Harrogate and Knaresborough MP Andrew Jones has written to the chairman of rail operator Northern urging him to “rethink” reductions to the service between Harrogate and Leeds.
The Stray Ferret reported last week that the 6.07am from Harrogate to Leeds — the first of the day — will be axed from May 15. Some evening services will also be cut.
Brian Dunsby, of Harrogate Line Supporters Group, branded the move ‘disgraceful’ and called for a rethink.
Now Mr Jones has also said the decision should be reconsidered. The Conservative MP said:
“Over the last 12 years we have seen steady improvements to our local rail services. The hated pacer trains have gone, we have more direct services to London with the Azumas and we had seen welcome increases in services to Leeds and York.
“Many groups and individuals lobbied hard to get those changes and we worked with regional and national rail companies in a positive and constructive way. None of us want to see these hard-won improvements lost.”
Read more:
- Red Arrows set to fly over Harrogate district this week
- Early morning train from Harrogate to Leeds cancelled
- Andrew Jones MP welcomes pause in smart motorway rollout
Mr Jones added that some long-term changes were understandable because of the trend towards working from home. He said>
“However these changes won’t be forever and there are other pressures in the local and national economy – such as the increase in fuel prices, the strength of the jobs market, the re-opening of the conference and exhibition business and the emphasis on greener methods of travel – which seem likely to lead to an increase in public transport use.
“It is simply therefore too early to judge whether it is right to consolidate the cuts made during the covid lockdowns into the timetable and add new reductions on top of that.”
Mr Jones said he had written to Robin Gisby, chairman of Northern, “asking him to pause any proposed service reductions between Harrogate and Leeds and consider reversing the earlier reductions in stages so that we get back to the level of service we had pre-pandemic”.
Derelict Knaresborough High Street properties restored
A row of derelict properties on Knaresborough High Street have been renovated with a £1m investment from Harrogate Borough Council.
The council bought the seven Grade II listed properties in 2019 after they had been unoccupied for several years. They consist of three retail units and four residences.
Renovation began with planning permission and listed building consent in 2020, and has just been completed.
One of the properties that did not need renovation has already been occupied by Knaresborough Exotic Rescue.
The other properties have been listed for rent or sale.
Councillor Graham Swift, deputy leader and Cabinet member for resources, enterprise and economic development, said;
“These properties had been a blight on the high street in Knaresborough for several years.
“But after they were brought to our attention by Councillor Darling, we recognised the potential they could have to provide both homes and business spaces, we took the necessary steps to purchase them.”
Read more
- Harrogate district volunteers wanted to fill sandbags for floods
- Plans for Harrogate’s first mosque approved
A former resident of one of the properties, Ms Hassall, wrote to Conservative MP for Harrogate and Knaresborough Andrew Jones to share her thanks for the project, saying;
“I am so very pleased that 82a Knaresborough High Street has been renovated; I lived there when I first got married in 1949.
It was quite a bad state then. However, we decorated it and made it as nice as we could.
It is good to see these properties being renovated.”
Police still investigating missing Porsches at former Knaresborough car dealership
North Yorkshire Police has confirmed that an investigation into missing Porsche sports cars at a former Knaresborough dealership Gmund Cars is still ongoing.
The police launched its investigation in the summer of 2019 after allegations from customers that Gmund transferred ownership of more than £1 million worth of cars without their permission.
In July 2019, North Yorkshire Police arrested a man in his fifties but no charges have been brought currently.
No further arrests have been made since the investigation began.
A North Yorkshire Police spokesperson said last week:
“The investigation is ongoing and as such we cannot provide any further statement.”
Frustration
One customer of Gmund, who asked not to be named, told the Stray Ferret last week that they are “very frustrated” with the pace of the investigation.
The customer bought a car from Gmund but said they have been told by the police they are not able to sell or modify it until the investigation is complete.
They said:
“I am very frustrated with the protracted process and total lack of transparency. After three years, the pace at which this is being conducted is incredible.”
Read more:
- How Harrogate Borough Council responded to a complaint around Cllr Mearns and Gmund Cars
- Exclusive: Harrogate MP aide and councillor at centre of £1 million Porsche investigation
- Harrogate MP refuses to answer Porsche investigation questions
History
The company started in 2006 and built up a strong reputation as a place that bought and sold classic Porsche cars.
