Interested in advertising with us?

Advertise with us

Subscribe to trusted local news

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

  • Subscription costs less than £1 a week with an annual plan.

Already a subscriber? Log in here.

04

Aug 2021

Last Updated: 03/08/2021
Environment
Environment

Kingsley Drive residents to 'remain vigilant' despite 217-home rejection

by Calvin Robinson

| 04 Aug, 2021
Comment

0

Residents on Harrogate's Kingsley Drive say they will remain vigilant despite Harrogate Borough Council rejecting a controversial plan for 217 homes in the area. Councillors unanimously refused the proposal from Persimmon Homes yesterday.

kingsley-drive
Residents on Kingsley Drive who objected to a 217 home plan next to their homes.

Residents on Harrogate’s Kingsley Drive say they will “remain vigilant” despite a controversial 217 home plan in the area being rejected.

Councillors on Harrogate Borough Council's planning committee unanimously voted to refuse the proposal from Persimmon Homes yesterday after council officers said it was unacceptable.

The council received 388 objections to the scheme and no responses in favour.

The Kingsley ward area will eventually see more than 600 homes built, including developments at Granby Farm and 149 homes on Kingsley Road.

However, despite the refusal, residents have said they intend to keep an eye on the proposal in case it is appealed.



John Hansard, who lives in the area, told the Stray Ferret that the refusal was a “good result” but added that locals were well aware that the plan could come back.

Mr Hansard pointed to the Planning Inspectorate's decision to approve 149 homes on Kingsley Road back in March, despite the borough council refusing the plan, as an example.

He said:

“It was a good result and I am pleased about that. It does give us a bit of breathing space.
“My only concern is that they [the developer] will appeal. I think that we need to look into that.
“I think we need to remain vigilant.”





Read more:






Meanwhile, Catherine Maguire, another resident on Kingsley Drive, said the result left her with mixed emotions.

She said the news was “positive” for the area, but added that there was further to go in opposing the scheme.

Ms Maguire said:

“It’s good to have some positive news, but I have mixed emotions and there is a long road ahead.
“You never know what a planning inspector will say. But I feel more confident this time, because there are too many issues with the site.”


Chris Watt, who spoke on behalf of Kingsley Ward Action Group at the meeting, said he was delighted that councillors sided with residents.

He told the Stray Ferret:

"I'm delighted that councillors listened to local residents and rejected this terrible proposal.
"The area is already suffering from heavy construction traffic from early in the morning and another massive housing project in an already over developed area would only make matters worse and add to congestion and pollution.
"It was telling how scathing councillors were about the proposals and it shows the power that local people can have."


Officer and councillor concerns


Ahead of refusing the proposal, council officers said the application was “not considered acceptable”.

Although the site is allocated for housing under the council’s Harrogate district Local Plan 2014-35, which outlines development in the district until 2035, officers had concerns about overdevelopment and inadequate information on surface water drainage and noise.

Authority officials also said in a report that the number of homes on the site was above the 173 allocated in the local plan.

The application, when combined with the nearby Stonebridge Homes development, would have seen a total of 313 houses built if it had been approved.

Meanwhile, Cllr Nigel Middlemass, ward member for Kinglsey, told the council’s planning committee that the development had not been thought through.

He said:

“This is the biggest and worst thought out [housing site] in the area. It is far too intensive and well above the numbers in the local plan.”


Paul Butler, agent for Persimmon Homes, requested that the committee defer the application so that the council and developer could work on the design and layout of the scheme.

However, the council’s planning committee voted unanimously to reject the scheme.