North Yorkshire Council says it has already saved taxpayers £3.8m a year in the transition from eight councils to one by cutting the roles of 24 senior managers.

The council’s finance boss, Cllr Gareth Dadd, underlined that none of the senior staff would be paid enhanced severance packages as the Conservative-run authority works towards a total of £67m of efficiencies by uniting the county, district and borough councils.

The comments follow critics of local government reorganisation questioning the amount of staff salary savings that it would achieve.

Cllr Dadd’s remarks come just weeks after severance packages of £770,000 were paid to four senior officers at Hambleton District Council because they did not wish to work for the incoming unitary authority.

A highly charged meeting of the district council last November heard the directors were fearful about the ring-fenced roles they would be given at North Yorkshire Council, despite no decisions having been made about their jobs.

A meeting of the unitary council’s executive heard the total exit costs for three senior management as a result of the transition had been estimated at £513,000, which had been raised as one of the former district councils had an enhanced redundancy scheme.

However, the changes had achieved £332,000 savings of salaries, meaning it would take around 18 months for the council to benefit from the redundancies.

Cllr Dadd said the redundancy costs were “minuscule” in comparison.

He said: 

“That £3.8m is the first step on our journey to possibly £67m of saving. That’s come from what some would describe as fat cats, but let’s just say the higher earners in the local government family.

“We should not lose sight of the fact that we have straightaway produced £3.8m as a result of local government reorganisation.”

The new council’s management structure has significantly fewer posts than the total for the previous eight councils, 60 compared to 36, resulting in some managers moving to the unitary authority without a specified role in the new structure.

Read more:

• ‘Undemocratic’ to ask Harrogate residents to pay for town council without stating its powers
• Harrogate leisure chief defends Ripon pool location amid ground stability concern
• ‘We want our learner swimming pool’, say Ripon councillors

A number of the senior staff left prior to vesting day on April 1, in the main having secured another role elsewhere, while some planned to retire just before or shortly after vesting day, while two are undertaking duties covering work for the new council which will take them up to their planned retirement.

An officer’s report to the executive states: 

“These duties make full use of their significant skills and experience to the benefit of the council and cover work areas that would otherwise require additional resource in terms of appointments, interim managers, or consultants.”

The £11.2 million Harrogate Station Gateway has been branded a “piecemeal vanity project” by the chair of the committee that voted to approve it.

The Harrogate and Knaresborough area constituency committee, which advises North Yorkshire Council, backed the scheme by 10 votes to three at a meeting on Friday.

The decision paves the way for North Yorkshire Council’s ruling Conservative executive to give the project the go-ahead on May 30.

It means Station Parade will be reduced to one lane of traffic so a bus lane and cycle route can be built and James Street partly pedestrianised.

Committee chair Pat Marsh was one of three Lib Dems to oppose the gateway but support by five of her colleagues and five Conservatives enabled it to go through despite vociferous public opposition.

In a press release issued last night, Cllr Pat Marsh — who is leader of the Harrogate and Knaresborough Lib Dems — called for businesses and residents to be consulted as the scheme progressed. She said:

“Of particular concern was the level of poor consultation and lack of any business impact assessment for the project. The council needs to acknowledge their mistakes and learn from them.

“Many residents and businesses put forward positive suggestions for improving the scheme. There is little evidence that any of this was listened to and actioned.”

Read more:

• £11.2m Station Gateway set to go ahead after crucial Harrogate area vote
• Publican says cycle path crackdown in Harrogate is ‘unreasonable’

Cllr Marsh, who represents Stray, Woodlands and Hookstone, added:

“The lack of long-term investment in the town centre and any meaningful strategic active travel plan for the Harrogate and Knaresborough constituency means that projects like the gateway are seen as isolated piecemeal vanity projects by the council’s administration rather than a solution that links improvements in traffic flow throughout the town, leading to significant carbon emission reductions.”

“There is nothing in this scheme that will reduce traffic volumes in the town centre to any meaningful degree.”

Cllr Marsh claimed North Yorkshire Council’s “unwillingness” to consider a Harrogate park and ride scheme “further highlights the lack of strategic thinking”.

