The £11.2 million Harrogate Station Gateway will boost business, increase house prices and reduce congestion, according to an economic report published today.
North Yorkshire County Council, which is leading on the controversial scheme, has opened a third round of consultation.
As part of this, it published an economic case report showing the impact of the scheme.
The document says there is evidence that town centre retail is at risk of decline and ‘the proposed scheme contributes to increasing investment, job creation and productivity’.
It says the project would also create better opportunities to travel by foot and bike, attract more shoppers, increase land prices and ‘act as a catalyst to urban redevelopment and wider town centre regeneration’.
Businesses have expressed concerns about the impact of the scheme on trade.
They fear the loss of parking spaces, particularly on a part-pedestrianised James Street, and extra traffic caused by reducing some of Station Parade to single lane traffic will deter shoppers, as well as the impact of lengthy construction work.

How James Street will look.
But the economic case report says a survey of James Street users ‘indicates that over 90% of those doing business on the street would be unaffected by the removal of parking’.
It adds:
“Of the 10% or less that are parking, less than 20% were of the opinion that they would take their business elsewhere.
“In combination, were the parking to be removed from James Street, the impact on current shopping/business visitors could be expected to be less than 2%.”
Read more:
- New Harrogate Station Gateway details revealed today
- Questions over deadline for £11.2m Harrogate Gateway project hit by legal threat
The findings are based on interviews with 294 people entering or leaving shops or businesses on James Street in October last year.
The report says the ‘overall impact on retail footfall is expected to be positive’ and that ‘research has also shown that station enhancements tend to increase the value of existing land and properties within certain radii surrounding the station’.
Congestion fears
North Yorkshire County Council said last week the scheme would extend the average journey time around town by 73 seconds at peak times. Some opponents fear the reality will be worse and the extra congestion will reduce property prices.
But today’s report rejects this. It says offices near the station are in high demand, adding the 11-storey Exchange tower on Station Parade has 99% occupancy and commanded office rents of approximately £25 per square foot.

Conservative councillors Keane Duncan and Phil Ireland at Station Parade last week.
Houses within 500 metres of the station could expect a 10% increase in value and houses within 1,000 and 1,500 metres could expect an uplift of up to 5%.
The report concludes:
“Based on local conditions, academic studies and case study evidence there is a strong economic case for the Harrogate Station Gateway.”
“The scheme is considered to support inclusive growth by presenting new opportunities to access jobs, education and training – that will serve to support a sustainable labour force in the district.
“This document has reviewed what is a large body of evidence and the strong precedents that indicate the Transforming Cities Fund scheme is likely to increase footfall and retail performance, increase property/land values and increase business investment.”
The project, which is not due to start until at least late spring next year, is one of three in North Yorkshire, and 39 nationally, being funded by the Department for Transport’s Transforming Cities Fund to promote active travel.
Today’s economic case report comes after Harrogate property developer Chris Bentley, who owns Hornbeam Park Developments, expressed concerns about the legality of the consultation process and said he was considering a judicial review.
North Yorkshire County Council, Harrogate Borough Council and West Yorkshire Combined Authority all support the gateway.
You can take part in the consultation here.
Care provider gives notice on Harrogate council-owned buildingsA care provider has pledged that none of its residents will be forced to move when it ends leases at three council-owned buildings in Harrogate.
Anchor Hanover has decided to give notice on buildings on Kings Road, York Place and Brunswick Drive which are owned by Harrogate Borough Council and used as retirement homes.
Joanne Hanson, regional head of housing at the care company, said it made the decision as the buildings require “extensive works…. to suit the needs of older residents”.
She added no one will be required to move out, while the council has confirmed it will take on the properties as affordable housing.
Ms Hanson said:
“We have a long history of working closely with Harrogate Borough Council to provide good quality retirement housing, providing valued services to residents and the local community.
“We regularly review all of our locations looking at financial viability, the investment required and the needs of current and potential customers, both now and in the future.
“After carrying out a review of this nature here, we have identified that extensive works are required to modernise these properties to suit the needs of older residents.
“Our priority is the welfare of our residents and we will be working closely with the council to effect a smooth transition.”
Read More:
- Harrogate residents set to be asked if they want a town council
- New town with 3,000 homes could get just 20% affordable housing
The leases have been in place since the 1980s and are worth £6,000 per year for all three buildings.
The retirement homes range from nine to six bedrooms which are rented out by people over the age of 55 who receive different levels of care.
‘No option’ but to close Woodfield school, says council
North Yorkshire County Council has “no option” but to press ahead with plans to close Woodfield Community Primary School in Harrogate, local authority officials have said.
Senior county councillors on the executive today agreed to publish formal closure notices from September 2022 ahead of a final decision to close the school from December 31.
Stuart Carlson, director of children and young people’s services at the county council, said although it was “regrettable” that it had to close the school, the authority had no alternative.
