north yorkshire county council Archives - Page 33 of 96

Councillors delay North Yorkshire climate change proposals

North Yorkshire councillors have postponed moves aiming to ensure robust and immediate actions are taken to tackle the climate change and biodiversity crises for about four months.

A meeting of North Yorkshire County Council saw a majority of elected members agree motions for further environmental measures should be referred to the council’s executive and constitutional working group for consideration.

Liberal Democrat, Independent, Green and Liberal councillors had proposed the authority establish a dedicated scrutiny committee, an executive member to oversee climate change and the development of a biodiversity action plan.

The calls came just days after the council’s executive declared a climate emergency, several years after numerous neighbouring councils, following mounting pressure from councillors.

Coordinator of the council’s Green Party group, Cllr Andy Brown, said while the executive’s recent decision to declare a climate emergency was welcome, “we all know good intent needs a clear, costed, timed action plan” to be approved by the same councillors.

He added a scrutiny committee was needed as it was the role of councillors to examine plans to tackle climate change and that residents suffering record high temperatures would struggle to understand why the authority was not taking more immediate action.

Cllr Brown said:

“Let’s be honest, how does it look if we say we declared an emergency, but say we’re only going to discuss the scrutiny arrangements in about four months’ time and we may not discuss them at all or we may not set up any scrutiny yet because we think our organisation is more important.

“How are we going to explain that to the people of Tadcaster who lost their bridge for so long, how are we going to explain that to people in Richmondshire who suffered those appalling floods that damaged their livelihoods?”

The authority’s chairman, Cllr Margaret Atkinson, who is tasked with controlling debates at full meetings of the authority, told the chamber the temperatures of the past few days had underlined the need to tackle climate change.

However, she said it was important the authority gave the motions “appropriate consideration”.

She added the council’s staff were already under a lot of pressure due to local government reorganisation.

The council’s deputy leader, Cllr Gareth Dadd, said the proposals had implications, such as financial ones, that needed to be fully understood, with a report by officers, before the motions could be properly considered.

He said it was possible creating an extra scrutiny committee could dilute the efforts of the authority’s existing scrutiny committees for matters ranging from health to transport.

Cllr Dadd said:

“Policy and organisational issues are often worse for being delivered on the hoof. Good policy may well take a little bit longer to deliver.”

Commissioner to be quizzed over planned cuts to Harrogate’s night-time fire crews

North Yorkshire’s Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner is set to face further scrutiny over plans to cut the number of night-time fire engines in Harrogate to just one.

Commissioner Zoë Metcalfe will face councillors at a special meeting of North Yorkshire County Council’s Harrogate and Knaresborough Area Constituency Committee next Thursday.

The plans, which are currently out to consultation, have already been criticised as “putting money before lives”.

The Fire Brigades Union also described the proposals as “seriously concerning”.

The plans would see Harrogate fire station continue to have two fire engines during the day, but just one between 10pm and 9am when fewer incidents usually occur.

The move would also mean some of the fire station’s 40 crew members are moved to different stations or roles.

Harrogate Fire Station on Skipton Road

A report to Thursday’s meeting said Harrogate is of a “predominantly low combined fire risk” and that this “does not warrant” two 24-hour fire engines.

Commissioner Metcalfe has also insisted the fire service would “continue to provide an immediate emergency response” during the night.

Yet concerns remain that the move would increase response times if multiple emergencies occur during late hours and back-up vehicles have to travel further from outside of Harrogate.

Steve Howley, secretary of the North Yorkshire Fire Brigades Union, previously urged the public to reject the proposals which he said would “put lives at risk.” He said:

“The Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner needs to fight for the correct funding from government, not simply mask underfunding by slashing services and providing the public of North Yorkshire with a second-rate emergency response service.”

Save £1.5m a year

Ms Metcalfe said the plans – which also include cuts to services in York and Scarborough – would save over £1.5 million a year, yet she insisted they are not cost-cutting measures.

She also said the savings would allow for investment in fire prevention.

The proposals are part of the fire service’s Risk and Resource Model which sets out how it will deploy staff and equipment across North Yorkshire over the next three years.

The consultation will run until August 14 and residents are being urged to give their feedback online.

Commissioner Metcalfe said in a statement:

“The role of a fire and rescue service has changed and continues to change, with only 26% of our incidents last year relating to a fire emergency.

