Debenhams will reopen its Harrogate store on June 15 as retailers in the town centre gear up to bounce back after lockdown is eased.
The department store is preparing to open 50 of its outlets across the UK with strict social distancing measures in place.
Non-essential stores, such as clothing shops and electronic outlets, will be allowed to reopen as of June 15 as lockdown restrictions are relaxed further.
It comes as the future of Debenhams store in Parliament Street was thrown into doubt after the company filed for administration back in April.
Read more:
- Primark announces it will reopen Harrogate store
- Harrogate town centre will be deep cleaned in preparation for shoppers to return.
Now, the store will reopen with Perspex shields at tills and PPE in place for staff as part of social distancing guidelines.
Steven Cook, chief executive of Debenhams, said the company was looking forward to opening again:
Harrogate Race For Life to be replaced by events at home”We are delighted to be welcoming customers back to our stores in the coming weeks.
“From the installation of perspex screens at till points to the roll-out of social distancing procedures and PPE, we have been working hard to ensure our colleagues and customers can work and shop with confidence.
“Our reopening plans follow the successful conclusion of lease negotiations on 120 stores, meaning that the vast majority of our stores will be reopening.”
A series of major fundraisers in Harrogate has been called off, leaving a hole in the budget for a national charity.
Race for Life, along with Pretty Muddy and Pretty Muddy Kids, had already been postponed from July to October but has now been cancelled altogether for this year.
Organisers Cancer Research UK say the decision has been made to keep participants safe. The events usually attract hundreds of participants onto the Stray, completing 5km and 10km courses.
Lisa Millett, the charity’s spokesperson in North Yorkshire, said:
“Since it began in 1994, Race for Life has raised over £890m for Cancer Research UK’s life-saving work. We’re incredibly grateful to everyone who has taken part and hope their support will continue.
“We know Race for Life is such a treasured part of the UK’s events calendar and it is with a heavy heart that for the first time in 27 years we have to announce that it won’t be taking place. The safety of our supporters, volunteers, suppliers and staff is however essential.
“We hope the Race for Life event series will be back bigger and stronger than ever in 2021. In the meantime, we’d love to invite as many people as possible to join us by taking part in Race for Life at Home in these challenging times.”
As a result of lockdown, Cancer Research UK says it expects to see a drop in income of up to 25 percent.
Through Race for Life at Home, the charity is encouraging people to set themselves challenges to complete in their own gardens or public places. It hopes the money raised will go some way towards filling the gap left my its major events, which fund long-term research and pioneering trials to treat people across the UK.
Related stories:
- Charities fear for future after major fundraising events called off
- Horticap refuses to take donations from pub served with prohibition notice
Lisa added: “Cancer hasn’t stopped and people affected by cancer need our support more than ever.
Harrogate hospital discharges 118 coronavirus patients“From a run or 5K walk around the garden or local park to limbo in the living room, there is no wrong way to Race for Life at Home. With no entry fee, people might choose to twerk, star jump, squat, skip, dance, trampoline, or come up with their own novel way of taking part and share it with friends. We’re urging everyone – men women and children – to join our community and help raise vital funds.”
Harrogate District Hospital has discharged 118 patients who tested positive for coronavirus – an increase of nine on last week.
The latest news, announced this afternoon, comes as the hospital also reported one new patient death with Covid-19, in today’s NHS figures.
It takes the total number of deaths at Harrogate and District NHS Trust to 67.
Read more:
- Nearly 1,000 Harrogate hospital staff absent in April due to coronavirus
- Clock ticking to the end of NHS Nightingale contract in Harrogate
Meanwhile, a further 115 patients who tested positive for coronavirus have died in hospitals across England.
#teamHDFT #thankyouNHS pic.twitter.com/qhGUlqciUL
— Harrogate NHS FT (@HarrogateNHSFT) June 4, 2020
NHS England said those who died were aged between 26 and 100 years old. Of that number, five patients had no underlying health conditions.
It means that the total death toll nationally in hospitals stands at 27,159.