In 2020, six alleged victims told the Stray Ferret spoke to about their experiences with the firm.
The company, which was based at the Nidd Valley Business Park, has now been dissolved and its owner Andrew Mearns was declared bankrupt.
His wife, the former Conservative councillor for Knaresborough Scriven Park, Samantha Mearns, was company secretary until December 2018.
Ms Mearns told the Stray Ferret in 2020 she was never interviewed by police in relation to the allegations.
In July 2021, she resigned from the council and moved to Wales citing family reasons.
MPs watch: Criticising the Prime Minister and trips to QatarEvery month the Stray Ferret tries to find out what our local MPs have been up to in their constituencies and in the House of Commons.
In February, war broke out in Ukraine and all legal restrictions for covid were lifted after almost two years.
We asked our three Conservative MPs, Harrogate & Knaresborough’s Andrew Jones, Skipton and Ripon’s Julian Smith, and Selby and Ainsty’s Nigel Adams if they would like to highlight anything in particular that they have been doing this month, but, as usual, we did not receive a response from any of them.
Here is what we know after analysing their online presence.

Andrew Jones, Harrogate and Knaresborough MP.
In Harrogate and Knaresborough, Mr Jones:
- Writing on his local “news” website, Community News, on February 1, Mr Jones commented on the release of the Sue Gray Downing Street parties report. He said he was “disappointed” the full report would not be published until after the police investigation but called the alleged events at Downing Street a “sorry state of affairs.”
- On February 15, the MP posed for a photo with Copgrove-based Abacus Manufacturing owner Ian Pattison. The pair discussed how the business had coped during covid and its expansion plans.
- The MP is the chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Infrastructure. On February 23 he posed for a photo with chancellor Rishi Sunak and leading figures from the civil engineering industry.
- At PMQs on the same day, Mr Jones asked the prime minister if the NHS would review the system for identifying people most vulnerable to covid, as he said some are at risk of being missed.
- The MP defended Harrogate District Hospital after the Local Democracy Service revealed 800 patients were allowed to return to their care homes without being tested for covid. Mr Jones said :“This must have been extremely difficult for them particularly in the early days of the pandemic when the world was fighting against something new.”
Read more:
-
New gritter tracker shows which roads in Harrogate district are being treated
-
Harrogate council ranks in lowest 15% of local authorities for tackling climate change

Julian Smith, MP for Skipton and Ripon.
In Skipton and Ripon, here is what we found on Mr Smith:
- The MP was uncharacteristically outspoken on Twitter during February. On February 1 he criticised prime minister Boris Johnson for suggesting labour leader Keir Starmer failed to prosecute Jimmy Savile while he was Director of Public Prosecutions. He wrote: “The smear made against Keir Starmer relating to Jimmy Saville yesterday is wrong & cannot be defended. It should be withdrawn. False and baseless personal slurs are dangerous, corrode trust & can’t just be accepted as part of the cut & thrust of parliamentary debate.”
- After Keir Starmer was harassed outside Parliament a week later, Mr Smith again called for the PM to withdraw the “false slur” about Jimmy Savile.
- In a tweet on February 26, he urged the UK government to “make an immediate open, welcoming and warm hearted commitment of sanctuary to those who wish to leave Ukraine. Rip up the usual bureaucracy and let’s just say they are welcome and we will make it as easy as possible to be here.”
- On February 9, Children from Masham C of E Primary School visited Mr Smith in Parliament. He tweeted that he was envious of their Happy Meal at the end of the day.
- The MP criticised fellow Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg who suggested civil servants do not make British life better. Mr Smith replied “Have to disagree. Massive thanks to all local, devolved & central gov civil servants.”

Nigel Adams, MP for Selby and Ainsty which includes rural Harrogate.
In rural south Harrogate, here is what we found on Mr Adams:
- The MP said on February 1 he was “delighted’ that North Yorkshire would become an Education Investment Area. Ministers plan to offer retention payments in those areas to keep the best teachers and prioritise them for new specialist sixth form free schools.
- On Twitter, the MP praised his boss Boris Johnson for hiring the “fabulous” ex-BBC and GB News journalist Guto Harri as his new director of communications.
