Subscribe to trusted local news
In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.
- Subscription costs less than £1 a week with an annual plan.
Already a subscriber? Log in here.
12
May 2021
Angry residents to fight controversial Wetherby Road Starbucks plan at appeal
Residents will fight controversial plans for a Starbucks on Wetherby Road at a public inquiry after Harrogate Borough Council decided not to risk a costly legal battle.
The council decided to withdraw its objection yesterday ahead of an appeal hearing on June 15, warning it could cost £50,000.
But residents will appear at the inquiry and make a case against the application.
Retail firm Euro Garages has spent almost a decade trying to win permission to open the coffee shop at the former 1st Dental surgery on Wetherby Road, Harrogate but has been refused three times by councillors and once by a government inspector.
Read more:
- Wetherby Road Starbucks drive-thru plan to go to appeal
- Harrogate councillors cave in over Starbucks drive-thru plans
Although the council decided yesterday not to put up a defence, residents will still contest the refusal as a third party.
Cllr Pat Marsh, a Liberal Democrat whose Harrogate Hookstone ward includes the site, is to meet residents tonight to devise a strategy for the hearing.
She said:
Cllr Marsh added that the application was another example of "big companies pushing for planning applications" to be put through.
The council rejected the proposal on grounds of air quality and traffic flow concerns in December 2019. It also raised concerns over a loss of amenity to those living next to the Starbucks due to noise and light pollution
Council drops defence
The council’s decision not to defend its objection was made at a planning committee meeting yesterday.
Speaking at the committee, Cllr John Mann, chair of the planning committee, said councillors did not have the legal expertise or experience to fight the appeal, which would see them “batted for six by the professional lawyers of the applicants”.
John Worthington, the council’s executive officer for development management, said officers could not stand successfully at appeal because their previous recommendation would “undermine” their case and that losing also risked legal costs of over £50,000.
After the meeting, a council spokesman told the Local Democracy Reporting Service that not contesting the appeal “hasn’t been an easy decision to make” but was “the best way forward in this instance.”
He said:
0