St Aidan’s floodlit pitch plans approved

Councillors have approved St Aidan’s secondary school’s plans to build a floodlit artificial sports pitch, subject to conditions on lighting and flooding.

A report from HBC officer Jeremy Constable had recommended the proposals for refusal due to its impact on the surrounding area.

However, councillors on Harrogate Borough Council’s planning committee voted by a near unanimous decision this afternoon (nine in favour with one abstention) to defer to the chief planner for approval once new reports on drainage and light pollution are drawn up.

Nearby residents in Harrogate had complained the 15-metre high floodlights would cause light pollution to their homes and the Stray. However, Jeremy Constable, who wrote the council report, conceded at the meeting that light pollution would be minimal.

He said:

“There’s not going to be a great deal of light pollution. It can be mitigated with shields so that shouldn’t be a large issue.”

St Aidan’s chair of governers Jo Wicks spoke and said the pitch is “first and foremost” for the school but will also be used by the community in the evenings because of a “desperate shortage” of 3G pitches in the town.

Its hours of use will be 9am-8pm, Monday to Friday, 9am-5pm on Saturdays and 10am-2pm on Sundays.

Read more:

Last week on HBC’s planning portal, the application had 40 objections and three in support. However, since the Stray Ferret story about the plans was published on Tuesday, there has been a surge of comments in favour, with 123 comments in support and 41 objections.

Several councillors spoke up in favour of the plans at the meeting, including Cllr Pat Marsh ,who said the council “would be letting our young people down” if they refused the plans.

She added:

“The weather at this time of year means the current pitches are unplayable. This is a way of providing to our young people. We owe it to them to provide this, not just for the school but for the wider community.”

Stockeld Park opens Christmas tree site in heart of Harrogate

From today, Stockeld Park will be selling a selection of its Christmas trees from Harrogate Borough Council’s Horticultural Nursery in the Pinewoods.

It’s part of a collaboration in which 10 per cent of takings will go back to HBC. .

George Grant, who is the estate manager said:

‘We are going to be selling Stockeld Christmas trees in the heart of Harrogate for the first time. Basically doing it this way means we can sell our trees to the people in Harrogate and then 10 per cent of the sales goes straight back to the council to spend on the community. After the year we’ve had I think it’s really important to try and give something back and it’s just a nice thing to be able to do.’

Stockeld Park, based in Wetherby plants 60,000 trees each year, cutting 35,000 each time and has over half a million growing.

Trees both big and small will be able to be purchased from today, 27th Nov until 23rd December between the hours of 9.30 am and 3.30 pm.

 

 

 

Harrogate district’s cabinet member for planning steps down

Harrogate borough councillor Rebecca Burnett has stepped down from her role as cabinet member for planning.

The council said in a statement today Ms Burnett had left the position with immediate effect to concentrate on her full-time job as marketing manager at bus company Transdev Blazefield.

She will be replaced by High Harrogate councillor Tim Myatt.

The news comes just over a week before the council is due to begin a judicial review in London’s High Court with the developer Flaxby Park Ltd.

Conservative councillor Ms Burnett previously worked in Harrogate and Knaresborough MP Andrew Jones’ office as a caseworker.

Cllr Burnett will continue to serve as a councillor for the Harrogate St Georges ward in Rossett, a position she has held since 2014.

She was made cabinet member for planning in May 2015, taking over from Cllr Michael Harrison, and oversaw the development of HBC’s local plan, which was adopted in March 2020.

Care providers back county council’s devolution bid

An independent body for care providers in North Yorkshire has said it would be “pointless and unnecessary” to allow devolution to dismantle the current system of social care in the county.

Under the existing two-tier system of local government, North Yorkshire County Council has full responsibility for social care in the county.

But this could change under government plans to devolve power.

The seven district and borough councils in North Yorkshire, including Harrogate Borough Council, would prefer to create an east / west model of local government.

NYCC prefer having a unitary authority for the county, which Mike Padgham, chair of the Independent Care Group, said would offer the best outcome for older and vulnerable people in the area.

Read more:

Mr Padgham said effective county-wide social care services already existed built on years of close working between the local authority and independent providers of social care. He added:

“It would seem pointless and unnecessary to dismantle this.

“NYCC is looking to bring in more investment and more decision-making power to a single authority, which can only be a positive move forward for the overall future of North Yorkshire.

“The proposal from NYCC for a single unitary authority provides the best option for facing and overcoming those challenges.”

Speaking on behalf of the seven district and borough councils, Keane Duncan, leader of Ryedale District Council, told the Stray Ferret it was “surprising and disappointing” that the ICG has backed NYCC’s proposal.

He added:

“ICG’s support for a mega-council is particularly disappointing too when they have not engaged with us about their views, aspirations and concerns for the future of care in our county.

“We would welcome the opportunity to share with them how our alternative to a mega-council can best support care providers, and those who need care, not only in North Yorkshire, but in the City of York too.”

 

149 homes near Harrogate High School refused

Councillors have refused 149 new homes on Kingsley Road near Harrogate High School because they said it would make already clogged roads in the area even worse.

