Library bosses are examining whether the covid-19 pandemic has caused permanent changes to people’s reading habits.
A meeting of North Yorkshire County Council’s partnerships scrutiny committee heard while library visits in the year to April were at about 60% of pre-pandemic levels, book issues had returned to about 85% of the number being borrowed before March 2020.
Chrys Mellor, the authority’s head of libraries, said despite the continued low numbers of people using libraries in North Yorkshire last year, with 304,549 e-books and e-audio items issued it was clear communities still want to use library services.
She said although the county’s “almost unique model” of largely volunteer-run libraries had only reopened partially following lockdowns last year, it still attracted more than a million visits last and saw nearly 1.5 million books issued.
Ms Mellor said it was noteable that about 3,000 people had become library members during lockdowns to borrow e-books, which now represented about seven per cent of items borrowed, and that most of those people had remained as members.
Read more:
- Plans to build asphalt plant beside controversial Allerton Park incinerator
- Northern Powergrid criticised over ‘unacceptable’ Storm Arwen failings
Earlier this year a Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy study concluded that “only time will tell if this recent shift to digital will prove to be a long-term model for our use of libraries”.
Referring to the difference between library visitors and books being issued, Ms Mellor said:
“As yet, it is unclear whether that is the people who came in to use the computers were not coming in quite as much because they had bought them or the people who came in for our social activities who are not quite ready to come back in.
“Certainly these last few months has seen a rapid increase in visits. Whether people were simply coming in less and actually borrowing more, that’s still to be worked out.”
She said North Yorkshire had been among the country’s highest performing areas for last summer’s reading challenge for children, but that it had seen about 50 per cent of the usual number of youngsters take part.
Ms Mellor said:
“Considering people were still being fairly wary about coming in we were quite pleased with that.”
The meeting heard while libraries were nearly back up to pre-pandemic opening hours, the council was working to help libraries across the county facing issues finding sufficient volunteers to run them.
Ms Mellor said:
Harrogate walkers highlight shared cycling routes and footpath concerns“Some volunteers have decided they have found something different to do in the last year, others are still a little bit wary about coming in. We equally have had reports of a lot of new and younger volunteers joining us.
“We still had over 100,000 [volunteer] hours last year when we weren’t even open full time.”
A Harrogate walking group has called for public footpaths to be protected from new housing developments.
It is among a new set of proposals issued by the Harrogate Group of the Ramblers’ Association to promote walking in Harrogate and Knaresborough.
The group has suggested that developers should be required to include wide and well-lit public footpaths in all new housing areas and, if possible, link paths with nearby rights of way to provide direct and easy access into the countryside.
It also highlighted how one footpath in Killinghall, which has just reopened after four years of ‘temporary closure’, was an example of “a source of particular concern”. Temporary closure of public rights of way through building sites of new development should be restricted to a minimum amount of time necessary, the group urges.
The proposals, which have been sent to newly elected local councillors at North Yorkshire County Council, also say plans to convert footpaths and footways to shared use with cyclists should be considered on a case by case basis in order “to achieve an outcome that is not detrimental to the interests of walkers and pedestrians”.
This follows concerns about the impact of the new Otley Road cycle path in Harrogate, which includes shared access between walkers and cyclists.
Read more:
- Council criticised for leaving ‘scorched earth’ rings around Stray trees
- Harrogate rail campaigner ‘optimistic’ early morning train could be reinstated
The letter to councillors says:
Public meeting next week over future of Woodfield school“At a time when both walking and cycling are being promoted both locally and nationally as desirable activities, it is particularly important that the needs and interests of the extensive walking and pedestrian community are taken into serious consideration and not just taken for granted.
“Walking is a particularly desirable activity to protect and promote, both for its benefits to the health and wellbeing of people of a very wide range of ages, including the elderly, and for its contribution to the reduction of air pollution by replacing the use of the car for many local journeys. “
A public meeting will be held next week over the future of Woodfield Community Primary School in Bilton.
North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC) has vowed it will take parents’ views into consideration as part of a consultation over a possible closure of the school.
The authority has now confirmed the closure would take effect from December 31 this year.
It has announced three options for future school allocations: the Woodfield catchment area could become part of that of Grove Road or Bilton Grange primary schools, or it could be split or shared between the two other schools.
