recent months twice spoken to business leaders at Harrogate District Chamber of Commerce about the controversial scheme.
In September last year, he discussed what impact inflation might have on its overall budget.
Cllr Duncan said:
“My aspiration is that we will have a high quality scheme.
“The last thing I would want to happen is us compromising on the public realm because that is a key part of the scheme and what we are wanting to deliver.
“If there are inflationary pressures with this particular scheme, then we are going to have to look at potentially what we can do around those costings. But that is not something we have discussed or are expecting at this point in time.”
But in March he said a £500,000 water feature planned for Station Square had been scrapped from the scheme “due to practical and cost constraints”.