north yorkshire county council Archives - Page 34 of 96

Bus services ‘facing potential cliff-edge’

Bus services in a county that failed to secure any money to improve services in the government’s high-profile Bus Back Better scheme are now facing “a potential cliff-edge”, North Yorkshire’s transport boss has warned.

In a statement to a meeting of North Yorkshire County Council next Wednesday, Cllr Keane Duncan said the authority was aware several of the county’s commercial routes were facing “significant pressures”, due to the loss of government subsidies in three months.

The warning from the Conservative-led council’s executive member for highways and transportation comes ahead of bus services across the country having to introduce a £2 price cap on local and regional journeys from October.

It also comes just three months after it emerged the authority’s £116 million Bus Back Better bid had been rejected in its entirety by the government, which claimed the bid had lacked “sufficient ambition”.

As winning the grant had been crucial for elements of the county’s Bus Service Improvement Plan, the authority expressed dismay at the decision.

Even ahead of the decision in March, members of the authority’s executive had underlined the need for bus services for the county’s rural communities, which dwindled following significant austerity cutbacks.

Cllr Duncan said the council had launched a review of the passenger service network across the county to understand which could become threatened in the coming months.

He said:

“The end of the Commercial Bus Services Support Grant provided by central government in October presents a potential cliff-edge in terms of the future profitability of routes our residents rely upon.”

He said the review would enable him to assess potential support the council could provide “to keep as many of our vital services running as possible”.

The authority’s opposition leader, Councillor Bryn Griffiths, said concerns had been mounting for the viability of some bus services as they appeared to have reached a tipping point.

Coun Griffiths said by giving one-off grants for specific projects limited to certain places the government was failing to provide the resources needed to improve access to public transport across England’s largest county.

He said:

“It’s an appalling situation. We lose out in the north of England in rural areas because the government doesn’t recognise the issues.

“Places like Bilsdale have no bus services on Sundays because the county council cannot afford to subsidise them, so people can’t get to hospitals to visit their loved ones. Cutting services even further is just ridiculous.

“It’s a vicious circle. You get fewer services, so it gets less and less attractive for people to use.”

Consultation announced for two new cycle routes

Consultation is to begin this summer on two new cycle routes in Harrogate and Knaresborough.

North Yorkshire County Council received £1,011,750 last year from the Department for Transport’s active travel fund to improve cycling and walking infrastructure.

The funding is due to be spent on two schemes in the Harrogate district and one in Whitby.

The Harrogate district schemes are on the A59 Harrogate Road, Knaresborough, between Badger Mount and Maple Close and on Victoria Avenue, between the A61 (West Park) and Station Parade.

The Victoria Avenue cycle path could link with the Beech Grove low traffic neighbourhood.

A third Harrogate scheme for Oatlands Drive was scrapped after a negative response, but new proposals to cut congestion in the area are due to be revealed in autumn.

The funding was secured more than a year ago and little discernible progress has been made since then.

The Stray Ferret asked the county council for an update.

Melisa Burnham, highways area manager at the county council, said:

“The two proposed schemes in Harrogate — along the A59 and on Victoria Avenue — are currently in the detailed design stage to understand the cost and funding requirements.

“We are carrying out road safety audits on the routes this month before taking the final designs to a public consultation in the late summer.”

But it seems the Knaresborough scheme will not proceed any time soon.

Although North Yorkshire County Council is leading on the project, the issue was raised last week at a Harrogate Borough Council meeting.

Stray land

Harrogate Borough Council has ringfenced £500,000 towards the Knaresborough scheme from its investment reserve.

When asked about progress on the initiative, Councillor Phil Ireland, the cabinet member for carbon reduction and sustainability, told the meeting “there has been an acceptance that this will not happen prior to local government reorganisation” in April next year.

Cllr Ireland said:

“We definitely want a cycleway between Harrogate and Knaresborough. However, it won’t happen quickly as further funding will need to be identified, plus there’s always the perennial issue of Stray land on the verges of Knaresborough Road.”

He added that the borough council, which will be abolished in April, was considering allocating the funding to other “shovel-ready schemes” from North Yorkshire County Council, such as the Victoria Avenue initiative.

