North Yorkshire Council Archives - Page 112 of 184

Council silent on claims it ignored safety warnings on collapsed Knaresborough wall

North Yorkshire Council has failed to respond to claims it ignored warnings about the state of a wall that collapsed in Knaresborough.

The stone wall on Briggate fell onto the highway on September 14 this year.

Fortunately, nobody was injured on what is one of the town’s busiest routes for pedestrians and motorists — but traffic lights have caused delays and disruption ever since.

Several residents and councillors have told the Stray Ferret they contacted the council about the wall before it fell. We were also told the council had a safety report on the wall.

Nearly three months on, the council has yet to respond to these claims.

The wall collapsed in September.

Cllr Hannah Gostlow, a Liberal Democrat who represents Knaresborough East on North Yorkshire Council, alerted the council in an email on June 16 last year.

Her message, seen by the Stray Ferret, said several old stone walls in Knaresborough needed “investigating and possibly monitoring for safety”, with Briggate top of the list.

It added:

“I am unsure who owns each wall but in each case they would either impact a road or path if they were to break down, and could potentially be a risk to life and also their repair could cause significant congestion in the town.”

Cllr Gostlow (pictured), who is also the current Knaresborough mayor, told the Stray Ferret:

“This issue was widely known about by residents and councillors.”

After the wall collapsed, Briggate resident Catherine Rogerson told the Stray Ferret she had reported the structure to North Yorkshire Council the previous month because it appeared to be buckling. She added:

“I said it was an emergency and could collapse, causing a nasty accident.

“Several other local people have also contacted them about it. We all stressed it was in a dangerous state.”

Failed to act

When the wall came down, we asked the council to respond to Ms Rogerson’s claims.

Melisa Burnham, the council’s highways area manager, said traffic lights would remain in place until repairs to the wall are carried out and “we are liaising with residents of nearby properties and are in discussions with contractors to ensure the work is completed as quickly as possible”.

We replied to the council’s media office, which handles all media enquiries, to say Ms Burnham’s response did not address the claims the council had failed to act on warnings.

However, we did not receive a response so we subsequently submitted a freedom of information request asking how many people had complained about the state of the wall in the previous two years and what action the council had taken. We also asked to be sent the council safety report.

Public bodies are supposed to respond to freedom of information requests within 20 working days.

After six weeks without a response, we pursued the matter with the council this week. It said the delay was “due to the request initially being under the incorrect service area” and a response would be sent “as soon as possible”.

Cllr Matt Walker who represents Knaresborough West said the council’s response since the wall collapsed has been wholly inadequate. He said:

“The council have avoided answering questions including providing a safety report that was done days before the wall fell. I wonder why?

“A full investigation needs to be done to understand why it happened in the first place and lessons learned. Residents have lost faith in the highways team to do anything and so have I.”

Cllr Walker also said he had received several reassurances work would start at the beginning of November but it only began on November 27, causing weeks of traffic lights around the unattended rubble.

At one point there were reports on social media of fed-up residents attempting to remove the rubble themselves.

That never happened and now the rubble is off the highway, but traffic lights remain.

Karl Battersby, the council’s corporate director for environment, said on November 22 the “works are now more complex than first anticipated” because of residents’ concerns about the cellars that were impacted by the collapsed wall”.

Roadworks are usually prohibited during Knaresborough’s annual Christmas Market Weekend, which begins today.

But the ongoing saga of the wall means they will continue to operate on Briggate, and are likely to do so for many weeks to come.

Plans submitted to convert Harrogate Debenhams into 34 flats

Fresh plans have been lodged to convert the former Debenhams building in Harrogate into 34 apartments.

Wetherby-based Stirling Prescient No. 1 Limited has tabled the proposal to North Yorkshire Council for the site on Parliament Street.

The building has been home to different retailers for more than a century. Before Debenhams, it housed the Buckley’s and Busby’s stores.

A previous application from Stirling Prescient had proposed the demolition of the building to make way for 50 flats. However, this was withdrawn in May 2022.

The fresh plan would retain the site and see the upper floors converted into 34 flats. The ground floor and basement levels would be used as “flexible commercial space” or a “drinking establishment”.

Debenhams on Parliament Street, Harrogate pictured in April 2020.

