Harrogate and Knaresborough Conservative MP Andrew Jones has rejected claims that investment zones could harm the environment.
North Yorkshire County Council revealed last week it had submitted expressions of interest to the government to create investment zones at three Harrogate district sites.
They are Harrogate Convention Centre, junction 47 of the A1 and Potter Space Ripon, a business park at Junction 50 of the A1.
The zones will benefit from liberalised planning laws and tax incentives for businesses, which has sparked concerns from environmental groups such as the Wildlife Trusts that they will put wildlife and wild spaces at risk.
But Mr Jones told the House of Commons this week:
“These are sites where we have existing commercial activity which were already earmarked for further investment. Investment zones give us the opportunity to lever in funding from the government.
“I understand that individuals and some groups were concerned that the new investment zones would see the development of huge swathes of countryside. I would not have supported their introduction were that the case.
“But it is clear from the sites that are being brought forward that this is far from the case”
Read more:
- Revealed: the three Harrogate district sites that could become investment zones
- Andrew Jones MP launches ‘non-political’ fact-checking service
Green Party rejects Mr Jones’ claims

Paul Ko Ferrigno
But Harrogate and District Green Party prospective parliamentary candidate Paul Ko Ferrigno criticised Mr Jones’ stance.
“Like his government, Mr Jones has had 12 long years to establish his green credentials, and it is on that track record that he must be judged, not some aspirational scheme that has been rushed in so quickly that councillors have not been given time to scrutinise the detail.
“It isn’t even clear that these investment zones are needed because we haven’t been told which regulations are potentially holding schemes back.”
Business support
Lilla Bathurst, manager of Ripon Business Improvement District, backed the county council’s submission. She said:
“Whilst the Potter Space is outside the Ripon BID area, we welcome any investment into the Ripon city region.
“The potential for more businesses and employment in the area, and therefore further footfall and spend in our BID businesses, can only be a positive and we fully support Cllr Carl Les and North Yorkshire County Council in their submission.”
However, the North Yorkshire branch of Unison took a different view:
We share the concerns of @WildlifeTrusts, and our branch committee has voted unanimously to oppose #InvestmentZones and we arw asking @northyorkscc to withdraw its interest.@AJonesMP @nadams @JulianSmithUK @JulianSturdy @RishiSunak @kevinhollinrake
@ChrisGPackham https://t.co/3oHgEsdb3u
— North Yorkshire UNISON (@NYUnison) October 15, 2022
Revealed: the three Harrogate district sites that could become investment zones
North Yorkshire County Council revealed today it has selected three possible sites in the Harrogate district to become investment zones.
The sites are: junction 47 of the A1; Potter Space Ripon, a business park at Junction 50 of the A1 and Harrogate Convention Centre.
The government has said the zones, which will receive liberalised planning laws and tax incentives for businesses, will support business and economic growth.
But they have been criticised by conservation organisations because of the potential impact on wildlife.
Last month, North Yorkshire County Council was named as one of 38 local authorities in talks with the government over creating investment zones.
Today, the county council named the 12 commercial sites it had identified for possible zones in North Yorkshire.
Read more:
- Harrogate district planning rules could be ‘radically streamlined’
- Harrogate Convention Centre ‘could lose £250 million without investment’
Of the seven districts within the county, only Selby, where five sites have been identified, has more locations than the Harrogate district.

Carl Les
Carl Les, the Conservative leader of the county council, said:
“We are at a very early stage in the process, but this could be an exciting and welcome initiative that would enable us to work with the government to deliver benefits for the North Yorkshire economy.
“Following discussions with our district council colleagues, we are submitting an expression of interest. This identifies a number of sites across the county that we feel fit the criteria from government. We look forward to further negotiations with Government following our submission.”
Full list of sites in North Yorkshire
The sites identified in the expression of interest are:
- Hambleton: Dalton, at Junction 49 on the A1.
- Harrogate: Harrogate, at Junction 47 of the A1; Potter Space Ripon, at Junction 50 of the A1; Harrogate Convention Centre.