The meeting will take place at Woodfield school on Wednesday at 6pm.
Cllr Annabel Wilkinson, member for education and skills at NYCC, said:
“Woodfield Community Primary School governors, together with North Yorkshire County Council, have worked extremely hard to find a solution which would see the school remain open but, sadly, this has not produced any viable options.
“During the consultation we will listen to parents’ views; we will also review the opinions of other groups involved with the school. Everyone will be given the opportunity to contribute.”
NYCC said it would welcome any views on its proposals, or alternative plans being put forward. All contributions will be part of a formal review which will be considered by the council’s executive before a final decision is made.
Read more:
- Bilton has ‘sufficient primary places’ if Woodfield school closes
- Woodfield school closure ‘an absolute disgrace’, says union
News about the consultation over the proposed closure was announced last month, ending months of speculation about the school’s future.
It followed its last Ofsted report labelling the school ‘inadequate’ in January 2020. Woodfield was then forced to try to find an academy to join.
Governors were in negotiations with nearby Grove Road Community Primary School, but a planned amalgamation to take effect from September fell through this year.
Woodfield’s governors said they had “exhausted all options” and were left with no choice but to consult over the closure.
Parents have protested to keep the school open.
As well as attending the meeting on Wednesday evening, parents can take part in the consultation on the council’s website.
Part of the consultation will include asking parents of current pupils to state their preference for an alternative school for their children to attend, either following any decision to close Woodfield, or sooner if they prefer.
A council spokesperson said:
“The overall intention will be to ensure fairness around the school transfer process in the event that a decision is ultimately taken to close the school.
“It will allow the local authority to apply consideration of admissions criteria to each request and avoid allocating places on a first-come, first-served basis.”
The authority said its admissions team is always happy to give advice to parents and can be contacted at schooladmissions@northyorks.gov.uk.
‘Unforeseen circumstances’ delays start of Oak Beck Bridge scheme“Unforeseen circumstances” has led to the start of a £1 million project to replace Oak Beck Bridge being delayed, council officials say.
The scheme, which is planned by North Yorkshire County Council, will see the bridge on the A59 in Harrogate replaced.
Authority officials say the bridge is in poor condition and needs to be replaced.
Work was due to start in January, but a start date for the project has yet to be confirmed.
The Stray Ferret asked the county council when it expects to start work on the scheme.
Philip Richardson, bridges manager at the authority, said:
“We realise the importance of replacing Oak Beck Bridge. Unfortunately we have not been able to progress the scheme as quickly as we would have liked due to unforeseen circumstances and we cannot confirm a start date.
“At the moment our legal team are still in talks over land agreements for the widening and discussions with Yorkshire Water are ongoing in relation to apparatus close to the existing structure.
“Please be assured that we will begin work as soon as we are able and provide suitable notice.”
Read more:
- Harrogate Oak Beck Bridge project to cost £1m
- Harrogate rail campaigner ‘optimistic’ early morning train could be reinstated
Meanwhile, The Stray Ferret reported this week that the project is set to cost taxpayers £1 million.
A contract valued at £1,067,929.93 has been handed to Leeds-based Howard Civil Engineering to demolish, design and build the new bridge.
The company said on its website that work would take 24 weeks and access would be maintained over the bridge.
It said:
“Access over the bridge will be maintained throughout the project, with the exception of night works for surfacing.”
The A59 road on which the bridge is situated is heavily used by traffic, especially by people visiting Aldi, B&Q and Pets at Home on the Oak Beck retail park.
The volume would increase if Tesco is given permission to build on the former gas works site nearby.
Harrogate Oak Beck Bridge project to cost £1mA project to demolish and replace a bridge near to Harrogate’s New Park roundabout will cost taxpayers £1 million.
The scheme, which is planned by North Yorkshire County Council, will see Oak Beck Bridge on the A59 replaced.
Authority officials say the bridge is in poor condition and work was earmarked to start in January but has been delayed.
A contract valued at £1,067,929.93 has been handed to Leeds-based Howard Civil Engineering to demolish, design and build the new bridge.