Cllr Ireland said the borough council was “waiting for some more information’ from the county council before making a decision.

The Victoria Avenue scheme could link with the Beech Grove low traffic neighbourhood, if the decision to close the road to through traffic is continued.

£60m Kex Gill contract to be awarded

A construction contract for the £60 million rerouting of a landslide-hit road between Harrogate and Skipton is set to be approved.

North Yorkshire County Council says it has found a preferred bidder to carry out the delayed project, which will see a new carriageway built for the A59 at Kex Gill.

The road is a key east-west link for the county and has been hit by 12 landslides in as many years, leading to diversions for motorists and costs for the council.

In one instance, a landslide in January 2016 shut the road for eight weeks.

The council had hoped works would start last autumn, however, the project has been hit by several delays including objections to compulsory purchase orders that the council made to acquire land for the new route.

Minerals company Sibelco also attempted to call in the project for a public inquiry, but this was rejected by the government.

There is now an aim for construction to begin next January, with completion in early 2025.

Funding for the project is coming from the Department for Transport, which has agreed to provide £56 million, while the council will make up the rest of the costs.

The council’s executive will be asked to agree to the awarding of the contract to the preferred bidder at a meeting next Tuesday.

But before the contract can be signed off, a final business case for the project will be submitted to the Department for Transport.

A report to Tuesday’s meeting said the road was still causing repair costs for the council which has planned drainage works this month and wants to see a permanent solution in place.

The report said:

“There remains a high risk that there will be further landslips in the future, which could potentially result in long term closures of the route, severely impacting connectivity between Skipton and Harrogate.

“Conversely there is a risk to public safety and economic disruption.

“Whilst short to medium term management measures are continually being undertaken, the county council recognised that in the longer term there was a need to develop proposals for a permanent solution.”

Harrogate property developer considers Station Gateway legal action

A Harrogate property developer is considering legal action over the town’s £10.9 million Station Gateway project.

Chris Bentley, who owns Hornbeam Park Developments, has concerns about the legality of North Yorkshire County Council’s consultation process.

In a letter from his lawyers, Mr Bentley threatened to take the local authority to a judicial review.

The letter, which was sent to the county council, Harrogate Borough Council and West Yorkshire Combined Authority, which all support the scheme, said that the second consultation “failed to include sufficient reasons for and information upon particular proposals to allow those consulted to give intelligent consideration and an intelligent response”.

In response, the council said that it did not accept that the second consultation was unlawful.

It argued that the council proposed to undertake further consultation on the Harrogate scheme.

In response, it said:

“A further consultation can address your client’s concerns, but also provide a pragmatic resolution and avoid the costs of formal litigation.”

Mr Bentley told the Stray Ferret that he felt the council had come up with “utopian ideas” and that the plan should be shelved.

He said:

“They just keep throwing the dice until they get the right answer. I think it should be shelved.

“There is so much other stuff that the town needs.”

He added that he would still pursue a judicial review because he felt the council’s decision making process is “flawed”.

Last month, the Stray Ferret asked the county council if there had been a legal challenge against the scheme.

Karl Battersby, Corporate director of business and environmental services at the council, said there had been “no formal legal challenge in response to issues raised regarding the consultation last autumn”.

The gateway scheme is set to undergo a third round of consultation this year.

In a report, county council officers said the consultation will be held alongside the publication of traffic orders required for the scheme.

It said:

“A further consultation will commence in July alongside the publication of the draft Traffic Regulation Orders required to implement the changed highway layout. Construction is targeted for an early 2023 start.”

The gateway project includes proposals such as the pedestrianisation of part of James Street and the reduction of a section of Station Parade to single lane traffic to encourage walking and cycling.

Harrogate residents set to be asked if they want a town council

Senior county councillors are set to launch a review into whether to set up a town council in Harrogate.

Harrogate Borough Council will no longer exist from April 1 when the new unitary authority, North Yorkshire Council, is created.

It will leave both Harrogate and Scarborough as the only areas of the county with no parish authority.

North Yorkshire County Council’s executive will be recommended next week to start a community governance review, which will consult on creating a lower tier authority.

