Plans have been submitted to turn an agricultural building in Coneythorpe into five two-bedroom homes.

The proposals for Spring Bank Farm on Shortsill Lane would include creating a “physical buffer” between the barn and the surrounding agricultural land and buildings.

The barn, currently used for storage, is made from a steel frame and block work. The application said the conversion would have vertical cedar wood cladding and aluminium window frames.

The external block work base would be retained, the application said, “ensuring the building retains its utilitarian, agricultural aesthetic as constructed and does not introduce alien or inappropriate elements to its rural surroundings”.

The barn would be converted to a terrace of five homes. Each would have an open plan living, dining and kitchen space on the ground floor, along with a bedroom and bathroom.

Each first floor would include a bedroom with en suite and dressing area, as well as a mezzanine overlooking the living area below.

The application said:

“The site benefits from an established [public right of way] which crosses the farm before connecting to Coneythorpe, approximately [500 metres] to the north of the subject building.

“The footway provides future residents with pedestrian access to the local public transport network with connections from Coneythorpe to Knaresborough, Harrogate, Boroughbridge and the surrounding villages and smaller towns.”

The plans have been submitted to Harrogate Borough Council, but will be decided by North Yorkshire Council after it comes into effect next Saturday.

To view or comment on the application, visit the planning pages of the Harrogate Borough Council website and use reference 23/00859/PBR.

Read more:

• New plans submitted to create 12 flats in former Harrogate care home
• Residents to protest against 73-home plan in Harrogate district village

Business Breakfast is sponsored by Harrogate law firm Truth Legal. 

Demand for new homes has driven a sales rise of more than 50% in the last year for a Harrogate estate agency.

Linley and Simpson is now planning to expand its land and new homes department to cover the whole of Yorkshire and the Humber from its 23 offices.

The company achieved a record-breaking £75m of new home sales in just one year, representing two in three of its overall sales.

David Waddington, the agency’s director of land and new homes, said:

“Having grown into the largest land and new homes agent in the area, we now have a strong launch pad for taking our services to house builders in new territories.

“Developers can draw upon our team’s 130 collective years’ sales and marketing expertise in this sector, as well as take advantage of an aligned and connected branch network, which is set to expand further in 2022 and beyond.

“It will also enable us to consolidate our position as the number one go-to agent on the property portals for land and new home stock.”

The company attributes growth in the sector to high demand following the covid pandemic, especially for family homes in rural areas. Rising energy bills are also prompting people to seek more efficient homes.

Demand continues to be high, with 306 new homes sold in the last year, up from 211 in the previous 12 months. The average price of a new home has also risen from £354,714 to £425,834 in the same period.

Read more:

• Business Breakfast: Harrogate law firm shortlisted for property award
• Business Breakfast: Care provider adds 120 staff to Harrogate team

Senior carer rewarded for decade of service

A care home in Boroughbridge has recognised the long service of one of its senior carers.

Leoni Senior started as a carer at Boroughbridge Manor in 2012 before working her way up to a senior role.

Her 10 years’ service with the firm were marked with a gift of flowers and jewellery.

Avril Bowyer, deputy general manager of Boroughbridge Manor, said:

“We’re delighted to be celebrating 10 years of loyal service with Leoni. She has demonstrated her dedication and loyalty to this home and its residents year after year.

“I speak for all of us here at Boroughbridge Manor when I say that I’m looking forward to many more years of working with Leoni.”

Jane McFarlane, employee services director at Barchester, which runs the home, added:

“I’m always pleased to hear stories about the long service of Barchester staff and am delighted Leoni has achieved this milestone.

“It is dedication like this that ensures our residents are provided with a happy place to live.”

Ripon City Council has called for a new consultation on plans to build 1,300 homes at Ripon Barracks after a transport assessment was belatedly published.

Harrogate Borough Council’s 30-day consultation on the Homes England scheme is due to close on February 17.