- Richmondshire: the area around A1 Junctions 52 and 53.
- Ryedale: Eden Camp East, Malton.
- Scarborough: Scarborough Business Park.
- Selby: Gascoigne Wood Rail Interchange, Olympia Park, and sites at Eggborough, Kellingley and Sherburn.
Cllr Les said:
“The sites we are putting forward for consideration are locations that have already been earmarked for commercial development to support business growth and job creation. The proposed benefits of investment zones could help to make these sites even more attractive to new businesses and accelerate development ambitions.
“We are fully aware of the need to minimise any environmental impacts, so all the sites we are putting forward have been selected in accordance with local planning and conservation policy. None are sensitive or protected sites.”
Proposed sites must meet the Government’s criteria to offer a significant economic opportunity, be ready to deliver quickly and align with the wider local strategy.
Once the government has received the expressions of interest from invited authorities, further criteria will influence site selection, including consideration of the overall geographic distribution of investment zones, the balance between residential and commercial, and urban and rural sites and the readiness to deliver.
North Yorkshire devolution deal ‘third lowest’ in north, says IPPR NorthNorth Yorkshire County Council has defended a £540 million devolution deal after a report found it to be the third lowest agreed across northern England.
A report by the think tank, IPPR North, analysed the deal in comparison with similar agreements struck in areas such as West Yorkshire and the Tees Valley.
The organisation looked at the proposed ‘gainshare’, which is the money provided by the government annually for the investment fund, and how it compared with other northern regions.
The report found that out of seven devolution agreements reached in the north of England, the North Yorkshire deal offered the third lowest investment funding per person.
The £540 million investment, which is spread out at £18 million per year over 30 years, came below the likes of South Yorkshire (£900m) and North of Tyne (£600m) in the analysis.

The analysis from IPPR North, which shows devolution investment funding per person.
The report comes after county council leaders agreed the long-awaited deal with ministers to devolve more powers, including an elected mayor, to North Yorkshire and York, in August.
Rosie Lockwood and Marcus Johns, of the IPPR, carried out the research into the deal which is set to go out for consultation this year.
Ms Lockwood said the fund would not “come close” to covering losses in local government cuts. However, she added that any funding was a step forward.
She said:
“Clearly this, or any investment fund alone, does not come close to the losses communities across the North have experienced because of austerity. And when shown alongside the north’s other initial devolution deals, as we have compared below, the fund comes fifth of the seven initial deals for size of investment fund per person.
“Nevertheless, the investment fund is a step in the right direction. It is better that decisions about how to spend this money are taken locally, in line with local priorities.”
Northern Powerhouse analysis
County council leaders defended the deal and pointed out that it was “only the beginning” of devolution in the county.
Cllr Carl Les, leader of the authority, said the agreement would give local officials “a seat at the table” to be able to negotiate further funding and powers from ministers.
Responding to the IPPR North report, he said:
“One of the key elements of the deal is an investment totalling £540 million over a 30-year period, as it provides flexibility to target money to specific schemes on a far more local level.
“While other devolution deals have secured larger figures of funding under their deals, this has to be placed in context, as this is simply just the start.
“Any devolution deal is about getting a seat at the table to build close working relationships with the government and evolve the initial agreement to ensure even greater benefits can be brought.
“As IPPR North acknowledges itself, this is not necessarily about where you begin, but where you’re going that counts – stating that a devolution deal is ‘just the beginning of a process that requires work, but has the potential to be transformative’.
“This means negotiating further deals in the future with the Government to bring even more decision-making powers and funding to York and North Yorkshire.”
Council officials also pointed to analysis by the Northern Powerhouse Partnership, a partnership group between civic leaders and businesses in the north of England.
Read more:
- County leaders coy on referendum calls for Harrogate town council
- North Yorkshire devolution concentrates power into ‘hands of few’
- Mayor for North Yorkshire agreed in £540m historic devolution deal
The research found that the £540 million investment would provide £23.31 per head of population per year across North Yorkshire and York — the second highest in the north.
It added that the only agreement which was higher was in North of Tyne, which amounted to £24.69 per person.
By comparison, the Liverpool City Region’s devolution deal provided £19.68 per head of population through the annual gainshare, while the figure is £10.88 in Greater Manchester.
Henri Murison, chief executive of the Northern Powerhouse Partnership, said:
Double council tax on North Yorkshire second homes approved“The £540 million which York and North Yorkshire has secured should go a long way towards transforming public services and driving up productivity in the region.
“Whether this means improving education and skills, providing better transport links, tackling climate change or ensuring better quality jobs and career opportunities, the funding under the investment fund is a vital resource for any devolution deal.
“Most importantly, the deal means the region gets a directly-elected mayor who will remain accountable to their voters.
“The very nature of devolution is about bespoke, local solutions which means that it’s normal to see some variation in what each authority has received in terms of funding.
“It’s also important to remember that the investment fund is just one element of any deal. Greater Manchester, for example, also has a housing investment fund.”
Owners of second homes in North Yorkshire are set to pay a 100% premium on their council tax.
Senior councillors on North Yorkshire County Council yesterday approved the measure, which is expected to come into force within two years.
The council’s executive unanimously backed the plans, which would effectively double council tax bills for second home owners, and the proposals will now be considered at a full council meeting.
The move will see the premium introduced for homes which have been sat empty for a year or more.
Cllr Carl Les, leader of the county council, said the move would help local people access housing.
He said:
“There is no simple solution to the issue of affordable housing, second homes and the impact they have on housing for local communities.
“But we recognise that bold and decisive action needs to be taken to deal with the affordable housing crisis in North Yorkshire, and that is why the executive has decided to pursue the policy of a council tax premium.
“It may not be popular with everyone, but that is not the key factor in this decision. We need to act to try and ensure more local people have access to housing in their own communities, and the premium on council tax bills for second homes will be a significant step towards achieving that.
“Second homes and the impact they can have on the availability of housing has been a long-running problem that has affected communities not just in North Yorkshire but across the country, and this was reinforced by the findings of the independent North Yorkshire Rural Commission.”
Analysis by the county council showed the introduction of a 100% premium on council tax bills for second homes in North Yorkshire could generate in excess of £14 million a year in additional revenue.
Read more:
- Harrogate district second home owners face extra council tax charge
- Second homes council tax premium plan gets mixed reception
- 793 Harrogate district second-home owners face double council tax charge
The research said that Richmondshire could generate about £1.8 million through the second homes premium, while the Craven, Harrogate and Ryedale districts could each provide about £1.5 million in extra revenue.
North Yorkshire County Council’s executive member for finance, Cllr Gareth Dadd, who is also the authority’s deputy leader, said:
Call for referendum over Harrogate town council“We know that there is an acute shortage of housing for local people in many communities in North Yorkshire, and this has been an issue that has long affected their opportunities to actually buy their own home.
“Places such as the Yorkshire Dales and the North York Moors as well as coastal towns such as Scarborough and Whitby are without question wonderful places to live.
“But with that comes the fact that these areas also see very high numbers of second homes, which affects the availability of housing for local people.
“The scheme to introduce the council tax premium will ideally see these second homes brought back into use for local people. But if not, then there will be a valuable new revenue stream created that will help fund council priorities, such as helping introduce more housing for local communities.”
Senior Conservative councillors in Harrogate are set to call for a referendum on whether to create a town council.
Harrogate Borough Council will no longer exist from April 1 when the new unitary authority, North Yorkshire Council, is created.
If a new town council is created it could be given control over areas including parks, tourism and events.
Some think a town council would boost local decision-making while others regard it as an unnecessary extra layer of bureaucracy.
Next week, Cllr Richard Cooper, leader of the council, and Cllr Graham Swift, deputy leader of the authority, will table a motion calling on the county council to hold a referendum.

Cllr Richard Cooper (left) and Cllr Graham Swift.
North Yorkshire County Council has launched a review into whether to create a lower tier authority in the town. A consultation into the matter is currently being held.