She also claimed recent failures to secure levelling-up and active travel funding from the UK government “questioned the ability of North Yorkshire Council to deliver this project on time and to budget”.

Friday’s meeting saw councillors agree to support the gateway on condition that further engagement with local businesses and residents took place.

The committee also requested an active role in the project as it progresses.

Councillors met today to decide whether the controversial Harrogate Station Gateway scheme should go ahead.

The Harrogate and Knaresborough area constituency committee decided to back the £11.2 million project – but with conditions.

Here’s what happened.

1.15pm – Meeting ends

The area constituency committee meeting has ended.

Thanks for following our coverage throughout the morning.

1.06pm – Committee votes to welcome Station Gateway investment with conditions

Cllr Peter Lacey, Liberal Democrat, has tabled a motion to welcome the investment in the scheme with conditions, including that concerns of residents are listened to as the project is developed and that the committee has a “meaningful role” in the implementation of the scheme.

The committee will also ask for a full report on the progress in the Autumn.

The committee votes to approve the motion by eight to three.

12.45pm – ‘It’s the wrong scheme’, says committee chair

Cllr Pat Marsh, Liberal Democrat and committee chair, says she is against the scheme.

She describes the project as “the wrong scheme” for the town.

Cllr Marsh says she is not against cycling and is looking for the best project for the town. She describes the project as “piecemeal”.

12.42pm – Otely Road scheme ‘taken away public confidence’

Cllr Monika Slater, Liberal Democrat, tells officers that the Otley Road cycle route has “taken away the public confidence” in the council delivering infrastructure schemes.

The council decided not to proceed with the scheme after building the first section of the route.

Meanwhile, Cllr Hannah Gostlow, Liberal Democrat, says she has felt “conflicted” over the scheme.

However, she says the scheme should be used as a “starting block” for active travel.

12.30pm – ‘The easiest thing to do would be to do nothing’

Cllr Michael Harrison, Conservative, says as a councillor the “easiest thing to do would be to do nothing”.

He agrees with Cllr Warneken’s comments and adds that making a decision to do anything in Harrogate “is difficult”.

Cllr Paul Haslam, Conservative, proposes that the committee endorses the scheme.

The public gallery is steadily emptying, after more than two hours of the meeting. Fewer than half of the seats are now occupied.

Those remaining are still listening intently, and are vocally opposing anyone who speaks in favour of the scheme. However, they are far fewer in number than earlier in the morning.

12.25pm – ‘If we don’t do something, when are we going to do something?’

Cllr Arnold Warneken, Green Party, asks the committee if it does nothing on the gateway today, “when are we going to do something?”

He takes a swipe at Cllr Walker “for politicising this”.

He adds:

“We all have an opportunity to have our say. I can see the huge benefits of this.

“It’s a catalyst for making change.”

12.20pm – ‘It’s a £11m vanity project’

Heading into debate, Cllr Matt Walker, Liberal Democrat, starts by describing the scheme as a £11m vanity project.

He says the council’s strategic review as “flimsy” and delivering “nothing of benefit”.

However, Cllr John Mann, Conservative, says “on balance” there is more advantages than disadvantages.

“What a surprise” shout members of the public as Cllr Mann declares his support.

12.10pm – ‘No queuing to Ripley’

Cllr Chris Aldred, Liberal Democrat, asks whether any of the traffic will back up to Ripley as a result of the work.

Mr Binks says there will be no queuing to the area.

In response, someone in the public gallery shouts “It already does”.

12.05pm – Impact on business

Cllr Michael Schofield asks why no consultation was done “properly” with business and why no business impact assessment was done.

Mr Roberts says a business impact assessment is “not normally carried out” on this type of scheme.

“So they don’t care, then,” say people in the gallery.

11.57am – First investment in Harrogate in 30 years

Mr Binks says the gateway scheme is “definitely an economic driver”.

He adds its an opportunity for Harrogate to have its first significant investment in 30 years.

Mr Binks ends his presentation and takes questions from councillors.