But Ripon City Council agreed this week to urgently contact Harrogate Borough Council, asking it to ‘reset the clock’ to give local residents more time to make their views known.

City council leader Andrew Williams, received unanimous support from fellow councillors after he said:

“Important information, most notably the transport assessment executive summary, was added to the Harrogate Borough Council planning portal after the consultation period began — and anybody who commented on the outline planning application prior to February 3 would not have seen the crucial transport document.”

In April, the city council called for the Clotherholme development to be scaled back to 800 homes because of concerns about the impact of more traffic on Ripon’s road network.

At Monday’s full city council meeting, Cllr Williams said:

“This is the biggest single development in Ripon’s history and while we welcome, in principle, new homes for the city, it is clear that we don’t have the roads infrastructure to support this many, which will come on top of the 390 homes at West Lane and other schemes.

“The addition of a further 1,300 homes will have a negative impact across Ripon.

“We’re asking to reset the clock, so that people have the opportunity to read the documents on the planning portal.”

David Walpole, a consultant commissioned by the city council to report on the traffic implications of Clotherholme scheme, has been asked by councillors to ‘object in the strongest possible terms’.

Read more:

• Ripon firm says school leavers are ‘totally unprepared for work’ 
• Ripon restaurant provides a taste of Chinese New Year celebrations

The transport assessment in support of the Homes England development says:

“The proposed mitigation measures for the Ripon Barracks site include a wide range of improvements not just in the vicinity of the development itself, but also throughout the western side of the city and into the city centre itself.

“These measures include; the implementation of pedestrian and cyclist improvements by implementing mitigation measures such as traffic calming on Clotherholme Road and Kirkby Road; the introduction of a one way system involving Kirkby Road, College Road and Trinity Lane to accommodate on road cycling while maintaining car parking along College Road; the provision of a gateway junction including segregated cycling facilities at the primary Kirkby Road access to the site; junction mitigation measures to alleviate traffic congestion at key city centre junctions and provide enhanced pedestrian crossing facilities; measures to prevent rat running; and proposed contributions to public transport bus services.

“As a consequence of the mitigation measures identified to support the proposed development (it) will meet the requirements of the NPPF (National Planning Policy Framework) ensuring there will be no unacceptable impact on highway safety or severe cumulative impacts and that sustainable modes of transport will be pro-actively prioritised both to and from the development and across the west of Ripon city centre.”

Harrogate Borough Council officers will meet residents groups and parish councils today to discuss the long awaited West of Harrogate Parameters Plan.

The plan describes the infrastructure requirements associated with up to 4,000 new homes due to be built in the western arc of Harrogate.

A draft version of the delayed plan has now been published and circulated by the council to groups including Harlow & Pannal Ash Residents Association, North Rigton Parish Council, Pannal and Burn Bridge Parish Council and Zero Carbon Harrogate. The Stray Ferret has also been sent the document.

At over 100 pages long, the document paints a broad brush vision of how the area will be transformed by new housing.

It includes proposals for two new primary schools and a possible new GP surgery — which have been previously announced.

Howard West, chair of Pannal and Burn Bridge Parish Council, told the Stray Ferret the plan lacked detail on addressing traffic and congestion.

He added:

“The parameters plan draft is in nice developer-speak but there’s no answer to the problems arising from building 4,000 homes around Harrogate’s western arc.”

Hapara and Zero Carbon Harrogate both said they would comment on the plan after today’s meeting.

Hapara previously said it was unhappy about the level of consultation offered to residents by the council during the process.

Read more:

• In Depth: Where is the infrastructure plan for 4,000 homes in west Harrogate?
• Harrogate planning committee ‘shambles and embarrassing’, says residents group

Beset by delays

The council initially said the parameters plan would be published in October 2020. But it was delayed until March 2021, then September 2021.

The draft plan is still to be ratified by the council.