Harrogate Borough Council’s planning committee had previously blocked the development twice this year due to concerns over the number of homes, traffic congestion and the environment.

Since the plans were last put before HBC in June, developer Richborough Estates reduced the number of homes from 155 to 149 and included a new transport assessment saying residents could use a bus stop in Bilton 1km away.

The site is designated for development within HBC’s Local Plan and HBC’s solicitor has previously warned councillors that refusing the plans could leave them open to a legal challenge by the developer.

However, meeting this afternoon via Zoom, councillors voted by 10 to 1 to refuse the application.

Read more:

There are several developments in the Kingsley area of Harrogate — which could see over 650 homes eventually built.

John Hansard from the Kingsley Ward Action Group spoke to the committee and called the transport assessment produced by the developer “a work of fiction”.

He said:

“There are still serious issues and walking over 1km to public transport makes a mockery of HBC’s carbon reduction strategy.

“Once this natural oasis is lost it’s gone forever and this area of Harrogate will be so much poorer for it.”

Dean Knight, technical director from Richborough, said the developer “has listened” after previous planning committees, but he faced a grilling from Cllr Pat Marsh who asked whether a 1km walk to the nearest bus stop was practical for elderly people or families carrying shopping.

Cllr Marsh called the traffic implications for the development “wrong, very wrong”.

Mr Knight said bus operator Transdev told the developer it was not possible to add a bus stop nearer to the site but said the 1km distance was not an “insurmountable” distance for people to walk.

Harrogate council wins contentious planning case at Court of Appeal

Harrogate Borough Council has won a case in the UK’s second-highest appeals court over a contentious planning decision.

The ruling stems from September 2018 when HBC granted planning permission for 21 new homes in the village of Bickerton near Wetherby.

Oxton Farm, which is near to the development, sought to overturn the decision through a judicial review, which was rejected in 2019.

In June 2020 the farm took the case to the Court of Appeal in London. They argued that HBC deviated from a government method councils use to calculate how many homes are needed in an area.

As Harrogate had no Local Plan at the time of the decision, the government says planners should use the most recent household projections made by the Office of National Statistics as its baseline for calculating its five-year housing supply.

In a report published five days before the Bickerton planning decision was made, the ONS said HBC requires 383 homes to be built a year to meet its five-year housing supply. This was almost half the 669 homes that HBC said it needed to be built each year in a previous report.

Read more:

Lawyers representing Oxton Farm said that HBC’s original projection was “falsified” by the ONS statistics.

They argued that the ONS figure of 383 new homes showed there was a “substantial surplus” of deliverable housing sites in the district and therefore there was no need to grant permission for this development, which is on green belt land.

Ruling in favour of HBC in his judgement, Lord Justice Lewison said Oxton Farm’s position was “erroneous” because the ONS was not mandatory for councils to follow.

He said:

“Government policy states quite clearly (a) that the standard method is not mandatory; (b) that the purpose of the
standard method is to determine the minimum starting point in deciding the number of homes needed in an area; and (c) that higher housing targets than those produced by the standard method will be considered sound.”

 

More homes added to major Ripon scheme

Harrogate councillors have recommended that more homes are added to a major housing scheme in Ripon.

Harrogate Borough Council’s Planning Committee met virtually on Zoom and agreed to defer the building of 14 new homes at Bishops Glade to the chief planner for approval.

131 homes were approved by HBC in 2017 and building at the site is currently underway.

Developer Harron Homes sought to build an extra 14 homes and change the mix of housing to include more affordable housing and more four-bedroom homes.

Read more:

Speaking at the meeting on behalf of the developer, agent Mark Beevers said the new four-bedroom homes were needed as “demand has fluctuated.”

Speaking against the proposals, Cllr Robert Windass said the number of four-bedroom homes already being built on the site is “over the top” and “all about profit for the developer.”

He added:

“They are not concerned about the mix as long as they get a maximum yield for the site”.

Cllr Pat Marsh said she was concerned at the affordable housing mix on the site and felt there are “ghettos” being built.

She also criticised the sustainable credentials of a plastic slide in the children’s play-area.

She said:

“As a council that says we want to get rid of single-use plastic within two years, that slide has to be metal. We’re not addressing the issues that are paramount to our world and looking at sustainability.”

However, HBC housing officer John Worthington reminded committee members that they were not there to “look at the site afresh” and planning permission has already been granted for the majority of the site.

Committee members voted in favour of the motion to defer and recommend for approval to the chief planner by six votes to five, with one abstention.

Councillors defer decision on 120-home Knaresborough scheme

A decision on 120 homes on the outskirts of Knaresborough has been deferred to the chief planner by Harrogate councillors.

Harrogate Borough Council’s Planning Committee met yesterday on Zoom and cited concerns from residents over footpaths and a lack of trees facing Boroughbridge Road.

Castleford-based developers Galliford Try Partnerships Yorkshire has proposed a mix of 2,3 and 4-bedroom homes on the site in Scriven, which forms housing allocation K37 under HBC’s Local Plan.