11.55am – ‘There’s a lot of parking opportunity in Harrogate’

Mr Binks says Harrogate already has “a lot of parking opportunity” as he outlines the loss of 40 spaces as a result of the scheme.

He adds that Harrogate has some 7,000 parking spaces, if Asda and Waitrose are included. As a result, he says the spaces lost would amount to 0.6% of the overall figure.

11.45am – Council data ‘is accurate and validated’

Mr Binks says the council’s plan for Station Parade is justified as the authority commissioned a study into the road using computer modelling over traffic.

He says:

“We have got that raw data to suggest what we are doing is accurate and validated.”

He adds that the drive from Kings Road to Station Parade has eight set of traffic lights which cause a delay in journey times.

Mr Binks says the flow of traffic is affected by the number of traffic signals – not the reduction from two lanes to one.

11.40am – Council acknowledges opinion is split

Council officers acknowledge that opinions on the scheme are “split down the middle”.

They also acknowledge that concern has been raised about the “impact on business”.

11.32am – Town centres ‘are changing’

Mr Roberts says town centres “are changing” and that the status quo “is not sustainable”.

In his presentation, Mr Roberts says 77% of people responded to a consultation to say that walking and cycling infrastructure needed to improve.

It’s pointed out that the £11.2m must be spent on physical infrastructure. It cannot be spent on areas such as improving bus services.

“Get the pavements sorted then!” shouts one woman from the public gallery.

11.25am – ‘We want to make Harrogate better’

Richard Binks, head of major projects at the council, opens his statement by saying he has 35 years experience in delivering regeneration schemes.

He adds:

“We genuinely want to make Harrogate better. It is the jewel in the crown of North Yorkshire.”

He hands over to his colleague, Matt Roberts, who says the council is “seeking a balanced approach” for people to get around town.

He adds:

“This is not about stopping cars.”

11.20am – ‘Not seeking your blind support’

Cllr Duncan tells the committee that he is “not seeking your unconditional, blind support”.

He says the executive will consider all views from the committee before the executive meeting in 25 days time.

11.17am – Gateway ‘not a perfect solution’

The meeting resumes and opens with Cllr Keane Duncan, executive councillor for highways, says the gateway scheme is “not a total and perfect solution”.

However, he adds that it is an “opportunity to change the town centre”.

He points out that there are 25 days left until the council’s executive makes a decision. He adds that he wants to use those days to “ensure we have the strongest case” for the project, including consulting with the committee.

A handful of people have left the public gallery during the break. Some of the most vocal opponents remain, however, and have already been shouting their views in opposition to Cllr Duncan’s statements.

11am – Committee breaks

Councillors have taken a break at the end of public questions for 10 minutes.

Mr Binks, head of major projects, is set to give a presentation when the meeting resumes.

10.55am – Harrogate Chamber of Commerce does not support gateway

Martin Mann, acting chief executive of the Harrogate District Chamber of Commerce, tells the committee that the chamber does not support the scheme.

Mr Mann points out that construction of the scheme could go on for “two to three years” due to other works planned by utility companies.

10.47am – Gateway scheme ‘not the way forward’

Frances Holroyd, who owns property in Princes Square in Harrogate, describes the scheme as “not the way forward”.

She goes on to add that the scheme should be “rejected in its entirety” and calls on the council to work with local businesses.

More applause from some in the public gallery.

10.42am – Investing in gateway for visitors and reducing carbon

Jemima Parker, of Zero Carbon Harrogate, starts her statement by pointing out local authorities who have made investment in gateway schemes and have also “made a public climate emergency”.

“What has that got to do with Harrogate?” people call as she refers to other towns with what she deems better infrastructure around their public transport.

Ms Parker points at the gateway scheme offers “modest carbon reductions”.

10.36am – Lack of vision ‘alarming’

Veronica Adams, another resident, reads from some of Harrogate historian Malcolm Neesam’s views.

She says that Mr Neesam found that council’s often had a “clear vision” which they shared with the public. But goes onto add that he found the current authority’s lack of vision “alarming”.