A council spokesperson said:

“The development of west Harrogate provides an exciting opportunity to deliver quality place-making, a wide-range of private and affordable homes to meet the current housing demand, while also ensuring we have the necessary infrastructure to support these future communities.

“Once approved, the West of Harrogate Parameters Plan will create clear goals and objectives by identifying what infrastructure is required. For example, first-class community facilities, school provision, green infrastructure and sustainable travel opportunities.

“A number of suggestions have already helped shaped the WHPP and I’d like to thank those local residents groups and parish councils for their valuable feedback.”

Property Gold is a monthly column written by independent property consultant, Alex Goldstein. With more than 17 years’ experience, Alex helps his clients to buy and sell residential property in some of the most desirable locations in Yorkshire and beyond.

Only Fools and Horses – the ultimate British sitcom following the trials and tribulations of Del Boy and his brother Rodney on their mission to get rich. However, when it comes to PLC new homes, it would seem that the large-scale developers are the ones beating the Trotters at the sales game.

I am continually staggered by the number of people who are queuing up to buy one of these homes, in a case of Boycie one-upmanship. Yet are the buying public’s memories so short like Trigger’s, that they forget the dreadful events in 2017 at Grenfell Tower where 72 people died?

What then unfolded was the cladding scandal, which has entrapped thousands of people and is still ongoing with no clear end in sight. It has also just come to light, that successive governments concealed the extent of fire safety risks to buildings going back to 1997. So why would a buyer think it a sensible choice of home or investment, if governments are also hiding information from you?

One then overlays countless misdemeanours which have been picked up in the press about the PLC developers, ranging from the controversial sale of freeholds to equity funds, escalating ground rents, to lack of insulation and pressurised selling tactics. Only the other day did London Fire Brigade warn an inquiry that developers were ‘gaming the system’ by deliberately designing blocks to be just shy of the threshold where more intensive fire safety systems were required.

Read More:

• Property Gold: How to be an attractive buyer
• Property Gold: Why is the Yorkshire property market so strong?

On the ground, these developments are often edge of town schemes with negligible associated infrastructure. When was the last time you saw a new GP surgery or school being built, or upgraded roads get underway? More interestingly, these schemes are actually making central town living even more expensive. Afterall, who wishes to use their car to get into a town they already live in? They therefore help underpin more centrally located homes, making it more difficult for younger generations to move up the ladder and are eroding the very integrity of our towns.

If you wish to buy a new build home, purchase from a small to mid-sized developer who has their name above the door and who acknowledges that building regulation standards are the basic requirement and not the pinnacle.

Our new homes system is broken and in light of recent news, arguably rotten to the core. My concern is that we have had decades of going down the wrong path, that we are never going to be able to find our way back out again.

The bottom line is, if you are thinking of buying a PLC new build – Only Fools would do so, you plonker Rodney!

If you have any comments or questions for Alex, please feel free to contact him at alex@alexgoldstein.co.uk

Owners of a historic Ripon site, which fell into a state of disrepair, have apologised to neighbours as the area is prepared for residential redevelopment.

Leeds-based Graycliffe Homes bought the former Girls’ High School Old Lecture Building, on College Road, as a development opportunity ten years ago.

Over the past decade, the two storey red brick Edwardian building has had windows broken and slates stolen while its grounds became overgrown.

Graycliffe’s managing director, Wayne Butterfield, who has been involved in a major tidy up of the area, told the Stray Ferret:

“It has become something of an eyesore and for that I would like to apologise to our neighbours.

“The new homes development here will see a transformation, that I hope is to the liking of people who live nearby.”

Planning permission was granted by Harrogate Borough Council for the former high school to be refurbished and converted to create eight townhouses.

An architect’s drawing showing how the refurbished building will look. Picture: Graycliffe Homes

There will also be five new-build homes on the site, which will be landscaped, with green spaces retained.

Graycliffe will not carry out the conversion and new build, but it is in discussions with developers who will carry forward the scheme.

