Access to NHS dentists across North Yorkshire has got worse and is “unacceptable”, according to one of the county’s Conservative MPs.
Kevin Hollinrake, who represents Thirsk and Malton, told a debate in Parliament this week that there has been “simply no availability” for dentists during his seven years as a MP.
Mr Hollinrake said one of his first acts as an MP was to raise the issue with the then Minister for Dentistry, Alistair Burt, in 2015.
However, now he says the issue has got worse and that across North Yorkshire there is no availability on waiting lists.
He told a Westminster Hall debate on access to NHS dentistry on Thursday that since 2015 the issue has “actually got a lot worse”. He said:
“This morning I checked across North Yorkshire—which is larger than my constituency—and there is simply no availability on NHS waiting lists.
“It has been like that for most of the seven years I have been in Parliament. The pity is that I have dentists who will accept NHS patients, but they just cannot get the units of dental activity.
“There is a real impasse between the issues and our honesty in saying whether NHS dentistry treatment is available in our constituencies.”
Read more:
- Investigation: ‘Shocking’ waits for NHS dentists in Harrogate district
- Watchdog report: Just one NHS dentist per 10,000 people in Harrogate district
Mr Hollinrake added that he often receives emails from constituents complaining of toothache and having to pay for private treatment despite the fact that they cannot afford it.
He said:
“This is simply unacceptable”.
Acute problem of NHS dentists
Last year, the Stray Ferret revealed that just two Harrogate district NHS dentists were accepting patients but both had a waiting list of at least two-and-a-half years.
The investigation revealed how acute the problem of dental care is for people on low incomes in the district, with one councillor describing the situation as “shocking”.
Meanwhile, a review of NHS dentistry published in August 2021 found that found there was just one NHS dentist practice per 10,000 people in the district.
Harrogate district covid rate drops below 1,000 for first time since DecemberThe Harrogate district’s covid rate has fallen below 1,000 for the first time in two months.
Currently, the district’s seven-day average stands at 890 per 100,000 people.
It’s the first time the rate has dropped below 1,000 since December 22.
However, the number remains above the county-wide average, which is 684 and the England rate of 709.
Latest figures from Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust show 26 patients are currently being treated at the hospital – down on 30 last week.
UK Health Security Agency data shows the daily number of positive covid cases is 191.
Meanwhile, the number of positive patients with covid who have died at Harrogate District Hospital since March 2020 stands at 221.
The latest death was reported on February 5, according to NHS England figures.
Read more:
- NHS writes off £13m in Nightingale hospital beds cost
- Harrogate care boss: Vaccine mandate led to ‘significant’ staff losses
Knaresborough Civic Society urges councillors to reject leisure centre plans
Knaresborough Civic Society is calling on councillors to reject a £13 million leisure centre in favour of rival proposals for an extension of the town’s swimming pool.
The civic society is supporting plans from the ‘Not on Fysche Field’ campaign group which has produced designs to upgrade the 30-year-old swimming pool as an alternative to its demolition proposed by Harrogate Borough Council.
A recommendation of approval has been made by the council on its own plans at a meeting next Tuesday, and the civic society has cautioned councillors that they must “take full responsibility for the outcome of such a huge decision”.
A civic society spokesperson said:
“Knaresborough Civic Society urges the planning committee to reject this short-sighted recommendation in favour of an alternative solution which will not result in the loss of mature trees, vital outdoor play facilities and green space.
“We have played an active role in campaigning for a more considered approach to this project and have made our views clear that building on the existing site – as was promised at the public consultation – should be the preferred option.”
The proposed £13 million leisure centre includes a six-lane pool and exercise studios, and has been hailed by the council as a “modern and fit-for-purpose” facility.
However, several concerns have been raised since the plans were first revealed in 2020, particularly over a council-run survey and the environmental impact of demolishing a building to replace it with another.
Read more:
- Plans approved for 38 flats at ‘Pannal skyscraper’
- £13m Knaresborough Leisure Centre recommended for approval
The survey on five potential locations for the leisure centre referred to locating it “on the site of the existing pool”, but it was only several months after this that the council revealed it wants to build the facility over a play area behind the existing pool at Fysche Field.
The civic society said demolishing the existing pool would result in “unnecessary damage” to the environment and argued it is at odds with separate council plans to extend The Hydro in Harrogate.
It also raised questions over what the scrapping of Harrogate Borough Council in April 2023 will mean for its proposals and new leisure company Brimhams Active.
A civic society spokesperson said:
“Sadly many Knaresborough residents who use the play area will only be aware of the loss of valuable community green space when the trees are felled and the diggers move in.