“We want to ensure we are addressing our current and future challenges and that we have the capacity to prevent and stop incidents happening in the first place.

“Inevitably, there are some areas where the setup of the service would change but I’m confident the right people, right equipment and the right support would continue to be available to everyone.”

To have your say go to www.TellCommissionerZoe.co.uk

Cabbies angry over plans to shorten Harrogate taxi rank

Cabbies have reacted angrily to plans to shorten the length of the main taxi rank in Harrogate as part of the £11.2m Station Gateway scheme.

The rank on Station Parade, opposite the train and bus stations, currently accommodates about a dozen hackney carriages.

Councillors want to reduce this by two vehicles and introduce a new bay over the road under plans to introduce single-lane traffic on Station Parade and create new cycle paths.

North Yorkshire County Council, which is leading on the gateway scheme, included the taxi rank proposals in new design plans that went out to consultation yesterday.

Tania Weston, the council’s programme manager for the gateway scheme, told a media briefing about the new designs last week that cabbies were satisfied with the new arrangements, which also include creating extra bays outside Mainline Taxis further along Station Parade.

Paul McMahon, who owns PM Taxis, said cabbies were told in talks with the council that the Station Parade rank would stay in its entirety.

He said:

“They have completely backtracked on what we were told.

“How can you possibly service a busy railway station, especially when conferences are in town, when you shorten the taxi rank?”

Kevin O’Boyle, who owns Central Taxis, said several town centre bays would be lost if the part-pedestrianisation of James Street also went ahead. He said:

“This would be an unfair, derogatory step.

“Problems were pointed out at council liaison meetings a good six months back but it appears to have changed nothing.”

Mr O’Boyle said shortening the main rank and creating a new bay over the road, which he understands will be for wheelchair-accessible taxis, would cause tensions among cabbies.

He said drivers sometimes already had to loop round Harrogate because spaces weren’t available on the rank and the situation would get worse.

He added it would also cause a scramble for customers on two fronts and cause ill feeling amongst cabbies waiting on the current rank who saw a wheelchair-accessible vehicle nip into the new bay over the road and pick up a non-wheelchair user.

Mr O’Boyle added:

“They need to get it into their heads that taxis are part of the infrastructure of the town.”

“Creating another rank will only cause divisions within the taxi trade.”

Harrogate taxi

Ms Weston said in a statement:

“During the second consultation we received feedback from taxi drivers and companies about the proposed changes.

“As a result, we are retaining the current taxi rank on Station Parade but this will be slightly shorter.

“There will be a relocated taxi space on the opposite side of the road.

“We have also included a raised table on the northern part of Station Parade (between Bower Road and Cheltenham Parade) to make easier for people to cross the road to access the taxi company.

“Previously taxi drivers requested additional taxi rank spaces on the west side of the town centre and we will offset any loss through the Transforming Cities Fund project by providing new spaces in this area.

“Additionally, should a decision be taken to progress the scheme, the contractor will be contacting taxi companies to understand their requirements during construction, including the potential location of temporary taxi ranks.”

‘Fantastic regeneration project’

The gateway project is one of three active travel schemes in North Yorkshire, and 39 nationally, being funded by the Department for Transport’s Transforming Cities Fund.

It is supported by North Yorkshire County Council, Harrogate Borough Council and West Yorkshire Combined Authority.

Councillor Phil Ireland, Harrogate Borough Council’s cabinet member for carbon reduction and sustainability, said last week hailed the scheme as a “fantastic regeneration project and the first major investment in Harrogate in 30 years”.

But business groups have expressed concerns about its impact on retail.

Contractor for Harrogate’s Otley Road cycle route to be appointed in autumn

Council officials have said a contractor to build the second phase of the Otley Road cycle route in Harrogate is expected to be appointed in the autumn.

But it is still unclear when work on the project will start.

The first phase of the route, which runs from Harlow Moor Road to Cold Bath Road, was completed in January.

However, residents raised concerns over its design and the length of time it took to complete the project.

As a result, county council officials delayed progress on the second phase to review its designs.

The Stray Ferret asked North Yorkshire County Council when the next phase of the route will be built and whether a contractor had been procured.

Melissa Burnham, highway area manager at the county council, said:

“Final detailed designs for phase two of the Otley Road cycle route are due to be approved within the next few weeks, with the contract expected to go out to tender during August.

“It is expected the contract will be awarded to the successful provider during the autumn.”

However, she did not respond to another question enquiring when construction is expected to start.

Council officials had previously set that procurement for a contractor would begin in June.

The second phase of the cycle lane will run from Arthurs Avenue to Beech Grove.

Costs have yet to be revealed for the next section of the route, but Hull-based PBS Construction was awarded a contract worth £827,000 for the first phase.

The third and final phase of the scheme, which will run from Harlow Moor Road to Cardale Park, is expected to be funded via contributions from housing developers.

£11.2m Harrogate Station Gateway will ‘boost business and house prices’

The £11.2 million Harrogate Station Gateway will boost business, increase house prices and reduce congestion, according to an economic report published today.

North Yorkshire County Council, which is leading on the controversial scheme, has opened a third round of consultation.

As part of this, it published an economic case report showing the impact of the scheme.

The document says there is evidence that town centre retail is at risk of decline and ‘the proposed scheme contributes to increasing investment, job creation and productivity’.

It says the project would also create better opportunities to travel by foot and bike, attract more shoppers, increase land prices and ‘act as a catalyst to urban redevelopment and wider town centre regeneration’.

Businesses have expressed concerns about the impact of the scheme on trade.

They fear the loss of parking spaces, particularly on a part-pedestrianised James Street, and extra traffic caused by reducing some of Station Parade to single lane traffic will deter shoppers, as well as the impact of lengthy construction work.

Latest Station Gateway visuals which show Harrogate's James Street pedestrianised.

How James Street will look.

But the economic case report says a survey of James Street users ‘indicates that over 90% of those doing business on the street would be unaffected by the removal of parking’.

It adds:

“Of the 10% or less that are parking, less than 20% were of the opinion that they would take their business elsewhere.

“In combination, were the parking to be removed from James Street, the impact on current shopping/business visitors could be expected to be less than 2%.”

The findings are based on interviews with 294 people entering or leaving shops or businesses on James Street in October last year.

The report says the ‘overall impact on retail footfall is expected to be positive’ and that ‘research has also shown that station enhancements tend to increase the value of existing land and properties within certain radii surrounding the station’.

Congestion fears

North Yorkshire County Council said last week the scheme would extend the average journey time around town by 73 seconds at peak times. Some opponents fear the reality will be worse and the extra congestion will reduce property prices.

But today’s report rejects this. It says offices near the station are in high demand, adding the 11-storey Exchange tower on Station Parade has 99% occupancy and commanded office rents of approximately £25 per square foot.

Conservative councillors Keane Duncan and Phil Ireland at Station Parade last week.

Houses within 500 metres of the station could expect a 10% increase in value and houses within 1,000 and 1,500 metres could expect an uplift of up to 5%.

The report concludes:

“Based on local conditions, academic studies and case study evidence there is a strong economic case for the Harrogate Station Gateway.”

“The scheme is considered to support inclusive growth by presenting new opportunities to access jobs, education and training – that will serve to support a sustainable labour force in the district.

“This document has reviewed what is a large body of evidence and the strong precedents that indicate the Transforming Cities Fund scheme is likely to increase footfall and retail performance, increase property/land values and increase business investment.”

The project, which is not due to start until at least late spring next year, is one of three in North Yorkshire, and 39 nationally, being funded by the Department for Transport’s Transforming Cities Fund to promote active travel.

Today’s economic case report comes after Harrogate property developer Chris Bentley, who owns Hornbeam Park Developments, expressed concerns about the legality of the consultation process and said he was considering a judicial review.

North Yorkshire County Council, Harrogate Borough Council and West Yorkshire Combined Authority all support the gateway.

You can take part in the consultation here.

‘No option’ but to close Woodfield school, says council

North Yorkshire County Council has “no option” but to press ahead with plans to close Woodfield Community Primary School in Harrogate, local authority officials have said.

Senior county councillors on the executive today agreed to publish formal closure notices from September 2022 ahead of a final decision to close the school from December 31.

Stuart Carlson, director of children and young people’s services at the county council, said although it was “regrettable” that it had to close the school, the authority had no alternative.

He said:

“It is regrettable and with heavy hearts that we come to this decision.