He said:
“It is regrettable and with heavy hearts that we come to this decision.
“But there is no further options available to us now other than to move to the recommendations.”
Mr Carlson added that a “thorough consultation” was carried out into the closure and that it had exhausted all options available to it.
He denied that the executive of the council would be “ignoring” parents by going ahead with the closure plans.
Mr Carlson said:
“I don’t think we have done [ignored parents]. We have conducted a thorough consultation, we have looked at all the proposals that have been put forward and we have indeed tried our hardest working with the governing body and other schools to find a solution.
“But they are no longer available to us.”
Read more:
- Woodfield school parents ‘frustrated and upset’ after merger U-turn
- Woodfield school closure ‘an absolute disgrace’, says union
Liberal Democrat councillor Monika Slater, who represents the Bilton Grange and New Park division, said she believed pupils at Woodfield should have been given greater priority for places as she also urged the council to learn lessons for the future.
She said:
“Part of the issue comes down to the fact neighbouring schools have been allowed to become oversubscribed.“
“And I was disappointed to hear that children were going to be treated the same as any other child in the area who wished to move given their situation is somewhat different when we are potentially looking to close the school.
“I really feel these children should have been given a higher preference on their choices.”
Conservative councillor Paul Haslam, who represents Bilton and Nidd Gorge on the county council and is also a governor of the school, called for a “post-mortem” into the downfall of Woodfield school.
A motion from Harrogate Borough Council asking to keep the school open was also considered.
But councillors said they had no other option but to move ahead with the closure plan.
Failure to find academy
The school was rated inadequate by Ofsted in 2020 and placed into special measures.
The rating meant the school had to become a sponsored academy, but it failed to find a backer.
A proposed merger with Grove Road Community Primary School fell through this year, prompting the county council to open a consultation on closing the school in the next academic year.
The school is also faced with a cumulative deficit of £229,000 in 2023/24 due to low pupil numbers.
Union bosses in North Yorkshire previously described the move to close Woodfield as an “absolute disgrace”.
The publication of the statutory notices will include a four-week period for objections to be made to the council by October 6.
Should a final decision to close the school be approved in October 2022, it would include expanding the catchment area of Bilton Grange and Grove Road Primary Schools to cover the Woodfield area.
Legal proceedings begin to evict Travellers in HarrogateHarrogate Borough Council has begun moves to evict Travellers from Oatlands Park.
Almost 20 vehicles arrived on the council-maintained park on Friday night.
It is believed they gained access from Hookstone Road, where a post blocking traffic from entering the park had been removed.
A council spokesman said today:
“We are aware of an illegal encampment on Oatlands Park in Harrogate and have started legal proceedings.
“Notices have been served requesting that the occupants leave imminently.”
Local people told the Stray Ferret that police had visited the site.
A North Yorkshire Police spokesperson said:
“Residents have made us aware of a group of caravans which have pitched on an area of Oatlands Park in Harrogate.
“As part of our usual neighbourhood policing response, local officers who were on patrol visited Oatlands and spoke to those concerned.”
Read more:
- Travellers arrive on Oatlands Park in Harrogate
- Calls for more temporary sites for Travellers in Harrogate district
Spofforth housing developer requests £23,000 in council appeal costs
A developer has asked Harrogate Borough Council to pay £23,000 in costs after it won a planning appeal against the authority.
Yorkshire Housing Ltd took the council to the government’s Planning Inspectorate after it refused a proposal for 72 homes on Massey Fold in Spofforth.
The developer already had outline permission to build on the site, but councillors turned down an application that finalised the appearance and landscaping details in November 2020.
At the time, councillors said the plan would have a “detrimental urbanising impact upon the character and setting of Spofforth”.
A planning inspector sided in favour with Yorkshire Housing and gave the go-ahead for the scheme in October 2021.
Now the council has confirmed that the developer has submitted a request for costs totalling £23,278 for the appeal.
Read more:
-
Call for government to reject controversial Spofforth homes plan
- Government approves controversial 72 homes in Spofforth
The developer sought costs from the council after it said the authority had “unreasonably delayed” the housing development.
Council officials asked the inspector dismiss the request. But the government awarded costs against the authority.
Local concern
The decision to approve the scheme followed concerns from local residents over the design and that the housing would not be in keeping with the village.
More than 300 local people and organisations, including Natural England and Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, raised concerns about the development.
Shirley Fawcett, chairman of Spofforth with Stockeld Parish Council, wrote to Prime Minister Boris Johnson appealing for help in challenging the development.
However, Siobhan Watson, the government planning inspector, said she found the council’s reasons for refusal “vague and illogical”.
She said:
Questions over deadline for £11.2m Harrogate Gateway project hit by legal threat“Given the site’s planning history, I find the council’s refusal of the application and subsequent defence of the case to be both vague and illogical.