Read more:
- No start date yet for Harrogate’s Oak Beck Bridge replacement
- Harrogate rail campaigner ‘optimistic’ early morning train could be reinstated
The company said on its website that work would take 24 weeks and access would be maintained over the bridge.
It said:
“Access over the bridge will be maintained throughout the project, with the exception of night works for surfacing.”
The Stray Ferret asked the county council if a start date for the scheme had been confirmed, but had yet to receive a response.
The A59 road on which the bridge is situated is heavily used by traffic, especially by people visiting Aldi, B&Q and Pets at Home on the Oak Beck retail park.
The volume would increase if Tesco is given permission to build on the former gas works site nearby.
Some Ukrainian refugees ‘entirely dependent’ on North Yorkshire hostsSome Ukrainian refugees have been placed in such remote rural locations in North Yorkshire that they are “entirely dependent” on host families to do anything.
A meeting of North Yorkshire County Council’s corporate and partnerships scrutiny committee heard while experience had shown refugees often prefer being placed in groups of people from their own communities in urban settings, the isolated locations of some well-meaning sponsors meant Ukrainians had access to little or no services.
Around 180 homes in North Yorkshire were made available to Ukraine refugees, with Harrogate taking part in rehoming some of those fleeing the conflict.
The issue was raised after the meeting was told the Home Office was continuing to consider whether to go ahead with controversial plans to launch a centre for up to 1,500 male asylum seekers at Linton on Ouse, a village with few facilities and little public transport.
While a lack of services for the non-detained asylum seekers at the former RAF Linton on Ouse base has been highlighted as a major concern, councillors questioned whether some Ukrainians placed into remote North Yorkshire homes were facing similar issues.
The meeting heard the top priorities for most refugees arriving in the county was getting a job and finding a school for their children, practicalities that were more difficult in rural and remote areas.
Wharfedale councillor Richard Foster, who is also Craven District Council’s leader, said:
“We have plenty of people giving up their houses and volunteering, but it isn’t the targeted approach taking people to areas we’re used to, it’s very much scattergun across the county.
“In rural areas people must be able to access bus services and that sort of thing. It’s great that people are willing to do it, but it is going to cause issues.”
Read more:
- 180 homes in North Yorkshire ready to welcome Ukrainian refugees
- Harrogate’s John Shackleton hoping to deliver ambulance to Ukraine
- Ripon MP urges Boris Johnson to take ‘more humane approach’ to Ukraine refugees
The meeting was told the authority had no control over the process, which involved hosts volunteering themselves and basic checks being undertaken by the Home Office.
Councillors heard visas were being issued irrespective of checks, such as housing suitability, that local authorities were undertaking. Host sponsors were regularly contacting the local authority to ask about services once the Ukrainian refugees had arrived, members were told.
Officers told the meeting the voluntary host system was creating challenges, particularly as many of the refugees were “in degrees of trauma” having just left a war-torn country.
One officer said:
“Let’s not underestimate the willingness of sponsors to do that, that’s really great. I’m not entirely convinced that all of them thought through what they were taking on.”
He added while the vast majority of sponsorships were working well, some had broken down for different reasons, including illness.
The officer said:
North Yorkshire Council chief executive to be paid up to £197,000“There are people placed in remote rural areas and we as a local authority would not have chosen to locate people there because of the lack of public transport.
“There are some, a small number, who are entirely dependent on their sponsor for absolutely everything. We would always try and place people where there is public transport and they can have some access and independence.”
The chief executive of the new North Yorkshire Council will be paid a maximum salary of £197,000, it has been revealed.
The new council, which will employ more than 10,000 staff, will come into existence on April 1 next year.
Seven district councils, including Harrogate Borough Council, will be abolished, along with North Yorkshire County Council.
The chief executive recruitment process will be overseen by a cross-party chief officer appointment and disciplinary committee, which met today to consider the salary as well as the recruitment process and job description.
One of the committee’s roles will be to decide whether to appoint an executive search agent, at an anticipated cost of £30,000, to help the process.
A report on the recruitment process to councillors at North Yorkshire County Council said the salary package had been benchmarked against similar public sector roles nationally. The report adds:
“The sample data shows the pay for unitary councils of a similar size to North Yorkshire falls within a salary range of £188,000 to £216,000 per annum.