It also proposes erecting a rooftop extension, plus the removal and replacement of canopies, shop fronts and slate roof, and removal and re-cladding of the facade of the 1960s element of the building.

A secure cycle store and seven car parking spaces are also included in the plan.

In documents submitted to the council, the developer said the new proposal would help to restore the site.

It said:

“The proposed development is located within the heart of the town centre with excellent pedestrian and public transport links and will provide a high quality and vibrant new residential development.

“The proposed building will create a new focal point along Parliament Street, restoring and sympathetically converting the current buildings on the site.”

‘Substantially revised’ proposal

The move comes as previous proposals to demolish the site were met with opposition.

In March 2022, Emma Gibbens, conservation officer at Harrogate Borough Council, said the demolition of the building would harm the local area.

She said:

“The loss of the traditional building form and architectural detail would be harmful to the street scene and character and special interest of the conservation area, the building forming part of the designated heritage asset in a manner that contributes positively to its character.”

The objection followed similar concerns from campaign group Save Britain’s Heritage, which said the developer had failed to provide “clear or adequate justification” for demolishing the building.

However, Historic England said it supported regeneration of the site but added that there should be a “sensitive conversion” of the two older department store buildings.

Documents submitted to the council as part of the fresh proposal acknowledged that plans to demolish the store were not well received.

However, it added that the scheme had been “substantially revised and positively respond to the feedback received”.

It said:

“The proposals will secure the long-term future of the site which will deliver wide ranging and lasting benefits to the town centre. Flexible commercial space at ground level and new residential development will strengthen the town’s long-term vitality and viability.”

North Yorkshire Council will make a decision on the plans at a later date.

Council quashes hopes of west Harrogate bypass

North Yorkshire Council has no plans to build a western bypass in Harrogate, with one councillor saying the move would “reopen old wounds”.

Business group Independent Harrogate published a document this month called A Vision for Harrogate that set out an alternative course of action for the controversial £11.2m Station Gateway scheme.

The document, written by retired architect Barry Adams, also puts forward suggestions to tackle congestion, such as establishing a park and ride scheme and building a western bypass.

A bypass proposal has been debated for decades, with Independent Harrogate arguing it could be key to link west and north Harrogate and reduce congestion.

Cllr John Mann, the Conservative councillor for Oatlands and Pannal, asked Cllr Keane Duncan, the council’s executive member for highways, if North Yorkshire Council would commit to building the bypass as a long-term project.

Cllr Mann said:

“I do know that congestion in Pannal and Oatlands would be much relieved if a relief road would be constructed.

“I think there’s merit in the idea, as we’ve only built 700 out of 4,000 scheduled homes for western Harrogate.

“Congestion is already quite severe and dangerous to motorists, cyclists and pedestrians.”

However, Cllr Duncan poured cold water on the idea and said the council’s predecessor, North Yorkshire County Council, held a widely publicised consultation about congestion in 2019, which rejected more roads being built in favour of sustainable travel, like improved cycling or walking routes.

The council abandoned unpopular plans to build a relief road by the Nidd Gorge following the consultation.

Cllr Duncan said:

“The results resoundingly favoured sustainable transport and demanded management solutions to congestion rather than the provision of new roads. The council then determined to respect that outcome and the council does not now plan to reopen old wounds.”

The council is working on a document called the Harrogate Transport Improvement Programme that will set out improvements to walking, cycling and bus infrastructure.

A report is expected in spring 2024.

Residents urge government to reject Bishop Monkton 23-home appeal

Residents have urged the government to reject an appeal to build 23 homes in Bishop Monkton.

Kebbell Development Ltd tabled a plan to build the houses on Knaresborough Road in the village.

At a meeting of the Skipon and Ripon area constituency planning committee in August,

councillors rejected the plan amid concern it would increase the amount of raw sewage released on streets.

The decision went against North Yorkshire Council officers’ recommendations to approve the scheme.

As a result, the developer has appealed the decision to the government’s Planning Inspectorate, which deals with planning disputes.

In a statement of case submitted to the inspector, Kebbell Development Ltd argued that there was no planning reason for the scheme to be refused.

However, Bishop Monkton Action Group has urged the government to throw out the appeal.

In a 26-page letter of objection submitted to the Planning Inspectorate, the campaign group said the scheme would “threaten the sustainability of our village”.

