A controversial plan to demolish the former Dunlopillo office block in Pannal to make way for apartments has been approved.
Harrogate Borough Council has given the go-ahead for the plan, which was submitted by Leeds-based Johnson Mowat Planning.
The proposal will see the 1961 office block replaced by 48 one-and two-bedroom apartments.
Under the plans, the site will be split into two blocks, one with four storeys and another with six.
There will also be one car parking space per apartment plus additional spaces for visitors at the back of the building.
Read more:
However, the plans have proved controversial with residents, the parish council and Harrogate and Knaresborough MP, Andrew Jones, all criticising the development.
In a letter to the borough council, Pannal and Burn Bridge Parish Council said it could “give no credence” to the proposal.
It said:
“The current Dunlopillo building has suffered decades of neglect and exists as an eyesore within its environment.
“Councillors and parishioners support its long-overdue demolition but can give no credence to the replacement and erection of a structure which – at a proposed 18 metre height, three metres above the current height – would exert an over-dominance and “mass” in its surrounds.”
Meanwhile, Andrew Jones this week called for a special planning committee to consider the development which he said.
He also wrote to Michael Gove, communities secretary, to ask for him to intervene “should the council’s local planning powers not be sufficient to enable full scrutiny of the application”.
Mr Jones said the development should not have been lodged under the permitted development rights, which the application has been made under.
He said:
“Permitted development rights are to enable positive development and apply in specific circumstances to achieve a specific goal. I do not believe that these rights were introduced for the situation in respect of this development in a semi-rural location.
“Such a significant proposal should go through the normal planning process, be thoroughly appraised by council officers and scrutinised by the councillors at a committee meeting where the public can also have their say.”
Johnson Mowat said in its planning documents submitted to the council that the scheme would be an improvement on the current empty office block, which has been deteriorating for several years.
‘Ambitious plans’ for new Knaresborough leisure centre revealedHarrogate Borough Council has revealed how its proposed new multi-million pound leisure centre in Knaresborough will look.
The council plans to build the new facility on the site of Knaresborough Pool on King James Road by spring 2023.
The new centre will have a six-lane, 25-metre pool, learner pool with flume, sauna and steam room, fitness suite and studio and spin studio.
Designs also show that it will have a café, electric car charging points, bicycle storage and a large play area.
The council has said it would prefer to build the centre towards the rear of the existing pool, where the play park is currently located, rather than build on Fysche field.
Knaresborough Pool would remain open throughout construction. When the new building opens, the council would demolish the existing pool and create a new play area in its place.

An aerial view of the plans.
However, the council is keeping the option of building on Fysche field on the table as “option B” under the plans.
If the council went ahead with building on Fysche field then it would create a new green space in place of Knaresborough Pool.
Some Knaresborough people are concerned Fysche field and the adjoining children’s playground area could be lost and have a launched a campaign to “protect central Knaresborough’s only recreational green space from being concreted over”.
Share your views on the Knaresborough leisure centre plans
The council has now asked for residents to share their views online ahead of a formal planning application. It will also host an in-person consultation at Knaresborough Pool on October 6 between 5pm and 8pm.
Cllr Stanley Lumley, Harrogate Borough Council’s cabinet member for culture, tourism and sport, and chair of the board of directors at Brimhams Active, said:
“We have ambitious plans to reduce the proportion of the population that are physically inactive but we can’t do this without investing in our facilities.
“This multi-million pound investment for Knaresborough will create a 21st century facility that provides fantastic opportunities for local people to move more, live well and feel great.
“Along with our new facility in Ripon and the redevelopment of the Hydro in Harrogate, as well as the districts other great leisure centres and pools, I hope people feel motivated, supported and inspired to stay active.”
Read more:
- Site revealed for new Knaresborough leisure centre
- Green Party attacks Knaresborough leisure centre plans
Mark Tweedie, managing director of Brimhams Active, said:
“Through the provision of fantastic modern leisure and wellness facilities and engaging, inclusive services we will be able to help many more people become active, lead healthier lifestyles and therefore live longer, more independent and happier lives.”
James Foley, commercial director for Alliance Leisure Services, said:
“The proposed transformation for Knaresborough has the capability to create a hugely positive impact within the community for generations to come.”
Backlash over search for locations
The current site was one of four options, along with Conyngham Hall, Knaresborough House and Hay-a-Park under consideration for the new leisure centre last year.
The council faced a backlash for considering Grade II* listed Conyngham Hall, with Knaresborough Civic Society among those opposing the move.
A Hands Off Conyngham Hall Grounds petition by the Harrogate and Knaresborough Liberal Democrats attracted more than 1,600 signatures.