Christopher Hughes, chair of Ripon Civic Society, welcomed the activity on site.

He said:

“This is an historically important building dating back to 1908 and we are pleased to see that is is being retained for conversion within the overall redevelopment plans.

“The society has taken a great interest in this site over the years and, at long last and many hold ups and frustrations, we are pleased to see it being tidied up in readiness for disposal to a developer, who will convert the former school building and carry out the other works.”

The building as it currently looks

The former school provided secondary education for girls, until its amalgamation with Ripon Grammar School in the early 1960’s.

Read more:

• Artworks provide echo to Ripon’s military past
• Another vandal attack on rare Ripon building

Afterwards, the building was used as part of the Ripon Teacher Training College and later the College of Ripon & York St John.

Following the closure of the training college, it was let to Leeds Metropolitan University whose lease on the building ended in 2012.

Ripon City Council is calling for a 500-homes reduction in the size of the barracks development.

The 1,300-dwelling Clotherholme scheme proposed by Homes England, has raised concerns about the impact of more vehicles on Ripon’s roads.

City council leader Andrew Williams, told the Stray Ferret:

“We support comprehensive redevelopment of the former barracks site and welcome the much-needed new and affordable homes it will bring.

“However, we believe that to avoid traffic gridlock in Ripon, numbers need to be scaled back to 800.”

Residents living on Kirkby Road are among those concerned about the traffic that the Clotherholme development will generate.

The call for reduced numbers was supported at a recent special meeting of the city council.

Councillors also approved spending on a further report from Ripon-based traffic, highways and transport engineering consultant David Walpole.

When the Ripon Neighbourhood Plan was being drawn up, it was envisaged that the barracks site would provide space for 800 new homes.

The site, encompassing Claro Barracks, Deverell Barracks and Laver Banks, initially included 11 hectares earmarked for employment uses.

After the allocation of land for employment uses was reduced, Homes England sought outline planning approval for a 1,300-home scheme.

A transport assessment prepared in support of the development, was described as ‘flawed’ by Ripon City Council.

It claimed it fails to address core issues local residents have raised.

City councillor Mike Chambers, who is also Harrogate Borough Council‘s cabinet member for homes and safer communities and a North Yorkshire county councillor, said:

“There are clearly traffic issues that need to be looked at.

“We want to work with Homes England and planners to achieve the best possible result for the people of Ripon.”

Read more:

• Ripon councillors reject ‘flawed’ transport report
• Plans submitted for 1,300-home Ripon development

Kirkby Road will be the principal route linking the Clotherholme development with the city centre.

Residents living there, including members of the Ripon Residents Action Group, have consistently lobbied for road improvements ahead of the construction of new housing.

Property Gold is a monthly column written by independent bespoke property consultant, Alex Goldstein. With over 17 years’ experience, Alex helps his clients to buy and sell residential property in some of the most desirable locations in Yorkshire and beyond. 

This week Alex looks at why leasehold property purchases are so controversial. 

Leasehold reforms seem to be here, with the Government now intervening and yet again the PLC developers are in the news for all the wrong reasons.

In September, the four largest house builders were investigated after ‘troubling evidence’ was uncovered about how leasehold properties were being sold.

The CMA (Competition and Markets Authority) found that some leasehold buyers were being hit with ground rents that doubled every decade, pressurised selling tactics and informing buyers they could buy the freehold for a small sum, only to find out latterly this cost had increased significantly. This left many people in a position of never being able to sell – a modern day slave to leasehold ownership, you might say.

Whilst the Government took action last year against the developers, the ban was not retrospective. This left many stuck in unsellable homes with crippling ground rents. Too little, too late for them unfortunately.

How then has this all come about?

Be under no illusions, the PLC developers are all about money and profit margins. Ethics and morals aside, selling a leasehold house gave a PLC developer more angles to make money.

