North Yorkshire Council has scrapped plans to create cycle lanes on Harrogate’s Victoria Avenue.
The council today announced it was holding a month-long consultation on proposals to change the wide avenue where the library is located.
The proposals include making the junction with Belford Road left-turn only and measures to prevent drivers illegally travelling straight ahead from Beech Grove to Victoria Avenue.
The consultation will focus purely on pedestrians and motorists — even though the council had identified Victoria Avenue as a “priority route” for cycling and announced last year it intended to create segregated cycle lanes 1.5 metres wide and buffer zones on both sides of the avenue.
A letter to residents announcing the consultation said:
“Unfortunately budgetary constraints mean that the previously envisaged cycle lanes cannot be included within this initial phase of this Victoria Avenue scheme.
“Following advice from Active Travel England, we have therefore concentrated on improvements for pedestrians and improvements to the public realm.”
The new proposals include:
- Signalisation of the pedestrian crossing at the junction Victoria Avenue and Station Parade to add a pedestrian phase, upgrade of the existing uncontrolled crossing at the junction of Victoria Avenue and West Park to a signalised pedestrian crossing
- Addition of tactile paving across all side roads
- A new bus stop outside the United Reformed Church and associated paving upgrades
- Relocation of the existing staggered zebra crossing and introduction of an in-line zebra crossing
- Removing some parking bays to facilitate access to the new bus stop
- Making the junction with Belford Road “Left Turn Only”
- Improvements to existing paving and benches
- Improved decorative street and footway lighting
- New ticket machines for kerb side parking bays
- Layout changes to prevent vehicles from making illegal straight ahead movement from Beech Grove to Victoria Avenue.
It is hoped the work will take place in autumn this year.

Victoria Avenue
Victoria Avenue was regarded as a key part of plans to create a joined-up, off-road cycling route from the train and bus stations to Cardale Park.
But with the second phase of the Otley Road cycleway abandoned, along with traffic calming measures on Beech Grove, today’s news is another blow to those campaigning for a greener town centre better suited to cycling.
Active Travel England, the government body that promotes walking and cycling, awarded the council funding to deliver a scheme on Victoria Avenue in November 2020.
Today’s announcement said “design development work has been ongoing” since then.
The letter to residents said:
“The works proposed support North Yorkshire Council’s desire and vision to increase active travel in and around Harrogate town centre by proposing a number of measures to increase pedestrian safety as well as improved bus provision.
“Whilst unfortunately is it not possible to include the desired cycle lanes within this proposed scheme, the proposed works will not prevent the installation of the cycle lanes in the future, and this will be the ambition within a future funding bid. North Yorkshire Council is committed to delivering a cycle scheme on Victoria Avenue.
Consultation on the proposals ends on May 12. As part of this, an engagement session will take place from 5pm to 7pm on Tuesday, May 7 at the council office. The address is Stray Room, St Luke’s Mount, Harrogate HG1 2AE.
To comment, you can email Area6.Boroughbridge@northyorks.gov.uk using ‘Victoria Avenue ATF 2 Consultation’ in the title of your email or letter.
Or post comments to: NYC Highways, Area 6 Boroughbridge Office, Stump Cross, Boroughbridge YO51 9HU
Read more:
- Harrogate house fire family launches crowdfunding appeal
- Should Harrogate have a ‘magnificent’ water feature?
Otley Road cycleway in Harrogate to be extended
The Otley Road cycleway in Harrogate is to be extended, a meeting heard last night (April 17).
The cycleway was conceived as part of wider plans to form a safe off road cycling route from Harrogate town centre to Cardale Park.
The first phase from Cold Bath Road to Harlow Moor Road, was constructed at a cost of £2.2 million but North Yorkshire County Council scrapped plans for the second phase last year.
Cllr Keane Duncan, the Conservative executive member for highways and transportation at the council, said at the time none of three options put forward proved popular with cyclists, walkers or motorists — despite cyclists highlighting how a consultation revealed more people were in favour of going ahead than not.
However, last night’s spring meeting of Harlow and Pannal Ash Residents Association heard that although there were no plans to revive the second phase, the third phase would go ahead.
Hapara chair Rene Dziabas said it had been informed of the news by North Yorkshire Council, which succeeded North Yorkshire County Council in April last year.
Mr Dziabas told the meeting, which was attended by council highways officials, the 1.1km phase three would be built on the north side of Otley Road between Harlow Moor Road and the western edge of Harlow Carr.
It would be a two-way shared cyclist / pedestrian route measuring three metres wide, he said.
He added five trees and about 1,500 square metres of grass verge would be lost as part of the scheme and there would be toucan crossings at Beckwith Head Road/Crag Lane and Cardale Park junctions.
The cycleway will be funded by developers who are in the process of building 4,000 homes in the west of Harrogate.
Mr Dziabas said:
“Just about everyone thought because phase two had been cancelled, phase three wasn’t going ahead. It’s going ahead. We have had it confirmed by highways.”
He added there will be no specific public consultation on phase three, which will be considered as part of a far broader west of Harrogate traffic assessment.
A leaflet by Hapara said:
“The general view of this scheme is that it will not deliver any real benefits to mitigate against the high levels of traffic on Otley Road which is how it was sold when initially launched.
If the intention is to get more people cycling, which is a perfectly sensible aim, this scheme seems to be an expensive way of delivering the
objective.”
It added:
“No timescales are available at the moment, but North Yorkshire Council has indicated that they wish to see phase 3 constructed prior to the occupation of dwellings on the relevant major sites, including H49 and H45. This could be years away but meanwhile design studies will continue.”
Read more:
- Harrogate’s Otley Road cycleway has cost £2.2m so far
- Confirmed: second phase of Harrogate’s Otley Road cycle route scrapped
By-election candidates support Harrogate active travel proposals
Candidates standing in next week’s Stray, Woodlands and Hookstone by-election have backed proposed new measures to encourage walking and cycling in Harrogate.
North Yorkshire Council is consulting on plans to introduce crossings at the junctions of Slingsby Walk and Oatlands Drive Slingsby Walk and Wetherby Road.
It hopes the move will encourage fewer journeys by car in a part of town densely populated by schoolchildren.
The Stray Ferret asked the five candidates standing in Thursday’s by-election for a seat on North Yorkshire Council for their views on the proposal.
Liberal Democrat candidate Andrew Timothy, who will be defending the seat for the Lib Dems following Pat Marsh’s resignation in February, was the only one not to respond.
The Conservative, Labour, Green and Reform UK candidates all, however, supported the proposal.
John Ennis, who finished runner-up for the Tories when the seat was last contested in 2022, said:
“Having myself campaigned over several years for pedestrian / cyclist crossings at these two points on Slingsby Walk, I very much welcome the fact the council is bringing these proposals forward, and would encourage local residents to respond to the consultation.
“Regarding the council’s reference to possible further traffic changes in the Oatlands Drive area, I am supportive in principle of 20mph, but opposed to any introduction of local one-way systems.”
Labour candidate Geoff Foxall, a former Harrogate borough councillor, said:
“I agree to both of these as necessary safety precautions: for school pupils on Oatlands Drive and residents and school pupils on Wetherby Road. Hopefully, these measures will encourage school pupils to walk or cycle to school rather than be driven there by parents.”

The Slingsby Walk and Wetherby Road junction.
Gilly Charters, who is representing the Green Party, said many residents in the Saints area were worried about child safety and the crossings would address this and support active travel.
She added:
“The local Greens have led the way at North Yorkshire to address speed limits and road safety issues in particular around schools and presented a pilot scheme to Harrogate and Knaresborough area constituency committee which paved the way for campaign groups to get safety measures in place on the roads around schools on the western side of Harrogate.
Reform UK candidate John Swales said he supported the crossings but “with a number of concerns, or reservations”.
He said it wasn’t clear how the pre-consultation was undertaken, and why motorists were not included, or why the cost of the schemes had appeared to increase since they were first mooted.
Mr Swales added:
“Also, I wouldn’t support a 20mph speed limits or junctions being made one-way, without a clear understanding of the benefits and drawbacks.”