Conservative leader of the council, Cllr Carl Les, has pledged to offer more powers to parish councils when the new North Yorkshire Council comes into force as part of a ‘double devolution’ policy.

Cllr Les said:

“Parish and town councils will play a key role in representing the views and promoting the needs of communities, so it is vital we look at offering people in Harrogate and Scarborough the opportunity to give their views on whether they want town or parish councils and, if so, what these might look like.

“At this stage, no proposals would be put forward. Residents would be invited to give their views on the formation of town councils and the reasons behind them. Depending on the response, there would be a further consultation in which people would be asked to comment on detailed proposals.”

The review will include a consultation with residents in Harrogate to ask their views on creating a town council.

Senior county councillors will be recommended to approve the review at a meeting of the council’s executive on July 19.

What is a town council?

Town and parish councils run services such as community centres and play areas, as well as maintaining bus shelters. Councillors are elected to serve on them but they are not paid.

The councils can also charge a precept as part of council tax bills to fund the services provided, meaning there is a cost to the people they serve.

In the Harrogate district, there are town councils in areas such as Ripon, Knaresborough, Pateley Bridge and Kirby Hill.

Because Harrogate does not currently have a lower tier council, it also raises questions over what its boundaries would be.

County council awards £5m reorganisation contract to national firms

A £5 million North Yorkshire County Council contract handed to four national consultancy firms has been criticised as a “waste of money”.

The contract was awarded to KPMG, Price Waterhouse Coopers, PA Consulting Ltd and Capita Business Service Ltd to give support for the formation of the new unitary authority.

However, councillors have questioned why the contract has been awarded and whether money could be better spent elsewhere.

The council advertised the requirements of the contract as to provide “reorganisation support for North Yorkshire Council”.

The Stray Ferret asked the county council what the consultancy firms will be doing as part of the contract and how much each would be receiving from the £5 million.

Conservative Cllr Gareth Dadd, executive member for finance at the council, said the consultancy firms will be on hand to provide expertise and advice to ensure the new council is “safe and legal”.

Cllr Dadd added that the spend was “necessary” to ensure that taxpayers get value for money from the proposal.

He said:

“The county’s proposals for a single new council with the scale and strength to provide effective public services that are fit for the future and reflect North Yorkshire’s unique rural geography was developed using in-house expertise.

“We did not use consultants for this purpose, but drew on decades of providing nationally acclaimed services to every household in the county to a very high standard.

“However, the complexities and challenges associated with such a major programme of local government reorganisation have meant that we have experts available to help ensure that the new council is safe and legal for when it is launched next year.

“Given the importance of this opportunity, the potential savings to be made and the ultimate prize of the strongest devolution agreement for North Yorkshire and York, some consultancy spend may well be necessary to ensure our proposals do represent best value.

“Each of the four consultancy firms have been selected through an official framework established by the government and are now available if needed to help with the local government reorganisation in North Yorkshire.

“There is no commitment that they will actually be commissioned by the county council for specific projects, but their expertise is available if needed.”

Cllr Dadd added that the new council was estimated to save £260 million over the next five years by streamlining services to one authority.

‘Waste of money’

However, Cllr Stuart Parsons, of the independent group on the county council, said he felt hiring consultants was a “waste of money”.

He said:

“I’m afraid that I think commissioning “consultants” is a waste of time and money. I would rather see that £5 million go to children’s and adult social care – spent there it would actually make a real difference.

“I find that consultants are simply failed officers.”

Meanwhile, David Goode, chair of the Harrogate and Knaresborough Liberal Democrats, questioned why the contract was needed.

He said:

“It seems like a phenomenal amount of money to spend on external consultants.

“I can understand why they might need some expertise, but it begs the question of what expertise we have in the council.”

The news comes as the county council is pressing ahead with setting up the new authority

An implementation executive made up of senior councillors has been created to make decisions on what the council will look like.

The new North Yorkshire Council will come into force in April 2023 and will replace the county council and seven districts, including Harrogate Borough Council.

Sinkhole in central Harrogate causes traffic problems

A sinkhole appeared this morning outside Harrogate Convention Centre on King’s Road.