10.30am – ‘This is not Holland, it’s Harrogate’

Judy D’Arcy-Thompson, a resident and part of the Stray Defence Association, says that the scheme would take away the “freedom and flexibility” of residents while also discriminating against the elderly.

She adds:

“This is not Holland, it’s hilly and often very chilly Harrogate.”

Meanwhile, Barry Adams, of the Harrogate Residents’ Association, adds that Harrogate is “not against change”, but describes the gateway scheme as “meaningless”.

Mr Adams goes on to add that the scheme “will not solve congestion in Harrogate”.

10.23am – ‘Wrong scheme at the wrong time’

More concern from business owners at William Woods, of Independent Harrogate, says the project is the “wrong scheme at the wrong time”.

Mr Woods asks why no public meeting was called to discuss the project. The public gallery applauds again.

Mr Woods’ question over whether the decision was democratic let to calls of “well done, well said” from the public gallery.

He adds:

“If you really care about Harrogate, you must reject this scheme.”

10.20am – Changes could be seen as “unnecessary” in the future

Andrew Brown, of Harrogate Civic Society, says the move to change Station Parade could be seen as “unnecessary” in the future.

He said the society is concerned over potential tailbacks, the pedestrianisation of James Street and public realm changes to Station Square.

Members of the public say “yeah!” and applaud when the civic society raises concerns about the impact on traffic.

10.15am – Concern over deliveries to Station Parade businesses

Sue Savill, of Party Fever on Station Parade, says that the cost to local businesses would “be devastating”.

She raises concern over deliveries to businesses on Station Parade.

Her speech is met with applause from half of the public gallery.

Richard Binks, head of major projects at the council, said he “empathised” with Ms Savill over her concerns. He added that he was happy to take the concern on board to adjust the project.

10.10am – Harrogate should ‘welcome investment’

Kevin Douglas, from Harrogate District Cycle Action, starts the statements.

He says Harrogate should “welcome the investment”. He adds that the scheme will help to “improve the town centre”.

Mr Douglas adds:

“This will not prevent people from driving in the town centre, if they want to.”

He calls on councillors to support the gateway scheme.

10am – Meeting starts

The meeting is underway and will start with questions and statements from the public.

Both Cllr Carl Les, leader of North Yorkshire Council, and Cllr Keane Duncan, executive councillor for highways, are in attendance to observe proceedings.

The public gallery is packed and more chairs are being brought in as members of the public continue to arrive.

9.27am – Pedestrian projects elsewhere

The report also suggests towns and cities that have been made more pedestrian-friendly have seen an increase in visitor numbers, and a boost to local businesses.

It says:

“For example, investment to make the Piccadilly area of Stoke-on-Trent more pedestrian-friendly led to a 30% increase in footfall there, whereas footfall increased by up to 35% on streets where the pedestrian experience had been improved in Scotland.

“The introduction of a pedestrianisation scheme in Coventry also led to a 25% rise in footfall on Saturdays and the trial closure of some roads in Cheltenham in 2018 similarly had a positive effect on the number of visitors to the local high street.”

9.24am – Recommended for approval

Unsurprisingly, the officer’s report to the committee about the scheme recommends that it is approved.

It argues the town centre is “at risk of decline” if nothing is done to make it more appealing and fit for modern needs. It says:

“The number of retail units in Harrogate has reduced by 12% in seven years with more at risk of becoming residential properties via new powers for permitted development changes in use class.

“Of the 92 retail units directly abutting the highways within the Station Gateway site, 15 were vacant in September 2021 (16%). This can be compared with a vacancy rate of 6% across the wider town centre. 

“Evidence suggests that the town centre retail sector is at risk of decline in the medium term. Consumer behaviours and expectations are evolving, and towns must diversify and advance to maintain healthy and vibrant visitor economies. The scheme is seeking to do just this. “

9.20am – Background to the scheme

The gateway scheme is financed by the government’s Transforming Cities Fund and looks set to cost £11.2 million.

It would see a bus lane and two-way cycle space introduced on Station Parade, with traffic reduced to one lane.

Cheltenham Mount would become a one-way street, while James Street would be partially pedestrianised from Princes Street eastwards.

