Subscribe to trusted local news
In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.
- Subscription costs less than £1 a week with an annual plan.
Already a subscriber? Log in here.
26
Nov 2023
North Yorks Council must pay £17,000 to care home patient over language used
A local authority has been obliged to pay about £17,000 of taxpayers’ money to a residential care home patient after it was found to have failed to use the correct language when explaining her charges.
North Yorkshire Council has also been recommended to pay the patient’s son £350 “to recognise the distress and anxiety caused” by its decision to treat monetary gifts to her children and grandchildren as capital that should be included when assessing how long she should be responsible for the full cost of her care.
Who should pay for social care remains a pressing issue with the council spending £230m a year on adult social care, equating to about 40 per cent of the authority’s budget.
This year it has received £19m additional grants from the government, but the council has spent an extra £36m on adult social care services.
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman said it had “found fault causing injustice” and to remedy the injustice by completing a financial assessment calculating when her capital would have fallen below the £23,250 threshold under which people pay the full costs of their care.
It also recommended the council reviews the financial assessments completed for other service users over the last 12 months where gifting was not deemed to be depriving the public purse of assets.
Read more:
- Tory transport chief urges Lib Dems to back scaled-back Harrogate Station Gateway
- £20m funding bid for Harrogate Convention Centre refurbishment rejected
While the Care Act 2014 states people should be able to spend the money they have saved as they wish, rules also state councils should ensure people are not rewarded for trying to avoid paying their assessed contribution.
Councils must therefore assess a person to decide whether they have intentionally deprived themselves of assets to avoid paying care fees, for example by making a lump sum payment to someone else as a gift.
The ombudsman’s report states the woman in care had previously gifted no more than £20 to her family, but in the two-and-a-half years following the sale of her property she gifted £19,500.
It is understood the officer who dealt with the assessment had been trying not to inflame a “deprivation of assets” situation and did not use those words when spelling out the reason for taking extra money from the woman.
Councillor Michael Harrison, executive member for health and adult services who is also the Conservative councillor for Killinghall, Hampsthwaite and Saltergate, said:
The authority undertakes an average of 6,000 financial assessments every year.
Cllr Harrison said:
0