The Harrogate Station Gateway project may have been approved, but the next stages of the £10.9m scheme will be far from straightforward.
It took almost two years of design work and heated debate to get to this stage – now questions are turning to when the vision of Harrogate town centre less dominated by cars could become a reality.
North Yorkshire County Council’s executive approved the project last month in the face of a deep divide amongst residents and businesses over what the major changes to several streets will mean for the local economy and traffic congestion.
The council originally said it anticipated construction would start this spring or summer, but it is now being much more ambiguous, saying works “could” begin “later this year”.
It also said construction could stretch into 2024 after initially aiming for completion by the end of 2023.
This uncertainty over when the project could start and finish has drawn further concern from some business leaders who had previously called for the gateway to be halted.
David Simister, chief executive of Harrogate Chamber of Commerce, said now the project is going ahead, it is key that disruption to businesses is kept to “an absolute minimum” when the construction phase eventually gets underway.
He said:
“We were initially told that if approved, work would commence in late spring/early summer, and what I wouldn’t want to see is it commencing in the run up to Christmas.
“When it does start, the message that needs to be communicated loud and clear is that the town remains open for business.
“The project team also needs to consult with the business community long before work starts, and it also needs to be prepared to listen to any concerns that might arise.”
Read more:
- Starbeck schoolchildren highlight air pollution dangers of idle engines
- Harrogate council to vote on 1.99% council tax hike
Works on the detailed designs of the project – which includes reducing a stretch of Station Parade to one-lane traffic and a part-time pedestrianisation of James Street – are now continuing ahead of a final business case being submitted around August.
Objections could lead to public inquiry
The business case will be submitted to the West Yorkshire Combined Authority which is overseeing the project funding from the government’s Transforming Cities Fund.
Subject to its approval, a contractor will then be appointed to carry out the works, as well as similar projects in Selby and Skipton.
Traffic Regulation Orders – which are legal documents needed to introduce road changes – will be necessary for all three schemes and could spark public inquiries if objections are received.
These orders are lengthy processes and can often take several months to complete due to the need for public consultations.
The idea of a judicial review – which would be a court hearing into whether the council’s decision to approve the Gateway was lawful or not – has also been previously discussed by some Harrogate businesses.
This would have the potential to either derail the project or delay it long enough to jeopardise funding.
Reduce congestion
Despite the objections and threats of legal action, the gateway has been well supported by many residents and campaign groups who have hailed it as a positive step to tackle climate change and cut car congestion.
The project also includes improvements for pedestrians and cyclists, with upgrades planned for Station Square and the One Arch underpass, as well the Odeon cinema roundabout and several other streets in the area.
North Yorkshire County Council, the lead partner on the scheme, has continually insisted that businesses, cyclists, pedestrians and public transport users alike will see the benefits once the project is completed.
It also said while the construction phase will be a challenge, the authority will try to minimise the impact on traffic and trade.
A county council spokesperson said:
New moves to improve cycling in North Yorkshire“Although the Department for Transport set an initial completion date of March 2023, the department has advised that completion could extend into 2024.
“The programme is tight, so the flexibility is welcome.
“The county council takes the delivery risk, but will have robust programme management in place and there is a sum for contingency within each scheme’s budget.”
A local authority facing a huge demand to increase cycling infrastructure has revealed it is mapping all non-public right-of-way cycle routes for the first time to make it easier for people to swap their cars for bikes.
North Yorkshire County Council’s highways team is set to produce a cycling route map spanning England’s largest county while also examining moves such as segregating road users as sweeping Highway Code changes are introduced to make cycling easier and safer.
The announcements follow the authority being inundated with proposals for cycle route schemes from residents and community groups after the authority received £1m from Department for Transport Active Travel Fund last year to improve the infrastructure for cyclists and pedestrians.
Despite numerous calls for action to enable active travel in rural areas, the council said it would focus the funding on large towns, such as Harrogate, as greater populations meant better value for money.
Harrogate currently has cycling routes planned for Otley Road and Victoria Avenue in Harrogate and Harrogate Road in Knaresborough.
A meeting of the county’s Local Access Forum this week heard safety concerns continued to be a major factor in determining whether people chose to cycle and that the government was trying to discourage segregating cyclists by using white lines, “given that white lines don’t do anything to protect cyclists”.
Instead, highway officers said, the authority was now moving towards physically segregating cyclists and motorists, but it was a more expensive than simply using white lines and would “not happen overnight”.
Read more:
- Killinghall roadwork misery set to continue for extra week
- Scrapping Pannal cycle lane ‘ludicrous’, says cycling group
The forum’s chairman, Paul Sherwood, said action was needed to improve roads for cyclists. He said:
“Is the highways section of the county council aware of the incredibly dangerous situation of the appallingly maintained roads in which cycling is extremely hazardous in the way the roads are at the moment?”
Funding from developers