Harrogate pub could be shut down over lockdown breachesA Harrogate pub that came under fire for breaching coronavirus lockdown rules could be closed down permanently.
The council has told the landlord of the Coach and Horses that a formal review of its licence is underway after it found 75 customers in the area drinking on Sunday.
Harrogate Borough Council sent its enforcement team to two pubs on Saturday and reported that people were breaking the rules. It gave advice to the licensees of both pubs and reminded them of the law.
The next day, the Coach and Horses opened again and followed the initial advice before, the council says it committed a further breach of regulations.
Council officers issued a prohibition notice to the pub the same day and in doing so officers were subjected to verbal abuse from customers. One even followed the officers along Tower Street and back to their cars.
Despite the prohibition notice, the council said the pub continued to trade in the same way. In his report, council officer Gareth Bentley said officers returned to the pub on Monday, after the notice was issued:
“On arrival they noticed two ladies drinking in open plastic cups at the front of The Coach and Horses. Additionally people were sitting outside, on the opposite side of the road to the pubs’ side door on Tower Street drinking from open plastic pint cups.”
Council officers and police officers returned to the premises yesterday to serve notice of the licence review, which could mean a permanent closure.
Read more on this story:
- What happened on Saturday afternoon?
- Harrogate pub owners said they followed government guidelines
- Why did the council serve The Coach and Horses with a prohibition notice?
The council, accompanied by North Yorkshire Police, said it will continue to monitor the situation over the weekend.
Councillor Mike Chambers, Harrogate Borough Council’s cabinet member for housing and safer communities, said:
Joy for grandparents meeting seven-week-old baby“Even after officers visited the Coach and Horses pub, and advised the landlord of their responsibilities, they still felt the need to continue breaching coronavirus regulations. Sadly, this has now resulted in the review of the pub’s licence. These regulation are there to protect our communities. “
A Harrogate family has been able to share the joy of a new arrival for the first time since lockdown began.
Jen Carne gave birth to Samuel on April 21 and, along with husband Rob Earl, was unable to introduce him properly to his extended family.
Though they visited and waved through the windows, the easing of lockdown restrictions this week enabled grandparents Ed and Rosie Carne to meet Samuel in the park for the first time – and catch up with his 20-month-old sister, Hannah. Jen said:
“There have been a few positives in that we’ve been able to spend a lot of time as a family without having lots of pressure to see lots of people, but we’ve missed out on family being able to come over and help. We’ve missed being able to see other mums and babies. I have missed a lot of Hannah’s groups – it has been tricky trying to entertain her while taking care of Samuel.”
Read more:
- Which attractions are open for families to meet up outside?
- Nurseries welcome children back for the first time since lockdown began
This week’s meet-up was a special moment for the whole family, who should have been gathering this week to celebrate Jen and Rob’s wedding, which has had to be postponed. However, Jen said they hope to be able to hold a small ceremony soon, with a reception at a later date.
Meanwhile, Ed and Rosie are just pleased to be able to meet their new grandson and see how Hannah has grown over recent weeks. Rosie said:
“I feel we’re very lucky we live so near so at least we can see them, but I find not being able to pick Hannah up very hard. We were helping out with looking after when Jen was working so I feel we’ve got quite a close relationship and sometimes she wants to crawl to us and we have to back off. We have a few little games we can do, but it’s not the same.”
Clock ticking to end of NHS Nightingale contract in Harrogate
With less than four weeks remaining in the contract between the NHS and Harrogate Convention Centre, both parties are remaining tight-lipped about the future of the Nightingale Hospital.
The initial agreement allowed the NHS to establish the emergency hospital across eight halls at Harrogate Convention Centre and was set to last until the end of June. No rent was payable to HCC – which, owned by Harrogate Borough Council, had to cover costs using taxpayers’ money.
Now, with the end of the contract looming, the council has refused to comment on whether any further agreement has been made.