“I consider that the development should have been clearly permitted and that the council produced vague and generalised assertions about the proposal’s impact which are unsupported by objective analysis.”
A legal threat against Harrogate’s £11.2 million Gateway project has raised new questions over whether the controversial scheme can meet its completion deadline.
There is an agreement between the Department for Transport and West Yorkshire Combined Authority that the project to revamp key parts of the town centre should be completed by March 2024.
But revelations that one of Harrogate’s leading property companies has submitted a proposed claim for a judicial review has cast uncertainty over the already-delayed project which is being led by North Yorkshire County Council.
Letters obtained through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request reveal claims from Hornbeam Park Developments that a council-run consultation on the proposals was “unlawful”.
The council – which recently announced plans for another consultation this summer – responded in a letter to say it “does not accept” the claims.
A Department for Transport spokesman said it expects all projects funded through its Transforming Cities Fund to be delivered on time and that where there are delays, deadlines will be “reassessed by a panel on a case-by-case basis”.
Read more:
- Another consultation to take place on £10.9m Harrogate Station Gateway
- Harrogate property developer considers Station Gateway legal action
- New Harrogate Station Gateway details revealed today
But when asked what a possible judicial review could mean for the Harrogate Gateway project, the spokesman added “we can’t comment on the specific funding arrangement” of the scheme “as this information is commercially sensitive”.
Separately, the council also said in response to the FOI that it “does not hold this information”.
Hornbeam Park Developments made the legal threat in February when it challenged the council’s decision to submit a final business case for the project despite survey results showing more respondents felt ‘negative’ (56%) about the scheme than those that felt ‘positive’ (39%).
The council then announced plans for another consultation and said it hoped construction works would start this winter, with completion in winter 2023/24.
The works will involve cycling and walking upgrades for Station Square and the One Arch underpass, as well the Odeon cinema roundabout and several other streets in the area.
But the most controversial plans include a reduction of Station Parade to one-lane traffic and a part-time pedestrianisation of James Street.
There are similar Gateway projects for Selby and Skipton, yet Karl Battersby, director of business and environmental services at the council, said the Harrogate scheme “has generated the most interest by far”.
He said:
“It is positive that local residents and businesses feel so strongly about changes to their town and it is important to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to share their views on designs for the ambitious scheme.
“The project has developed since the previous consultation, and we know that the impact of the changes on traffic levels and flows were key issues raised in the previous consultation and we will provide further information on those aspects.
“We will also be consulting on the draft Traffic Regulation Orders, which would be required to implement the scheme.
“We will continue to work to the current timescales as set by the Department for Transport and West Yorkshire Combined Authority.”
Mr Battersby also said details of the next consultation will be announced “shortly”.
Travellers arrive on Oatlands Park in HarrogateTravellers have set up a camp on Oatlands Park in Harrogate.
Vehicles, which arrived last night, are believed to have gained access from Hookstone Road.
A post preventing traffic from entering the park was lying on the ground this morning.

Where the vehicles are believed to have entered.
Almost 20 vehicles are parked on the grass, at the side of the field.
The Harrogate Borough Council-maintained park includes public toilets, a play area for children and is a popular place for football matches.
The Stray Ferret has approached Harrogate Borough Council to ask if it is taking any action.

Read more:
- Calls for more temporary sites for Travellers in Harrogate district
- Andrew Jones MP writes to Priti Patel about ‘law-breaking’ Travellers
Plan to convert former Markington pub into house
Plans have been lodged to convert a former Markington pub into a house.
The Cross Keys Inn, High Street, closed in 2016 after declining turnover and profitability.
Now, plans have been tabled to Harrogate Borough Council to convert the pub into a home.
ID Planning, who have lodged the plan on behalf of Leeds-based Lotherton Property Services, said in documents submitted to the council that the building had been extensively marketed.
It added that potential buyers had little interest in reopening the pub.
The documents said:
“No party expressed any interest whatsoever in reopening it as a public house or indeed any other use other than residential.”
The proposal would see the former pub converted into a four bedroom house along with three car parking spaces.
Harrogate Borough Council will make a decision on the plan at a later date.
Read more:
- New 3,000 home settlement in Harrogate district to be called Maltkiln
- Two primary schools planned for new 3,000-home Harrogate district settlement
New town with 3,000 homes could get just 20% affordable housing
The proportion of affordable homes to be built at Harrogate’s biggest development in decades could be just 20 per cent.
Maltkiln is a 3,000-home settlement planned for the Hammerton and Cattal area.
It aims to play a major role in addressing the district’s housing need by providing “much-needed homes and jobs in a sustainable location”.
But a newly-published development plan document from Harrogate Borough Council states that the number of homes to be classed as affordable is “anticipated to be within a range of 20 to 40 per cent”.
The council’s target for affordable homes at all new housing sites is 40 per cent.
