To continue reading this article, subscribe to the Stray Ferret for as little as £1 a week
Already a subscriber? Log in here.
10
Mar 2023
A coach company based in Boroughbridge will have to pay more than £30,000 after a tribunal found it had harassed an employee who had Asperger's syndrome.
A hearing at Leeds Employment Tribunal heard Thomas Holland was also subjected to direct discrimination, victimisation and unauthorised deductions from his pay while he worked for A&A Coach Travel, which provides private hire and school transport services.
The tribunal heard Mr Holland had been called "special needs", an "illiterate cretin", and an "imbecile", as well as other offensive terms for people with disabilities, by A&A employee James Fairchild in group chats between all staff.
There were further messages from other employees, shown to the tribunal by Mr Holland, and he said he was also subjected to face-to-face abuse while at work.
A report from the tribunal said:
However, the problems came to a head in November 2020, when his car was damaged while in the company's car park. He was told another employee had reversed into it but, when he reported it to transport manager Antoni La Pilusa, Mr Holland found he was "not interested".
Mr Holland said he was then put under pressure not to pursue an insurance claim for the damage, and that Mr La Pilusa threatened to dismiss him if he did.
The tribunal report said:
When Mr Holland's father, Robert, heard what had happened, he helped his son to write a resignation email. He asked for outstanding wages of £576 to be paid.
The company claimed it was deducting the money from his pay to cover damage done to its vehicles while he was driving them. However, the tribunal found there was no evidence that Mr Holland caused any of the damage to the vehicles.
Defending A&A Coach Travel at the tribunal, James Fairchild asked Mr Holland why he had not reported the abusive messages to his managers.
Mr Holland said all the company directors and managers had seen the group chat, and he did not want to risk his job by creating problems.
Mr Fairchild told the tribunal Mr Holland had himself been "involved in banter disparaging of others (particularly women)" but he did not provide any evidence of this.
The tribunal heard further claims that Mr Holland had damaged other vehicles, but was again not given any evidence.
0