Interested in advertising with us?

Advertise with us

Subscribe to trusted local news

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever. By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

  • Subscription costs less than £1 a week with an annual plan.

Already a subscriber? Log in here.

21

May 2021

Last Updated: 20/05/2021
Environment
Environment

Spofforth residents 'not surprised' by 72 homes appeal

by Calvin Robinson

| 21 May, 2021
Comment

0

Residents in Spofforth have said they're not surprised by an appeal by Yorkshire Housing against a council decision to refuse plans for 72 homes in the village.

spofforth-sign-1-2

A leading figure in the fight against plans to build 72 homes in Spofforth has urged the government to reject it as the battle was reignited this week.

Yorkshire Housing has challenged Harrogate Borough Council’s decision to reject its proposal for the site on Massey Fold.

The developer already has outline permission to build on the site but councillors turned down an application for appearance and landscaping in November.

Chris Heslop, a third-generation farmer and parish councillor in the village, said the development would turn the village into a “carbuncle of urban sprawl” when it went before the council.

Speaking yesterday, he said he wasn't surprised Yorkshire Housing had challenged the decision, which will now be decided by the government's Planning Inspectorate.

Mr Heslop said:

“I just hope that during the appeal they uphold the decision that was made. There is nothing really we can do about it.
“Spofforth needs housing and it needs a level of low-cost housing, but this would not meet those needs."





Read more:






More than 300 local people and organisations, including Natural England and Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, have raised concerns about the scheme.

In its decision notice, the council said the plan would have a “detrimental urbanising impact upon the character and setting of Spofforth”.

But, in a statement of case by planning lawyers Walton & Co, which is representing the developers, said the “solitary” reason for refusal was “expressed in generic language”.

It said:

“It is therefore unclear which particular aspect of the layout or design of the proposed scheme is considered to give rise to such impacts, and the assertions made in the reason for refusal are entirely unsubstantiated.”


A decision on the appeal will be made by the government at a later date.