Police and highways staff from North Yorkshire County Council have been on site ensuring vehicles and bikes can pass safely.

But the hole, which is about 50cm wide and a metre deep, is causing some delays in the area.

Traffic turning left at the end of Ripon Ripon is particularly affected.

The hole is in the right hand lane of King’s Road heading out of town so traffic is able to pass in the inside lane.

Harrogate sinkhole

The hole could take a few days to repair.

The Stray Ferret has asked North Yorkshire County Council for further details.

There were delays on the same stretch of road last week when a lorry broke down.

North Yorkshire County Council finally declares climate emergency

A council which has repeatedly been challenged over the speed and scale of its carbon-cutting actions has made a U-turn to declare a climate change emergency.

North Yorkshire County Council’s executive agreed the authority would immediately adopt a climate emergency, following in the footsteps of several hundred British councils.

Senior councillors said the significant change in position by the Conservative administration had followed it listening to the requests of elected members from a number of political groups.

They added that not declaring a climate emergency could prove a distraction from its significant green efforts.

Commitments made by the council include support for the York and North Yorkshire Local Enterprise Partnership’s ambition to be the UK’s first carbon negative region – carbon neutral by 2034 and carbon negative by 2040.

These ambitions have been endorsed by the leaders of the Councils of York and North Yorkshire in the devolution deal requests submitted to government in December 2020.

An independent commission set up to examine levelling up for rural communities in the county last year found tackling climate change should be a priority, backing other ambitions for North Yorkshire to become a ‘green lung’ and to lead on employment in the green economy and a revolutionary energy transition.

In addition, the authority, which is the region’s largest employer, has sought to change staff work bases to cut commuting emissions and has made a £1m pump-priming fund available to support new carbon cutting projects, with just under half of the fund already allocated.

Harrogate acted in 2019

Nevertheless, neighbouring councils in Leeds, Darlington and York, as well as district and borough councils in North Yorkshire declared a climate emergency in 2019.

At the time North Yorkshire County Council stopped short of doing so, instead committing to producing a carbon reduction plan.

Since then, and particularly following May’s elections, North Yorkshire council’s leadership has faced increasing numbers of requests from campaigners and councillors to formally declare a climate emergency.

A meeting of the council’s executive heard the authority’s leadership was “absolutely committed” to getting its own carbon emissions in order.

Councillor Greg White, climate change executive member, told the meeting the authority was “keen to affirm how serious we are about tackling climate change” by declaring a climate emergency and pledging to play its full part in cutting carbon emissions.

He said the authority was doing everything possible to reduce its emissions and meet a challenging net zero emissions target it had set for 2030 while protecting key services.

‘Proud that we acted’

The council’s deputy leader, Councillor Gareth Dadd, told the meeting significant carbon cutting progress had been made across the council’s many properties and workforce.

He said:

“It’s often said that actions speak louder than words. Well I think as an authority we can be very proud that we have acted in a very positive way after recognising the climate emergency two or three years ago.”

Following the meeting, Cllr White said the authority had previously been reluctant to declare a climate emergency as it could be viewed as putting words above actions.

He said the council was already undertaking most measures people associated with tackling the climate change emergency.

Decision on North Yorkshire second homes council tax premium delayed

A proposal to double council tax on second homes has been postponed to enable an investigation into whether residents with more than one property could easily swerve paying the extra charge.

North Yorkshire County Council’s executive agreed to delay considering a policy to charge a 100% premium on second homes so that the potential £14 million windfall the authority believes it could generate from April 2024 could become part of its budget decisions.

The move is part of the authority’s response to a surge in people following the pandemic buying holiday homes in the tourism destination county, increasing demand for housing and prices so that local families cannot afford to stay in the communities.

The proposal to be ready to levy the extra tax should expected government legislation be approved has been warmly some councillors as a “statement of intent” by the council.

Some councillors saw it as the authority getting to grips with the escalating issue which has already seen some villages, particularly in the Yorkshire Dales and coastal areas, compared to ghost towns for much of the year.

The council’s officers have highlighted that although uncertainty surrounds possible loopholes in the forthcoming government legislation, a law to apply a 100% premium on second homes was introduced in Wales in 2017/18 which last year was paid on more than 23,000 properties there.