The deadline for comments is Sunday, April 14. For more information and to view the plans, click here
Any comments should be emailed to Area6.Boroughbridge@northyorks.gov.uk using ‘Oatlands Drive/Wetherby Road crossing consultation’ in the email title.
Read more:
- Harrogate Spiegeltent to return after two years
- Local business raises concern about new Harrogate Tourist Information Centre
Harrogate could get county’s first tiger crossing to boost cycling
The first tiger crossing in the county could be built in Harrogate as part of new proposals to encourage cycling and walking.
North Yorkshire Council is consulting on plans to build crossing points on Oatlands Drive and Wetherby Road.
Under the plans, a tiger crossing would be built at the junction of Slingsby Walk and Oatlands Drive and a more traditional toucan crossing would be constructed at the junction of Slingsby Walk and Wetherby Road.
It is hoped having two crossings on Slingsby Walk will encourage more people to use the off-road route across the Stray.

The junction of Slingsby Walk and Wetherby Road.
Tiger crossings, also known as parallel crossings, consist of a zebra crossing with segregated zones for cyclists and pedestrians. They are named after similar crossings in Hong Kong that were painted yellow and black.
The one on Oatlands Drive would be sited on a raised table, which would make the crossing more visible and calm traffic. Other traffic calming measures, including a reduction in the speed limit on Oatlands Drive to 20mph, are also in the pipeline.
Both proposals involve the loss of Stray land, which the council would have to compensate for by giving up land elsewhere to become Stray land.
It’s preferred option is land immediately adjacent to the Stray and also to the proposed crossing on Wetherby Road.
The council had previously pledged to have both crossings constructed by the end of this month.
It shelved plans to introduce a one-way system on Oatlands Drive in 2021 after a backlash by residents.
Read more:
- Calls for safer cycling on Oatlands Drive in new Harrogate survey
- Plans to install two pedestrian and cyclist crossings in Harrogate
No 6: Harrogate Station Gateway ‘descoped’ after legal flaws and political rows
In this article, which is part of a series on the 12 stories in the Harrogate district that shaped 2023, we look at the Harrogate Station Gateway saga in 2023.
The year 2023 was supposed to be the year when the Harrogate Station Gateway started to happen.
After years of talk, work would begin on reducing a section of Station Parade to single lane and James Street would be partly pedestrianised. But not a single shovel has entered the ground and the scheme remains mired in mess.
A meeting of North Yorkshire Council’s Harrogate and Knaresborough area constituency committee was supposed to bring clarity in May.
Cllr Keane Duncan, the council’s Conservative executive member for transport, turned the heat up on the Liberal Democrat-controlled committee beforehand by warning the scheme would be dead if the committee didn’t back it. The “majority of spend”, he added, must take place in 2023/24 budgets so there could be no delay.
Councillors voted 10-3 in favour, which paved the way for Cllr Duncan and the rest of the council’s ruling Conservative executive to press the go button. But the political consensus didn’t last long. The Lib Dems quickly withdrew their support, claiming the council had not engaged in meaningful consultation as promised in May.

Cllr Keane Duncan talks about the Station Gateway to Harrogate District Chamber of Commerce.
They called on Cllr Duncan, who would later win the Conservative nomination to stand in next year’s York and North Yorkshire mayoral election, to resign. He accused the Lib Dems of “weak and inconsistent leadership” and “playing games with the scheme”.
Meanwhile, local property firm Hornbeam Park Developments, which owns some buildings on James Street, launched a judicial review to challenge the council’s decision making.
Lawyers claimed there were six grounds for challenge, including the council’s failure to hold a public inquiry before issuing traffic regulation orders for the scheme. In August, the council confirmed it had “quashed” its May decision to proceed with the gateway. It conceded:
“Due to the necessity of having a public inquiry before confirming the relevant traffic regulation order, it was considered prudent to accept this ground of challenge.”

A Harrogate District Cycle Action graphic showing the scrapped elements.
This prompted Andrew Jones, the Conservative MP for Harrogate and Knaresborough MP, to say the gateway was a” timed-out dead scheme” and offer to intervene to help retain the funding locally.
