This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities...
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
    • Politics
    • Transport
    • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Education
    • Sport
    • Harrogate
    • Ripon
    • Knaresborough
    • Boroughbridge
    • Pateley Bridge
    • Masham
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Newsletter
  • Podcasts

Interested in advertising with us?

Advertise with us

  • News & Features
  • Your Area
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Newsletter
  • Podcasts
  • Politics
  • Transport
  • Lifestyle
  • Community
  • Business
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Education
  • Sport
Advertise with us
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Latest News

We want to hear from you

Tell us your opinions and views on what we cover

Contact us
Connect with us
  • About us
  • Advertise your job
  • Correction and complaints
Download on App StoreDownload on Google Play Store
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Comments Participation T&Cs
Trust In Journalism

Copyright © 2020 The Stray Ferret Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Site by Show + Tell

Subscribe to trusted local news

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

  • Subscription costs less than £1 a week with an annual plan.

Already a subscriber? Log in here.

22

Jul

Last Updated: 22/07/2025
Environment
Environment

Application for 210 homes on county border draws over 100 objections

by John Grainger

| 22 Jul, 2025
Comment

0

wetherby-newhomesmap
The proposed development would be on the edge of Wetherby, but falls within North Yorkshire.

A planning application to build 210 homes on a greenfield site on the edge of Wetherby has drawn 118 objections.

The 13-hectare site lies within the former Harrogate district – so legally in North Yorkshire – but in practice would form an extension of Wetherby, which is in West Yorkshire and served by Leeds City Council.

Many objectors have cited this point as a reason why the application, which was submitted last month by Hallam Land Management and Stockeld Park, should be turned down.

One pro forma letter sent by many local residents says:

The developers say it’s in North Yorkshire, but the people living here would depend on Leeds for everything — roads, schools, GPs. Yet there’s no agreement in place with Leeds, and no clear plan for how all this would work. It doesn’t seem fair or sensible to go ahead without that.

Wetherby is a historic market town. People come here for its charm, green spaces, and community — not for industrial estates or endless building. Pushing more and more housing onto the edge of town puts all of that at risk.

This isn’t about saying ‘no’ to any new homes. But development needs to be done properly — in places with train stations, jobs, and the space to grow.

The site, to the north of the A661 road between Harrogate and Wetherby, abuts the edge of the Spofforth Park residential development by Bellway at Ingbarrow Gate.

Malcolm Gardner, director of the Spofforth Park Management Company, has added his voice to object to the proposals, calling them “speculative in nature, strategically incoherent, and environmentally unsound”.

Wetherby Civic Society has also written to object against the development.

Another resident, Kirsten Evans, wrote:

Roads are already struggling with heavy traffic congestion, and this is before completion of the 1000+ houses currently being built adjacent to the racecourse, and other nearby developments, eg in Collingham, that feed into Wetherby.

To add a further 210 properties will have a massive impact on the town its residents and services. The bus services from Wetherby are limited. There is no train station. Parking is already a challenge. It is the wrong location.

In total, 120 comments have been received from the public, and only one of them was in favour.

But in a planning statement supporting the application, development consultancy Lichfields, acting on behalf of the applicants, points out that there is a presumption in favour of sustainable development set out in the National Planning Policy Framework.

It says that, since the Harrogate District Local Plan published by Harrogate Borough Council has not been updated since that council’s abolition in 2023, it is out of date and permission should be granted in the absence of other overriding considerations. It concludes:

...the adverse impacts of the granting of planning permission do not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits. The proposals therefore accord with NPPF paragraph 11(d) and planning permission should be granted.

North Yorkshire Council’s deadline for deciding on the application is September 11, 2025. 

StarPlan to rebuild Montpellier cottages to create retail unitStarTesco recruiting for new Harrogate store as opening details revealedStarAppeal hearing to be held over homes on Harrogate’s Kingsley Farm