- On February 16, the MP visited Qatar for a trip to help drum up trade to the UK.
- Mr Adams’ constituency includes Tadcaster, just outside the Harrogate district, which was hit by floods in February. He told ITV the Environment Agency needs to ‘get their fingers out’ and invest in flood defences for the town.
Fresh calls have been made to reinstate a Harrogate bus service which was scrapped more than three years ago.
The 104 service between Wedderburn Road and Harrogate town centre was removed in November 2018, despite efforts from residents and councillors to save the service.
Locals say the scrapping of the service has left elderly and disabled residents cut adrift and forced to pay for taxis to get into town.
However, with North Yorkshire County Council bidding for a £116 million to help fund bus services, there have been renewed calls to reinstate the service.
Removal was a ‘slap in the face’
Lynne Hallums lives on Stonefall Drive, which the bus used to serve as part of its circular of the Wedderburn Estate.
She has chronic nerve pain, fibromyalgia and has to wear a hearing aid. Lynne used to take the 104 into town around four times a week.
She said the bus used to serve a large elderly community, all of which knew each other. It was also a means of getting to Mowbray Square medical centre and the hospital.
But now she says the removal of the service has left them without regular transport and cut them off as a community.
Lynne said:
“When they said they were going to take it [the bus] away, it was like a slap in the face.”
After the removal of the 104 bus, a voluntary service known as “dial-a-ride” was put on to serve the estate.
Read more:
- ‘Strong support’ for more Harrogate bus lanes
- Improving county bus services an ‘enormous challenge’, says transport boss
However, Lynne says that the voluntary service needed to be booked in advance and did not help those who wanted to go into town regularly.
Meanwhile, elderly and disabled residents are forced to either walk to Wetherby Road or Knaresborough Road to catch a bus.
Lynne bought her house on Stonefall Drive 12 years ago and said the bus stop outside her house was a key selling point.
However, she says she is now considering moving after two years of covid lockdowns and the lack of a regular service to get into town and meet people has had an affect on her mental health.
“I need to get out of this house, my mental health is suffering.
“We do not get to see anyone. We cannot support the local businesses.”
Renewed calls to reinstate
The subsidy for the 104 service was withdrawn in May 2014 when North Yorkshire county councillors agreed that town services should no longer be subsidised.
The decision was made in an effort to save the council £1.1 million and Connexions, which operated the service, subsequently stopped running the bus in 2018.
Craig Temple, director of the company, said the removal of the subsidy was the starting point which led to the service being stopped.
He said:
“I did not want to take it off. The people were lovely and it is not something that we wanted to do.
“We looked at other ways of reintroducing it. I would love to put it back on, the people were great customers and it breaks my heart.”
He added that the loss of subsidy, drop in passenger numbers due to covid and the lack of small buses in its fleet to be able to serve Wedderburn meant it was unlikely that the company would be able to reintroduce the service.
However, residents, local councillors and Andrew Jones, Conservative Harrogate and Knaresborough MP, have called for it to be reinstated.
Ahead of the county council bidding for funding for improved bus services, Mr Jones said he hoped a Wedderburn service would be included in its proposal as the removal of the service had “cut off a whole section of our community from the hospital, the medical centre at Mowbray Square and the town centre”.

Cllr Chris Aldred (left) and Andrew Jones MP.
Cllr Chris Aldred, the Liberal Democrat councillor who represents the Fairfax ward on Harrogate Borough Council, to the Stray Ferret that while the removal of the service may make sense commercially, he was “not convinced” it served residents well.
He added that he had raised the idea of reinstating the service as part of the county council’s bus improvement strategy, which it has bid to government for £116 million of funding for.
Cllr Aldred said:
“Despite this strategy, I cannot see it returning. There does not seem to be anything in that strategy for local services.”
£116m bus strategy
The council’s plan asks for £116 million of government cash over the next eight years to fund support for existing and new services, a simpler ticketing system, better information on journeys and other measures.
The aim is for services to cover the whole of North Yorkshire and has been dubbed an “enormous challenge” by Cllr Don Mackenzie, Conservative executive county councillor for highways.
It is hoped these targets will be also met through so-called enhanced partnerships where councils agree to infrastructure improvements in return for better services from bus companies.