“But there is no further options available to us now other than to move to the recommendations.”

Mr Carlson added that a “thorough consultation” was carried out into the closure and that it had exhausted all options available to it.

He denied that the executive of the council would be “ignoring” parents by going ahead with the closure plans.

Mr Carlson said:

“I don’t think we have done [ignored parents]. We have conducted a thorough consultation, we have looked at all the proposals that have been put forward and we have indeed tried our hardest working with the governing body and other schools to find a solution.

“But they are no longer available to us.”

Liberal Democrat councillor Monika Slater, who represents the Bilton Grange and New Park division, said she believed pupils at Woodfield should have been given greater priority for places as she also urged the council to learn lessons for the future.

She said:

“Part of the issue comes down to the fact neighbouring schools have been allowed to become oversubscribed.“

“And I was disappointed to hear that children were going to be treated the same as any other child in the area who wished to move given their situation is somewhat different when we are potentially looking to close the school.

“I really feel these children should have been given a higher preference on their choices.”

Conservative councillor Paul Haslam, who represents Bilton and Nidd Gorge on the county council and is also a governor of the school, called for a “post-mortem” into the downfall of Woodfield school.

A motion from Harrogate Borough Council asking to keep the school open was also considered.

But councillors said they had no other option but to move ahead with the closure plan.

Failure to find academy

The school was rated inadequate by Ofsted in 2020 and placed into special measures.

The rating meant the school had to become a sponsored academy, but it failed to find a backer.

A proposed merger with Grove Road Community Primary School fell through this year, prompting the county council to open a consultation on closing the school in the next academic year.

The school is also faced with a cumulative deficit of £229,000 in 2023/24 due to low pupil numbers.

Union bosses in North Yorkshire previously described the move to close Woodfield as an “absolute disgrace”.

The publication of the statutory notices will include a four-week period for objections to be made to the council by October 6.

Should a final decision to close the school be approved in October 2022, it would include expanding the catchment area of Bilton Grange and Grove Road Primary Schools to cover the Woodfield area.

Questions over deadline for £11.2m Harrogate Gateway project hit by legal threat

A legal threat against Harrogate’s £11.2 million Gateway project has raised new questions over whether the controversial scheme can meet its completion deadline.

There is an agreement between the Department for Transport and West Yorkshire Combined Authority that the project to revamp key parts of the town centre should be completed by March 2024.

But revelations that one of Harrogate’s leading property companies has submitted a proposed claim for a judicial review has cast uncertainty over the already-delayed project which is being led by North Yorkshire County Council.

Letters obtained through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request reveal claims from Hornbeam Park Developments that a council-run consultation on the proposals was “unlawful”.

The council – which recently announced plans for another consultation this summer – responded in a letter to say it “does not accept” the claims.

A Department for Transport spokesman said it expects all projects funded through its Transforming Cities Fund to be delivered on time and that where there are delays, deadlines will be “reassessed by a panel on a case-by-case basis”.

But when asked what a possible judicial review could mean for the Harrogate Gateway project, the spokesman added “we can’t comment on the specific funding arrangement” of the scheme “as this information is commercially sensitive”.

Separately, the council also said in response to the FOI that it “does not hold this information”.

Hornbeam Park Developments made the legal threat in February when it challenged the council’s decision to submit a final business case for the project despite survey results showing more respondents felt ‘negative’ (56%) about the scheme than those that felt ‘positive’ (39%).

The council then announced plans for another consultation and said it hoped construction works would start this winter, with completion in winter 2023/24.

The works will involve cycling and walking upgrades for Station Square and the One Arch underpass, as well the Odeon cinema roundabout and several other streets in the area.

But the most controversial plans include a reduction of Station Parade to one-lane traffic and a part-time pedestrianisation of James Street.

There are similar Gateway projects for Selby and Skipton, yet Karl Battersby, director of business and environmental services at the council, said the Harrogate scheme “has generated the most interest by far”.

He said:

“It is positive that local residents and businesses feel so strongly about changes to their town and it is important to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to share their views on designs for the ambitious scheme.

“The project has developed since the previous consultation, and we know that the impact of the changes on traffic levels and flows were key issues raised in the previous consultation and we will provide further information on those aspects.

“We will also be consulting on the draft Traffic Regulation Orders, which would be required to implement the scheme.