‘No irregularities’ found after Harrogate council officer ‘massaged’ key planning reportAn investigation has concluded that “no irregularities” took place when a Harrogate Borough Council planning officer sent emails saying he “massaged” a key report on plans for the controversial Kirby Hill A1(M) service station.
The council launched the probe after emails revealed Barrie Gannon, a former principal landscape architect, made changes to a report in 2019 when the council went against three previous refusals of the plans to recommend approval in what campaigners described as a “complete U-turn”.
Seventeen months later, the service station was approved at a fourth appeal by the developers despite 25 years of objections.
It is not known what changes were made to the landscape report, but Gareth Owens, chairman of Kirby Hill Residents Against Motorway Services, said he believes the council’s actions were “highly suspicious”.
Mr Owens also said he has “no confidence” that the matter has been “properly investigated” and added it “leaves more questions than answers”.
He said:
“We think the council’s U-turn on the decision, after 25 years of objections on landscape grounds, is highly suspicious.
“The landscape position remained one of refusal until shortly before the planning committee meeting. It was altered only when a different landscape officer, by his own admission, ‘massaged’ the report.
“The council has not provided any evidence that this change of heart was above-board and followed due planning process.
“The absence of such evidence suggests that it was not.”
Change of stance
The emails, which have been seen by the Local Democracy Reporting Service, show Mr Gannon said to a colleague:
“I’ve massaged the landscape section 9.56 -9.69 which hopefully reads better.”
Read more:
-
Inquiry launched after council officer ‘massaged’ A1 service station report
- ‘There is a need’ for A1 service station near Kirby Hill, inquiry told
- Government approves A1 service station after fourth appeal in 25 years
The landscape report itself said the impact of the service station was “not substantive” in what campaigners described as the “complete U-turn” from a previous council assessment which warned the plans would cause “significant harm”.
This led to questions over why a change of stance was taken, but the council has repeatedly defended its position.
A council spokesperson said:
“We can confirm that, following allegations that a report was ‘massaged’, an investigation was carried out.
“This investigation found no irregularities in the preparation of the officer report for the planning committee.
“As was stated at the time, officer recommendations are fair and impartial, and carefully considered against local and national planning policy, case law, consultation and anything else considered to be ‘material’ to the decision.”
Background: Villagers’ 25-year fight against the Kirby Hill service station
For over a quarter century, villagers living in Kirby Hill had been fighting – and winning – a battle against the plans from Irish-firm Applegreen.
The service station was refused four times by councillors on Harrogate Borough Council’s planning committee and three times by a government inspector in 1997, 2003 and 2010.
However, their luck ran out in 2019 when a fourth government inspector gave the go-ahead.
Planning inspector David Rose said in his ruling that the proposals were “materially different” to past plans.
However, his decision was met with anger from villagers whose objections had not altered since the first application was submitted back in 1996.
Developer remains ‘fully committed’ to Kingsley Drive homesA developer behind a controversial proposal to build 217 homes in Harrogate has said it “remains fully committed” to the site.
Persimmon Homes saw its plan for Kingsley Drive rejected by Harrogate Borough Council last month.
Residents lodged 388 objections to the scheme and offered none in favour.
The Stray Ferret asked Persimmon whether it intended to appeal the application or submit fresh proposals for Kingsley Drive.
A spokesperson said:
“We remain fully committed to the Kingsley Drive site and are still considering our options.”
Residents ‘remain vigilant’
The Kingsley ward area will eventually see more than 600 homes built, including developments at Granby Farm and 149 homes on Kingsley Road.
Persimmon’s plan to build 217 homes was rejected by councillors after authority officials said the application was “not considered acceptable”.
Read more:
- Tesco Skipton Road supermarket ‘could put us out of business’
- Kingsley Drive residents to ‘remain vigilant’ despite 217-home rejection
- Council rejects controversial plan for 217 homes on Kingsley Drive
The site is allocated for housing under the council’s Harrogate district Local Plan 2014-35, which outlines development in the district until 2035.
But although the principle of development has been established, council officers had concerns about overdevelopment and inadequate information on surface water drainage and noise.
Authority officials also said in a report that the number of homes on the site was above the 173 allocated in the local plan.
John Hansard, who lives in the area, previously told the Stray Ferret that residents were aware that the plan could come back following last month’s rejection.
He said:
Talks planned in battle to save Ripon’s Spa Baths“It was a good result and I am pleased about that. It does give us a bit of breathing space.
“My only concern is that they [the developer] will appeal. I think that we need to look into that.
“I think we need to remain vigilant.”
Councillors in Ripon are hoping to meet soon with Harrogate Borough Council’s preferred bidder for the city’s Spa Baths.