“However, the proposed salary limit for the new chief executive is £197,000.
“Set against the current combined packages for the eight chief executives of North Yorkshire councils, this would deliver an annual saving in excess of £1 million.”
Read more:
- Decision on Harrogate town council could take two years
- Harrogate district’s leisure and housing companies ‘will transfer’ to North Yorkshire Council
£30m saving a year
Ending the two-tier system of local government in North Yorkshire is expected to save about £30m a year in total.

Carl Les
County council leader Carl Les, who is chairing the chief officer appointment and disciplinary committee, said:
“Our new council will be one of the largest local authorities nationally, providing essential services to more than 600,000 people.
“The chief executive will need to manage a revenue budget of around £1.4 billion and the new council will have an ongoing capital programme of around £350 million.
“In addition to the vast array of council services and functions, this job also includes heading up the council’s commercial operations at a critical time.
The report to councillors includes details of the current salaries of council leaders in North Yorkshire. It can be seen below.
Harrogate district’s leisure and housing companies ‘will transfer’ to North Yorkshire Council
Harrogate Borough Council has confirmed its leisure and housing companies will be transferred to the new North Yorkshire Council, but questions remain over what will happen thereafter.
Brimhams Active and Bracewell Homes were launched in the last three years with the backing of just under £11 million from taxpayers.
The borough council said in a statement this week that “there are no plans to change how they’re currently run, albeit they will transfer” when the authority is abolished next April.
This comes as council officers from across North Yorkshire are working together on county-wide plans for how all services will work when they come under the control of the new North Yorkshire Council.
Currently, housing and leisure services across the seven districts are run in different ways through arm’s-length companies, management firms, charity trusts and by the local councils themselves.
Councillor Carl Les, leader of North Yorkshire County Council, said the correct decision-making process would be followed for the future of services and that he would not be drawn on whether it would be better to scrap the current set-ups.
He said:
“Leisure and housing are two of our work streams going forward for the next 10 months and it would be wrong to try and prejudge what recommendations are going to be made for the new council to adopt.
“These are two important issues and we recognise that Harrogate has companies doing these pieces of work.
“But this has to be fed into our ongoing work which will then give recommendations to the executive and wider council.”
Brimhams Active launched last August when it took over control of leisure centres and swimming pools in Harrogate, Starbeck, Ripon, Knaresborough and Pateley Bridge.
‘New vision’
Harrogate Borough Council hailed the move as a “new vision for the future” of services and said it would save around £400,000 a year through business rates relief and VAT benefits.
Councillor Pat Marsh, leader of the council’s opposition Liberal Democrat group and Brimhams Active board member, said the company has so far been a success despite challenges with covid closures and staffing shortages:
“Several local authorities have stopped even providing leisure services, it is not a compulsory service.
“Setting up Brimhams Active has meant the council continues to offer and develop the service for the benefit of our residents.”
However, Cllr Marsh was less praiseworthy of Bracewell Homes which launched in 2019 with the aims of turning the council a profit and delivering much-needed affordable homes.
She said:
“I had hoped that Bracewell Homes would deliver social housing, but that has not happened. It was never the kind of housing company that I was arguing for.”
Read more:
- Decision on Harrogate town council could take two years
- North Yorks council leader says MPs should decide PM’s fate
Confirming both companies will be transferred to the new council, a Harrogate Borough Council spokesperson said:
North Yorks council leader says MPs should decide PM’s fate“We are working collectively with the county council and neighbouring district councils to ensure a smooth transition to the new authority on 1 April.
“Part of this work involves looking at local authority controlled companies such as Brimhams Active and Bracewell Homes.
“Decisions on what they might look like in the future will be made by North Yorkshire Council.”
The future of Prime Minister Boris Johnson following the partygate saga is for Conservative MPs to decide, says North Yorkshire County Council’s leader.
The Guardian reported yesterday that Cllr Les would support a leadership election in the party.
However, speaking to the Stray Ferret today he claimed he was misquoted and any leadership election within the party was a matter for MPs. He said:
“I said it was disappointing results and I am sure that [partygate] was a factor.”