The Stray Ferret asked the county council whether any restating of the 104 service to Wedderburn was included in its plan and, if it wasn’t, what measures does the authority intend to implement to help elderly residents with public transport.
Michael Leah, assistant director for travel, environment and countryside service at the county council, said:
Energy crisis could mean £796 increase for Harrogate district households“Our Bus Service Improvement Plan does not include details of individual bus services or journeys yet instead outlines how we aim to expand services and support those which already exist. We continue to provide a discretionary £1.5 million budget to subsidise local bus services which provide fixed route and timetabled bus services that are not discretely commercially viable.
“In partnership with our operators, we aim to increase passenger numbers and therefore, through increasing commercial viability in this way, seek to extend the bus network as well as increase frequency of services.
“Through the plan, and based on funding received, we are committed to delivering more flexible, on-demand services following the successful YorBus pilot in Bedale, Ripon and Masham. YorBus is fully accessible, with low floor access and a ramp access for users of wheelchairs, pushchairs and those with mobility difficulties.
“We have just concluded the public consultation on proposals in our enhanced partnership plan. A report incorporating the feedback will go to our executive in March to consider the enhanced partnership with bus operators, with a view to that partnership coming into effect from April 1, 2022.”
Harrogate district residents will be among the hardest hit by the energy crisis with households paying around £796 more this year, according to analysis by the Liberal Democrats.
The Lib Dems have hit out at government proposals to deal with soaring energy bills and urged Chancellor Rishi Sunak to scrap the planned National Insurance tax hike, which will pile further pressure on household budgets from April.
Their calls come as figures show the Harrogate district will be the 12th hardest hit area in England during the energy price hikes.

Bryn Griffiths
Councillor Bryn Griffiths, leader of the Lib Dems on North Yorkshire County Council, said:
“Residents across North Yorkshire have been sorely let down by this Conservative government, they are shouldering the financial pain of Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s poor decisions.
“The Lib Dems demand better and object to the Chancellor’s approach, he is not fit to lead.”
Windfall tax
The Lib Dems are also calling for a windfall tax on big profit oil and gas companies, something Spain’s left-wing government has already announced.
However, the UK government has argued that a one-off tax like this would stop companies investing as it also defended its own plans for a repayable £200 discount on all energy bills and a further £150 council tax rebate for most households.

Andrew Jones
Harrogate and Knaresborough MP Andrew Jones said:
“I understand the arguments for a windfall tax and can see it is superficially attractive.
“But we can only tax UK companies and the current tax rate on oil and gas profits is already 40% – double that on most other sectors of the economy.
“In the gas and oil industry we have investment needs of £11bn in an industry and supply chain which supports almost 200,000 jobs.
“Putting that investment and those jobs at risk would be a very dangerous and potentially hugely damaging blow to British industry.”
“Global gas prices are high due to various factors but primarily driven by an increase in demand, a reduction in the availability and because the number of suppliers and the length of the supply chains has decreased.
“Many expect these changes to be medium-term effects and that the factors that have driven the price increase will ease but not totally disappear.
“Anyone claiming that there is a way of avoiding these global higher energy prices for domestic customers going forward is simply making it up.”
Read more:
- Zero Carbon Harrogate receives £125,000 to make buildings more energy efficient
- Administrators reveal state of Harrogate firm CNG Energy’s finances
Council tax rebate
The council tax rebate will apply from April to homes in council tax bands A to D, benefiting around 52,000 households in the Harrogate district.
It will be made directly by Harrogate Borough Council and will not need to be repaid.
The further £200 discount on energy bills will apply to all domestic electricity customers from October, with the government meeting the costs.
However, unlike the council tax rebate, this discount will be automatically recovered from people’s bills in equal £40 instalments over a five year period from 2023, when it is hoped global wholesale gas prices will have come down.
Announcing the measures earlier this month, Chancellor Rishi Sunak said:
Plans approved for 38 flats at ‘Pannal skyscraper’“I know the number one issue on people’s minds is the rising cost of living.
“That’s why the government is stepping in with direct support that will help around 28 million households with their rising energy costs over the next year.
“We stood behind British people and businesses throughout the pandemic and it’s right we continue to do that as our economy recovers in the months ahead.”
