Thank you for your interest in this story
To continue reading this article, subscribe to the Stray Ferret for as little as £1 a week
Already a subscriber? Log in here.
11
Jun 2023
Concerns over 'undemocratic' planning meeting on Knox Lane houses
Questions have been raised over whether the planning process is democratic after a controversial housing application in Harrogate was deferred for a third time.
The 53-home proposal for Knox Lane was discussed at a planning committee meeting at the end of May, but councillors were told this week that residents were unhappy about the way it had been conducted.
The plans were recommended for approval, but councillors did not follow planning officers' advice.
Instead they voted to defer it again because the developer, Jomast, had not carried out the land contamination report requested at the last meeting.
This week, nearby resident Adele Laura Wilson asked North Yorkshire Council's Harrogate and Knaresborough area constituency committee why the report had been brought to the planning committee again by officers when the requested information was still not available.
She also said a motion was put forward at the meeting to reject the application, but officers advised them they needed to have planning reasons for turning the plans down otherwise the decision would be overturned at appeal, with costs to the council.
Ms Wilson added:
She also said incorrect information was given to the committee about the site, which an officer said was only partially in a special landscape area (SLA). The whole site was in fact part of the SLA, Ms Wilson said, but there was no opportunity for this to be corrected during the planning meeting.
She said:
Read more:
- Controversial Knox Lane 53-homes plan deferred for third time
- Plans approved for Kingsley Road and Tesco — but Knox Lane decision deferred
Resident Alison Hayward said she was addressing Thursday's area constituency committee on behalf of residents in Knox and Bilton, who were "extremely disappointed and outraged" by the situation.
Ms Hayward said:
She said the meeting had been held during the half-term holidays, when fewer local people were available to attend.
Ms Hayward also raised concerns about the fact the planning meeting had not been streamed live, as it would usually be, because of "technical problems" on the day. She said this meant there was no "proper record" of the meeting, as the minutes did not record everything discussed.
In a statement read by clerk Mark Codman, NYC's legal, planning and democratic services departments responded:
The statement said there was no legal requirement for a meeting to be recorded and minutes were never verbatim. Live streaming was only introduced in Harrogate during the covid pandemic, and was not used for all meetings across North Yorkshire.
The statement also said:
0