“This would be the wrong decision by a council favouring a company run by councillors that may or may not exist after local government reorganisation in a year’s time.”
If approved, the new leisure centre could be built by the end of 2023.
The other locations previously considered included Knaresborough House, Hay-a-Park, Conyngham Hall and a plot of land at Halfpenny Lane.
Four released on bail after Jennyfields drugs raidFour people have been released on bail after police seized a “large amount” of suspected class A and class B drugs in Jennyfields.
North Yorkshire Police arrested two men and two women on suspicion of possession with intent to supply drugs and handling stolen goods.
Officers executed a drugs warrant at a property on Newby Crescent in Jennyfields on Wednesday.
In a statement, the force said a “large amount” of suspected class A and class B drugs were seized alongside items officers believed to have been stolen.
A spokesperson for North Yorkshire Police added:
“The officers executing the warrant were from the Expedite team, the operational support unit and the neighbourhood policing team.
“A large amount of suspected class A and class B drugs were located at the property alongside items believed to have been stolen.
“Two men and two women were arrested on suspicion of possession with intent to supply class A and class B drugs and handling stolen goods. They have been released on bail while the investigation continues.”
Read more:
- Thieves threaten man then steal his car in Starbeck
- Drug pushers jailed after £140,000 cannabis seizure in Boroughbridge
- Police seize ‘substantial amount’ of drugs in Jennyfields
Plan approved to convert former Smarties nursery in Ripley into home
Plans have been approved to convert the former Smarties Day Nursery in Ripley into a home.
Smarties opened in 1987 and catered for 52 children. The building, which is called Wood Close, is part of the Ripley estate and is owned by Sir Thomas and Lady Emma Ingilby.
However, it closed last year after its owners decided not to renew its lease.
Now, Harrogate Borough Council has approved plans by Sir Thomas to convert the former nursery into a house.
Sir Thomas lodged the proposal as the Ingelby’s son and family plans to move there from Ripley Castle.
The nursery’s closure last year prompted an emotional response from many parents on the Stray Ferret’s Facebook page, with one saying she was “absolutely gutted” and another calling it “really sad news”.
Read now:
- Ripley’s Smarties nursery could reopen in new location
- Smarties nursery in Ripley to close next month
- Plans to convert former Smarties nursery in Ripley into home
‘Golden opportunity’ for local councils to take back public buildings and services
Local councils across the Harrogate district are to be given the chance to take back control of public buildings and services under what has been described as a “golden opportunity” for communities.
When Harrogate Borough Council was created in 1974 it took over ownership of several key assets, including Ripon Town Hall and Knaresborough House.
But almost half a century later the borough council is now coming to an end as it will be scrapped and replaced with a new unitary authority covering the whole of North Yorkshire from April next year.
These major reorganisation plans have stoked widely-raised concerns over the future of many buildings which are key meeting places for communities and also play a crucial role in delivering local services and supporting the visitor economy.
‘Rightful owners’
Ripon Independents Cllr Pauline McHardy last night made calls for the borough council to kick-start the process by offering support to local councils that may want to submit any takeover plans.
She told a full council meeting this would be a “golden opportunity for assets across the district to be transferred back to their rightful owners”.
She said:
“In 1974, the people of Ripon and its council had no say in their assets being transferred at no cost to Harrogate Borough Council.
“Now we want them given back to parish, city and town councils for the same as Harrogate Borough Council paid – nothing.”
Read more:
- Chief constable says maximum council tax rise will enable crime prevention
- Harrogate council staff still working from home – despite change of guidance
- North Yorkshire Combined Authority: What is it and how would it work?
Cllr McHardy put forward a motion outlining her requests and was supported by the Liberal Democrats, including Knaresborough mayor Cllr Christine Willoughby who said it “can not be right” for local councils to pay for buildings which they once owned.
However, after a stormy debate both parties ended up voting against the motion, which was amended by Conservative council leader Richard Cooper, who said local councils would be able to “procure” the assets.

Ripon Town Hall.
This sparked questions over whether local councils would have to pay, but Cllr Cooper said this “does not necessarily mean cash changing hands”.
He also said the motion first put forward “simply isn’t legal” as the borough council itself can not produce takeover plans for its own buildings to be run by local councils.
Cllr Cooper said:
“Seeking to get better services for residents run from these assets is where we should be focusing.
“If parishes can do it better and put together a delivery plan – great.
“I wish them all well and good luck in managing those services from parish, city and town councils. But what I am seeking to do is make sure they get control of assets and run great services from them legally, quickly and sensibly.
“The original motion I’m afraid just won’t do that.”
What will happen in Harrogate?
The prospect of a new town council for Harrogate is highly likely under the reorganisation plans and something which has been supported by all political parties.
Among the key assets which the town council could take over include the likes of the Stray, the Royal Hall, Royal Baths, the Pump Room Museum, the Sun Pavilion and more.
There are also questions over what will happen to council offices, not least to mention Harrogate Borough Council’s new civic centre headquarters.
At the moment, Harrogate and Scarborough are the only major towns in North Yorkshire not served by a parish or town council.
North Yorkshire County Council has previously said services such as parks and markets could be run by a town council, while areas including planning and highways may be handled by a Harrogate and Knaresborough Area Constituency Committee on the new unitary authority.
It has also said it is supportive of the idea of a Harrogate Town Council, although this would require a community governance review and could lead to a local referendum with a vote from residents.
Man suffers serious injuries after Harrogate car crashA man in his 60s suffered series injuries after a crash at Buttersyke roundabout at Pannal in Harrogate yesterday.
Emergency services were called at 7.20am after two cars, a blue Seat Ibiza and a black Volkswagen Golf, crashed near to the A658 roundabout and the A61.
The incident caused long delays at rush hour yesterday.
North Yorkshire Police said a man from Leeds in his sixties, who was driving the Seat Ibiza, suffered serious injuries and was taken to Leeds General Infirmary. He remains in a serious but stable condition.
The passenger of the Ibiza was unharmed and the driver and passenger of the Volkswagen, a couple from Harrogate, sustained minor injuries
Read more:
- Bid to break Ripon’s ‘wall of silence’ protecting criminals
- Man denies murder at flat on Harrogate’s Mayfield Grove
Officers are now appealing to anyone who may have information or dashcam footage of the crash.
A police statement added:
Harrogate council approves council tax hike“Officers are keen to speak to anyone who witnessed the incident or who may have dashcam footage of either the collision itself, or either vehicle prior to the incident.
“Anyone with information which would assist the investigation is asked to dial 101, select option 2 ask to speak to Traffic Constable Steve Wright. Alternatively you can email steve.wright1@northyorkshire.police.uk – please quote reference 12220023352.”
A 1.99% council tax rise has been approved by Harrogate Borough Council as part of its final budget before the authority is swallowed up into a new North Yorkshire Council.
The increase equates to an extra £5 per year for average Band D households and will come into force from April.
It was approved at a full council meeting last night which marked the last time that the Conservative-run council will set its own budget before it is scrapped and replaced with a unitary authority covering the whole of North Yorkshire from April 2023.
The county’s other six district councils will also be scrapped, as well as North Yorkshire County Council which has proposed a 3.99% council tax rise for Harrogate district residents in its final budget.
There are further tax rises expected from police and services which if all approved could see council tax bills for average Band D households rise to a total of £2,079.
This comes at a time when families are facing a cost of living crisis and opposition councillors have warned many will have to choose between heating and eating to cover their bills.
‘Residents will be faced with eat or heat choice’
Cllr Pat Marsh, leader of the opposition Liberal Democrat group on Harrogate Borough Council, told last night’s meeting that the authority should be using more of its cash reserves to ease the pressure on residents.
She said:
“It is such a pity that we could not have a 0% increase in council tax to help our residents who are faced with soaring energy costs, fuel and food bills, and 1.25 percentage point in National Insurance contributions from April.
“Many residents will be faced with the eat or heat choice in 2022 – that is disgraceful.
“This is also why we should have kept our fees and charges at a 0% rise and not at least 2.5% as mentioned in many of the cabinet budget papers.
“Using our reserves would take the pressure off our residents to some small degree.”
Cllr Pauline McHardy, leader of the Ripon Independents group, also said she would have supported no increase in council tax and described the 1.99% rise as “another blow to the community”.
Read more:
- Chief constable says maximum council tax rise will enable crime prevention
- Harrogate council staff still working from home – despite change of guidance
Cllr Graham Swift, deputy leader of the council, responded to say that not increasing council tax would be “nonsense” as the authority is also facing increasing costs and has to keep services running and its staff paid.
He also argued that no alternative budget proposals were put forward by the opposition parties and that the council’s cash reserves had been earmarked for projects.
Cllr Swift said:
“We have to pay our staff… and we will also be squeezed by energy prices and as a result of this giving a zero council tax increase to all of our residents is nonsense.
“Despite the hardships that we will all face over the next year or so, I think most rational people recognise that global energy prices are the principal driver of the heating and electricity costs – not Harrogate Borough Council.”