Officers replied that the roads were subject to a scheduled programme of inspections and the council was looking to gain extra funding through property developers’ contributions for safety improvements. The meeting heard the availability of funding could increase when the forthcoming unitary authority controls most of the county’s planning matters.
The meeting was told it was hoped a county-wide map of non-public right of way routes would make it easier for cyclists to plan.
An officer said:
“We recognise it is not that easy to find out where those routes are. We are moving towards making that more accessible.”
The meeting heard the authority would be taking into account the HIghway Code changes, in which cyclists are encouraged to cycle in the middle of the road, but the changes were unlikely to impact on the design for cycling infrastructure.
Councillors were told the council would examine schemes such as one introduced in parts of York where bollards have been placed at the side of the road to segregate cyclists and motorists, which had increased safety for cyclists while the narrowing of the road had slowed traffic.
Long-awaited Otley Road cycle lane opens to safety concernsThe first phase of the much-anticipated cycle lane on Otley Road in Harrogate was completed today amid safety fears by a cycling campaign group.
North Yorkshire County Council has now completed the initial stretch from Harlow Moor Road to Arthurs Avenue. It is the first of three phases on Otley Road.
However, the junction with Harlow Moor Road has given Harrogate District Cycle Action group cause for concern.
Kevin Douglas, chairman of HDCA, told the Stray Ferret the cycle route was a “step forward” overall but the junction failed to meet safety standards:
“We can see that they have widened the junction for cars. It is great news for drivers but that was not the point of the scheme.
“In its current form I do not think it meets the minimum safety standards.
“The council is planning to widen the path at the junction by using land owned by Yorkshire Water which would improve the situation but until then it is too narrow.
“Overall I see this as a step forward. The sooner we have cycle lanes that connect houses on the edges of town with the town centre the better.”
Read more:
- Otley Road business owner ‘fuming’ about cycle path works
- Killinghall roadwork misery set to continue for extra week
North Yorkshire County Council has been working closely with Mr Douglas and other local cycling groups as part of the consultation process.
Much of the route is shared with pedestrians.
Cllr Don Mackenzie, executive member for access, told the Stray Ferret:
“There has been some criticism about the fact that it is shared access with pedestrians and cyclists, but that has always been part of the design.
“I have had many conversations with Mr Douglas. He is concerned about the pinch point at the Harlow Moor Road junction but we are going to resolve the issue. It’s a fair assessment.
“We have reached an agreement with Yorkshire Water so we can widen that path. I cannot give a date on when those works will start.”
Construction of the second phase, from Cold Bath Road to Beech Grove, is due to start in April. There is still no timescale for phase three, which will connect to Cardale Park.
Mr Mackenzie also raised the prospect of eventually extending the cycle lane to Beckwithshaw. He told the Stray Ferret it would likely receive funding due to the number of housing planned for the area. Developers, as part of planning consent, would be expected to fund the route.
Scrapping Pannal cycle lane ‘ludicrous’, says cycling groupA decision to scrap a legal agreement for a housing developer to build a cycle lane in Pannal has been described as “ludicrous”.
Bellway Homes had agreed to build the cycle lane on Leeds Road when its 128-home development at the former Dunlopillo factory site was approved by Harrogate Borough Council in 2017.
But the Section 106 agreement has now been scrapped by the council in favour of a £189,000 contribution from the developers after the cycle lane costs increased to almost £1m due to new government guidance on design standards.
Kevin Douglas, chairman of Harrogate District Cycle Action, described the decision as “ludicrous” and said the developers should be made to fulfil their agreement.
He said:
“Councils are not always going to have this kind of money themselves so they should be ensuring developers who are building houses and bringing more people into the town provide the appropriate infrastructure we need.
“The cycle lane wasn’t a brilliant scheme in the first place, but at least it would have been something.”
‘We need these links’
Mr Douglas also said cycle links in outskirt areas like Pannal should be seen as a priority to make the most of larger projects including the £10.9 million Harrogate Gateway.
He added:
“Making improvements in the town centre will be great but we need these links in for people to get there.
“It’s very important that all these plans and projects connect together.”
The decision to scrap the agreement was made at a meeting of Harrogate Borough Council’s planning committee on Tuesday after a recommendation from officers.
Kate Broadbank, housing officer at the council, told the committee it “would not be reasonable” to make the developers build the cycle lane given the increased costs.
Read more:
- First section of Otley Road cycle lane due to be finished this week
- Housing developer can ‘no longer afford’ to pay for Leeds Road cycle path
North Yorkshire County Council, which is responsible for highways, had also agreed to the decision prior to the meeting and is now drawing up proposals for wider improvements in Pannal using the £189,000 agreed alongside other contributions.
Paul Thornton, planning manager at Bellway Homes, said the company believed these wider plans would be of more benefit to the area.
He said:
Housing developer can ‘no longer afford’ to pay for Leeds Road cycle path“The proposed commuted sum will be used to help fund wider improvements along the A61 which will ultimately benefit residents of Pannal and the wider district.
“We believe the funding provided through the amended Section 106 contribution will be far more beneficial than progressing a standalone scheme.”
One of the UK’s biggest housing developers, which is building 128 homes in Pannal, has said it can no longer afford to pay for a cycle route on Leeds Road, despite being legally obliged to do so.