However, with national government advisors speaking publicly about the likelihood of a second wave of Covid-19, it seems unlikely the NHS will take down the facility in the near future. England’s chief medical officer, Prof Chris Whitty, said this week:
“It may be that there’s a seasonal element and if so, for most respiratory viruses, they are more likely to be transmitted, there is a higher likelihood of transmission, in the winter.
“The winter is always worse than summer, spring and autumn for health services, and we need to think about this in terms of how we come out for the next phase.”
While having the NHS Nightingale on stand-by has been described by many as reassuring, concerns have been raised repeatedly about the potential impact on the local economy – especially as hospitality businesses prepare to reopen in early July.
Harrogate’s businesses are heavily reliant upon tourist and conference visitors to the centre, which says that it contributes around £60m to the local economy. Hotels, restaurants and bars have already spoken out about the need to fill the gap left by the conference trade.
Read more:
- Harrogate District Hospital had a fifth of its workforce off sick
- Why one leading hotelier believes the Nightingale hospital could cause problems for the town’s hospitality trade
Harrogate Borough Council refused to make any comment on the status of negotiations with the NHS over the future of the Nightingale hospital, saying the contract was confidential. Last month, HCC director Paula Lorimer told The Stray Ferret that the next events were scheduled for August and, in the meantime, she was doing all she could to reschedule events which could not be held.
This week, Harrogate District Chamber of Commerce’s chief executive, Sandra Doherty, told The Stray Ferret it was a “feather in Harrogate’s cap” to be chosen to host the NHS Nightingale for the region. However, she warned:
“The conference and exhibition industry is the life blood of Harrogate’s economy, and those businesses that rely on this vitally important trade need clarification as to when these venues will be handed back.
“Whilst the coronavirus lockdown has resulted in the cancellation and postponement of many events, organisers will now be looking to reschedule them for later in the year. Harrogate is blessed with a number of other superb conference facilities, and we need to do everything we can to encourage organisers to consider using them as an alternative.
“We must do everything in our power to keep new and existing business here.”
Exclusive: Nearly 1000 Harrogate hospital staff absent in April due to coronavirus
Nearly 1000 staff at Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust were absent from work because of coronavirus in the first month of lockdown.
The vast majority of the 974 took time off to self-isolate with coronavirus symptoms for an average of nine days – the rest will shield themselves until the end of June.
It means that one in five of Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust’s staff have taken time off and it has come at a major cost.
In the first month of the financial year, from April 6, the Trust paid out £478,000 for sickness at full pay. The figures come from a report from the Trust’s Board of Directors seen by The Stray Ferret which details its finances.
What has Harrogate District Hospital Trust spent coronavirus money on?
Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust spent just over £1 million on its coronavirus response in the same period – which was in line with other Trusts in the region. The report says the Trust received money from the NHS centrally to cover it.
Most of the money was spent on sick pay but the report also highlights what else the Trust has spent its money on:
- £216,000 to help set up the NHS Nightingale Yorkshire and the Humber
- £145,000 on other costs
- £101,000 on expanding the Trust’s medical, nursing and other workforces
- £40,000 on additional shifts for the existing workforce
- £34,000 on the segregation of patient pathways
- £22,000 on increasing capacity in the Intensive Treatment Unit
- £17,000 on coronavirus testing in NHS laboratories
Read more on this story:
No new coronavirus deaths at Harrogate District Hospital
Harrogate District Hospital has not reported any coronavirus deaths in today’s figures from the NHS.
The number of deaths at the hospital stands at 66. The hospital reported two coronavirus deaths yesterday.
Read more on this story
- Watch how Harrogate thanked its carers during the coronavirus lockdown
- The last time Harrogate hospital reported coronavirus deaths
A further 179 people, who tested positive for coronavirus, have died in England’s hospitals. It brings the total number of confirmed reported deaths to 27,044.
Patients were aged between 12 and 97 years old. Four of the 179 patients, who were aged between 78 and 93, had no known underlying health conditions.