The group said it had concerns over the impact on drainage and sewage, as well as a “historic lack of investment” in the area’s sewer system.

It said:

“We have highlighted the key issues within the scheme as submitted by the applicant that threaten the sustainability of our village.

“However, the historic lack of investment in our sewer infrastructure is already threatening the sustainability of our village.

“This is evidenced in raw sewage discharge on our streets, in people’s drives and gardens plus sewage discharges onto our Beck and the Ure in a Drinking water safeguard zone. Please do not make this any worse for us.”

The move comes as councillors rejected the proposals at a council meeting three months ago.

One councillor said having more properties in the village could exacerbate the “abomination” of raw sewage being released into the streets during heavy rainfall.

The committee had also called for Yorkshire Water to provide more detail on how the scheme would impact on foul water drainage in the village.

No representative from the company appeared at the meeting.

But the company said “most, if not all” of the “sewage escapes” in the village were caused by residents putting excessive toilet paper, fat, oil and grease down toilets and sinks which caused pipes to block.

A government planning inspector will make a decision on the appeal at a later date.

Council spends £850 on photographer for Ripon hornblower

North Yorkshire Council spent £850 on a photographer who captured images of the Ripon hornblower on the River Thames.

The council revealed the sum following a Freedom of Information request by the Stray Ferret.

Allison Clark, the city’s first female hornblower, represented Ripon and North Yorkshire’s tourism industry at the World Travel Market event this month after Ripon City Council granted a special dispensation.

As part of this, she “called the watch” on a City Cruises boat on the River Thames.

The event was jointly hosted by North Yorkshire Council, Visit York, Visit Leeds and Herriot Country Tourism.

The council told the Stray Ferret it spent £1,658 of taxpayers’ money on the trip.

More than half of this — £850 — went to the photographer, who took other images of the City Cruises event besides the hornblower.

The council contributed £500 towards commissioning the cruise.

It also spent £175 on a standard room at a Premier Inn, including breakfast, plus rail fares for the hornblower and a representative of Ripon City Council, which cost a further £132.

Asked if the trip had been beneficial to local tourism, a spokesperson for North Yorkshire Council said:

“The purpose of the City Cruise was to provide a platform for the tourism businesses of North Yorkshire, York, Leeds and Herriot Country, to connect with buyers from the travel industry.

“There are many great stories to tell the travel industry about North Yorkshire, and on this occasion we chose to tell them about the fascinating history of the Ripon hornblower.

“This demonstration undoubtedly made an impression on the travel industry representatives on board and we hope that this memorable event, together with the connections they made with businesses, will encourage them to bring more and more visitors to North Yorkshire in the coming months and years.”

Tesco agrees to pay £50,000 for Harrogate bus stop improvements

Tesco is set to pay £50,000 to improve bus stops as part of the planning agreement for its new store in Harrogate.

The supermarket was granted planning approval subject to conditions for a store on the former gasworks site on Skipton Road in February.

As part of its section 106 agreement with North Yorkshire Council, Tesco will pay for improvements to five stops as part of a service in the Killinghall area.

The agreement, which has recently been published on the council website, says the money will go towards new extended shelters with information boards, seating and “where necessary raised kerbs to each carriageway”.

The five bus stops would be on Skipton Road and Ripon Road.

A council report said:

“North Yorkshire Council wish to provide a new bus service in the Killinghall area as part of the bus service contribution from the housing development on Penny Pot Lane and these additional improvements would add value to the new service and help encourage sustainable travel by bus to reach the new store.”

It added that the council felt the contribution was a “reasonable request”.

The supermarket has also agreed to pay £5,000 towards a travel plan for the area.

It has also agreed to provide a replacement store at Jennyfields Local Centre should the existing store close within five years of Tesco opening.

Tesco has also committed to on-site and off-site provision, maintenance and monitoring habitat provision for biodiversity.

The move comes as construction work has yet to start on the new store nine months on from its approval.

Planning documents say a new roundabout will be built at the store entrance and the A59 will be widened to provide a filter lane.

The Stray Ferret approached Tesco for an update on when it intends to start work on the scheme, but we had not received a response by the time of publication.

The council received 82 representations about Tesco’s planning application. A total of 24 were supportive and 57 objected, mainly on the grounds of amenity, traffic, environmental and drainage impacts.