Plans have been approved for a second time to build an apartment block at the former Dunlopillo factory in Pannal.
Developer Echo Green Developments was granted planning permission in September last year to demolish the main office block and build 48 apartments.
In December the developer then submitted new plans that would supersede the previously approved plans.
It included 38 apartments, fewer than the original proposal, but would still be two storeys taller than the demolished building.
The initial decision to approve the plans, which was made under permitted development rights, was met with anger from some residents.
Pannal historian Anne Smith said the village would be lumbered with a “skyscraper-type building”.
Read more:
- New plans submitted for smaller Dunlopillo development
- Harrogate council should have acted quicker on Dunlopillo housing plans, review finds
Permitted development rights were brought in under the Conservative government and can be used by developers to fast track the redevelopment of disused offices.
Nevertheless, Conservative MP for Harrogate and Knaresborough Andrew Jones intervened to say the scheme should have been decided by a vote from the council’s planning committee.
A review by the council concluded the plans were “appropriately considered”.
Mr Jones called on residents to submit objections to the second application. In the end, it received 26 objections.
Harrogate council should have acted quicker on Dunlopillo housing plans, review finds
A review has found Harrogate Borough Council should have acted quicker on controversial housing plans for the derelict Dunlopillo building in Pannal.
Residents, councillors and Harrogate and Knaresborough Conservative MP Andrew Jones all criticised the council when it approved plans for 48 apartments at the site last September.
The decision was made at officer level and without a vote from councillors, which led to the council launching an internal review into how it handled the plans submitted under rules called permitted development rights.
A report has now concluded a “longer period of time than ideal” was spent on parts of the process.
It also said residents should have been consulted with sooner and that this could have allowed time for a vote from councillors.
Despite this, the council said the plans were still “appropriately considered”.
A council spokesperson said:
“The lessons learnt review regarding the former Dunlopillo site in Pannal found that the case was appropriately considered by officers and determined in-line with the appropriate legislation.
“It was acknowledged that some internal process areas could be strengthened, including prioritisation of such applications in the future and a greater overview by senior officers.”
Read more:
- Harrogate council housing company Bracewell Homes won’t pay any dividends this year
- Plan approved to demolish Harrogate social club for flats
- New plans submitted for smaller Dunlopillo development
The report explained that extra time was spent on the application because it was the first the council had received under permitted development rights, which fast-track the conversion of empty buildings into homes.
Since the plans were passed new proposals have since been submitted for the Station Road site with a reduced number of apartments to replace the derelict office building which has been described as a “monstrosity”.
Echo Green Developments now wants to build 38 apartments at the site, which pillows and bedding manufacturer Dunlopillo moved out of in 2008.
The proposed building is still two-storeys higher than the existing offices – something which has been a key concern for residents who are fearful the development will have a major visual impact on the area.
‘Improvements could be made’
Mr Jones had urged residents to make their voices heard on the latest plans and has now welcomed the conclusion of the review.
He said:
“I was pleased to see that the council had done an internal review on the matter and concluded that, although all the correct factors were taken into account in reaching a decision, there were improvements in the process that could be made.
“I know planners have a difficult job with ever-changing laws and guidance. I know too that they rarely have to take decisions on issues which are uncontroversial.
“That is why I am really encouraged that they have taken the time to look back, evaluate and implement changes in regard of this brand-new class of permitted development.”
Mr Jones added:
“After the initial submission which prompted my concerns over the decision-making process, the applicants submitted a new proposal for the Dunlopillo site.
“This superseded the earlier decision and time was available to get the application before a planning committee.
“I think this shows that not only did planners critically evaluate what had been done previously, but they implemented the positive changes identified in the report.
“I am grateful that they took this approach irrespective of the outcome of the process.”
A decision on the latest plans is expected this month.
Andrew Jones MP calls for Sue Gray report to be published in fullAndrew Jones, the Conservative MP for Harrogate and Knaresborough, asked Boris Johnson whether the Sue Gray report will be published in full during a heated debate in Parliament today.
Mr Jones asked a question after the Prime Minister’s statement on the report this afternoon.
The report lists 16 gatherings over a 20-month period. Of those, four did not reach the threshold for the police to investigate.
Mr Jones — sitting next to former Prime Minister Theresa May — asked:
“The update that we have from Sue Gray is, as she says herself, extremely limited.