Improvements would be made to junctions and crossings on Cheltenham Parade and Station Parade, and to the roundabout near the Odeon cinema on East Parade. There would also be work to the One Arch underpass, Station Square and the length of Station Parade to create a more welcoming environment.

Read more:

• Stray Views: Time for councillors to back Harrogate Station Gateway
• Dutch-style roundabout ditched from £11.2m Harrogate Station Gateway

Starbeck Baths announced today it expects to re-open on May 15.

The Victorian swimming pool closed on April 6, just before the Easter weekend, due to an “unforeseen mechanical failure”.

Its closure was keenly felt by local swimmers because of the long-term closure of The Hydro in nearby Harrogate for a delayed £11.8 million upgrade.

But the baths posted on social media today:

“We are excited to let you know that we took a big step towards reopening today. The brand new filter has been installed and switched on for the first time. Stage one done.

“The second stage, our bit is underway, known as heat and treat which will take a week to 10 days, which is about the same time it will take for our water test results to arrive.

“If everything goes to plan, fingers and toes crossed we will be able to welcome you back to the pool from Monday 15th May.”

The pool is run by the North Yorkshire Council-controlled Brimhams Active, which manages leisure facilities in the Harrogate district.

The new filter system

Read more:

• ‘Good’ Ofsted rating for ‘happy and welcoming’ Starbeck nursery
• Renewed call to move Harrogate ‘little temple’ to Starbeck

A petition calling for improvements to roads around schools in Harrogate will be delivered to the highways authority next week.

Set up by a group of parents concerned about safety for youngsters travelling to and from school, the petition has attracted almost 900 signatures.

It calls for a 20mph limit on roads across Oatlands, Pannal Ash, Rossett and the Saints area of Harrogate. The parents said thousands of pupils travel to four primary schools, five secondary schools, Harrogate College and several nurseries and pre-schools in the area each day.

In their petition, the parents said:

“Change is urgently needed. Without it the safety, health and well-being of the children, young people and the wider community remains at stake and road safety will continue as a barrier to walking and cycling in the area and across Harrogate.

“Maximum speed limits of 20mph have been delivered in other rural and urban areas of Yorkshire and the UK including Calderdale, Cornwall, Oxford, Edinburgh, the Scottish Borders, London and in Wales. We want these improvements for south and west and other communities within Harrogate.”

The petition references two serious collisions earlier this year – one on Beechwood Grove and one on Yew Tree Lane – which left three children hurt and requiring hospital treatment.

The incident on Yew Tree Lane left two 15-year-old Rossett School boys with serious, potentially life-changing, injuries.

Read more:

• ‘Comprehensive’ road safety improvements announced for Harrogate schools
• Children raise awareness of road safety issues affecting Ripon schools

After the collision, there were renewed calls for better safety measures around schools in the area. However, the campaign for changes dated much further back, with local parents having presented their requests to North Yorkshire County Council last year.

This year, meetings have been held between all headteachers in the area with representatives of North Yorkshire Council’s highways department. All the affected schools have put their names to the campaign for reduced speed limits.

Hazel Peacock, one of the parents who set up the petition, said:

“A big thank you to all of you who have signed the petition for a maximum speed of 20mph on roads in south and west Harrogate to improve road safety. There are a a total of 870 signatures to date!

“We will be submitting the petition to North Yorkshire County Council [next week]. If you have yet to sign it or would like to share with friends or family living or working in the Harrogate and Knaresborough constituency area, who may also be interested in supporting the campaign, please sign and share the petition by May 8, 2023.”

To see or sign the petition, click here.

North Yorkshire Council has said it has no plans to build a learner pool in Ripon following calls by local councillors and residents.

There have been hopes in the city that a facility to help children under four learn to swim could be built by the new council despite the now-abolished Harrogate Borough Council opening the £18m Jack Laugher Leisure and Wellness Centre on Dallamires Lane only two years ago.

The new facility has a six-lane pool — but not a smaller pool.

Critics say this forces families with young children to go to Knaresborough, Harrogate or even further afield for swimming lessons.

