This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities...
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
    • Politics
    • Transport
    • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Education
    • Sport
    • Harrogate
    • Ripon
    • Knaresborough
    • Boroughbridge
    • Pateley Bridge
    • Masham
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Latest Jobs
  • Podcasts

Interested in advertising with us?

Advertise with us

  • News & Features
  • Your Area
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Latest Jobs
  • Podcasts
  • Politics
  • Transport
  • Lifestyle
  • Community
  • Business
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Education
  • Sport
Advertise with us
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Latest News

We want to hear from you

Tell us your opinions and views on what we cover

Contact us
Connect with us
  • About us
  • Advertise your job
  • Correction and complaints
Download on App StoreDownload on Google Play Store
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Comments Participation T&Cs
Trust In Journalism

Copyright © 2020 The Stray Ferret Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Site by Show + Tell

Subscribe to trusted local news

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

  • Subscription costs less than £1 a week with an annual plan.

Already a subscriber? Log in here.

16

Aug 2022

Last Updated: 15/08/2022
Environment
Environment

170-home plan 'not right' for Knaresborough, says town councillor

by Calvin Robinson

| 16 Aug, 2022
Comment

0

A Knaresborough town councillor says the area has 'done its bit' to increase housing stock in the Harrogate district.

waterlaneknaresborough

A 170-home development in Knaresborough which was rejected by the government “was not right” for the town, says a local councillor.

Planning inspector Chris Baxter refused the proposal, which was earmarked for Water Lane in the town.

The decision is the latest refusal for landowner Geoffrey Holland, who has twice sought permission from Harrogate Borough Council to build on the site.

Cllr Andy Bell, a Liberal Democrat who sits on Knaresborough Town Council, said the town had already “done its bit” to increase housing stock.

He said:

“I was pleased to speak against this development both at Harrogate Borough Council planning and at the appeal in front of the Planning Inspector.  
“This development is not right for the town, and wider than that Knaresborough has done its bit to increase the area's housing stock without a comparable improvement in infrastructure.  
“It’s impossible to get a NHS dentist in Knaresborough already.”


Following its latest rejection in August 2021, Cunnane Town Planning took the council's decision to appeal on behalf of Mr Holland.

It said that there were “no significant or demonstrable adverse impacts that would arise as a consequence of the development”.




Read more:



  • Government rejects plans to build 170 homes in Knaresborough

  • Knaresborough pub co-founder leaves after two years






However, the borough council said the scheme had a number of “fundamental” issues.

In his decision notice, Mr Baxter dismissed the developer’s appeal on the grounds that the plan was outside the development boundary and would still have “significant harm” on surrounding areas.

Mr Baxter acknowledged that the scheme had “adequate affordable housing” and would not have an impact on highways safety, but added that it still had issues.

He said in a decision notice published last week:

“The proposal would not have a detrimental effect on highway safety and adequate affordable housing would be provided within the scheme. 
“However, these matters and the benefits described above would not outweigh the significant harm I have identified with regards to the effect on the surrounding area and future users.”