“So will (Boris Johnson) confirm that at the earliest opportunity he will have the report published in full?”
Mr Johnson did not commit to that request. He replied:
“What we will do is wait until the police have concluded their enquiries and then see what more we can publish. That is what we are going to do.”
Read more:
- MPs watch: Hedgehogs and Downing Street parties
- Could Harrogate be the home of the new North Yorkshire Council?
- Harrogate MP says ‘lawmakers can’t be lawbreakers’
The Stray Ferret asked all three Harrogate district MPs, which besides Mr Jones include Skipton and Ripon MP Julian Smith and Selby and Ainsty MP Nigel Adams for their reaction to Sue Gray’s report and whether they would call on the PM to resign.
None replied by the time of publication.
You can read the report here. Ms Gray concluded:
“The whole of the country rose to the challenge. Ministers, special advisers and the Civil Service, of which I am proud to be a part, were a key and dedicated part of that national effort.
“However, as I have noted, a number of these gatherings should not have been allowed to take place or to develop in the way that they did.
“There is significant learning to be drawn from these events which must be addressed immediately across government.”
The PM said today he is making changes to how Downing Street and the Cabinet Office is run so they can get on with the job of government. He said:
MPs watch: Hedgehogs and Downing Street parties“I get it and I will fix it.”
Every month the Stray Ferret tries to find out what our local MPs have been up to in their constituencies and in the House of Commons.
In January, the Downing Street parties scandal dominated the news whilst covid Plan B restrictions were lifted.
We asked our three Conservative MPs, Harrogate & Knaresborough’s Andrew Jones, Skipton and Ripon’s Julian Smith, and Selby and Ainsty’s Nigel Adams if they would like to highlight anything in particular that they have been doing this month, but, as usual, we did not receive a response from any of them.
Here is what we know after analysing their online presence.

Andrew Jones, Harrogate and Knaresborough MP.
In Harrogate and Knaresborough, here is what we found on Mr Jones:
- On January 17 Harrogate MP Andrew Jones told a constituent that “lawmakers can’t be lawbreakers” after Prime Minister Boris Johnson admitted attending a party during the first coronavirus lockdown.
- Mr Jones supported the government’s decision to pause the rollout of smart motorways, despite being a key advocate during his time as transport minister.
- The MP backed a campaign for road signs in Starbeck that alert motorists of hedgehogs.
- On January 25, the MP spoke about ‘levelling up’ at the UK Bus & Coach Conference.
- On January 27, Mr Jones signed the Holocaust Educational Trust’s Book of Commitment.
- Mr Jones spoke seven times in the House of Commons during January, including asking a question about the victims of the Tonga tsunami.
- Network Rail remove graffiti from Hookstone Road bridge in Harrogate after a resident reported it to him.
Read more:
-
New gritter tracker shows which roads in Harrogate district are being treated
-
Harrogate council ranks in lowest 15% of local authorities for tackling climate change

Julian Smith, MP for Skipton and Ripon.
In Skipton and Ripon, here is what we found on Mr Smith:
- Mr Smith did not update his website during January.
- He did not comment publicly on the Downing Street parties scandal.
- On January 11 Mr Smith spoke at the Skipton & Ripon Area Constituency Committee about the lack of lateral flow tests in Ripon.
- Seven of the MP’s 12 tweets were related to Northern Ireland.
- On Twitter, he paid tribute to Andrew Lupton, of Ripon firm Econ Engineering, who died. He said Mr Lupton had “massive drive and focus. All thoughts & prayers with his family.”

Nigel Adams, MP for Selby and Ainsty which includes rural Harrogate.
In rural south Harrogate, here is what we found on Mr Adams:
- On Holocaust Memorial Day on January 27 the MP looked back on a trip to Auschwitz six years ago. He tweeted: “We must always honour the memory of those who perished & never turn a blind eye to antisemitism.”
- The MP hit out at Labour who he suggested support the Insulate Britain roadblock protests. He tweeted: “Labour’s mask slipping again by being on the side of those wanting to bring our country to a standstill.”
- On January 26 Mr Adams voted in favour of making trade unions pay 2.5% of their total income to cover the costs of a trade union regulator.