But the council’s planning committee went along with case officer Kate Broadbank’s recommendation to grant approval.

She said the development would “create jobs and provide social, environmental and economic benefits to the local area” and was “in accordance with the development plan policies”.

Tesco first secured planning permission on the site in 2012 but revived its plans in December 2021.

North Yorkshire gateway schemes branded ‘risky’ for taxpayers

Council finance bosses have warned long-awaited transport schemes in Harrogate, Selby and Skipton will put taxpayers’ money at risk.

A meeting of North Yorkshire Council’s executive on Tuesday saw the Tory-led authority push forward an £11.2m project for Harrogate, £28.7m of improvements for Selby and a £7.8m initiative for Skipton, as part of the Department for Transport’s Transforming Cities Fund programme.

Before the meeting, the council issued a press release saying the schemes would be “transformative” for the towns. But all three have been scaled back from their original proposals and there are concerns costs could rise due to inflation.

In Harrogate, the latest plans focus on public realm improvements to Station Square and One Arch, improved access to the bus station and better coordinated of traffic signals.

More ambitious aspects, such as the part-pedestrianisation of James Street, reducing a stretch of Station Parade to single lane traffic and changes to the Odeon roundabout have been dropped.

In Selby, works will see improvements to pedestrian and cycling access along Station Road and Ousegate, the new station access and car park to the east, along with improvements to the station building and the new plaza entrance into Selby Park.

In Skipton the scheme will focus on a canal path connection from the railway station to the cattle mart and college, and a walking route to the bus station, including Black Walk and a replacement Gallows Bridge.

In response to the proposals, the authority’s Labour group leader Cllr Steve Shaw Wright issued a statement saying Selby “deserved better” and that the proposal had been stripped back so much it now represented “a relatively, cheap and cheerful, superficial facelift”.

Harrogate Conservative councillor John Mann told the meeting the business group Independent Harrogate was convinced the scheme would fail to tackle traffic issues in the town, and a bypass or relief road was needed, particularly with more than 3,000 homes set to be built in the town’s west.

However, executive member for transport Cllr Keane Duncan replied that a consultation over congestion in Harrogate had concluded residents wanted sustainable public transport improvements more than new roads and the authority was not about to “open old wounds”.

He said the proposals represented “landmark” improvements for the three towns, before underlining concerns over funding large scale projects “in this era of high inflation and supply chain issues”.

Cllr Duncan said the authority needed to be “realistic about what we can achieve”, and said the revised proposals focused on “core elements with the most public support” and were based on “frank, honest conversations”.

The meeting heard while the authority was set to submit full business cases to the West Yorkshire Combined Authority for the Skipton and Selby schemes in December, and for the Harrogate scheme, as soon as possible, key elements of the project would now be brought forward at later dates.

Cllr Duncan said:

”We are not reneging on the ambition and scale of our overall vision.”

The council’s finance boss, Cllr Gareth Dadd said:

“These three projects, whichever way you cut it, are risky in terms of financial over-runs. A 10 per cent over-run could put this authority at £5m of risk.

“I’m not saying we shouldn’t do it but we have to justify any cost over-run to every member right across this county. At what point can we get off the hook if it all becomes unsustainable?”

The meeting then heard the council would not be able to “mitigate against all the potential cost over-runs”.

The authority’s environment director Karl Battersby said the council would not enter into contracts unless they represented good value for taxpayers and were affordable within the proposed budgets.

Council approves multi-million pound Bewerley Park upgrade

Senior councillors have given the go-ahead for a major investment in its outdoor learning centres at Bewerley Park and East Barnby.

North Yorkshire Council’s executive yesterday approved spending £4.2m on an 84-bed accommodation block at Bewerley Park, near Pateley Bridge, and improvements to the accommodation block and dining room at East Barnby, near Whitby.

Bewerley Park was built in the 1940s and has been used by North Yorkshire schoolchildren for decades. Its activities, which include canoeing, rock climbing and orienteering, enable young people to learn life skills and have fun.

The council’s outdoor learning service charges between £145 and £170 per night to attend Bewerley Park but it has struggled to record a profit since 2015.

This year it hiked the charge by up to £30 a night due to inflationary pressures.

The council’s Conservative executive member for finance, Gareth Dadd, said the service was “on its knees” but the investment has rescued the two sites “from the jaws of death”.

He added:

“We were ready to send bulldozers in. Let’s make no bones about it.

“Officers and staff have responded and come up with what is a sustainable business model. Credit to them all in developing that.”

Further works at Bewerley Park could take place at a later date with a decision expected by 2028. Cllr Dadd said any future expansion will be dependent on the success of the new accommodation block.

The council will still need to obtain planning permission for the work but it says the centres will remain open during construction.

Cllr Annabel Wilkinson, the council’s executive member for education, learning and skills, added:

“This is an exciting project. For decades both centres have proven very popular, being visited by generations of families. Thousands of children and young people visit the centres each year and leave with positive, happy memories.

“It’s vital that our centres continue to deliver wonderful experiences in a more modern environment.”

Farmers urged not to leave mud on North Yorkshire roads

Farmers and lorry drivers in North Yorkshire are being urged not to leave mud on the roads.

North Yorkshire Council said today people have been in touch reporting muddy roads following the recent wet spell.

It prompted the council to call on drivers of agricultural and construction vehicles to be responsible when using public routes.

Cllr Keane Duncan, the council’s executive member for highways and transportation, said:

“We understand that this is a busy time in the farming calendar, and that this year the prolonged period of rain is likely to have made conditions worse than usual.

“However, that makes it more important than ever that if farmers or construction vehicle drivers do need to use public roads, they take their responsibilities seriously.”

Cllr Duncan added drivers leaving mud risked legal action:

“If mud on the road results in injury, damage to property, loss or inconvenience, legal action can follow, with penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment.”

The council said farmers or construction vehicle operators must:

Keep to their own farm roads whenever possible.
Keep to low speeds and prevent mud from being deposited by removing any excess before driving on to roads.
Be prepared to hire equipment to promptly remove deposits.
Use authorised signs prominently positioned for road users to see.
Clean the road as necessary during the working day and always at the end.
Ensure that equipment and labour is available and is suitable for the soil and weather conditions.
When using a contractor, ensure agreement is reached beforehand on who is responsible for mud on the road (signs, cleaning etc) and that suitable public liability insurance is in place.

You can report mud on the road here.

Council plans to bring North Yorkshire leisure services in-house

North Yorkshire Council looks set to bring the entirety of its leisure services in-house.

The move would consolidate its operators, including Brimhams Active, into an in-house service over the next four years.

North Yorkshire Council’s transition overview and scrutiny committee will consider the proposal at a meeting on Monday (December 4).

Cllr Simon Myers, executive councillor for culture, arts and housing at North Yorkshire Council, said:

“The strategic leisure review provides us with an exciting opportunity to transform the delivery of our leisure service and improve outcomes for communities across North Yorkshire.

“What we are recommending puts us at the forefront of a national movement to transform services with a renewed focus on physical and mental health and wider well-being.”

The recommendations follow the first phase of the council’s strategic leisure review, which includedinput from communities and sports groups, as well as organisations such as Sport England and North Yorkshire Sport.

A cross-party working group of councillors visited sites throughout North Yorkshire and their feedback also informed the proposals.

The council said the proposals will build on current best practice, expertise and experience and aim to transform leisure centres into sport and active well-being hubs.

Meanwhile, a report to the committee also recommends carrying out a leisure investment strategy, which will include a review of each leisure site.

The report added:

“This will build on the work already undertaken from the asset condition surveys and will consider further the condition of each site, future role and sustainability as a part of the new delivery model.”

The move comes as Brimhams Active, which was set up by the former Harrogate Borough Council in 2021, recently completed multi-million pound refurbishments at the Harrogate Leisure and Wellness Centre and Knaresborough Leisure and Wellness Centre.

The company was set up following a strategic review carried out by the borough council, which recommended a local authority controlled company called Brimhams Active be formed to run leisure services in the district.

Its sites include Harrogate Leisure and Wellness Centre, Knaresborough Leisure and Wellness Centre, the Jack Laugher Leisure and Wellness Centre in Ripon and Nidderdale Leisure and Wellness Centre in Pateley Bridge.

Failed to act

Read more:

‘Substantially revised’ proposal

Read more:

Read more:

Read more:

Read more:

Read more:

Read more:

Read more:

Read more:

Read more: