This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities...
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
    • Politics
    • Transport
    • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Education
    • Sport
    • Harrogate
    • Ripon
    • Knaresborough
    • Boroughbridge
    • Pateley Bridge
    • Masham
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Newsletter
  • Podcasts

Interested in advertising with us?

Advertise with us

  • News & Features
  • Your Area
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Newsletter
  • Podcasts
  • Politics
  • Transport
  • Lifestyle
  • Community
  • Business
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Education
  • Sport
Advertise with us
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Latest News

We want to hear from you

Tell us your opinions and views on what we cover

Contact us

Register for our newsletter

Free Newsletter Sign Up

Join now
Connect with us
  • About us
  • Correction and complaints
Download on App StoreDownload on Google Play Store
  • Website Terms & Conditions
  • Subscription Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Comments Participation T&Cs
Trust In Journalism

Copyright © 2020 The Stray Ferret Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Site by Show + Tell

Subscribe to trusted local news

If you are accessing this story via Facebook but you are a subscriber then you will be unable to access the story. Facebook wants you to stay and read in the app and your login details are not shared with Facebook. If you experience problems with accessing the news but have subscribed, please contact subscriptions@thestrayferret.co.uk. In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

  • Subscription costs less than £1 a week with an annual plan.

Already a subscriber? Log in here.

08

May

Last Updated: 07/05/2026
Transport
Transport

Pothole payouts fuel concerns about state of Harrogate district roads

by John Plummer

| 08 May, 2026
Comment

0

mixcollage-07-may-2026-04-38-pm-958
Chamber chief executive Martin Mann and potholes in Sharow.

New figures obtained by the Stray Ferret have revealed North Yorkshire Council pays out more in pothole claims on roads in the Harrogate district than everywhere else combined.

We submitted a freedom of information request to the council asking how many insurance claims it has received over the last five years for vehicles damaged by the state of the road surface.

We also asked how much the local authority, which is responsible for highways, has paid out.

To get a comparison, we asked for the figures to be broken down into the council's seven highways areas, which are: Richmond, Thirsk, Whitby, Pickering, Skipton, Boroughbridge and Selby.

Boroughbridge, where the council’s Area 6 highways team is based, covers the former Harrogate district, which includes Harrogate, Ripon, Knaresborough, Pateley Bridge, Boroughbridge and Masham.

The figures reveal there were 442 insurance claims for damage on Harrogate district roads from 2021 to 2025. The total for the other six areas combined was 462.

The amount paid out for claims in the Harrogate district over the same period was £48,013, compared with £33,107 for the other six areas combined, which is 45% higher.

Just £1,835 was paid out in Richmond, where only 54 claims were made. The next highest after the Harrogate district was Thirsk, where 122 claims led to payouts of £13,838.

The council said it disagreed with the suggestion that roads in the Harrogate district were worse than everywhere else and the figures were explained by the area being “the most urban in the county”.

According to figures on the council’s website, North Yorkshire had a population of 604,900 in 2016. Harrogate has 75,070 residents and Scarborough 52,100.

Martin Mann, chief executive of Harrogate District Chamber of Commerce, expressed concerns that the state of roads in the Harrogate district was damaging businesses.

Mr Mann said:

Whilst we understand that Harrogate is a more urban area than most, we are still very aware of the infrastructure requiring more maintenance and repairs appear to be few and far between.

It is also concerning that both the Victoria Avenue £1 million investment is still awaiting the ‘snaggings’ to be completed over six months after completion, and the new crossing on Wetherby Road has already been patched.

What do you think? Use the comment section below to give your views.

StarHarrogate congestion to be reduced at the cost of short-term disruption on main roadStarAfter all the argument - should Harrogate Station Gateway go ahead? Vote nowStarNew road at Kex Gill delayed yet again