They could sell the freehold to an investor, who in turn could ratchet up ground rents and the developer doesn’t get their hands dirty. This would provide (up until now) a useful additional income stream and was all legal.

How, then, have people managed to buy such properties and be unaware of the pitfalls? Could it be that some PLC developers had a monetary referral system with a panel of ‘recommended’ conveyancing solicitors, who then overlooked updating buyers on the finer detail?

It’s easy money with limited input required – keep ground rents high for additional income (which also commonly had annual percentage hikes) and charge leaseholders to alter their homes. Combine these with poor building management and these properties become even harder to sell – hence the birth of the ‘fleecehold’ movement.

Now that the Government claim they want to resolve matters, will leaseholders have the opportunity to retrospectively claim their costs back for lease extensions or purchasing the freeholds? Equally, could this now open the floodgates for legal cases against the PLC developers?

What is clear, is that the PLC developers created various angles to squeeze more money out of a deal, meaning higher share prices, happier stockholders and bigger executive salaries.

Whilst the Government have promised that leasehold reforms are coming, there’s no reason to celebrate just yet. All eyes are on the detail, which will do little for those owners who have been already hoodwinked and are now enslaved to their properties. Thank your lucky stars you have read this and won’t fall for the same tricks!

Property Gold is a monthly column written by independent bespoke property consultant, Alex Goldstein. With over 17 years’ experience, Alex helps his clients to buy and sell residential property in some of the most desirable locations in Yorkshire and beyond. 

This week Alex highlights some of the problems with New Homes sold by Private Listed Companies – and why he would never buy one. 

Apples – sometimes you bite into one and what lies beneath the pristine surface, is nothing but a floury, rotten core. You could say this is like buying a new build home from a PLC developer (i.e. one who is listed on the stock exchange), where their sprawling mass-volume schemes continue to plague Yorkshire. But what exactly is my issue with them and why would I never buy one?

Let’s start with one of my biggest issues – build quality. There are consistent reports in the media about sub-standard practices and corners being cut – all with the sole aim of maximising profit margins. PLC developers are not charities and are there to support their shareholders and to maintain stock position. PLC developers usually want 25-30% profit margin on each unit they sell, but they still need to install the glamorous kitchens and bathrooms as buyers can see and touch these. Therefore areas can be overlooked on items one can’t see behind the scenes such as cavity wall insulation, fire barriers, plumbing, wiring, roofing etc to get the profit. It’s not exactly ethical.

Many buyers then say, don’t worry we have all the guarantees and warranties, so we’re covered if something goes wrong. Well I would turn this around and ask – have you actually tried to make a claim on said warranty? Good luck!

It’s all about secondary and tertiary locations – after all, the only land available for the size of schemes that PLC developers want, lie on the outer fringes of already existing conurbations. So where is the upside when property is all about location? Lack of supporting infrastructure, traffic problems, shortage of school places and GP surgeries – the list goes on.

In these uninspiring, soulless Stepford streets, one can rarely add value as the developer has already maxed out the angles so their profit is amplified. In addition, buyers seem to sleepwalk into paying an excessively high price from the outset due to the glossy marketing and commission hungry sales staff. Therefore new owners are solely relying on the market to increase their home’s value during their time in ownership. So what happens if the market doesn’t go up and/or you fall into negative equity?

With the continued decline of the High Street, isn’t it about time we reinvigorated these areas. I firmly believe there is no need to build on open green space. Instead the Government needs to incentivise PLC developers to refurbish what we have and to help bring communities back together.

In conclusion, I did a quick straw poll of 20 estate agents and solicitors that I work alongside. Not a single one owned a PLC new home. And that’s all you need to know.

If you have any comments or questions for Alex, please feel free to contact him on alex@alexgoldstein.co.uk. 

Read More: 

• Property Gold: Virtual Tours – are they worth it?
• County council housing company accused of avoiding building affordable homes