Harrogate and District Green Party has attacked “unforgivable” plans to build Knaresborough’s new leisure centre on a playing field popular with children and dog walkers.

Harrogate Borough Council, which is behind the plans for the new facility to replace the town’s existing swimming pool at Fysche Field, has begun drawing up designs after a survey showed just over 80% of respondents were in support of the site.

But some residents have criticised the consultation process and are mounting a campaign to protect the playing field next to the leisure centre from development.

They said the survey was poorly publicised and failed to attract enough responses – and now the Green Party has also accused the council of being “completely misleading” as it did not disclose the loss of green space during the consultation.

Shan Oakes, the party’s coordinator and former parliamentary candidate, said:

“This was either total incompetence from the council or them being disingenuous.

“The consultation should be null and void because the wording of the questions was completely misleading and only 471 people responded.”

Harrogate Borough Council previously defended the survey saying it was “well publicised” and that the comments submitted “will help shape the future of the facility”.

Read more:

• Plans for Knaresborough pool ‘catastrophic’ for environment
• Knaresborough farmers’ market returns this weekend

A spokesperson also said the amount of green space that could be lost has not yet been determined and would be subject to approval of a planning application.

As part of the consultation held over December and January, the council-owned Knaresborough House, Hay-a-Park and Conyngham Hall were also considered as potential sites for the new leisure centre.

‘Precious green space’

There was also a privately-owned site at Halfpenny Lane, which Shan Oakes said had won the support of the Green Party before it was discounted by the council. She said:

“We were in favour of this site because it is brownfield and in the right location. Fysche Field, however, should not be touched as it is a precious green space used by so many.

“The pandemic has shown that green spaces are so vital for our mental health and keeping people connected – and it is unforgivable that the council would even think about taking this away.

“Their so-called green credentials are actually a greenwash and we will fight these plans every step of the way.”

A council spokesman said:

“Although the existing site in Knaresborough has been recommended, we are still in the early stages and no formal plans have been submitted. Once submitted they will be subject to the normal planning application process.

“The current venue is nearing 30 years old, is operating at capacity, only provides a swimming pool and has a number of on-going maintenance issues which are not resolvable without significant investment.

“Once completed, the new leisure centre will provide energy efficient, state-of-the art facilities that will encourage a healthier and more active lifestyle for our residents and something they can be proud of.”

If the plans are approved, the new leisure centre will include a new 25-metre pool, a 66-station gym and two studio spaces, and could be built by the end of 2023.

The owners of three Harrogate bars have teamed up to call on Harrogate Borough Council to approve their request to put tables and chairs on the Stray.

Outdoor dining will restart under the government’s roadmap on April 12 but three Harrogate bars are still unsure if they can use much of their space outside.

Harrogate Borough Council approved the use of tables and chairs on Stray land last summer but is yet to decide whether to give the bars the green light this time around.

Simon Colgan, who runs the Blues Bar and The Empress with his wife Sharon Colgan, told the Stray Ferret:

“It makes a massive difference for our capacity, when we have the tables on the Stray it more than doubles for both of our bars

“We will still open if we can just have the six tables on the pavement. We will fight it because we have got customers who are desperate to come back.

“Without a doubt I would say this is critical for our business. It really is important, especially after another of three months of lockdown.”

David Dresser, who owns Fashion House Bistro, also told the Stray Ferret:

“It would be disappointing for us if we were not able to have outdoor dining back on the Stray land.

“That is on the basis that if we have some bad weather days then those days are right offs. This would help us on good days to make sure that business is stable.

“So it would affect our turnover but if we got those tables and chairs on the grass it would give us a boost.”

Read more:

• 34 jobs at risk as Bettys closes York cafe
• Ripley Show cancelled due to covid

Both Simon Colgan and David Dresser approached Harrogate Borough Council with their request when Boris Johnson set out his roadmap last month.

However, a spokesman for Harrogate Borough Council told the Stray Ferret:

“We are currently awaiting feedback from the Duchy on the proposed approach, prior to a consultation starting.”

The Duchy of Lancaster owns the Stray and Harrogate Borough Council are its custodians.

We asked the council about its timeline for a consultation but did not receive a reply by the time of publication.

Harrogate Borough Council spent more than £350,000 on bed and breakfast accommodation for homeless people from the start of the first lockdown until the end of last year.

The local authority worked with some businesses in the district to put people up. But it also sent some homeless people as far as Darlington, which is more than an hour’s drive from Harrogate.

People were also sent to Leeds and York.

The Stray Ferret understands it was necessary to use accommodation elsewhere because some empty hotels in the district were reluctant to accept homeless people.

From March to December, the council spent £353,000 on B&Bs and more than £1,400 on taxis for homeless people, according to council documents.

Read more:

• Harrogate jumpers raise £10,000 for homeless people
• Harrogate homeless units still not used this winter

The national government covered the cost through a grant as part of its “Everyone In” scheme to get people off the streets during the pandemic.

A spokeswoman from Harrogate Borough Council said:

“The coronavirus pandemic has placed extra demand on our homelessness service, which accounts for the additional spend in recent months.

“We received a government grant to provide accommodation for rough sleepers or those at risk of rough sleeping in the Harrogate district.

“We may sometimes use accommodation in another council area, but at all times the receiving local authority is notified and the person continues to be supported by our homelessness team.”

The Local Government Association published a report in November, which found that Everyone In saved saves by encouraging councils to take rapid action.

Liz Hancock, chair of the Harrogate Homeless Project, echoed those findings and told the Stray Ferret:

“The Everyone In scheme was a relief. We recognise how hard Harrogate Borough Council has worked and continues to work on this.

“This was emergency action but the council is now looking at long-term solutions to keep people off the streets.”

Harrogate Borough Council has said it still does not know the final cost of Ripon’s new swimming pool.

In response to a second Freedom of Information request about the project from the Stray Ferret, the council said.

“The information you request is not held by Harrogate Borough Council because the final costs are not yet known.”

A £10.2 million contract was awarded to construction company Willmott Dixon before work started on site in November 2019.

The 17-month contact was for delivery of a six-lane pool, along with refurbishment of the existing Ripon Leisure Centre on the Dallamires Lane site.

That contract specified a completion date of May 21 this year, but a press release issued by HBC said the project will now be completed in November.

Councillor Stanley Lumley, HBC’s cabinet member for culture, tourism and sport, said the project had been ‘slightly delayed’ by covid.

In a press release dated November 13, he added:

“Ground work, known as grouting, is nearing completion.”

Grouting is a method used to stabilise unstable ground.

Read more:

• Additional Ripon swimming pool cost ‘confidential’
• Call for urgent action to safeguard Ripon’s Spa Baths

Ground stability issues

Sixteen months before the council approved the swimming pool development, a sinkhole opened up in the leisure centre car park.

Following the incident in February 2018, which saw the car park barriered off and closed, the council issued this statement:

In the first FOI request, the Stray Ferret asked HBC how much of the contract costs related to ground remediation prior to construction.

The council was also asked if additional fees are payable to Willmott Dixon for extension of the project.

HBC responded, saying:

“Additional ‘site preliminaries’ will be payable to the main contractor as a result of the extension of the construction contract.”

The council added:

“A public authority may refuse to disclose information to the extent that its disclosure would adversely affect the confidentiality of commercial or industrial information where such confidentiality is provided by law to protect a legitimate economic interest.”

A group representing 187 Harrogate businesses has expressed concern the proposed £7.9 million Station Gateway could damage the local economy.

In its submission to the gateway consultation, which ends tomorrow, Independent Harrogate said it was ‘broadly supportive’ of the scheme’s aim to promote sustainable transport.

But it added Harrogate’s hospitality and retail sector was in a ‘fragile and critical state’ and it had ‘serious concerns’ about the scheme’s economic impact.

Robert Ogden, writing on behalf of Independent Harrogate, said it therefore opposed plans to reduce traffic on Station Parade to one lane, or to pedestrianise James Street. He added the group believed East Parade to be the best location for cycling lanes.

The submission said the town needed an updated infrastructure masterplan rather than ‘pocket planning’. Such a plan should include park and ride schemes, numerous electric car charging points and extensive cycling routes, it added.

It said Harrogate Borough Council‘s current masterplan, devised in 2016, was out of date and doesn’t cater for outlying villages, which don’t have regular bus services and don’t benefit from the focus on cycling. The submission said:

“Both North Yorkshire County Council and Harrogate Borough Council are effectively discriminating against village residents and creating a playground for Harrogate residents only, many of whom will happily get into their cars and drive to work in Leeds and other areas.”

Read more:

• Harrogate Civic Society calls for Station Gateway to remain two lanes
• Call for public to engage with Harrogate Station Gateway plans

The submission said Independent Harrogate was not anti-cycling, adding it would support initiatives such as Cycling Sundays, whereby some central Harrogate streets were closed to traffic to encourage walking and cycling. It added:

“This cautious approach would help gauge the appetite for cycling in Harrogate without too much detrimental economic impact.”

But overall it said town centre visitors arriving by car ‘need easy access and somewhere convenient and close to the shops/cafes/restaurants to park’, adding:

“To ignore the considerable income that visitors bring will be hugely damaging and they should not be excluded from any surveys, which sadly appears to be the case at the moment.”

The government’s Transforming Cities Fund has provided funding for the gateway project, to improve the design of the town and encourage more sustainable transport.

North Yorkshire County Council, Harrogate Borough Council and West Yorkshire Combined Authority are delivering the initiative.

Read the full letter from Independent Harrogate here.

Police and council officers have closed a house on Mayfield Grove, Harrogate where a man died this month.

North Yorkshire Police said in a statement today it and Harrogate Borough Council had carried out a joint investigation following ‘concerns about crime and anti-social behaviour at the multi-occupancy address’.

Mark Wolsey, 48, died on Mayfield Grove this month. A suspect has been charged with murder and is remanded in custody pending trial.

A court approved the closure for an initial period of three months. Entry to the premises is now a criminal activity.

The police statement said the closure would give officers ‘an opportunity to work with the landlord and residents in the premises’.

Read more:

• Police name Harrogate murder victim and charge suspect
• Cannabis farm ‘under the noses’ of Ripon residents

Inspector Nicola Colbourne, of North Yorkshire Police said:

“It’s really important that we support our communities who expect to be able to live in a safe environment.

“This approach demonstrates one way we can do that in a proportionate and effective manner.

“We’ve worked closely with Harrogate Borough Council, and this work continues to ensure we strengthen our communities for everyone and help the most vulnerable people.”

Dean Richardson, head of safer communities at Harrogate Borough Council, said in a statement:

“It is imperative that residents across the Harrogate district feel safe in their homes and their community.

“Anyone who doesn’t feel safe should report their concerns to us or North Yorkshire Police, giving as much detail as possible.

“Where there is sufficient evidence to support any reports, we will work with the police and partner agencies, to act accordingly.”

The developers behind a new business park near Knaresborough that could create up to 2,000 jobs have formally submitted proposals.

Opus North and Bridges Fund Management have sent plans to Harrogate Borough Council to transform a 45-acre site into a mixed-use development designed to support offices, logistics operators and tech firms.

The site – to be called Harrogate 47 – is located at Flaxby near junction 47 of the A1(M) and was acquired by the developers in October last year.

It is allocated as the main strategic employment site in the council’s Local Plan and already has existing planning permission for more than half a million square feet of employment space.

The new plans include up to 130,000 sq ft of office accommodation, about 75,000 sq ft of tech starter units and approximately 430,000 sq ft for logistics and warehouses.