However, critics have claimed the premium could even lead to council tax receipts falling as second home owners could simply transfer the property to being a holiday cottage business or swap the named owner’s details for someone who does not own property.

A meeting of the executive heard given that council tax rates for second homes mirror those of main residences there may also be issues that need resolving with how properties are classified for council tax.

Executive member for finance Cllr Gareth Dadd told the meeting the authority was not “going soft” on the policy before it was adopted, but it wanted certainty that second home owners could not use loopholes, undermining what the authority wanted to achieve.

Nevertheless, the executive did approve following other councils in North Yorkshire in introducing the maximum permitted council tax premiums on empty properties.

Councillors heard the introduction of council tax premiums on empty properties in Ryedale had been successful in bringing properties back into use.

Properties that are left unoccupied and substantially unfurnished for two years or more, will have to pay 100% extra council from April, while those with properties that have been empty for 10 years or more, will have to pay three times their main residence council tax bill.

Cllr Yvonne Peacock, who has spearheaded a high-profile campaign to stop the exodus of young families from the Yorkshire Dales, told the meeting she was delighted by the move as run-down empty properties ruined the appearance of villages.

She said:

“I’m sorry, I have no sympathy. If you cannot afford to do it up then you must put it on the market and let somebody buy it and they can do it up.”

793 Harrogate district second-home owners face double council tax charge

About 800 second-home owners in the Harrogate district could be hit by double council tax charges under proposals to tackle the affordable housing crisis.

North Yorkshire County Council has proposed the 100% premium on council tax bills for all second homes in the county from April 2024.

Official figures show there were 793 second homes in Harrogate last year and the county council said these could generate an extra £1.5 million a year to fund services and affordable housing schemes.

Across North Yorkshire, the tax hike could create around £14 million annually, the county council added.

Cllr Carl Les, leader of the county council, described second homes as a “major issue” for areas across the country and said the proposals for North Yorkshire would depend on the government passing legislation in the coming months.

He said:

“The county is a wonderful place to live and visit, and that has seen the trend towards people wanting to purchase a property either as a second home or a holiday let.

“Any proposed premium on second home owners will be carefully considered and debated by the council before the new legislation is introduced.

“But the revenue generated would prove to be a key source of funding to help to bridge the new council’s budgets and finance vital areas such as homelessness costs and also providing more affordable housing.”

The proposal has also been welcomed by councillor Pat Marsh, leader of Harrogate and Knaresborough’s Liberal Democrats, who said holiday hotspots were in danger of “becoming ghost towns” because of second homes.

She said:

“Villages in these desirable areas, in particular, suffer from the viability of not just shops and pubs, but also schools and in some areas the impact is also felt through losses of GPs and other NHS services.

“That is why the Lib Dems welcome the proposal to charge a council tax premium on second homes.

“Residents of these largely rural communities are finding it increasingly difficult to get onto the property ladder because of huge demand for holiday homes pushing up the overall price of property out of their reach.

“In some extreme areas this has created resentment and bitterness as locals cannot afford to buy property in their own communities.”

The number of second homes in Harrogate has increased by more than 13% over the last decade and it has been argued the problem puts a strain on an already limited housing stock at a time when high house prices are driving low-income earners out of the district.

Yet the proposed tax hike has been met with opposition from some politicians who fear it could devalue homes and undermine businesses which depend on second home owners.

There are also concerns it could lead to second home owners transferring their properties to holiday lets to qualify for discounted business rates.

Cllr Stuart Parsons, leader of the Independent group on the county council, described the move as “one of the stupidest suggestions the Tories have ever come up with”.

He told the Local Democracy Reporting Service the proposals would cause more harm than good as there would be “so many loopholes people could dodge out of paying the premium as they wish”.

Other local politicians have also claimed some areas of the county are suffering more due to holiday lets than second homes.

Read more:

Read more:

Stray land

Read more:

Read more:

Read more:

What is a town council?

‘Waste of money’

Read more:

Read more:

Harrogate acted in 2019

Read more:

‘Proud that we acted’

Read more:

Read more: