Knaresborough Civic Society has objected to the borough council’s proposals for a new leisure centre saying it isn’t future proof or in-keeping with the town’s heritage.

The chair of Knaresborough Civic Society, Bill Rigby, has said the current plans don’t acknowledge the climate crisis and criticises the council for choosing to tear down a building rather than adapting it.

He said the civic society is unanimous in its opinion that the current building could be re-developed to suit the town’s growing population.

Mr Rigby added that the civic society supports the investment and provision of a new leisure centre but said it was important for the group to ensure it is future proof for the next generation:

“In the present climate, especially following COP26, I don’t think we’ve been strategic with these plans or addressed the environmental impact. Surely we should be rebuilding rather than destroying? In terms of the economics it would be much cheaper too.”

The Civic Society’s concerns

In its official objection response to Harrogate Borough Council in regards to the plans the society said:

• Is there is a recognised need for any expansion of the existing swimming pool. What evidence by way or research or public consultation or survey exists to establish that there is such a need?
• Does the pool need to be expanded from four to six lanes or can the opening hours be increased?
• We are not satisfied that the council has investigated properly the much cheaper and less disruptive alternative of renewing the services within the existing structure which is only 30 years old and has recently been refurbished.
• Concerns over the loss of the safely ensconced playground and the felling of 21 mature trees
• Looks like an industrial warehouse
• We believe that this proposal will also not meet the environmental and climate saving credentials of the Council.

Read more:

• Council accused of ‘trophy investment’ for £9m purchase of Harrogate’s Royal Baths
• Eco-development could be catalyst for green housing in Harrogate district

Alternative plan

The civic society said it had seen a new set of plans produced by local architects on behalf of the community which aim to be sustainable and use the current building as its base.

The alternative plans

One of the people involved in the group putting forward the plans is David Hull who set up the NotOff group to protect Fsyche Field from development.

He said the plans are on behalf of a group of locals to offer an alternative proposal that is “cheaper, greener and far less environmental destructive”.

The society’s plans are being offered to Harrogate Borough Council as an alternative option.

The leader of a Knaresborough group fighting to stop a new swimming pool being built on a green field has described the plans as “environmental vandalism of the highest order”.

David Hull set up Not on Fysche Field (Not Off) when Harrogate Borough Council proposed a new Knaresborough leisure centre and suggested it could be built on the park alongside the current site.

Mr Hull handed in a 600-name petition to the council last night opposing the plans and read a strongly worded statement.

He said:

“This proposal to build on Fysche field park has been a complete shambles from day one.

“Harrogate Borough Council have behaved in a totally selfish and arrogant fashion by deliberately withholding information and not being honest with the public.

“The people are speaking and need to be heard. They don’t want or need this environmentally destructive development on Fysche field.

“Building a brand new pool right next to a perfectly functioning one is environmental vandalism of the highest accord.”

Mr Hull’s petition calls for any new leisure centre to be built on the existing footprint rather than moving it onto the green field adjacent.

The council’s current favoured plan is to build the new leisure centre on the play area to the side of the leisure centre rather than the green space. But the threat to the park remains.

Read more:

• Call to ban animal testing in Harrogate district rejected
• Homes England ‘frustrated’ by delays to 200-home scheme at Police Training Centre

During his presentation last night, Mr Hull read comments from individuals who he said supported the campaign. One questioned whether councillors were “getting rich” from this development.

This drew a strong rebuke from council leader Richard Cooper, who said councillors shouldn’t be “slighted or demeaned” in this way.

Speaking to the Stray Ferret today, Mr Hull said:

“We wanted to demonstrate that the community is not saying no to the development. We support a sensitive development but it needs to be sympathetic to the local area.”

Mr Hull added that greater transparency from the council would stop people holding so many negative opinions.