‘Proud of the council’s work’
Cllr Swift added:
“£5 a week is the council tax. For that people get their bins emptied, their leaves swept, their provisions of leisure facilities and all the programmes that go with helping our most needy.
“The list is almost endless of what district councils do and I’m very proud of the work that many people in this council do to ensure that we can provide not only a balanced budget, but a controlled modest expenditure increase.”
The 1.99% rise will increase Harrogate Borough Council’s tax bills for the average Band D property up to £255.92.
The council makes up just under 13% of bills, while North Yorkshire County Council makes up 70% and police and fire services the remainder.
Parish and town councils also charge a small levy.
All 24 Conservative councillors present at last night’s Harrogate Borough Council meeting voted in favour of the 1.99% rise, while seven Liberal Democrats abstained and two Ripon Independents voted against.
North Yorkshire Police pledges to improve dire freedom of information responseNorth Yorkshire Police has pledged to improve its freedom of information performance after the amount of responses handled on time fell as low as 9%.
The Information Commissioner’s Office included the county’s force in a list of police forces whose FOI responses was deemed under-performing.
Now the force has referred itself to the ICO over its timeliness of responses, its backlog of requests and its low performance.
Organisations are required to respond to requests promptly and within 20 working days. North Yorkshire Police has a target of meeting this 95% of the time but its performance in recent years has fallen woefully short.
It fell as low as 9% in April 2020 and the highest it has reached is 59% in August the same year.
The ICO said in a report dated October 2020:
“Although significant progress has been made to improve NYP’s performance, the Commissioner’s analysis of the performance statistics has led her to issue this practice recommendation to ensure that the trend of improvement continues and NYP achieves satisfactory levels of timeliness.”
Read more:
- ‘God help us!’ — fears over need for £31m to fund North Yorks fire service
- Chief constable says maximum council tax rise will enable crime prevention
A total of 365 FOI requests were outstanding in April 2020. Of that figure, 309 requests were overdue and 193 were over six months old.
North Yorkshire Police revealed last week it had created an action plan to tackle the problem.
It said the reason for its lack of response was “mainly caused by increased volumes of FOIA requests, subject access requests and Family Court Order request”.

North Yorkshire Police’s FOI response performance as submitted to the Information Commissioner. Table: ICO.
The police action plan has set a target to respond to 85% of requests within 20 working days by September 2022.
The plan recognised its compliance rates had not been met. It said that this was down to “reduced staff resources” and “continued demand for disclosure”.
Developer appeals Knaresborough 170-homes refusalA developer has appealed a council decision to reject plans for 170 homes in Knaresborough after seeing the proposal twice refused.
Landowner Geoffrey Holland’s application would have seen homes built on Water Lane in the town.
However, Harrogate Borough Council rejected the latest proposal after planning officers said the scheme had a number of “fundamental” issues.
Proposals for 218 homes near Meadowside Academy were first rejected by the borough council’s planning committee in October 2019.
Mr Holland then scaled back house numbers for the scheme to 170 in his second push for approval, but saw this turned down in August last year.
Now, the developer has taken the decision to the government’s Planning Inspectorate.
‘No demonstrable adverse impacts’
In a statement of case, Cunnane Town Planning, which has lodged the appeal on behalf of Mr Holland, said there were “no significant or demonstrable adverse impacts that would arise as a consequence of the development”.
However, Kate Broadbank, the council’s planning officer, told the meeting in August 2021 that the scheme had a number of issues to resolve.
She said:
“One of the site allocation requirements is the provision of a circular recreation route – and this has been provided around the edge of the site.
“However, it is considered to be unsatisfactory, as it is a narrow path between the site boundary and side elevations of dwellings, meaning it is not very well overlooked and would not provide a safe, attractive route.
“The same situation occurred around the open space and children’s play area where houses backed onto this.
“The applicant has tried to overcome this by turning some houses around to face onto the path and play area, however, this has led to an issue with rear gardens now backing onto the streets.
“On the whole, the scheme is considered to lack character or a sense of place.”
Read more:
- Bid to build 170 homes in Knaresborough refused again
- Traffic plan sparks concerns over 1,300-home Ripon Barracks scheme
The site is allocated for more than 148 homes in the Harrogate District Local Plan 2014-2035, which outlines development in the district until 2035. This means development will happen once councillors are satisfied with detailed plans.
The latest proposals included a mix of one and two-bedroom apartments, as well as two, three and four-bedroom houses.
A total of 81 of these properties would have been classed as affordable.
More than 80 residents had lodged objections against the plans, which did not receive a single letter of support.