Harrogate’s deep clean starts on MondayHarrogate town centre is set to undergo a deep clean next week ahead of non-essential retail shops reopening after 10 weeks of lockdown.
Harrogate BID has contracted Yorkshire-based UK Nationwide Cleaning Services for the work which will be carried out from Monday (June 8).
The four-year contract will see the company power wash pavements and street furniture on a night and is expected to take two weeks to complete.
Read more on this story
- Primark announces Harrogate store will reopen
- Harrogate BID creates social distancing posters for businesses
It comes as non-essential shops, such as clothing stores and electronic outlets, will reopen from June 15 as the lockdown is eased.
Simon Kent, Harrogate BID interim-manager, said:
“In a recent survey of the town centre businesses, the vast majority of those who responded said their number one priority was a deep clean. I’m delighted to say that we are now just days away from fulfilling this.
“We have awarded this contract to UK Nationwide Cleaning Services. The company is no stranger to this type of work, as they already work with BIDs across the UK.
“From next week, life will slowly start to get back to normal, and we want Harrogate to look superb. The deep cleaning will be a major fact in helping us achieving this.”
Meanwhile, Harrogate Borough Council has been handed £141,000 as part of the European Union Regional Development Fund to help reopen high streets safely.
The money is designed to fund measures such as new signs, temporary barriers, street markings and marketing campaigns to reassure people that High Streets are safe. However, the authority said a plan for the money is still being devised.
Council ‘sets precedent’ by breaking listed building guidelinesHarrogate Borough Council’s planning committee has been accused of going against its own guidance in approving plans for a fence on its land.
The council applied for permission to put up a 1m high fence along the boundary between its land and the privately-owned Tower House, which adjoins the Grade II listed Harlow Hill Tower on Nursery Lane, on the edge of the Pinewoods in Harrogate.
The council’s own design guide states:
New 2m high timber panel fences used as screens to maintain privacy for neighbours are generally acceptable in back gardens, however in sensitive locations, such as the boundary to a Listed Building or in a Conservation Area, the screen should be of brick or stone as appropriate to the setting.
A planning application was submitted earlier this year for a picket fence running 28m along the boundary behind Tower House. Reporting to the planning committee, principal conservation officer Emma Gibbens said:
“A stone wall of matching stone would be more appropriate, however, there are concerns over the creation of a significantly more permanent solution for what seems to be a short term requirement, whereas the picket fence represents an option that could easily be removed in the future when it is no longer required.”
Read more:
- How will use of public money be scrutinised during the pandemic?
- The agony of getting a single cycle route built in Harrogate
Tower House was bought eight years ago by Neil and Lucy Hind. The boundary in question is not visible from Nursery Lane because of high hedging, but separates the house from a piece of land owned by the council.
‘No change’
Mr Hind addressed the committee during yesterday’s virtual meeting, urging members to reject the proposal. He said nothing had changed since the last planning committee meeting in March, when councillors deferred their decision on the proposal, telling officers to reconsider whether a fence was the most suitable option.
Mr Hind told committee members yesterday there had been no change to the fence proposal which they had refused to accept in March, other than limiting its life span to five years. The committee’s previous requests for an explanation of why the fence was needed, and for council officers to consult with the neighbours, had not happened, he said.
Among those objecting to the plans was Cllr Pat Marsh, who said:
“I feel that if we’re doing this, we’re almost setting a precedent which will impact on other parts of our district that have got listed buildings. Why don’t we just make it a permanent fixture? Why mess around with temporary fences?”
Her views were shared by Cllr Robert Windass and Cllr Nigel Simms, who said a more suitable material should be used for a boundary so close to a listed building. However, the plans were passed by six votes to five.
After the meeting, Mr Hind told The Stray Ferret:
“The committee members were originally unanimous in their view that the plans were not acceptable, so it is somewhat a mystery as to who or what changed some of their minds over the last few months.
“It was clear from the discussion that these plans are still not in line with the council’s own guidance and policy. However, it seems there is one rule for the council and one for residents, especially where cost is a factor.”