Subscribe to trusted local news
If you are accessing this story via Facebook but you are a subscriber then you will be unable to access the story. Facebook wants you to stay and read in the app and your login details are not shared with Facebook. If you experience problems with accessing the news but have subscribed, please contact subscriptions@thestrayferret.co.uk. In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.
- Subscription costs less than £1 a week with an annual plan.
Already a subscriber? Log in here.
13
Oct 2020
District MPs vote against food safety amendment
Harrogate district Conservative MPs Andrew Jones, Julian Smith, and Nigel Adams voted against an amendment to the Agriculture Bill yesterday that would have forced any future trade deal to meet UK food safety and animal welfare requirements.
The government said the amendment was not needed as it had already committed to ensuring UK food standards would be retained in any post-Brexit trade deals.
MPs voted by 332 votes to 279 to reject the House of Lords amendment. Former Harrogate councillor and current York Outer MP Julian Sturdy was one of 14 Tory rebels who voted against the government.
The bill will now return to the Lords.
Harrogate and Knaresborough Liberal Democrat parliamentary spokesperson Judith Rogerson accused Andrew Jones of "selling out" farmers.
She said:
Read more:
- MPs WATCH: Care home visits, the Brexit bill and a visit to Ripon Cathedral
- Harrogate district MPs vote as Brexit bill clears Commons
Farming minister Victoria Prentis told the Commons the government was "absolutely committed to high standards".
Last week, protestors met outside Mr Jones' constituency office in Harrogate urging him to vote down the amendment.
Philip Knight, who attended the protest, told the Stray Ferret he was worried the bill would lead to lower food standards in post-Brexit trade deals:
The Stray Ferret asked Mr Jones, Mr Smith, and Mr Adams for comment but none had responded at the time of publication.
0