The future of the Grade II listed building has been uncertain since owner Harrogate Borough Council put it on the market in February, saying it would be surplus to requirements when Ripon’s new multi-million swimming pool opens.
This sparked fears the 116-year-old baths could be sold for housing.
The campaign to retain it for community use, led by Ripon City Council and Ripon Civic Society, received a boost this month when the building was designated an asset of community value.
This gives communities a right to bid to buy the building before it is sold on the open market.
The identity of Harrogate Borough Council’s preferred bidder is being kept under wraps due to commercial confidentiality but city council leader Andrew Williams said he was looking forward to constructive discussions.

Replacing Spa Baths: Ripon’s new swimming pool, which will open this year.
He told the Stray Ferret:
“We met with the borough council last week following our successful application to have the baths listed as an asset of community value.”
“At that meeting, we were told that the preferred bidder intends to include an element of community use as part of wider redevelopment of the site.
“We are keen to find out what that community use would be and if there is a way forward that is acceptable to all involved.”
Read more:
The 116-year-old building was converted from a spa to a public swimming pool in 1936 and has the distinction of being the only English spa to be opened by a member of the royal family.
A civic society plaque near the entrance records the fact that Princess Henry of Battenburg performed the opening ceremony in 1905.
Harrogate MP criticises Dunlopillo housing plan
The MP for Harrogate and Knaresborough has weighed in on a plan to demolish the former Dunlopillo offices in Pannal to make way for apartments.
Otley-based developer Quattro Property Group has submitted the plans, which would see the 1961 office block replaced by 48 one-and two-bedroom apartments.
However, Andrew Jones has criticised the plan and said should not have been lodged under the permitted development rights, which the application has been made under.
The proposal has also proved controversial among some residents, one describing the plan as “awful”.
Mr Jones has written Harrogate Borough Council to call for a special planning committee to scrutinise the proposal.
Read more:
-
Housing plans set for ‘eyesore’ Dunlopillo office block in Pannal
-
Plan for eight commercial units on former Dunlopillo site in Pannal
- Pannal residents ‘erupt in fury’ at Dunlopillo housing plans
He has also written to communities secretary, Michael Gove, to ask for him to intervene “should the council’s local planning powers not be sufficient to enable full scrutiny of the application”.
Mr Jones said on his community news website:
“Permitted development rights are to enable positive development and apply in specific circumstances to achieve a specific goal. I do not believe that these rights were introduced for the situation in respect of this development in a semi-rural location.
“Such a significant proposal should go through the normal planning process, be thoroughly appraised by council officers and scrutinised by the councillors at a committee meeting where the public can also have their say.”
The proposal would be split into two blocks, one with four storeys and another with six.
There would also be one car parking space per apartment plus additional spaces for visitors at the back of the building.
Planning consultants Johnson Mowat has submitted planning documents to Harrogate Borough Council on behalf of the developer that says the scheme would be an improvement on the current empty office block, which has been deteriorating for several years.
It says:
“This site has been a blot on the landscape for far too long and we are looking forward to delivering a high quality building.”
The Stray Ferret approached Johnson Mowat for comment, but did not receive a response.
What is permitted development?
Permitted development means that a developer can apply for certain types of applications to go ahead without the need for planning permission.
The last major change to permitted development rights was in 2015, under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat government. However, many changes have since been made since 2020 in response to covid.
Developers can also apply for “prior approval” to carry out a development under permitted development, such as converting retail or office space into homes.
In this case, the developer will ask whether prior permission is required before proceeding with a proposal.
It can take between 28 and 56 days for a council to grant approval to an application.
Harrogate to get second Christmas marketA second Christmas market is to be staged in Harrogate on the first weekend of December.
Harrogate Borough Council said in a statement today it had agreed a partnership with Little Bird Made to hold a festive artisan market in Valley Gardens on December 4 and 5.
The statement added that subject to an acceptable event management plan, the artisan market will feature around 60 local traders and producers.
The stalls will sell a variety of festive arts and crafts, clothing, homeware, jewellery, as well as locally produced food and drink.
Read more:
- Dates and locations for new Harrogate Christmas market revealed
- Annual Christmas concert at Harrogate Royal Hall returns
It will accompany the new Harrogate Christmas Fayre, organised across town by Market Place Europe, which will run from December 3 until December 12.
The fayre will see 50 stalls erected in Cambridge Street, Market Place, Station Square and Cambridge Crescent.
Harrogate Borough Council is also working with Harrogate BID and North Yorkshire County Council on the fayre, which will take the place of the one traditionally held on Montpellier Hill.
‘Festive cheer’
Little Bird Made’s website says its markets offer a “diverse, quality, shopping experience that celebrates independent producers”.
Ripon resident Jackie Crozier, who set up Little Bird Made in 2018, said:
“I am delighted to be working with Harrogate Borough Council to bring an additional Christmas market to Harrogate this year.
“Our markets showcase some of Yorkshire’s finest small businesses and are a great opportunity to bring some festive cheer and buy that special gift for the holidays.
“We are always looking for new traders to join our growing portfolio of markets, so anyone looking for a stall should get in touch.”
Cllr Andy Paraskos, cabinet member for environment, waste reduction and recycling, said:
Ripon’s biggest car park set for three-week resurfacing“We’ve said for some time that we want to ensure festive cheer returns to Harrogate town centre this year and I’m delighted that Little Bird Made will complement Market Place Europe’s offering.
“They provide fantastic artisan markets that showcase the best home-grown traders and producers and I’m confident there will be something for everyone. I’m eager to see what will be on offer.
“Hopefully this leads to a longer-term relationship with Little Bird to deliver a monthly artisan market in the Valley Gardens in the future.”
Ripon’s biggest car park looks set to undergo an £85,000 resurfacing.
Harrogate Borough Council has advertised a contract to carry out the work at Cathedral car park, on Victoria Grove.
The 193-bay car park sits in view of the cathedral and is used by drivers for long sand short stays.
The council said in its contract notice that the site has become worn and hazardous to members of the public.
It said:
“Over the years the current surface of the car park has become pot-holed, with large areas of loose tarmac resulting in trip hazards to members of the public, and claims for vehicle damage.”
Read more:
The contract is for a complete resurfacing of the car park, and to increase the number of parking spaces to 206, along with 10 disabled bays.
The council will also require the contractors to undertake trunking and ductwork in preparation for the installation of electric vehicle charging points.
A separate contract will be procured to install the charging points.
While it is unclear if any disruption will be caused by the works, the resurfacing contract is due to start on November 8 and last for three weeks.
Companies wishing to undertake the work have until October 20 to bid for the contract.
Unison Harrogate rejects ‘derisory’ council staff pay offerThe Harrogate Borough Council branch of Unison has voted to reject a pay offer following a ballot with members.
The trade union held a ballot, which closed on Friday, over whether to accept a proposed increase of 1.75%. The offer followed a national consultation from the Local Government Association over a pay increase.
Unison officials described the offer as “derisory” and recommended members reject the proposal.
Of a turnout of 62% of its members, 74% voted to refuse the pay offer.
Dave Houlgate, Harrogate branch secretary of Unison, said it was “little surprise” that staff voted to reject the proposal.
He said:
“Staff are worn down after years of real-terms pay cuts and with inflation at nearly 4%. Despite this they’ve continued to go above and beyond during the pandemic in providing much needed services to support residents and businesses alike in the district.
“There has still been no formal public recognition for their efforts from the council but to be clear, Unison is in no doubt that council staff have been fantastic over the past 18 months or so and at the very least deserve a decent pay rise for once.”
Read more:
- New Ripon pool may not be ready to open in November
- Union concerns over staffing shortages at Harrogate district leisure centres
- Harrogate councillor tables alternative boundary proposals to government
The Harrogate branch balloted borough council staff, while North Yorkshire Unison consulted with school staff.
The branch will now await the results from ballots across England and Wales before taking further steps, which could include industrial action.
Harrogate Borough Council have been approached for comment.
Final approval for 135 homes in KillinghallA plan to build 135 homes in Killinghall has been given final approval.
Harrogate Borough Council has granted permission for the scheme, which was submitted back in 2017.
The homes will be built off Otley Road, before the junction with the A59 Skipton Road.
Approval was given after the council agreed a section 106 with Leeds-based Home Group.
The agreement will see 50 homes classed as affordable built on the site.
Of these, 34 will be made available to rent, including one, two, three and four-bed properties. Another 16 will be offered as part of a shared ownership scheme.
Read more:
-
‘It’s hugely disappointing’: Knaresborough affordable homes refused
-
Housing Investigation: New homes out of reach for too many locals
The remaining homes will be sold on the open market.
The agreement also includes the “ongoing management and maintenance” of public open space at the development.
Following submission of the proposals, Killinghall Parish Council offered no objection to the plan.
However, it raised concern that access to the site from Otley Road would create a “rat run” through to Skipton Road.
A statement put before the council by planning agents Lichfield and Partners on behalf of the developer said the scheme would bring economic benefits to the area.
It said:
“The application proposals would have significant net social, economic and environmental benefits, which clearly outweigh any adverse impacts of the development.”