Parents who formed Ripon Pool Action Group published a survey last year that found there are over 1,000 children of pre-school age living in the Ripon area that could benefit from a learner pool.

At a meeting of Ripon City Council last week, council leader Andrew Williams, who also sits on North Yorkshire Council as an independent, said the city council would be writing to the new authority asking it to commit to building the pool.

But Nic Harne, North Yorkshire Council’s corporate director of community development, said the new council, which is looking to make savings, has no plans to build a learner pool.

Mr Harne said: 

“Residents will understand that it is extremely expensive to build and maintain swimming pools so the right thing to do is to ensure that there are safe and secure facilities to meet the local demand.

“Therefore, we have no plans to build a learner pool in Ripon.”

Leisure facilities in Ripon are run by Brimhams Active, an arm’s length company set up by Harrogate Borough Council.

North Yorkshire Council, which now owns Brimhams Active, has pledged to undertake a £120,000 review of leisure services with the aim of creating a countywide model for delivering leisure and sport by 2027.

Mr Harne added: 

“As we bring together our leisure provision under the new council, we are reviewing all our facilities across the county to ensure they continue meet the needs of their communities.”

Read more:

• ‘Undemocratic’ to ask Harrogate residents to pay for town council without stating its powers
• Harrogate leisure chief defends Ripon pool location amid ground stability concern
• ‘We want our learner swimming pool’, say Ripon councillors

A floral tribute to King Charles has been created in Harrogate.

North Yorkshire Council‘s parks team created the eye-catching display on Stray land on Montpellier Hill. It is currently behind railings, which will be removed on Saturday’s coronation day.

The parks team made the royal cypher using a technique called carpet bedding, which involves using plants so compact and tightly knitted that the result looks like a woven carpet. The display will stay in place for 12 months.

Some of the parks team that worked on the display.

A council spokesperson said:

“The display is made up of more than 15,600 plants, including sedum, sempervivum and ajuga, which are all compact plants ideal for this type of display.

“The temporary fencing will be removed first thing on Saturday morning to enable people to enjoy the display fully.”

Read more:

• Coronation events: where to celebrate across the Harrogate district
• Fireworks finale will end Ripon’s coronation day celebrations

A fireworks display will provide a spectacular end to coronation day celebrations in Ripon’s Market Square on Saturday night.

North Yorkshire Council and North Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service have given the go-ahead to a 10-minute display starting at 10.50pm.

The return of pyrotechnics to the city centre follows the cancellation in 2021 and 2022 of Ripon’s traditional New Year’s Eve displays, because of safety concerns about the launch area for the fireworks at the rear of the town hall.

This issue has now been resolved with approval given to a new launch area on The Arcade Car Park.

The Market Square, which has been decked in bunting created by Ripon Community Poppy Project, will be a focal point for the free-to-attend event organised by Ripon City Council to celebrate the coronation of King Charles III and Queen Camilla.

Today (Saturday) from 11am until 8pm, there will be free fairground rides and from 3pm onwards there will be performances on stage from Cilla & Friends; Katherine Jenkins tribute, Midnight Soul Sisters, and an 80s Pop tribute band.

The Flash: Queen tribute band takes centre stage at 9.30pm to give a rousing build up to the fireworks finale.

Read more:

• Crowning glory for Ripon’s knitters
• New Bishop of Ripon is announced

North Yorkshire Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner Zoe Metcalfe is facing pressure to step down following further criticism that the police are failing to protect vulnerable children.

Ms Metcalfe’s role includes scrutinising the performance of North Yorkshire Police.

But leading North Yorkshire councillors have voiced dismay over the lack of progress Ms Metcalfe has brought about in the force over the last year.

It comes after His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services highlighted continuing concerns over child protection.

A HMICFRS report this week found evidence-gathering delays and a lack of knowledge about online abuse inquiries were reducing North Yorkshire Police’s ability to safeguard children.

Following a re-inspection of the force in December, the watchdog revealed police officers had not forensically examined digital devices connected to a suspected child rape six months after they were submitted.

In response, the commissioner, who is tasked with holding the force to account, said both her and her team had been “regularly assured that all concerns would be tackled head on and improvements made at a significant pace”,only to find “12 months later, the force is not in the position I expected them to be in”.

She said:

“Not enough has been done and there is simply no excuse – North Yorkshire Police have let the public and the most vulnerable in our society down.

“I know that it is my responsibility to increase the accountability of and pressure on the chief constable, to demand answers and not accept anything other than immediate and significant improvement.”

Within hours of the report being published Ms Metcalfe struck a determined tone as she held a public online meeting with senior officers, including chief constable Lisa Winward, where she questioned them over the progress made over 10 recommendations.

The meeting heard the force fully accepted the criticisms and was investing in officers’ training and in control room staff, the recruitment of specialist child protection workers, and cutting the time it takes to examine digital devices to less than 72 hours.

The force said it had spent £400,000 on reducing its digital forensics backlog and £1.17m on hiring specialist child protection staff, and was establishing dedicated safeguarding teams in each of the three regions it covers.

Call to resign

Once the elections for City of York Council are concluded the North Yorkshire Police, Fire and Crime panel, which exists to hold the commissioner to account, will reconvene and consider holding an extraordinary meeting to question the commissioner.

The panel pushed Mrs Metcalfe’s predecessor, Philip Allott, to step down and heavily criticised the county’s first commissioner, Julia Mulligan, over her treatment of staff.

Ms Metcalfe has confirmed she is seeking to be the Conservative candidate for mayor of North Yorkshire and York, elections for which are due to take place in May next year. She has claimed to be “uniquely qualified” for the role.

Leader of the opposition on North Yorkshire Council, Cllr Bryn Griffiths said the Liberal Democrat group would be calling for Ms Metcalfe to resign at the next meeting of the authority.

North Yorkshire Council’s Labour group leader, Cllr Steve Shaw Wright said the commissioner had been in charge for “nothing but a series of calamitous reports”.

He said:

“She is doing very little. Police at the coal face are actually doing a brilliant job across North Yorkshire, but the ones who lead them need to get on with the job they are supposed to be doing.

“They have been short-staffed for a while, but that lays at the door of the Tory commissioner, who should have been banging doors down for a lot longer than this.

“‘Call me Zoe’ wants to be the Conservative candidate for the mayor of North Yorkshire and York, but I think she’s blown it.”

Read more:

• Crime commissioner’s office to move to Harrogate Police Station
• North Yorkshire Police ‘still needs to improve’ on child safeguarding, say inspectors

The North Yorkshire Council Independent group leader said the latest criticism showed there was no legitimate reason by commissioners should exist.

Cllr Stuart Parsons said increasing “scrutiny” by calling for the police to provide evidence of progress would only take more police officers off their day-to-day jobs. He said:

“What is the point of a police, fire and crime commissioner if she can’t ensure the force is doing what it is meant to?

“Instead of believing everything she has been fed she should have been investigating what was really going on and then calling them to account.”

A large tree that damaged a Porsche in Harrogate during recent storms has been felled.

Zenya Dunn, who lives on Granby Road, told the Stray Ferret her partner Michael woke to find his car beneath a large splintered branch during February’s Storm Otto.

Speaking back then, she said it was the second time the Porsche had been struck by falling branches from the tree.

Ms Dunn added her Range Rover, parked nearby, and the house front window had narrowly escaped being damaged by the tree during storms. She said the couple had alerted the council to the danger numerous times.

Zenya Dunn, standing next to her partner’s Porsche in the aftermath of Storm Otto. 

North Yorkshire Council has now pruned the tree to little more than a stump.

Read more:

• Harrogate couple’s dismay after tree crashes on Porsche for second time
• Historic Harrogate house to be auctioned next month

Jon Clubb, acting head of parks and environmental services at the council, said:

“Storm Otto caused considerable disruption to parts of North Yorkshire in February. Our parks and grounds maintenance team acted swiftly to remove a large branch on Granby Road which had fallen during the storm.

“Unfortunately, damage to the tree was so severe that it needed removing and the work was recently carried out. We will be carrying out replacement plantings this winter in line with our trees and woodland policy.

The splintered branch being removed in February.