Read more:
- Resign and higher fines: Harrogate district bereaved families react to PM’s lockdown party fine
- Harrogate district MP: ‘Time for Boris to get on with the job’
- Andrew Jones MP tells constituent he feels ‘anger’ over partygate
When asked if he supported Mr Johnson, Cllr Les reiterated that the Prime Minister’s future was for “the parliamentary party to decide”.
His comments follow the publication of the Sue Gray report, which found that many of the parties in Downing Street “should not have been allowed to happen”.
Harrogate and Knaresborough Conservative MP, Andrew Jones, told a constituent in a letter that he felt “anger” over the report.
But Mr Jones, who said in January that “lawmakers can’t be lawbreakers”, did not say whether he had submitted a letter of no confidence in Mr Johnson.
The BBC reported this morning that 27 Tory MPs have publicly urged the Prime Minister to resign.
Letters of no confidence have been submitted to Sir Graham Brady, chairman of the 1922 committee of backbench Conservative MPs, but the precise number is unknown.
Former Attorney General Jeremy Wright became the latest senior Conservative to call for Mr Johnson to step down, saying the lockdown parties at Downing Street had done “lasting damage” to the party.
Harrogate Convention Centre investment could require county council consentA historic investment in Harrogate Convention Centre could require county council consent to go ahead should a devolution funding bid fail.
In what would be the biggest single spend by Harrogate Borough Council in its lifetime, the convention centre would undergo a £47 million revamp to create more space.
However, questions surround how exactly the authority will fund the project as the clock ticks down to April 2023 when the council is abolished.
‘Devolution negotiations under way’
Funding for the convention centre has formed part of a devolution deal for North Yorkshire, which has already been submitted to government.
The 140-page document, which has already been submitted to ministers, includes a request to “work with government to address the capital funding gap we have identified through our business case work to date”.
However, questions surround where the money would come from for the scheme should ministers not agree to the funding.
Read more:
- No final decision on HCC investment until 2022, says council
- Major redevelopment of Harrogate Convention Centre could start in October
Cllr Carl Les, leader of North Yorkshire County Council, said there could be an opportunity to apply to the government’s levelling up fund.
He added that any investment by the borough council would also require joint county council consent as the authority is restricted to spending no more than £1 million on capital projects.
Cllr Les said:
“Negotiations about devolution for North Yorkshire and York are under way.
“We have made a strong case for more powers and funding in a number of areas, including the Harrogate Convention Centre.
“Discussions are still under way with government and we hope to know the final shape of the deal in July.
“If government does not choose to fund the HCC through a devolution deal, then there could be other funding routes, including the government’s Levelling-Up Fund.
“Harrogate Borough Council is still able to invest in the centre. If the investment was to be more than £1 million, there would need to be joint consent with the county council’s executive.”
Meanwhile, David Goode, chair of Harrogate and Knaresborough Liberal Democrats, said the £47 million investment should be paused.
He said:
“North Yorkshire needs to take stock of where the convention centre sits within its overall strategy and how they would like to manage and run it.
“The area as a whole would be worse off if it was closed.”
He suggested there might be a “lower cost” alternative to the £47 million refurbishment that could still result in the venue being “viable” for conferences and concerts.
Cllr Goode also suggested parts of the conference centre could be mothballed for periods of time to reduce costs.
Council silent on HCC
Harrogate Borough Council has so far remained silent over a major £47 million renovation of the town’s convention centre as negotiations continue over funding for the scheme.
The borough council has already spent £1.5 million on contracts for the redevelopment, which has yet to be approved.
Figures revealed by the Local Democracy Reporting Service in December 2021 showed that the council had awarded contracts to companies such as KPMG, Arcadis, and Cushman and Wakefield.
This included design and feasibility work, a first phase business case and an outline business case.
Due to fears of a potential loss of £14.9 million worth of events, the council this year decided to accelerate part of its plans for studio two at the centre.
This would see seminar rooms created to accommodate up to 1,200 people.
According to council reports, a contract award for the acceleration is due to be put before senior borough councillors in June.
Following approval of the acceleration of the project, a competitive tender process was opened with a potential start date for the work earmarked for October.
However, the wider project has yet to be given approval. A spokesperson for the borough council said previously that a decision was due this year on the wider scheme.