This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities...
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
    • Politics
    • Transport
    • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Education
    • Sport
    • Harrogate
    • Ripon
    • Knaresborough
    • Boroughbridge
    • Pateley Bridge
    • Masham
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Latest Jobs
  • Podcasts

Interested in advertising with us?

Advertise with us

  • News & Features
  • Your Area
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Latest Jobs
  • Podcasts
  • Politics
  • Transport
  • Lifestyle
  • Community
  • Business
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Education
  • Sport
Advertise with us
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Latest News

We want to hear from you

Tell us your opinions and views on what we cover

Contact us
Connect with us
  • About us
  • Advertise your job
  • Correction and complaints
Download on App StoreDownload on Google Play Store
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Comments Participation T&Cs
Trust In Journalism

Copyright © 2020 The Stray Ferret Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Site by Show + Tell

Subscribe to trusted local news

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

  • Subscription costs less than £1 a week with an annual plan.

Already a subscriber? Log in here.

01

Oct 2021

Last Updated: 01/10/2021
Politics
Politics

Harrogate council criticised for approving Pannal "skyscraper"

by Tamsin O'Brien

| 01 Oct, 2021
Comment

0

Harrogate’s MP and residents have criticised the borough council for its “mistake” in approving plans for a controversial apartment block on the former Dunlopillo site in Pannal without a vote from councillors.

0-1-4

Harrogate’s MP and residents have criticised the borough council for its “mistake” in approving plans for a controversial apartment block without a vote from councillors.

The plans to demolish the derelict Dunlopillo office building in Pannal to make way for a six-storey apartment block were this week approved at officer level and under rules called permitted development rights despite calls for an emergency meeting.

The decision not to call members of Harrogate Borough Council’s planning committee together for a vote has been criticised as “very wrong”.

However, the council has hit back saying it must follow rules under permitted development rights and that the calls for an emergency meeting were made too late.

A council spokesperson said:

“Proposals received under permitted development are different to applications made to us under the Planning Act.
“We receive notification from the developer and then have 56 days to check the submission and assess it. If we do not determine the application within 56 days, the proposal is deemed to have been given consent.
“In this instance, the request to consider the application was made too close to the target date to enable an emergency planning committee meeting to be arranged.”


Permitted development rights were introduced by the government to fast-track the conversion of empty buildings into homes. However, there have been criticisms over how much of a say residents and councillors have in the process.

Harrogate MP Andrew Jones previously said the Dunlopillo plans should not have been lodged under these rules and has now criticised the council for its “mistake” in approving the development in this way.

He said:

“Over the past eleven years as our area’s MP I have been extremely supportive of our local councils. I do think though in this instance the council has made a mistake in not putting this application before planning committee.
“The outcome may well have been the same; it may not.  That is not a matter for me but for elected members.
“It would though have given council officers the opportunity to demonstrate to councillors and the public the reasoning behind the decision they made.
“Whatever the outcome, surely this would have been a better way to deal with this particular application?”






Read More:



  • Pannal residents ‘erupt in fury’ at Dunlopillo housing plans

  • Controversial Dunlopillo apartment plan approved










The plans from Otley-based Quattro Property Group include 48 flats for the Station Road site which has sat empty since Dunlopillo – which made pillows and mattresses – moved out in 2008.

The apartments will be split into two blocks – one with four storeys and another with six – and residents are fearful that the development will have a major visual impact on the area which has no other buildings of this type.

Resident Anne Smith said:

“We are going to be stuck with this skyscraper-type building. I honestly don’t know what Harrogate Borough Council are doing because there has been a lot of opposition to this.
“It would have been far fairer for the plans to have gone before councillors.
“We are extremely disappointed that this didn’t happen – this is all very wrong.”