This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities...
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
    • Politics
    • Transport
    • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Education
    • Sport
    • Harrogate
    • Ripon
    • Knaresborough
    • Boroughbridge
    • Pateley Bridge
    • Masham
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Newsletter
  • Podcasts

Interested in advertising with us?

Advertise with us

  • News & Features
  • Your Area
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Newsletter
  • Podcasts
  • Politics
  • Transport
  • Lifestyle
  • Community
  • Business
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Education
  • Sport
Advertise with us
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Latest News

We want to hear from you

Tell us your opinions and views on what we cover

Contact us

Register for our newsletter

Free Newsletter Sign Up

Join now
Connect with us
  • About us
  • Correction and complaints
Download on App StoreDownload on Google Play Store
  • Website Terms & Conditions
  • Subscription Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Comments Participation T&Cs
Trust In Journalism

Copyright © 2020 The Stray Ferret Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Site by Show + Tell

Subscribe to trusted local news

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

  • Subscription costs less than £1 a week with an annual plan.

Already a subscriber? Log in here.

01

Mar 2024

Last Updated: 01/03/2024

Ripon councillors withdraw support for referendum on cathedral annexe

by Thomas Barrett Local Democracy Reporter

| 01 Mar, 2024
Comment

0

mixcollage-01-mar-2024-03-14-pm-4342
Cllr Eamon Parkin (left) and Cllr Chris Hardisty

The future of a proposed public referendum on Ripon’s £8m annexe has been thrown into doubt after two councillors withdrew their support today.

The referendum, officially called a parish poll, has been proposed by Kirkgate resident Stanley Mackintosh.

It wouldn’t be legally binding but would include around 12 yes or no questions on topics including the felling of trees, open space and impact on businesses.

Earlier this week, Mr Mackintosh had the support of two councillors, Eamon Parkin and Chris Hardisty, which was required to hold a parish meeting that could eventually approve the referendum.

He then posted an online notice with a date and venue for the meeting.

However, the notice included the logo of Ripon City Council which council leader Andrew Williams said falsely implied it was issued by the council and amounted to an “act of fraud”. The notice also said only residents of Ripon could attend, which was incorrect.

Following the notice being posted, the two councillors withdrew their backing.

Speaking to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, Cllr Williams said:

“The public has to have faith that documents with the council’s logo are legitimate.”


In response, Mr Mackintosh said the notice was a “misunderstanding” and he took it down as soon as he was asked to by a council clerk.

Cllr Williams, whose division on North Yorkshire Council includes the cathedral, strongly criticised the referendum proposals, calling it a “circus” and saying it is “making the city look like a joke”.

He said the poll would cost Ripon City Council between £10,000 and £12,000, representing a “waste of money” that would achieve “nothing constructive”.

He added:

 “I’ve had several emails from angry residents describing Stanley Mackintosh in less than pleasant terminology.”


Mr Mackintosh is now lacking the two councillors needed to bring forward the parish meeting.

However, he can still call one with the support of six Ripon residents who are on the electoral roll, meaning it is still likely to take place.

For the referendum to go ahead, Mr Mackintosh would then require support from just 10 residents at the meeting.

But there are now questions over whether the referendum may worsen an already toxic debate within the city surrounding the annexe proposals.




Read more:



  • Ripon primary school joins catholic academy

  • Your chance to experience the sights and sounds of Ripon free of charge 






Ripon resident Jenni Holman, who launched a 2,000-strong petition to save 11 trees that would be chopped down under the cathedral’s plans, says she does not support the poll.

She told the LDRS:

“I don’t know if it will be useful.  The poll is not binding and could cause further rift within the community. I think the application is best left for the planning committee to consider in due course.”


Mr Mackintosh told the LDRS that he hoped the referendum would still take place but the process may now be delayed.

He was skeptical over the claim that the poll would cost £10,000. Mr Mackintosh added:

“People have got a bit sensitive now looking for an error. I immediately removed my notice of the poll and this morning I put up an amended version without any logo that also says it’s not limited to Ripon electors.
“Cllr Williams had the same complaints about the last parish poll I proposed in 2001 but it gives the people of Ripon a chance to have their say about the annexe in a secret ballot."