But the council, which had previously insisted the scheme would be dead if it wasn’t approved, ploughed on and began hastily assembling new proposals.
By November, they suggested public realm improvements to Station Square and One Arch, which is the foot tunnel under the railway at the bottom end of Station Parade, improved access into the bus station and linked sequencing of the traffic lights between the Ripon Road/King’s Road and the Station Parade/Victoria Avenue junctions. The possibility of a southbound segregated cycle lane on Station Parade, while retaining two lanes for motorised traffic, is also being explored.
The political wrangling continued when Lib Dem leader Cllr Pat Marsh accused Cllr Duncan of “pinching” their ideas.
The scheme is one of three worth £42 million being funded by the government’s Transforming Cities Fund to improve station gateways to town centres in Harrogate, Selby and Skipton.
Read more:
- Cyclists brand scaled-back Harrogate gateway plans a ‘huge disappointmen’
- Councillors push ahead with scaled-back £11.2m Harrogate Station Gateway
- Council concedes it should have held public inquiry into Harrogate Station Gateway
By the end of the year all three had been “de-scoped” because “cost estimates have significantly increased during the detailed design development period”, according to a council report.
The council was keen to gloss over questions about its handling of a scheme, and how it had breached public law by failing to issue traffic regulation orders — particularly as it had awarded £2 million to consultants for help.
Cyclists were frustrated by the loss of what was once hailed as a key project in establishing a secure route from the town centre to Cardale Park. The gateway lexicon had also changed from being about active travel to sustainable transport, suggesting it’s more about better traffic lights than encouraging walking and cycling.
Councillors are expected to decide early in 2024 whether to accept the smaller Harrogate scheme — assuming the government lets the deadline slip. It appears smaller and less controversial than the original plans — but little about the gateway is ever straightforward.
Stray Views: I can suggest only two solutions to Harrogate’s traffic congestionDear Editor,
I read repeatedly of North Yorkshire Council councillors and others stating that recent consultations on Harrogate’s traffic congestion have rejected any road building projects and instead have supported more active travel schemes as the preferred solution. [Council quashes hopes of west Harrogate bypass]
Whilst I do not have a copy of the consultations to refer back to, my memory is that there never was a question along the lines of “Would you like to see further bypasses built? ”. The questions were more vague and designed to obtain the preferred council outcome. For example “Would you support the encouragement of more active travel?”. It is almost impossible to say “No” to such a question. The health benefits alone make “Yes” the only sensible answer.
But active travel will not remove Harrogate’s congestion at anytime in the near future, or even the medium term. The station gateway as originally proposed would not have improved the journey from, for example, Oatlands to Asda nor the journey back with a week’s shopping – wobbling up Leeds Road on a bicycle!
I can suggest only two solutions to Harrogate’s traffic congestion – one would be to complete the bypass around Harrogate, on a route that avoided sensitive areas of countryside. The other would be to ban all non-electric vehicles and all large cars from journeys into and within Harrogate. This second solution would need to be coupled with a scheme to provide small electric vehicles to all residents at a much subsidised cost (which would be demonstrably cheaper than building a bypass!), together with 2 or 3 Park and Ride schemes.
We could be pioneers! Think of Harrogate leading the way and being ahead of other towns in its innovative approach to reducing traffic congestion.
Yours
Andrew Dodd, Harrogate
We’ve also had a number of emails from readers getting in touch with us after we ran a story about the new parking payment system at Harrogate District Hospital, run by private firm Parkingeye. Harrogate hospital defends criticism of new parking payment system. We will be doing a follow up story including some of your experiences this week. Get in touch with your views contact@thestrayferret.co.uk.
Read More:
- VIDEO: First look at new £17.5m Knaresborough leisure centre
- Campaigners shocked as Harrogate district has highest number of fatal accidents in county
- EXCLUSIVE: Stray Ferret reveals not a single litter fine in Harrogate district for past three years
Station Gateway: Andrew Jones calls for funding to be switched to ‘other projects’
Andrew Jones has called for government funding for the Harrogate Station Gateway to be reallocated to other projects.
The Conservative MP for Harrogate and Knaresborough said North Yorkshire Council should not waste time trying to keep the project alive, after it today announced it was “rescinding” its decision to proceed.
That announcement came following a legal challenge from Hornbeam Park Developments, which had applied for a judicial review of the way the Station Gateway project had been managed.
Mr Jones said:
“The key consideration is that the latest challenge means that the deadline to spend the cash allocated to this area is certain to expire. It is time therefore to stop spending public money trying to drag what is effectively a timed-out dead scheme – the good parts regrettably and the bad too – over the line.
“The council must start talking to government about retaining the funding and re-positioning it to other projects in Harrogate and Knaresborough. I am happy to help with that process.”
The project has been controversial, with business organisations raising concerns about its impact on footfall and therefore the viability of town centre shops.
The £11.2m scheme was to be funded by the Transforming Cities Fund, and would have seen Station Parade narrowed to one lane around the bus and railway stations.
A bus lane and cycle routes would have been introduced, as part of plans to encourage more active travel.
It would also have included the pedestrianisation of the eastern half of James Street, and changes to Lower Station Parade, with a bus lane added on its eastern side.
‘Flip-flopping’
At a meeting of Harrogate and Knaresborough Area Constituency Committee in May, business owners raised concerns about the impact of the loss of 40 parking spaces and potential queues of traffic through the town centre.
After three hours, the committee voted by eight to three in favour of supporting the scheme.
All five Conservative councillors and most Liberal Democrats voted for it,
Liberal Democrat leader and committee chairman Cllr Pat Marsh said councillors had been given a free vote on the issue.
The public gallery at the Harrogate and Knaresborough Area Constituency Committee meeting in May
However, Cllr Marsh then went to the meeting of North Yorkshire Council’s executive to plead with its members not to proceed with the scheme.
The next month, the Lib Dems withdrew all its councillors’ support, citing the lack of meaningful engagement with businesses and local residents over their concerns.
In today’s statement on the issue, Mr Jones took aim at the Lib Dems for “flip-flopping” on the project:
“Of course, consistent political leadership is critical when managing major investment and the majority group on the Harrogate and Knaresborough area committee has been unable to provide that.
“Whether or not one supports the gateway project in total, in part or not at all such weak local leadership presents difficulty when we look to attracting future investment.”
Looking to the future, Mr Jones said there were elements of the Station Gateway project that could be carried forward into a new scheme.
He also said he had asked North Yorkshire Council to address concerns over other parts of the plan.
He added:
“There are parts of the scheme I think that are welcome – the emphasis on sustainable transport, tidying up the area as you come out of the bus and train stations, the improvement of the public realm, changing the crossing arrangements on Lower Station Parade, improving the shabby one arch and so on.
“There are elements of concern too such as the narrowing of Station Parade for a short stretch outside the bus station and how deliveries to businesses will work and I have consistently asked the council to address these concerns. It is clear that significant numbers have not been reassured by the explanations that have been given.”
Read more:
- Decision to proceed with £11.2m Harrogate Station Gateway revoked after legal challenge
- Secret Bakery set to open new shop in Harrogate station
Harrogate business survey reveals opposition to Station Gateway
Three times more businesses oppose the £11.2 million Harrogate Station Gateway than support it, according to a survey.
Harrogate District Chamber of Commerce revealed the results of a members’ questionnaire at its monthly meeting last night.
Asked whether they were in favour of the scheme, seven respondents said ‘yes’ while 21 said ‘no’.
Members were also asked if they felt the scheme, which would see James Street partly pedestrianised and a section of Station Parade reduced to single lane to make way for a cycle route, would make business in the town better or worse.
Eighteen said it would make it worse, four said better and six either felt it would be the same or expressed no opinion.
Nineteen opposed the pedestrianisation of James Street, while nine supported it.
Asked whether the scheme would “encourage you or your team to participate in more active travel”, five replied ‘yes’ while 23 said ‘no’.
Martin Mann, acting chief executive of the chamber, said:
“No-one’s in any doubt the town centre needs some work, but the answer is not this design.”
Read more:
- £11.2m Station Gateway set to go ahead after crucial Harrogate area vote
- Council in discussions with Harrogate Station Gateway contractor
Pat Marsh, the Liberal Democrat leader in Harrogate and Knaresborough, told the chamber meeting North Yorkshire councillors should visit the affected area before deciding whether to proceed with the gateway on May 30.
Cllr Marsh, who was one of three councillors to oppose the scheme when it was voted through by North Yorkshire Council’s area constituency committee this month, said:
8 takeaways from the Harrogate Station Gateway meeting“If this was a planning decision we would be having a site visit and we would walk the route before making a decision. The same should happen.”
“I’m so against this scheme, I can’t tell you.”
Councillors voted by 10 to 3 in favour of proceeding with the £11.2 million Harrogate Station Gateway last week.
The heated three-hour meeting saw members of the public and North Yorkshire councillors speak for and against the scheme.
It would see the biggest change to the town centre for decades, including traffic on a 300-metre stretch of Station Parade being reduced to single lane so cycle lanes can be built and part of James Street pedestrianised.
But the meeting revealed far more than that. Here are eight key takeaways.
1 The project looks certain to go-ahead
North Yorkshire Council is expected to ratify the decision to proceed with the gateway when its ruling executive meets on May 30.
The Harrogate and Knaresborough area constituency committee, which met last week, is only an advisory body to the executive but the council’s Conservative transport chief Cllr Keane Duncan pledged in advance of the meeting to abide by its decision. The 10-3 vote in favour appears to have sealed its fate.
Cllr Duncan told the meeting the council was “up against it” if it didn’t want to lose the £10.9 million pledged by the Department for Transport towards the £11.2 million scheme. He said:
“We will have to make a decision as an executive on May 30 if we want to ensure we deliver this scheme in line with DfT requirements.”
He added the “majority of spend” must take place in 2023/24 budgets, so expect roadworks this winter.

Station Square is many visitors’ first impression of Harrogate.
2 Supporters say it will halt town centre decline
Although the gateway is mainly regarded as a transport scheme, supporters are keen to portray its potential for regenerating Lower Station Parade and the area around the bus and train stations.
Matthew Roberts, economic development officer at the council, displayed a slide at the committee meeting showing the number of shops in Harrogate declined from 539 in September 2013 to 474 in September 2021. The meeting also heard evidence that pedestrianisation often led to an increase in spending.
Mr Roberts concluded his presentation by saying:
“Change is often daunting but in Harrogate’s case, much needed.”
3 Otley Road cycle route has undermined confidence
The spectre of the Otley Road cycle route loomed over the meeting.
Liberal Democrat Cllr Monika Slater, who represents Bilton Grange and New Park, told officers the much-criticised cycle route had “taken away the public confidence” in the council’s ability to deliver infrastructure schemes.
The prospect of a part-pedestrianised James Street also raised concerns that Harrogate’s premier retail street could become a soulless shopping experience, as some feel Cambridge Street has become, rather than the pleasant oasis portrayed in council designs.

Cambridge Street – bland?
4 Divided Lib Dems enabled the go-ahead
The Harrogate and Knaresborough area constituency committee, which advises North Yorkshire Council, consists of eight Lib Dems and five Conservatives — so the Lib Dems could have halted the scheme.
But there was no party whip and a wide range of views emerged. Committee chair and Harrogate and Knaresborough Lib Dem leader Pat Marsh, who represents Stray, Woodlands and Hookstone, was scathing:
“I’m totally against this scheme – it’s the wrong scheme. We need to get around the table and look at a more connected plan.”
Fellow Lib Dem Matt Walker, who represents Knaresborough West, and Michael Schofield, who represents Harlow and St Georges, described it as a “vanity project”. But the other five Lib Dems voted in favour, as did all five Conservatives, after receiving vague assurances the committee would be involved in the scheme going forward.