A spokesperson for the developers said the existing planning permission allows for the commencement of the site’s enabling works so it can be made “oven-ready” for the main construction to start as soon as the new consent is granted.

Guy Bowden, a partner at Bridges Fund Management, added:

“As Harrogate 47 is such an important site with immense potential to make a significant economic contribution to the local area, we are keen to maintain momentum and as such are commencing preparatory works.

“The work being undertaken will ensure that the plots are ready for construction to begin, which could be as early as summer 2021, and our appointed agents are already in detailed discussions with potential occupiers who have expressed an interest in the scheme.”

The appointed industrial agents for Harrogate 47 are CBRE and Gent Visick, with the office enquiries directed to the office agency teams at CBRE.

Read more:

• Plans submitted for 400-home eco-resort at Flaxby
• Knaresborough employment site ‘that could support 2,000 jobs’ sold

Oliver Freer, from CBRE’s northern planning team, which prepared the planning application, said:

“The new masterplan for Junction 47 responds to the market demand for employment accommodation for office, hi-tech/hybrid and logistics uses in this location, and is in accordance with the land allocation of the site.

“A successful consent would allow much-needed commercial space to be delivered, enabling local companies to stay and attracting new inward investment into the district, whilst unlocking the potential for some 2,000 new local jobs.”

Ryan Unsworth, development director of Opus North, added:

“We have been working hard with our appointed consultancy team and key stakeholders since we acquired the site to progress a masterplan that would maximise the job-creating potential of the site whilst addressing current and anticipated regional demand for sustainable office and industrial accommodation.

“We are confident that our application captures these aspects and look forward to seeing the initial works start on site to facilitate development.”

There is growing support amongst Harrogate councillors for meetings to remain virtual post Covid in a move which could mean almost all decisions are made online.

Emergency regulations which allow local authorities to meet remotely were introduced in March last year. Harrogate Borough Council has since held all of its full council, cabinet and committee meetings online.

The rules are due to expire in May but as the government is said to be considering making them permanent.  The council is now looking into how remote meetings and live streaming could continue in the future.

Liberal Democrat councillor Chris Aldred, who has been pushing for the live streaming of meetings since before the pandemic, told the council’s general purposes committee on Thursday that Covid had shown there is a “clear” interest in people being able to watch meetings online.

He pointed towards recent meetings which have had more than 100 views on YouTube, and said:

“People are clearly interested in the deliberations of their local council and we ought to continue to give them the opportunity.

“For me, one statistic sticks out above them all. On 26 January there was the planning committee debate on the Harrogate Spring Water application. 800 people viewed that as it was happening.

“You can’t get 800 people into the civic centre. You can hardly get that number of people into the Harrogate Convention Centre.

“If you then look at how many people viewed it over the next fortnight – 2,200. That one statistic proves we need to be giving people the opportunity to continue to view these meetings at a time and place of their choice.”

Read More:

• “Major concern” over one lane traffic proposal for Station Parade says Highways boss
• Harrogate Borough Council halts covid business grants

Ripon Independents councillor Pauline McHardy added:

“We shouldn’t exclude members of the public that do want to listen into meetings but are too far away or perhaps don’t drive.

“These are supposed to be public meetings and we should be open, transparent and always above board.”

Liberal Democrat councillor Phillip Broadbank also said:

“It is time to do this. People really want to take part and see what their local authority is doing.”

A previous vote against streaming meetings

Before the pandemic struck and in January last year, Harrogate councillors voted against an idea of live streaming in-person meetings because of claims it would have been too expensive.

The costs were not initially made public but later revealed as ranging between £5,000 to nearly £48,000.

A report to the general purposes committee said: “The view of councillors seems to be that larger, more complex meetings such as council and planning committee are better held in person.”

Union officials have lodged a formal dispute to Harrogate Borough Council over the cost of staff working from home.

Unison said the authority refuses to cover any additional costs incurred by remote working and had been doing so for a full year.

