Subscribe to trusted local news
In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.
- Subscription costs less than £1 a week with an annual plan.
Already a subscriber? Log in here.
20
May 2021
Developers challenge Spofforth 72-home refusal
Developers behind a controversial 72-home plan in Spofforth have lodged an appeal against Harrogate Borough Council's refusal of the scheme.
Councillors on the authority's planning committee turned down the application by Vistry Partnerships and Yorkshire Housing in November last year.
At the time, more than 300 local people and organisations, including Natural England and Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, raised concerns about the scheme on Massey Fold in the village.
The proposal already has outline permission, but councillors rejected the application which dealt with the appearance and landscaping of the development even though a council report recommended approval.
Read more:
Spofforth: a broken planning system that’s failed a village
Controversial 72-home Spofforth development refused
The council said the plan would have a “detrimental urbanising impact upon the character and setting of Spofforth”.
Now, the developers have taken the decision to the government’s Planning Inspectorate, which deals with planning appeals.
A statement of case by planning lawyers Walton & Co, which is representing the developers, said the "solitary" reason for refusal was "expressed in generic language”.
It said:
A decision on the appeal will be made by the government at a later date.
It becomes the latest Harrogate council planning decision to be challenged by developers.
Retail firm Euro Garages has also taken the authority’s rejection for a drive-thru Starbucks coffee shop on Wetherby Road to appeal.
The decision saw the planning committee go against council officer recommendations.
Last week, the authority decided to drop its defence of the refusal after officers said their previous recommendation would "undermine" their case and that losing also risked legal costs of more than £50,000.
Instead, residents will fight the proposal at a hearing on June 15.
0