5 There are fears of Harrogate turning into Peterborough or Milton Keynes
Former Harrogate borough mayor Caroline Bayliss was one of many anti-gateway speakers at the start of the meeting. She said the project was “bland enough to suit Peterborough, Milton Keynes or Croydon”, adding:
“It takes away more of our distinct character to be replaced by concrete.”
Former architect Barry Adams, who handed out details of an alternative approach, described it as a “blinkered and contrived highways-led solution”.
By contrast, gateway supporters say it will breathe new life into a run-down part of town that provides the first impression for visitors by bus and train.

There are fears land near the train and bus stations will be developed.
6 Tower block fears
There are fears that the gateway could pave the way for other developments in the vicinity.
Martin Mann, acting chief executive of Harrogate District Chamber of Commerce, even said:
“There are also concerns about the development of the land next to the station, potentially into a tower block, which may overshadow Station Parade and this redevelopment to the public realm.”
Businesses recovering from covid are also more concerned about the disruption caused by months, or years, of roadworks rather than long-term vision of improvement presented by gateway supporters.

Harrogate has 7,000 parking spaces
7 Just 0.6% of parking spaces will be lost
The loss of parking spaces on James Street is one of the gateway’s most controversial aspects.
Richard Binks, head of major projects and development at the council, said 40 parking spaces would be lost in total because of the scheme
He said Harrogate had more than 7,000 parking spaces, if Asda and Waitrose are included, and therefore only 0.6% of spaces would be lost.
8 Cheltenham Parade bus lane scrapped
Mr Binks revealed plans to introduce a bus lane on Cheltenham Parade had been removed from the scheme.
But he added a bus lane on Lower Station Parade remained part of the plans. He said 44 buses an hour used that stretch of road and “each bus would gain 17 to 20 seconds” because of the lane.
Mr Binks added the project had been amended to allay business fears about unloading on Lower Station Parade after the owner of Party Fever raised concerns the business and customers would no longer be able to park outside. He said:
“We are proposing to truncate the length of the lead in the taper to the bus lane over the length of Bower House and make that double yellow line like it is now. That would avail you the opportunity to load as you do now, It would avail customers 30-minute pick up and drop off time.”
“You have a very valid point, we will take it on board and adjust the project to suit.”
Read more:
- Council in discussions with Harrogate Station Gateway contractor
- Station Gateway: Highways boss welcomes ‘positive’ backing from councillors
- As it happened: Councillors vote to SUPPORT Harrogate Station Gateway scheme
£30,000 cycle priority crossing planned in Harrogate
North Yorkshire Council has proposed constructing a cycle priority crossing in Harrogate.
The £30,000 scheme where Bilton Lane dissects Nidderdale Greenway would give cyclists and pedestrians crossing the road priority over vehicles.
The road would be raised to make the crossing more visible to motorists.
The council has sent letters to Bilton residents to get their views. The letter says there has been an increase in the number of cyclists and pedestrians using the Nidderdale Greenway cycle network. It adds:
“As part of the council’s efforts to improve accessibility and promoting active travel, we are proposing to construct a cycle priority crossing on Bilton Lane at the crossing of Nidderdale Greenway.
“The crossing is designed with a raised table making it more visible to drivers and helping to slow them down. Priority will be given to cyclists and pedestrians to cross safely without having to compete with drivers on the road.
“People with mobility issues such as those using wheelchairs or mobility scooters can cross more easily with the crossing being at the same level as the footway. Apart from improved safety, other benefits include increased accessibility, better health outcomes and environmental benefits.”
The crossing would be 7 metres long, 6.6 metres wide and 75 millimetres high.
Paul Haslam, a Conservative who represents Bilton and Nidd Gorge on the council, said he supported the idea in principle.
But he added the Bilton Lane speed limit needed to be reduced from 30mph to 20mph and parking arrangements improved so the crossing was more visible to motorists.
Cllr Haslam also called on farmers, who often drive vehicles on Bilton Lane, to be consulted and for the car park next to the greenway and Bilton Lane to be resurfaced.
Read more:
- Publican says cycle path crackdown in Harrogate is ‘unreasonable’
- ‘Grim’ future predicted for Harrogate cycling after funding snub