48 of the homes will be classed as “affordable” and will contribute to the district’s need for building 208 additional affordable homes per year, HBC said.

Harrogate Borough Council’s Planning Committee meets on Zoom.

After concerns over pressure on local infrastructure were raised following the submission of Outline Planning Permission, the developers reduced the number of homes from 146 to 120.

The development faced an objection from Scriven Parish Council who said it will result in “saturation” for Knaresborough town and its facilities.

The objection said:

“Knaresborough is under tremendous pressure and the historic market town, which all the residents recognise and enjoy, is being destroyed by over development.

“Currently, there appears to be no provision for additional educational facilities or doctors surgeries to cater for this major influx of population.”

Parish councillor Miranda Armitage spoke to the Committee and said the proposals should be revised to add a mini-roundabout which would make access to the site safer.

She said:

“The entrance/exit is totally inadequate and downright dangerous.”

Read more:

A report from HBC said overall the benefits of the development “significantly and demonstrably” outweigh any harm for the area.

Speaking to the Committee on behalf of the developer, Stephen Hughes, said they are happy to look at the changes suggested by the Committee.

He added:

“It’s a key scheme for us, representing an investment of £25million. Despite an unprecedented economic backdrop we see this as a significant scheme.”

Ripon housing development refused

Harrogate councillors have refused a 38-home development in Ripon, citing concerns around the number of homes proposed and its impact on a nearby Grade 2 listed building.

Meeting virtually yesterday on Zoom and streamed live on YouTube, Harrogate Borough Council’s Planning Committee refused a full planning permission application from developer Newett Homes by a near-unanimous decision.

The site is designated for development within HBC’s Local Plan but was criticised for being almost double the suggested yield of 20.

Harrogate Borough Council’s Planning Committee meets on Zoom.

Mr James Mortimer, owner of the Grade 2 listed Prospect House, which stands around 30 metres away from the proposed development told the Committee that the homes would bring “substantial harm” to Prospect House.

He said:

“The development of this site fails to provide any unique public benefit and harms Prospect House a listed asset.”

However, Richard Mowatt, speaking on behalf of the developers, told the Committee that the development will have “environmental, societal and economic” benefits for the area.

Read more:

Cllr Pat Marsh objected to the plans calling it a “compromise” due to the density of the site. She also said the 15 affordable homes were not enough.

She said:

“Rather than reaching for quality, we’re saying, ‘that’s just acceptable’.”

She also criticised the plans for not being environmentally friendly.

She added:

“There’s nothing in here for zero-carbon and homes that produce their own electricity. I’m saddened by that as well.

Responding, HBC housing officer Kate Williams, said affordable housing targets in the Local Plan are not “prescriptive”. She also said in Ripon there’s more of a demand for more 2 and 3 bedroom housing for market.

Other objections raised at the Committee included worries over a sinkhole in the woodland to the east of the site.

Major Harrogate housing scheme blocked for second time

Developers have been asked to “go away and rework” a major housing scheme near to Harrogate High School after councillors failed to approve it for a second time.

Meeting virtually today on Zoom and streamed live on YouTube, Harrogate Borough Council’s Planning Committee passed a motion submitted by Cllr Andrew Paraskos to defer the plans for 155 homes until developer Richborough Estates addresses concerns over housing density, transport provision and sustainability.

Plans for 170 homes on Kingsley Road were initially considered the Planning Committee at a meeting on January 28 but councillors passed a motion to refuse it, saying it would lead to a loss of green space and put local schools and the roads network under pressure.

However, HBC’s solicitor, who spoke at the Committee, said a full refusal could leave the authority open to a legal challenge from the developer as the site has been already been allocated in the Local Plan.

The revised plan reduced the number of homes from 170 to 155 which satisfied HBC housing officer who said it “mitigates concerns over being over-intensive.”

Speaking against the development, Cllr Pat Marsh said local infrastructure would be unable to cope with the added demand.

She told the Committee:

“It doesn’t serve any purpose for the existing community and it just brings more pain and aggravation. It adds nothing for the area other than misery for the local residents. The roads will be horrendous.”

Speaking to the Committee, local resident Mr Hansard said he was “aghast” that the plans were coming before the Planning Committee for a second time.

He said:

“The fact that Richborough Estates have reduced housing by 15 does nothing to change the fact that this proposal is nonsensical. No amount of legal interference will change the fact that this development is unethical and a potential risk to public health.”

Read more:

Speaking on behalf of the developer, James Hall, agent for planning consultants Barton Willmore told the Committee that the plans have been revised after discussions with HBC officers and said he didn’t think the layout was over-intense.

He said:

“We’ve listened. We want to make the scheme work well”.

He also said changes have been made to the road layout to tackle congestion and a cycleway has been added to create a new “greenway” to the school and the town centre.

The development had 91 objections with one saying that the matter should not be considered virtually.

Several objections pointed to the impact the development would have on local schools. Harrogate High School has asked for a contribution of £307,435 and Grove Road primary school has asked for £263,422 to cover extra demand for places.