It said achieving this figure at Maltkiln will be “challenging” as the development needs to be financially viable.
Yet the council also admits the affordability of homes is a “key issue” that needs to be addressed as Harrogate remains as one of the most unaffordable places to live in England.
High house prices
Average house prices in the district are around 11 times average incomes, forcing many people out of the area.
The Maltkiln document states:
“Whilst we want to strive to deliver as much affordable housing as possible, an element of flexibility will also be required.
“This is explicitly acknowledged in the justification to the affordable housing policy where delivery is anticipated to be within a range of 20% to 40%.”
The document also said this range is “not out of step” with other large housing settlements elsewhere in the UK “where figures of 15 per cent, 25 per cent and 35 per cent have been set”.
Read more:
- New 3,000 home settlement in Harrogate district to be called Maltkiln
- Two primary schools planned for new 3,000-home Harrogate district settlement
But councillor Pat Marsh, leader of the opposition Liberal Democrat group on the council, said the authority should be aiming for at least its own 40 per cent target in order to provide homes for those most in need.
She also said that during the creation of the Harrogate district Local Plan 2014-35, her party’s vision for Maltkiln was an “eco-village” which is not car dependent and has many community facilities.
Cllr Marsh said:
“That eco-village had to be in a sustainable place and therefore the area around the Hammertons with two rail halts seemed an ideal place.
“Once taken up and accepted as the new settlement site, there has been a need to ensure all the right infrastructure is in place to serve the existing and new community.
“This includes schools including a secondary school, shops, open spaces and sports pitches. Also, that the houses built would be carbon neutral.
“Added to that the requirement of 40 per cent affordable homes which is very important and we should not consider the delivery of less.”
Flaxby rejected
The Hammerton and Cattal area was chosen as the location for the huge housing plans after rival proposals for 2,750 homes on the former Flaxby Golf Course were rejected by the council in a decision which led to a legal challenge from the developers.
The proposals for Maltkiln include two primary schools and land for a secondary school, as well as shops, employment space and a GP surgery which will be centred around the train station.
The council said it chose this location due to its transport links with the York-Harrogate-Leeds railway line and the A59.
It also said this location will “steer development away” from nearby residents who previously warned the housing plans will be “utterly devastating” for surrounding villages.
A six-week consultation on the development plan document is planned for October when residents will be asked to share their views on areas including roads and public transport.
After this, the document will then be submitted to the government for public examination.
Consultation announced for two new cycle routesConsultation is to begin this summer on two new cycle routes in Harrogate and Knaresborough.
North Yorkshire County Council received £1,011,750 last year from the Department for Transport’s active travel fund to improve cycling and walking infrastructure.
The funding is due to be spent on two schemes in the Harrogate district and one in Whitby.
The Harrogate district schemes are on the A59 Harrogate Road, Knaresborough, between Badger Mount and Maple Close and on Victoria Avenue, between the A61 (West Park) and Station Parade.

The Victoria Avenue cycle path could link with the Beech Grove low traffic neighbourhood.
A third Harrogate scheme for Oatlands Drive was scrapped after a negative response, but new proposals to cut congestion in the area are due to be revealed in autumn.
The funding was secured more than a year ago and little discernible progress has been made since then.
The Stray Ferret asked the county council for an update.
Melisa Burnham, highways area manager at the county council, said:
“The two proposed schemes in Harrogate — along the A59 and on Victoria Avenue — are currently in the detailed design stage to understand the cost and funding requirements.
“We are carrying out road safety audits on the routes this month before taking the final designs to a public consultation in the late summer.”
Read more:
- Residents may ask council to reconsider Otley Road cycle path
- Harrogate and Knaresborough trains to Leeds to be reinstated in December
But it seems the Knaresborough scheme will not proceed any time soon.
Although North Yorkshire County Council is leading on the project, the issue was raised last week at a Harrogate Borough Council meeting.
Stray land
Harrogate Borough Council has ringfenced £500,000 towards the Knaresborough scheme from its investment reserve.
When asked about progress on the initiative, Councillor Phil Ireland, the cabinet member for carbon reduction and sustainability, told the meeting “there has been an acceptance that this will not happen prior to local government reorganisation” in April next year.
Cllr Ireland said:
“We definitely want a cycleway between Harrogate and Knaresborough. However, it won’t happen quickly as further funding will need to be identified, plus there’s always the perennial issue of Stray land on the verges of Knaresborough Road.”
He added that the borough council, which will be abolished in April, was considering allocating the funding to other “shovel-ready schemes” from North Yorkshire County Council, such as the Victoria Avenue initiative.
Cllr Ireland said the borough council was “waiting for some more information’ from the county council before making a decision.
The Victoria Avenue scheme could link with the Beech Grove low traffic neighbourhood, if the decision to close the road to through traffic is continued.