The motion, which will go before a full borough council meeting on September 21, says:
“This council calls upon North Yorkshire County Council to hold a binding referendum of Harrogate town residents who would be constituents of a new Harrogate Town Council to determine whether such a council should be formed.
“Information should be made available before the vote on what duties the new town council will have and how much the additional council tax precept will be to pay for those duties.
“Such a referendum will give democratic legitimacy to the new town council in the eyes of those who fund it and are affected by its decisions.”
Harrogate and Knaresborough Liberal Democrats have already called for Harrogate to have its own town council.
Read more:
- Harrogate town council: What is it and what would it cost taxpayers?
- Decision on Harrogate town council could take two years
Harrogate and Scarborough are the only major places in North Yorkshire not to be parished.
Earlier this year, Conservative leader of the county council, Cllr Carl Les, said he hoped the matter could be resolved “as soon as possible”.
When asked when the referendums could be held, Cllr Les told the Local Democracy Reporting Service that this was currently unclear. He said:
“We are getting a lot of requests about town councils made to us from people including local politicians, as well as the business community and groups like Harrogate Civic Society.
“There is clearly an appetite to do something about this.
“And of course the sooner we can do it, the sooner we can find out whether there is an appetite amongst the general population.
“They are the key people in all of this. They have to be asked for their opinion and will say yea or nay.”
A public consultation over setting up a town council for Harrogate is currently open. You can have your say here.
The consultation will close on September 30.
Consultation launched to set priorities for new North Yorkshire councilA major consultation will ask people across North Yorkshire to give their views on public services this month.
North Yorkshire County Council is carrying out the project, titled Let’s Talk, to provide the foundations for decision-making and policy when the new unitary authority comes into effect in April next year.
It will see the existing NYCC and seven district councils, including Harrogate Borough Council, abolished in favour of the single authority for the whole of North Yorkshire, excluding York.
NYCC’s leader, Cllr Carl Les, said the results will deliver a vision for the new council, showing people’s priorities for spending on everything from social care and education to waste collection, recycling and highways maintenance.
He said:
“Having one new council will save millions of pounds by streamlining services and preventing duplication, creating the most efficient and cost-effective way of delivering them that we can.
“This money will help support services to ensure they are stronger and fit for the future and will fund decision-making on the most local level possible.
“It is vital we engage with the public to help shape exactly how the new council will operate, and this biggest ever conversation in North Yorkshire will be the way in which we can glean people’s views.
“I would urge everyone who lives and works in North Yorkshire to take time to put forward their opinions, and we will listen carefully to those views.”
The Let’s Talk campaign begins on Monday, September 19, running until Friday, December 23.
The first topic in the consultation will be on local communities, looking at education, job opportunities, parks and open spaces, and more.
Read more:
- Council explores move to protect Harrogate Convention Centre with limited company status
- North Yorkshire County Council hits back at ‘dilution of democracy’ criticisms
Future discussions will include public transport, roads and pavements, and access to libraries and museums. Housing provision, climate change and mobile phone and broadband coverage will also form part of the project.
The responses will help to shape policy for North Yorkshire Council over the first three years of its existence.
NYCC has pledged to ensure all communities have the opportunity to engage with the consultations through local events, which are yet to be announced, and online.
Cllr Les added:
“The new council will be the largest geographically in the country as it will cover England’s largest county, but it is being built with local at the heart of everything it will do.
“There will be local staff providing local services, based on local priorities and decision-making taking into account the views of the public.”
To take part in the consultation from September 19, click here. Details of events will also be posted on the same website.
Report says North Yorkshire mayor will ‘promote local democracy’A review of proposed sweeping changes to local government in North Yorkshire and York has concluded having an elected mayor and a combined authority “will promote local democracy”.
The claim, in a report to a meeting of North Yorkshire County Council’s executive on Tuesday, comes ahead of an eight-week public consultation over the devolution deal that local authorities have struck with the government alongside local government reorganisation.
Concerns have been raised repeatedly by councillors in North Yorkshire that the substitution of the county’s district, borough and county councils for a single unitary council and a mayor-led combined authority will erode residents’ ability to shape key decisions.
Earlier this month, Independent Cllr John McCartney said many residents engaged in local democracy felt “irked and discombobulated” as their local councils were being swapped for a remote one in what he described as “a power grab” by county hall in Northallerton.
Independent group leader Cllr Stuart Parsons described the potential substitution of hundreds of district and borough representatives for two North Yorkshire and two City of York councillors on a combined authority as a blow for democratic representation and decision-making.
Green Party group coordinator Cllr Andy Brown said devolution “did not appear to be a great exercise in democracy” in the county.
However, the officer’s report to the executive highlights how local government reorganisation was a prerequisite of devolution, which under the proposed deal would bring £540m of new government investment to spend on local priorities.
The report states:
“The deal means that decisions previously taken centrally would now be taken closer to the people affected and the region is not disadvantaged as other regions acquire their own devolution deals.
“The proposed mayoral combined authority will promote local democracy through direct democratic accountability. The introduction of a directly-elected mayor will enable a greater focus for change that will seek to enhance economic growth.”
Read More:
- North Yorkshire devolution concentrates power into ‘hands of few’
- Mayor for North Yorkshire agreed in £540m historic devolution deal
- Explained: What is North Yorkshire’s combined authority?
The county council’s leader, Cllr Carl Les, said the consultation would see the authority argue very strongly that the devolution deal would see more decision-making by locally elected politicians, rather than civil servants and ministers in Whitehall.
He said while much of the structure of local government in North Yorkshire would not change, the most notable differences would be having an elected mayor to act as a strong voice for the county and city and a combined authority to provide strategic decision-making.
Addressing concerns over local democracy, Cllr Les said while all residents would continue to a locally elected councillor to represent them, the council was in talks with a number of parish and town councils about what services they would like to have jurisdiction over.
He said there was “nothing on or off the table” in terms of the powers towns and parishes could take on.
Eight-week consultation to be held on creating North Yorkshire mayorAn eight-week public consultation looks set to start in October asking people in North Yorkshire if they support devolution and the election of a mayor.
North Yorkshire County Council’s executive will be asked to agree to the consultation when it meets on September 6.
It will also be asked to pay an initial £600,000 to cover the costs of the consultation exercise and other early implementation costs.
If devolution goes ahead, it will lead to the creation of a combined authority for North Yorkshire and York and the election of a mayor for the region.
A draft deal was signed on August 1, which is Yorkshire Day, in York. The 32-page document promised £540 million over 30 years and more devolved powers over skills, transport and energy.
Now councillors are being asked to move to the next stage of the process.
Councillor Carl Les, the Conservative leader of the county council, hailed the deal as “life-changing for the region’s economy”, adding:
“I have been a huge supporter of the devolution of powers and money from Whitehall to the Town Hall and of local-led decision making set against our own priorities.
“I have no problem in recommending the acceptance of the draft deal and of asking my executive colleagues to agree a public consultation.”
Earlier this month, the Liberal Democrats in Harrogate and Knaresborough called for a public vote on the deal saying it gave too much power to one person.
Read more:
- North Yorkshire devolution concentrates power into ‘hands of few’
- Strayside Sunday: Is the £540m Devolution Deal good enough?
- Explained: What is North Yorkshire’s combined authority?
If the consultation is agreed, it will run through the autumn and close before Christmas.
York and North Yorkshire councillors will then consider the results and make a decision on a submission back to the UK government in the spring.
The current timeline then outlines the formation of a combined authority for the region in winter 2023, with the public electing a mayor in May 2024.
The deal can be found on the Government’s website, here.
The executive paper can be read here.
Richard Flinton appointed first North Yorkshire Council chief executive
Richard Flinton was this morning appointed as the first chief executive of the new North Yorkshire Council.
Mr Flinton will take up the £180,000 to £197,000 a year role when the new authority comes into existence in April 2023.