Bellway Homes was granted planning permission for its Jubilee Park development on the site of the former Dunlopillo factory in 2017. Homes are being sold there for upwards of £316,000.
Bellway Homes committed to paying for a cycle route on the A61 from the bridge over the River Crimple in Pannal to the Fulwith Mill Lane junction. This was done by a section 106 agreement, which housebuilders pay to mitigate for the cost of development.
However, more than four years after being granted permission to build the homes, the developer today asked Harrogate Borough Council‘s planning committee to remove the agreement, which it called “unreasonable” due to a change in government cycle scheme standards.
‘No longer viable’
Speaking at the planning committee this afternoon, Paul Thornton, planning manager at Bellway Homes, said the initial plans for the scheme were to widen the footpath to provide shared access with cyclists.
But a recent change in government standards meant the developer would now be obliged to create a cycle route segregated from motor vehicles to protect the safety of cyclists. Mr Thornton said this change had made the route “no longer viable” due to the increase in cost.
Bellway instead offered to pay £189,000 to the council to go towards the route or unspecified “wider improvements” along the A61.
Read more:
- Bid to convert Kirkby Malzeard pub at centre of long-running campaign
- Harrogate set for ‘greatest investment in town centre in decades’
Mr Thornton said:
“It will help fund winder improvements along the A61 which will benefit Pannal and the wider district.
“We believe the funding will be far more beneficial than a standalone scheme.”
Harrogate Borough Council housing officer Kate Broadbank, who wrote a report to councillors recommending they approve the removal of the section 106 agreement, said the cycle route would now cost £980,000 due to the new government standards.
Ms Broadbank wrote in the report that “it would not be reasonable” to expect the developer to pay for it all.
Liberal Democrat councillor Hannah Gostlow, who represents Knaresborough Scriven Park, asked if this meant the taxpayer would now foot the rest of the bill if the cycle route ever gets built.
Harrogate Borough Council’s chief planner John Worthington said this was an “impossible question to answer”.
Councillors agreed to remove the section 106 agreement and accept the £189,000 offer by 7 votes to none, with three councillors abstaining.
Don’t judge Otley Road cycle path until its complete, says campaign groupHarrogate District Cycle Action has urged people to hold judgement on the new Otley Road cycle path until it is completed in full.
The first phase of the long-delayed Harrogate cycle path between Harlow Moor Road and Arthurs Avenue was due for completion last week but has now been pushed back again until 21 February 2022.
Kevin Douglas, chairman of Harrogate District Cycle Action, said while the campaign group had raised some concerns over the works completed so far, people would only see the full benefits when all three phases of the project are completed.
He said:
“This is only one phase and a very small part of the whole project.
“What we wanted to see was a scheme that was going to be an exemplar for other cycle routes and at the moment we haven’t got that because it is only part of the bigger picture.
“When the whole thing is done it should be better and encourage more people to cycle and walk.”
The cycle path is part of a wider package of sustainable transport measures for Harrogate, which will cost around £4.6 million once completed.
Funding was first secured by North Yorkshire County Council in 2017 and there have since been several delays involving utility and construction works.
Read more:
- Otley Road business owner ‘fuming’ about cycle path works
- Otley Road cycle path ‘disaster waiting to happen’, says pub landlord
There have also been drawn-out discussions with the Duchy of Lancaster – the owners of the Stray – over the use of grass verges protected by law.
Despite the long-awaited progress on the first phase, the county council has said it is still unable to say when the project could be completed in full.
It said phase two could start in April and that the final phase connecting Cardale Park relies on developer funding, which is currently being worked on and will lead to more detailed planning, including a feasibility study.
Junction concerns
The concerns raised by Harrogate District Cycle Action over the first phase involve changes to Otley Road’s junction with Harlow Moor Road, as well as priority for pedestrians.
Mr Douglas said the campaign group would soon meet with council officers to highlight the issues.
He said:
“We said right at the beginning that this is one of the most difficult parts of Otley Road to work on. There are constraints and we acknowledge that.
“But the Harlow Moor Road junction has been widened to allow traffic through which is frustrating and has narrowed the turning for pedestrians and cyclists.”
Mr Douglas added:
Electric bike shop to open in Harrogate next month“With all the delays that are going on we will keep pressing the council which should have been doing one phase and then straight onto the next one.
“I couldn’t see them doing a new road scheme in this way – they just wouldn’t do it.”
A specialist electric bike shop will open on Leeds Road in Harrogate next month.
The Electric Bike Shop will open on February 11 in a unit that previously was home to Fultons Foods and Choices video rental.
The company began in Bristol but has expanded to open stores in London, Cheshire and the Midlands. Harrogate will be its ninth location.
It sells and services bikes with electric motors and also sells e-cargo bikes, which are like electric bikes but have a large storage area to transport goods.
Helen Gadbury, PR manager from Electric Bike Shop, told the Stray Ferret that Harrogate is a “prime location” for the company to open its next shop.
She added:
“The bikes are getting more powerful and the technology has improved a great deal. The majority of our customers are older people who used to cycle regularly but had suffered from a lack of confidence. Electric bikes are a way to get out and start cycling again.”
Six jobs are set to be created. It will be open from Monday to Saturday.
Read more:
- Cycling campaigners stop in Harrogate on 500-mile tour to Glasgow
- £10.9m Harrogate Station Gateway ‘must focus’ on cycling and walking

Councillors will this week debate a petition urging them to abandon the £10.9 million Harrogate Station Gateway.
North Yorkshire County Council is due to decide shortly whether to proceed with the scheme, which would part-pedestrianise James Street and reduce traffic to single lane on some of Station Parade to encourage cycling and walking.
A petition by Harrogate Residents Association calling for the scheme to be halted generated 714 signatures.
Petitions that attract 500 signatures are automatically scheduled for debate by the county council.
It will therefore be discussed by the council’s Harrogate and Knaresborough area constituency committee on Thursday – although a final decision on what happens next will be made later.
Read more:
- Majority are negative towards Harrogate Station Gateway, consultation reveals
- Stray Views: Station Gateway will benefit far more people than cyclists
Anna McIntee, co-founder of Harrogate Residents Association, will be given five minutes to speak before councillors debate the matter for a maximum of 15 minutes.
Ms McIntee told the Stray Ferret it would be “crazy” to proceed in the face of widespread opposition from residents and businesses.
She said:
“I don’t really understand how they can ignore all the residents and all the businesses that oppose it. It would be crazy to plough ahead.”

Residents were shown the plans at a public meeting at Victoria Shopping Centre.
The county council revealed last month that of 1,320 people who replied to an online survey, 55% felt negatively towards the gateway, 39% felt positively and five per cent felt neutral. One per cent said they didn’t know.
Shortly afterwards three Harrogate business groups urged the county council and Harrogate Borough Council. which also supports the initiative, to “put the brakes on this scheme”.
Many of those opposed fear the scheme will push traffic into residential areas and damage business.
‘No decision taken’
A report to councillors recommends they ‘note’ the petition and ‘consider a response’. It adds:
No. 1: The cycling schemes that divided Harrogate“The (gateway) proposals aim to introduce a significant high quality uplift to the public realm in the heart of the town aimed at increasing footfall and quality of experience for residents and visitors.
“They will also provide safe cycling infrastructure and improved footways which is key in promoting healthier and more sustainable travel choices.
“Currently no decision has been taken on implementation of the project, the results of the second round of consultation are being analysed and a report with final recommendations will be taken to the executive early in the new year.”
Nothing generated more debate on the Stray Ferret’s social media this year than schemes to promote cycling in and around Harrogate.
There was the Otley Road cycle path, Beech Grove Low Traffic Neighbourhood, plans to make Oatlands Drive one-way to vehicles and funding for cycle schemes on Victoria Avenue in Harrogate and Harrogate Road in Knaresborough.
But the £10.9 million Station Gateway scheme proved the most controversial of all.
Gateway: petitions and legal threats
The scheme aims to transform the gateway to the town near the bus and train stations by reducing traffic on part of Station Parade to single lane and part pedestrianising James Street while encouraging cycling and walking.

How James Street would look.
With funding for the initiative secured from national government, North Yorkshire County Council and Harrogate Borough Council, which both support the scheme, ran two public consultations this year.
Both revealed a deeply divided town: some welcomed the opportunity to create a greener town by encouraging cycling and reducing car use; others felt the scheme would merely move traffic off the A61 Cheltenham Crescent and onto nearby residential streets, cause delays on Station Parade and damage town centre businesses.
Matters came to a head at a feisty Harrogate District Chamber of Commerce meeting in February when pro-gateway representatives, led by Don Mackenzie, executive member for access at the county council, gave a presentation to a sceptical audience.

Don Mackenzie speaking at the chamber meeting.
It ended with businesses threatening to mount a judicial review to halt the process.
The results of the second consultation, published this month, revealed that of 1,320 replies to an online survey, 55% felt negatively, 39% positively and five per cent neutral towards the scheme. One per cent said they didn’t know.

A consultation event in Victoria Shopping Centre.
The chamber has called for the scheme to be halted and two residents groups have filed petitions opposing the project in its current form.
The county council is expected to decide next month whether to proceed with the scheme but the early indications are it will press ahead with final designs in the hope that work will start in spring.
Read more:
- New data reveals dramatic impact of Beech Grove closure on nearby roads
- Majority are negative towards Harrogate Station Gateway, consultation reveals
- ‘Severe weather’ delays Otley Road cycle path in Harrogate
- Victoria Road one-way scheme will stop ‘rat run’, says cycle group
Beech Grove: barriers and cuts across the Stray
North Yorkshire County Council’s decision to ban through traffic on Beech Grove caught many people by surprise in February.
The move aimed to link Beech Grove with the forthcoming Otley Road cycle path and the proposed Victoria Avenue cycling improvements, creating a more connected cycling route around Harrogate.

Tyre tracks on the Stray next to the planters on Beech Grove.
Planters blocking traffic were initially introduced on a six-month trial basis in February but this was extended to 18 months, meaning a decision on whether to extend the scheme will be due after August 2022.
Some vehicles on Beech Grove initially flouted the law by driving on Stray land to bypass the planters.
Data obtained by the Stray Ferret this month following a freedom of information request to the council revealed the move has so far had little impact on cycling journeys on Beech Grove.
It has, however, had a considerable impact on traffic on nearby streets Victoria Road and Queens Road. But the council claims the data reveals there is “no evidence” to support claims that traffic has increased on Cold Bath Road.

Malcolm Margolis on Beech Grove
Harrogate cycling campaigner Malcolm Margolis conducted his own survey, which produced higher figures for cyclists. He claimed it proved the initiative was working well.
The issue looks set to rumble on throughout the year until a decision is made on whether to continue the experiment after August.
Otley Road: work finally begins
Work finally began on the much-delayed cycle path in winter when phase one of the project, from Harlow Moor Road to Arthur’s Avenue, got underway.
North Yorkshire County Council hopes the path will improve safety and alleviate congestion along the Otley Road corridor.

Phase one work gets underway.
Phase one was due to finish before Christmas but the council blamed ‘severe weather’ for another delay and said work should now finish in January.
Phase two, from Harlow Moor Road to Beech Grove, is due to start in March.
It is unclear when phase three, from Harlow Moor Road to Cardale Park, will start. That stretch of the cycle lane relies on developer funding from housing built in the west of Harrogate.
The county council is currently working on various plans, including a feasibility study, for phase three.
Oatlands Drive plans scrapped
North Yorkshire County Council announced in February it had received £1m from the Department for Transport’s Active Travel Fund for four schemes to improve the infrastructure for cyclists and pedestrians.
Three of the schemes were for the Harrogate district. They were: the A59 Harrogate Road, Knaresborough, between Badger Mount and Maple Close; Oatlands Drive, Harrogate between Hookstone Road and Knaresborough Road and Victoria Avenue, between the A61 and Station Parade.
The projects for Knaresborough and Victoria Avenue are still due to proceed.
But plans to make Oatlands one-way to traffic and improve the narrow cycle lanes were shelved after 57% of consultation respondents opposed the proposal. They cited the impact on school buses and the creation of a ‘rat run’ on surrounding residential streets at peak times.

Oatlands Drive, Harrogate.
Subsequent traffic proposals for the saints area were also dropped after opposition.
The council said it would commission an Oatlands constituency feasibility study’ to “re-assess opportunities” for infrastructure improvements but so far nothing has been forthcoming.
Traffic continues to park in the cycle lanes on Oatlands Drive. Harrogate Borough Council introduced signs urging motorists not to do it but they appear to have had little impact.

One of the signs on the Stray alongside Oatlands Drive.
New data has revealed the Beech Grove Low Traffic Neighbourhood has had a dramatic impact on traffic on nearby roads — but the number of cyclists using it remains around three an hour.
North Yorkshire County Council closed the Harrogate road, which connects the A61 and Otley Road, to through traffic in February, initially for a six-month trial. It later extended the trial to 18 months.
The move aimed to reduce traffic and encourage cycling and walking on the road, which runs alongside the Stray. Beech Grove was chosen because it would connect to other planned cycle schemes in the town.
But some residents and motorists were angered by the sudden loss of the thoroughfare and said it would just push traffic elsewhere.
The council has released new data about the controversial LTN following a freedom of information request from the Stray Ferret. The council’s press office had refused to provide the information, saying it wanted to wait until the trial had ended.
The council also provided a letter sent in October to residents living close to the LTN. The letter includes data that reveals road traffic has reduced on Beech Grove by as much as 85% since the closure.
The council compared current data with a traffic count on the road undertaken in 2015 that found, on average, 2,712 vehicles a day used its mid-point.
Displaced traffic
The data addresses the question of whether the closure has pushed traffic onto nearby roads.
An automatic traffic counter on Victoria Road found there has been a 230% increase in vehicles using the northern section since the LTN was introduced. In February, 300 vehicles a day used the road. The number increased to 1,058 a day in April then fell slightly in subsequent months.

Information by North Yorkshire County Council. AADT stands for annual average daily traffic.
Queens Road has also seen the number of vehicles using it double from around 500 to over 1,000 a day.
However, in the letter sent to residents the council disputed claims that Cold Bath Road has born the brunt of displaced traffic from the LTN. It said its traffic counter found “no evidence” to support the suggestion that traffic levels have increased.
It said around 8,500 vehicles used Cold Bath Road a day pre-covid 2019 and the number had fallen to 7,200 in 2021. However, it added the the latest numbers from August this year suggested traffic had now returned to pre-covid levels.
Read more:
- Beech Grove closure officially extended until August 2022
- Beech Grove closure to remain in place, despite petition objecting
-
‘It’s working well’: Campaigner counts cyclists using Harrogate’s Beech Grove
The number of cyclists using the Beech Grove LTN remains between two to three an hour, although the number increased in November.
North Yorkshire County Council does not record what time of day cyclists use the road and only has the figures for a 24-hour period.
In August 2020, before the LTN was introduced, around 50 cyclists used the road each day. This has stayed broadly the same throughout 2021.
Council officers believe the automatic traffic count numbers are “light” compared to casual observations they have made when visiting the LTN. The council said it planned to conduct manual surveys on this.
In August, the Stray Ferret joined cycling campaigner Malcolm Margolis, who spent an hour counting cyclists using the LTN on a sunny September afternoon. He counted 21.

Information by North Yorkshire County Council
Conservative county councillor Don Mackenzie, executive member for access, said:
“We are committed to encouraging active travel, easing congestion and improving air quality in Harrogate. Experimental traffic restrictions on Beech Grove and Lancaster Road will run until August 2022. At that point we will compile an extensive report of cyclist data which will span the 18-month period to paint a full comprehensive picture.
“We will consider this alongside the consultation responses, vehicle data, ongoing site observations and other active travel measures in Harrogate before a formal decision will be taken on the way forward.
“Other schemes such as the Otley Road cycle route, the Station Gateway project and the Active Travel Fund proposals for Victoria Avenue are all at various stages of design and construction so when work is complete we anticipate a further increase in cycling.
“A reduction in traffic levels on Beech Grove has resulted in a reduction in the speed of vehicles and an increase in cyclists. More people are likely to cycle – for both commuting and leisure – when improved infrastructure is in place that reduces conflict with vehicles.”