It added that union officials had made “reasonable and legitimate” requests for the borough council to pay a tax free allowance of £6 a week for those who have no choice but to work from home.

But, the council said less than 50% of its staff are working from home and it had ensured that all of them are aware of the tax relief available from HMRC for working from home.

The tax relief offered by the government offers people who have to work from home the chance to claim costs based upon the rate in which they pay tax.

For example, a person who pays 20% basic rate claiming relief on £6 per week would receive £1.20 per week.

Read more:

• Plans for Knaresborough pool ‘catastrophic’ for environment
• Dutch firm awarded £1.1m design contract for Harrogate Convention Centre
• Harrogate council awarded £2.4m to cut carbon emissions

David Houlgate, branch secretary for Unison Harrogate Local Government branch, said the relief from HMRC “does not come close” to covering increased costs of working from home.

He said:

“Staff have incurred increased gas, electric and water bills as a result of working from home and are in effect being asked to subsidise the council in delivering its services. Against this are the savings in these very same utilities that we believe the council is making by way of staff working from home and council sites being closed or sparsely occupied.

“It should be noted that we do not accept any argument that staff are saving on travel costs. This may benefit some but by no means all.

“The dispute also includes an issue around mileage because of a deferral by the council on a decision relating to Unison’s request for the council to change its policy on mileage to reflect the fact that the workplace has now in effect changed by way of staff being forced to work from home. 

“Ordinarily staff who use their own vehicles on council business can claim for mileage when doing so but only from the established workplace. Unison believes that the workplace is no longer the office but is in fact the home.”

In response, a council spokeswoman said:

“In a time when many employers are going out of business, making redundancies or putting staff on furlough we have managed to ensure no one has been put in this position. This has been achieved by being in a relatively strong financial position before the pandemic, redeploying staff to other council services and being extremely cautious with our finances over the last 12-months.

“We have ensured that staff who are working at home as a result of the ongoing global pandemic – which we believe to be less than 50% of all employees – are aware of the HMRC tax relief for additional household costs. This tax relief is backdated for the 2020/21 tax year and equates to £62.40 for the basic tax payer. Any member of staff who believes they have higher costs than £6 a week, can claim via the HMRC.

“A vast proportion of office-based staff are also saving on travel costs, whether public transport or their own vehicles.”

The conservative leader of Harrogate Borough Council leader has said highways officials should not “shy away” from transport measures which “make use of the private car more difficult”.

Speaking before a Harrogate and Knaresborough Area Committee today, Cllr Richard Cooper welcomed measures for more cycle lanes and sustainable transport plans for the town.

Cllr Cooper, who also represents Harrogate central on the county council, told the committee that any opposition to such measures was inevitable.

However, he said the county council, which is the highways authority, should not hide from the public what the measures are intended to do.

He said:

“I think it’s a big job to do in persuading the public that they actually need also to fully get behind the alternative to more roads and congestion.

“That alternative I’m afraid is, and we should not hide it from people, making the use of the private car more difficult. It’s taking away tarmac that is dedicated to private cars and giving it to cyclists, pedestrians and public transport.

“Let’s not shy away from that, that is what we are talking about.”

He added that “there will always be a level of protest” and that council bosses should take those views into account.

Read more:

• Oatlands Drive one-way plans scrapped
• Harrogate’s rural bus services not good enough, says councillor

But, Cllr Cooper said the council ultimately had a decision to make which should reflect the authority’s objectives to reduce carbon emissions.

His comments come as North Yorkshire County Council officers will go to detailed consultation on Monday on active travel plans in Harrogate.

The proposals include cycle lanes on Victoria Avenue and on the A59 Maple Close between Harrogate and Knaresborough.

Meanwhile, Cllr Don Mackenzie, executive county councillor for access, announced that a controversial plan to make Oatlands Drive one-way would be scrapped.

Instead, the council will consult on proposals for a 20 mile per hour zone on the road.

The county council received £1,011,750 for cycling improvements and outlined three cycle route projects in Harrogate.