“We will continue to work to the current timescales as set by the Department for Transport and West Yorkshire Combined Authority.”

Mr Battersby also said details of the next consultation will be announced “shortly”.

Social care pilot scheme in Harrogate district ‘could bankrupt council’ without more funding

A national overhaul of the adult social care system will be trialled across North Yorkshire next year – but could leave authorities with a budget deficit stretching into the millions.

North Yorkshire County Council is one of five authorities signed up to be part of the pilot scheme from January, before it is rolled out across the country in October 2023.

It will see a cap of £86,000 placed on each individual’s spending on their care in their lifetime, after which the local authority will fund it for as long as needed.

The reforms will also allow people to retain up to £100,000 of their own assets and still qualify for funding for their care. The current limit is £23,250.

While the result will be a benefit to individuals who get to keep more of their own money and pass it on to their relatives, there is an obvious challenge facing local authorities.

NYCC believes the new system could cost it £45m per year more than it currently pays for adult social care, and it has yet to be told how much money it will be given for the pilot scheme, known as ‘trailblazers’.

Cllr Michael Harrison, executive member for health and adult care, told the Stray Ferret:

“It will benefit residents because no-one is going to pay more [for their care during their lifetime]. Most people are going to pay less, depending on how long they’re in the care system.

“It’s entirely positive for residents from a financial perspective. The rub is, who’s going to fund it?”

At the same time as the changes to funding are introduced, reforms in care fees are being planned.

They will do away with the current two-tier system, which sees local authorities pay a lower rate than a private individual has to pay for the same care.

Cllr Harrison said it is not yet clear what the new fees would be, but it was inevitable that local authorities would end up paying more so care homes did not see a drop in funding.

“If you reduce their income, the viability of the market is threatened.

“Whatever we’re paying, when it comes down to what the individuals working in social care earn, most of them are either on minimum wage or not far off.”

Cllr Michael Harrison

While those two reforms to funding and charging are being planned, a third financial implication for local authorities will come in the form of overseeing an inevitable rise in the number of people accessing local authority funding towards their care.

“The sheer workload of assessment and brokerage and IT – there’s a huge weight of bureaucracy surrounding that because there’s just going to be more people in the system.

“We don’t know how many people are out there self-funding who will come to us – why would we?

“It’s new costs in a market that’s already under stress. How much, we don’t know.

“A piece of work has been done by the County Council Network and we think this could all cost NYCC up to £45m a year – additional [to what it already spends on care].”

Implementation of the new equal care fees system has recently been delayed by the government. The new funding structure being introduced next year will also only apply to people entering the care system, not those already in it.

While this takes the immediate pressure off NYCC’s budget by phasing in some of the changes, Cllr Harrison and his department’s officers know the full impact will be felt in the future.

The changes are set to be funded by the new health and social care levy, brought into effect in April, which has seen a 1.25% increase in National Insurance. The money raised is to be shared between the NHS – which will take most of it – and adult social care.

However, the current Conservative leadership race has seen almost all of the contenders to be Prime Minister declare they would scrap the levy – yet none has said what they would do about funding the scheme without it.

Meanwhile, Cllr Harrison said it has not yet been confirmed what NYCC’s share of the money will be to fund the new system coming into force in less than six months.

“If we apply the normal ratios, we can usually be pretty confident what our share of funding would be. If we’re right, we’ve got up to a £23m hole in our budget in a council already producing a structural deficit of £50m. It would bankrupt us.”

So why did NYCC agree to be part of the trailblazers project, bringing the problems of the new system forward by nine months?

Cllr Harrison said he believes North Yorkshire County Council has a reputation for being competent and working constructively with central government.

At the same time, North Yorkshire has certain characteristics that can be tested through the pilot scheme: an older than average population, a large, rural landscape, with 500 care providers spread across it, and a relatively high proportion of self-funders accessing services.

The rural nature of the county, along with a higher than average elderly population, make it a useful case study for the government to test how its new system will work.

He also hopes it will be an opportunity to make careers in care better funded and more respected, in line with the council’s Make Care Matter campaign.

“Part of being involved in the trailblazers is to try and shape government policy to understand the challenges and find solutions to those challenges and pilot the changes up front.

“The risk to us is if it’s going to hurt us financially before the rest of the country.”

