The leader of North Yorkshire County Council has defended its decision to support the government’s doomed investment zones.
The council submitted expressions of interest to create 11 zones, including three in the Harrogate district at junction 47 of the A1 near Knaresborough, business park Potter Space Ripon at junction 50 of the A1 and Harrogate Convention Centre.
The zones, which were a key policy under former Prime Minister Liz Truss’ administration, were supposed to benefit from tax incentives and liberalised planning regulations.
But some environmental groups expressed concerns about their potential impact on nature and the landscape.
Chancellor Jeremy Hunt announced in his autumn statement the scheme would be focused towards research and the council’s proposals would no longer be taken forward.
Cllr Carl Les, leader of North Yorkshire County Council, said the authority remained “committed” to economic growth in the county despite the decision.
He said:
“We understood when making our submission that the investment zones proposal was at a very early stage and that there were no guarantees.
“However, we are committed to seeking opportunities to support sustainable growth whenever possible, so we believed there was value in presenting an expression of interest relating to suitable sites around North Yorkshire. These sites were selected following discussions with colleagues in district and borough councils.
“All the sites put forward for consideration are locations that have already been earmarked for commercial development to support business growth and job creation. While the proposed benefits of investment zones may have been attractive to new businesses, we will continue to work with our partners to support economic growth across the county.
“In Harrogate, the convention centre is the subject of a bid to the government’s Levelling-Up Fund. We hope to learn the outcome of this bid shortly.”
Read more:
- Council explores move to protect Harrogate Convention Centre with limited company status
- Working group set up to steer future of Harrogate Convention Centre
- What now for Harrogate Convention Centre after investment zones dropped?
Investment zones ‘won’t harm environment’, claims Andrew Jones MP
Harrogate and Knaresborough Conservative MP Andrew Jones has rejected claims that investment zones could harm the environment.
North Yorkshire County Council revealed last week it had submitted expressions of interest to the government to create investment zones at three Harrogate district sites.
They are Harrogate Convention Centre, junction 47 of the A1 and Potter Space Ripon, a business park at Junction 50 of the A1.
The zones will benefit from liberalised planning laws and tax incentives for businesses, which has sparked concerns from environmental groups such as the Wildlife Trusts that they will put wildlife and wild spaces at risk.
But Mr Jones told the House of Commons this week:
“These are sites where we have existing commercial activity which were already earmarked for further investment. Investment zones give us the opportunity to lever in funding from the government.
“I understand that individuals and some groups were concerned that the new investment zones would see the development of huge swathes of countryside. I would not have supported their introduction were that the case.
“But it is clear from the sites that are being brought forward that this is far from the case”
Read more:
- Revealed: the three Harrogate district sites that could become investment zones
- Andrew Jones MP launches ‘non-political’ fact-checking service
Green Party rejects Mr Jones’ claims

Paul Ko Ferrigno
But Harrogate and District Green Party prospective parliamentary candidate Paul Ko Ferrigno criticised Mr Jones’ stance.
“Like his government, Mr Jones has had 12 long years to establish his green credentials, and it is on that track record that he must be judged, not some aspirational scheme that has been rushed in so quickly that councillors have not been given time to scrutinise the detail.
“It isn’t even clear that these investment zones are needed because we haven’t been told which regulations are potentially holding schemes back.”
Business support
Lilla Bathurst, manager of Ripon Business Improvement District, backed the county council’s submission. She said:
“Whilst the Potter Space is outside the Ripon BID area, we welcome any investment into the Ripon city region.
“The potential for more businesses and employment in the area, and therefore further footfall and spend in our BID businesses, can only be a positive and we fully support Cllr Carl Les and North Yorkshire County Council in their submission.”
However, the North Yorkshire branch of Unison took a different view:
We share the concerns of @WildlifeTrusts, and our branch committee has voted unanimously to oppose #InvestmentZones and we arw asking @northyorkscc to withdraw its interest.@AJonesMP @nadams @JulianSmithUK @JulianSturdy @RishiSunak @kevinhollinrake
@ChrisGPackham https://t.co/3oHgEsdb3u
— North Yorkshire UNISON (@NYUnison) October 15, 2022
Revealed: the three Harrogate district sites that could become investment zones
North Yorkshire County Council revealed today it has selected three possible sites in the Harrogate district to become investment zones.
The sites are: junction 47 of the A1; Potter Space Ripon, a business park at Junction 50 of the A1 and Harrogate Convention Centre.
The government has said the zones, which will receive liberalised planning laws and tax incentives for businesses, will support business and economic growth.
But they have been criticised by conservation organisations because of the potential impact on wildlife.
Last month, North Yorkshire County Council was named as one of 38 local authorities in talks with the government over creating investment zones.
Today, the county council named the 12 commercial sites it had identified for possible zones in North Yorkshire.
Read more:
- Harrogate district planning rules could be ‘radically streamlined’
- Harrogate Convention Centre ‘could lose £250 million without investment’
Of the seven districts within the county, only Selby, where five sites have been identified, has more locations than the Harrogate district.

Carl Les
Carl Les, the Conservative leader of the county council, said:
“We are at a very early stage in the process, but this could be an exciting and welcome initiative that would enable us to work with the government to deliver benefits for the North Yorkshire economy.
“Following discussions with our district council colleagues, we are submitting an expression of interest. This identifies a number of sites across the county that we feel fit the criteria from government. We look forward to further negotiations with Government following our submission.”
Full list of sites in North Yorkshire
The sites identified in the expression of interest are:
- Hambleton: Dalton, at Junction 49 on the A1.
- Harrogate: Harrogate, at Junction 47 of the A1; Potter Space Ripon, at Junction 50 of the A1; Harrogate Convention Centre.
- Richmondshire: the area around A1 Junctions 52 and 53.
- Ryedale: Eden Camp East, Malton.
- Scarborough: Scarborough Business Park.
- Selby: Gascoigne Wood Rail Interchange, Olympia Park, and sites at Eggborough, Kellingley and Sherburn.
Cllr Les said:
“The sites we are putting forward for consideration are locations that have already been earmarked for commercial development to support business growth and job creation. The proposed benefits of investment zones could help to make these sites even more attractive to new businesses and accelerate development ambitions.
“We are fully aware of the need to minimise any environmental impacts, so all the sites we are putting forward have been selected in accordance with local planning and conservation policy. None are sensitive or protected sites.”
Proposed sites must meet the Government’s criteria to offer a significant economic opportunity, be ready to deliver quickly and align with the wider local strategy.
Once the government has received the expressions of interest from invited authorities, further criteria will influence site selection, including consideration of the overall geographic distribution of investment zones, the balance between residential and commercial, and urban and rural sites and the readiness to deliver.