Subscribe to trusted local news
In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.
- Subscription costs less than £1 a week with an annual plan.
Already a subscriber? Log in here.
16
Feb 2022
£1.4m Georgian house owner threatens legal action over Ripon homes
The owner of a £1.4 million Georgian house in Ripon has warned Harrogate Borough Council it could face legal action as the authority passed plans for 30 homes nearby.
James Mortimer said “significant harm” would be caused to his Grade II-listed Prospect House as a result of the housing plans for land off Springfield Close.
He also criticised the designs from developers Newett Homes and said he believed there was an “error of law” in a council report that could lead to a judicial review.
Mr Mortimer told a council planning meeting on Tuesday:
Prospect House is listed for its special architectural or historic interest, which includes its use as an officers’ mess for soldiers en route to the Somme during the First World War.
Read More:
- Calls to relocate litter bins in Ripon
- Ripon padel tennis courts given the go-ahead
- 390 homes approved in Ripon despite concerns over impact on Fountains Abbey
Mr Mortimer complained that the housing development would be in “full view” from the rear of the five-bedroom property which dates back to 1835 and sits around 120 metres away from the site.
Screening concerns
His complaints were backed up by Ripon councillor Sid Hawke who said trees between the two sites would provide little screening.
Cllr Hawke said:
An agent for Newett Homes told councillors that several changes had been made to the plans since they were refused in June 2020.
This included a reduction in the number of homes from 38 to 30 and design changes such as imitation chimneys to try to make the development in keeping with the area.
The agent also said the homes were repositioned to reduce the impact on Prospect House “as much as feasibly possible”.
The plans were approved by councillors with nine votes for and one against.
0