This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities...
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
    • Politics
    • Transport
    • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Education
    • Sport
    • Harrogate
    • Ripon
    • Knaresborough
    • Boroughbridge
    • Pateley Bridge
    • Masham
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Latest Jobs
  • Podcasts

Interested in advertising with us?

Advertise with us

  • News & Features
  • Your Area
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Latest Jobs
  • Podcasts
  • Politics
  • Transport
  • Lifestyle
  • Community
  • Business
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Education
  • Sport
Advertise with us
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Latest News

We want to hear from you

Tell us your opinions and views on what we cover

Contact us
Connect with us
  • About us
  • Advertise your job
  • Correction and complaints
Download on App StoreDownload on Google Play Store
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Comments Participation T&Cs
Trust In Journalism

Copyright © 2020 The Stray Ferret Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Site by Show + Tell

Subscribe to trusted local news

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

  • Subscription costs less than £1 a week with an annual plan.

Already a subscriber? Log in here.

19

Sept 2024

Last Updated: 19/09/2024
Environment
Environment

Council insists it listened to villagers affected by Maltkiln plans

by Thomas Barrett Local Democracy Reporter

| 19 Sept, 2024
Comment

0

masterplan-image-with-graphics-small-white-4-1
The plan for Maltkiln

North Yorkshire Council says it exceeded the statutory minimum requirements for consultation regarding plans for 4,000 homes at Maltkiln following criticism from local parish councils.

A public examination is taking place in Harrogate all week regarding the Maltkiln Development Plan Document (DPD).

The DPD aims to guide how a new town and two primary schools would be built between Harrogate and York.

If Maltkiln goes ahead as currently envisaged it will transform the area around Cattal, Whixley, Green Hammerton and Kirk Hammerton.

The council says the draft document “sets a clear and ambitious thirty-year vision” for the scheme.

Government-appointed planning inspector Clive Coyne will judge if the DPD is up to scratch, if changes are needed and if developer Caddick Group and North Yorkshire Council can move forward with the scheme.

Mr Coyne asked the council if it believed it met the strict legal duties required regarding consultation with members of the public.

The council wrote in a statement ahead of the meeting that it consulted with the community in each stage of the preparation of the DPD and also met “extensively” with a local liaison group which included parish councillors.

oplus_2-2

The Maltkiln planning inquiry, which is being held at Harrogate Civic Centre. Picture: LDRS.

During the inquiry, Mr Coyne heard from Paul Brown KC, a barrister representing North Yorkshire Council, who said that the authority went over and above what was legally required of them during the consultation stages.

Mr Brown said: 

The council’s position was even throughout the covid period, where it was difficult, we have more than adhered to and if anything exceeded the statutory minimum.

However, three residents from local parish councils said the council’s approach to consultation left them “confused” and “in disbelief” with some rural residents struggling with online forms.

They also said the council should have consulted again following the withdrawal of the Dent land in December 2022, which made up 43% of the overall scheme and left residents with many unanswered questions.

Alex Smith, who was speaking on behalf of a coalition of parish councils, said the council had held no face-to-face meetings with residents which had damaged trust in the DPD process.

Mr Smith said: 

It left residents unable to ask questions and clarify issues. There was very little interactive engagement with a broad section of residents. Many couldn’t participate meaningfully and it confused residents.

Kevin Bramley representing Hunsingore, Walshford with Great Ribston & Cattal Parish Council, described the DPD consultations as neither “reasonable nor proportionate”.

He said: 

There were no village hall settings where officers could defend or promote their plan. Residents are still in disbelief about that.

Paul Townsend from Kirk Hammerton Parish Council said the Covid period was “extremely difficult” for the council but with restrictions lifted there should have been efforts to rectify a lack of in-person meetings.

He added: 

Given the fact there was so little opportunity to talk to people during covid, that should increase your responsibility. You should go out and meet with people to tell them what’s going on.

The inspector Mr Coyne asked the council why there had been no face-to-face meetings since the pandemic.

In response, Mr Brown KC said: 

It can’t be right that when we moved the plan on, the government expected us to go back to the starting blocks and carry out a consultation we couldn’t do during covid. If we had to consult after every change we’d never get anywhere.

Mr Coyne replied: 

To my mind, legal requirements have been met in terms of adequate consultations, the methods are something for the council to consider and decide. Was the change in land ownership enough to consider another consultation? I don’t know.

The Maltkiln public examination continues this week at Harrogate Civic Centre and is open to the public. For a timetable, click here.

StarMaltkiln developer updates proposals for 4,000-home settlementStar4,000-home Maltkiln scheme facing fresh land ownership headache