An extraordinary meeting this morning ratified his appointment. Sixteen applications for the role were received.
Mr Flinton is the current chief executive of North Yorkshire County Council. Carl Les, the current leader of the county council, will be the new leader of North Yorkshire County Council.
Cllr John McCartney, an Independent councillor for Osgoldcross, told the meeting people had been assured North Yorkshire devolution would not amount to a “power grab” by the county council but that appeared to be the case now that it had been named the continuing authority and there was a continuing chief executive.
He added:
“The perception of this is absolutely appalling out there. It’s just a disgraceful perception.
“People do not understand why they did not get a vote on the governance of their local councils and their local services and they do not get a vote on how their council tax will be used.”
Read more:
- County council boss set to be appointed chief executive of new North Yorkshire Council
- Harrogate council could dip into reserves to cover soaring energy costs
Cllr McCartney went onto add that there was a “disconnect” between the council and the county, which would be “as big as the Humber estuary” when the unitary council comes into force.
He said:
“Residents who vote Conservative in the main at General Elections are irked and discombobulated and feel like they have been treated with contempt.
“I don’t take much from the USA, but government of the people, for the people and by the people is a pretty good recipe for democracy. But that is not what North Yorkshire County Council is going to be.”
In response, Cllr Carl Les, leader of the council, said the process for choosing Mr Flinton was “well done” and attended by all political groups within the council.
He said:
“I don’t know what to say to John McCartney. I don’t think much of what you have said has anything to do with what we are discussing today which is the appointment of a chief executive.”
Cllr Les added Mr Flinton had “grown through the ranks of this organisation and grown into every role we have given him. I am sure he will continue to do so.”
Following the meeting, Mr Flinton said:
“I am honoured to have been chosen to become the chief executive of the new council at a time of huge change and opportunity in North Yorkshire.
“We are faced with some unprecedented challenges that have arisen from rising inflation as well as pressures on social care and also the issues which all local authorities are facing in recruiting and retaining staff to their workforces.
“But with those challenges come immense opportunities, while working with colleagues in North Yorkshire’s district and borough councils to introduce the new unitary authority.”
Council leader ‘shares disappointment’ over lack of HCC funding in devolution deal
The leader of North Yorkshire County Council has said he shares disappointment that funding for Harrogate Convention Centre has not being included in a £540 million devolution deal.
Cllr Carl Les said a bid for funding to support a £47 million HCC redevelopment was included in a request to government, but was turned down.
His comments come as Cllr Richard Cooper, leader of Harrogate Borough Council, told the Harrogate Advertiser that while he supported the deal, he felt it “fell short” due to a lack of funding for the facility.
The borough council has since had to draw up a bid to the government’s levelling up fund in an effort to support the project.
Cllr Les told the Stray Ferret that the county council would continue to work with the borough council to secure funding for the facility.
He said:
“We did put a request for the Harrogate Convention Centre in the asks which were submitted to government.
“Harrogate sent officers to present the case, but the message from civil servants was that it should not be included.
“I share Richard’s disappointment, but we were given a clear steer and we are supporting Harrogate in that.”
Cllr Les added that the county council “recognised the importance” of the convention centre.
Historic deal
A historic £540 million devolution deal for North Yorkshire and York was announced by government yesterday.
The deal includes £18 million of guaranteed government cash for 30 years and it will also mean the county gets an elected mayor and combined authority.
Read More:
- Have devolution fears that Harrogate will be voiceless come true?
- Mayor for North Yorkshire agreed in £540m historic devolution deal
The agreement has been described as “a one-in-a-generation chance to help tackle regional inequalities by not only reducing the North-South divide nationally, but also helping to resolve economic differences that are being felt between urban and rural areas”.
Speaking after signing the deal in York yesterday, chief secretary to the treasury, Simon Clarke said:
“Local leaders are best placed to know what their communities need so I’m delighted that the people of York and North Yorkshire will be able to directly elect a mayor to deliver on their priorities.
“Devolution will benefit people across the region and we are committed to boosting more local areas in the same way as we level up the whole country.”