However, he said, there are clauses in the agreement which will allow NYCC to pull out if the scheme is not working and to revert to the current arrangements until all councils move to the new system after the pilot concludes.

The aim, however, is to go through the trailblazers project with the ear of the government, proving that more money is needed before it can be rolled out further. But will the funding come through?

“I’m hopeful. If it doesn’t, it will bankrupt a number of councils round the country and potentially impact the viability of the whole care sector.”

Harrogate district prepares for heatwave as red weather warning issued

The Met Office has upgraded its weather warnings to red for the Harrogate district on Monday and Tuesday next week.

Temperatures are set to rise as high as 38C in the early part of the week, before dropping rapidly from Wednesday onwards.

The warmer weather begins tomorrow, with highs of 24C, rising to 30C on Sunday. A previous amber weather warning has been upgraded to red, meaning there is a risk to health among the general population, not just the most vulnerable.

A spokesperson for the Met Office said:

“Exceptional, perhaps record-breaking, temperatures are likely on Monday, then again on Tuesday.

“Nights are also likely to be exceptionally warm for the UK, especially in urban areas. This is likely to lead to widespread impacts on people and infrastructure.”

The forecast has prompted some event organisers across the Harrogate district to make changes to their plans.

At St Michael’s Hospice on Hornbeam Park, Harrogate, an open garden event on Sunday has been brought forward to the morning rather than later in the day as the heat increases, and organisers are reminding visitors to bring sun hats and sunscreen.

A spokesperson said:

“While the beautiful warm weather looks set to continue, there is plenty of shady areas, lots of water available and – while stocks last – free ice cream and ice lollies to cool you down, thanks to the charity’s corporate supporters Froneri.

“Drop in any time between 10am and 12 to see stunning views and garden areas, enjoy refreshments and a mindful moment. Entry is free, however do bring some cash as there will also be a raffle and a plant sale.”

Harrogate Borough Council is also considering changing the location of an event on Sunday evening. A spokesperson said:

“We are looking at the best location for the open air theatre in the Valley Gardens on Sunday to ensure there is shade available under trees.”

Meanwhile, care homes are being given advice by North Yorkshire County Council to keep their residents well during the high temperatures.

Cllr Michael Harrison, executive member for health and adult services, told the Stray Ferret:

“We have got regular communication with all of our care homes. We’ve about 225 care homes in North Yorkshire and we make sure from a public health perspective that we give various messages about keeping out of the sun, drinking lots of fluids and being more concerned about the welfare of people.

“That’s not only in care settings – it’s also for people to look out for their next door neighbours and other vulnerable people.”

Harrogate roads set for three weeks of resurfacing work

Four Harrogate roads are set to undergo three weeks of resurfacing work which will see road closures and temporary traffic lights in place.

North Yorkshire County Council’s highways department will carry out the work on Claro Road, Ainsty Road, Devonshire Place and Coach Road from Sunday, July 24.

As part of the work, the roads will be closed or have two-way traffic lights in place.

Resurfacing will be carried out on the following dates and locations:

Sundays July 24, July 31 and August 7 on Claro Road under a road closure from 7.30am to 11.30pm.
Monday, July 25 to Thursday, July 28 on Claro Road under two-way traffic lights from 9am to 4pm.
Monday, August 1 to Friday, August 5 on Claro Road under a road closure from 6.30pm to 11.30pm.
Monday, August 8 and Tuesday, August 9 on Devonshire Place and Coach Road under a road closure from 7.30am to 6pm.

Ainsty Road will undergo patching work on Friday, July 29 under a road closure from 7.30am to 11.30pm, but access will be maintained for residents.

Advance warning signs will be installed at all locations and a signed diversion route will be in place.

Cllr Keane Duncan, North Yorkshire County Council’s executive member for highways and transportation, said:

“We are working hard to improve the condition of North Yorkshire’s roads, with an extensive programme of works across the county to improve the condition of our vast network.

“The maintenance works on these key Harrogate roads are the latest in our efforts, and I know they will be very much welcome.”

Read more:

Save £1.5m a year

Read more:

Read more:

‘Fantastic regeneration project’

Read more:

Read more:

Congestion fears

Read more:

Failure to find academy

Read more:

Read more:

Read more:

Read more: